Recognition of Customary Norms Within the Framework of Indonesian Legal Positivism

Recognition of Customary Norms Within the Framework of Indonesian Legal Positivism

Authors

  • Firdaus Arifin Faculty of Law, Universitas Pasundan, Bandung https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4830-7605
  • I Gde Pantja Astawa Faculty of Law, Universitas Padjajaran, Bandung
  • Ihsanul Maarif Faculty of Law, Universitas Pasundan, Bandung
  • Dewi Sulastri Faculty of Sharia and Law, UIN Sunan Gunung Djati, Bandung
  • Mohd Kamarulnizam Abdullah Institut of Malaysian and International Studies, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Selangor

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15575/kh.v7i1.39409

Keywords:

Indigenous legal communities, Indonesian legal system, Legal pluralism, Legal positivism, Recognition of customary norms

Abstract

The recognition of customary norms within Indonesia’s legal system continues to face challenges due to the dominance of legal positivism, which emphasizes legal certainty through codified regulations. Although Article 18B (2) of the 1945 Constitution acknowledges the existence of indigenous legal communities, its implementation within the national legal system remains limited and conditional, leading to legal uncertainty for indigenous groups. This study aims to analyze how customary norms are recognized within Indonesia’s positive legal system and to identify the challenges and opportunities in harmonizing these two legal frameworks. This research employs a normative legal method with a conceptual and statutory approach, analyzed qualitatively using a descriptive-analytical framework. The findings reveal that customary law remains marginalized within the national legal system due to inconsistencies in regulations and court rulings, as well as the absence of a clear harmonization mechanism. The implications of this study emphasize the need for more inclusive legal reforms, enhanced capacity-building for law enforcement officials, and a stronger role for Indigenous communities in legal policymaking. These measures are expected to strengthen the recognition of customary law within the national legal system, contributing to greater substantive justice for Indigenous communities.

References

Asriadi, A., Sara, R., & Fakrulloh, Z. A. (2023). Juridical Analysis Of Settlement Of Land Disputes Through Decisions Of Customary Institutions. Journal Research of Social Science, Economics, and Management, 2(10). https://doi.org/10.59141/jrssem.v2i10.454

Baskatawang, L. (2023). A Brief History of Reconciliation in Canada. Peace Review, 35(1), 109–118. https://doi.org/10.1080/10402659.2022.2164183

Coutsoudis, A. (2023). Customary international law is law in South Africa — Now what? Analysing the courts’ identification and application of customary international law over the last decade. South African Law Journal, 140(1), 53–94. https://doi.org/10.47348/SALJ/v140/i1a4

Diala, A. C., & Kangwa, B. (2019). Rethinking the interface between customary law and constitutionalism in sub-Saharan Africa. De Jure, 52(1). https://doi.org/10.17159/2225-7160/2019/v52a12

Effendi, O. (2022). The Challenge of Indonesian Customary Law Enforcement in the Coexistence of State Law. Asy-Syir’ah: Jurnal Ilmu Syari’ah Dan Hukum, 55(2), 173. https://doi.org/10.14421/ajish.v56i1.1033

Falahy, L. E., Giyarsi, G., & Birahmat, B. (2024). Customary Land Rights in Positive Law (Agrarian Law) and Islamic Law in Indonesia. Jurnal Kawakib, 5(02), 106–113. https://doi.org/10.24036/kwkib.v5i02.227

Firmansyah, Y., S, M. A., Wijaya, H., & Sylvana, Y. (2021). Elaboration, Collaboration, And Contribution Of Traditional Law In Indonesian National Legal System. International Journal of Social Science and Religion (IJSSR), 2(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.53639/ijssr.v2i1.37

Griffiths, A. (2017). Broadening the Legal Academy, the Study of Customary Law: The Case for Social-Scientific and Anthropological Perspectives. Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal, 20, 1–24. https://doi.org/10.17159/1727-3781/2017/v20i0a3263

Hadi, S., & Michael, T. (2022). Hans Kelsen’s thoughts about the law and its relevance to current legal developments. Technium Social Sciences Journal, 38, 220–227. https://doi.org/10.47577/tssj.v38i1.7852

Handayani, E., & Suparno, S. (2023). The role of customary law in the governance of sustainable agrarian culture in local communities. Corporate Law and Governance Review, 5(1), 29–37. https://doi.org/10.22495/clgrv5i1p3

Handayani, S., Gazali, I. M. U., Yaurwarin, W., Raodiah, R., & Idrus, W. (2023). Validity and Effectiveness of Customary Law-Based Environmental Management for The Sustainability of Natural Resources. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 9(5), 2350–2356. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9i5.3642

Hariri, A., Unggul Wicaksana, S., & Arifin, S. (2022). A Critical Study of Legal Positivism As a Legal System in a Pluralist Country. KnE Social Sciences, 7(15), Article 3rd International Conference on Law Reform (3rd INCLAR). https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v7i15.12131

Heliany, I., Widowati, W., & Sihotang, M. (2023). The Pluralism of Indonesian Criminal Law: Implications and Orientations in the Post-New Criminal Code. SASI, 29(3), 514. https://doi.org/10.47268/sasi.v29i3.1494

Iskandar, D., Purba, N., Batubara, I., & Yeltriana, Y. (2022). The Position of Traditional Law as a Source of Law in the Civil Law System in Indonesia. Jurnal Akta, 9(3), 345. https://doi.org/10.30659/akta.v9i3.26719

Kuntadi. (2023). The Existence of Decisions of Customary Institutions in the Settlement of Criminal Cases in Indonesia. KnE Social Sciences, 8(3), 323–334. https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v8i3.12838

Lawal Arowolo, A. (2019). African Traditional Intellectual Property Rights, Customary Law, and Legal Pluralism. African Journal of Legal Studies, 11(4), 299–318. https://doi.org/10.1163/17087384-12340037

Maghfirah, M., Zulkifli, Z., Syahrin, M. A., & Aslati, A. (2022). THE LEGAL TRADITION IN INDONESIA: FINDING THE MIDDLE WAY. Sosiohumaniora, 24(1), 52. https://doi.org/10.24198/sosiohumaniora.v24i1.35341

Marta, A. D., Suwaryo, U., Sulaeman, A., & Agustino, L. (2019). Dilemma of customary land policy in Indonesia. Masyarakat, Kebudayaan Dan Politik, 32(2), 134. https://doi.org/10.20473/mkp.V32I22019.134-143

Matuankotta, J. K. (2020). Pengakuan dan Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Eksistensi Pemerintahan Adat. SASI, 26(2), 188. https://doi.org/10.47268/sasi.v26i2.305

Meidy, S. H. (2022). Eksistensi Pemberlakukan Pidana Adat Bagi Masyarakat Di Luar Hukum Adat. Widya Yuridika, 5(1), 175. https://doi.org/10.31328/wy.v5i1.2456

Moansadok, M. M. E., Indarti, E., & Sulistyawan, A. Y. (2024). The Principle of Material Legality in the Criminal Code: A Paradigmatic Review of the Normativity of Adat Law in the Indonesian Legal System. Pakistan Journal of Criminology, 4, 575–582. https://doi.org/10.62271/pjc.16.4.575.582

Mongush, A. M. (2021). The role of customs in the system of social norms. SHS Web of Conferences, 118, 02019. https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/202111802019

Murniwati, R., Utama, N., & Wahyudi, R. (2024). Dispute over Customary Land of the Bodi Sapik Clan, Certified Without the Permission of the Mamak Kapalo Waris and Its Settlement in Jorong Baruah, Tanah Datar. Ekasakti Journal of Law and Justice, 2(2), 139–148. https://doi.org/10.60034/42bpvp84

Nugroho, S., Absori, A., Harun, H., & Setiahadi, R. (2019). Customary Law Harmonization Norma Interaction and Legal State in the Management of Natural Resources Conservation. Proceedings of the Proceedings of 1st Workshop on Environmental Science, Society, and Technology, WESTECH 2018, December 8th, 2018, Medan, Indonesia. Proceedings of 1st Workshop on Environmental Science, Society, and Technology, WESTECH 2018, December 8th, 2018, Medan, Indonesia, Indonesia. https://doi.org/10.4108/eai.8-12-2018.2283961

Nurjaya, I. N. (2016). Is The Constitutional And Legal Recognition Of Traditional Community Laws Within The Multicultural Country Of Indonesia A Genuine Or Pseudo Recognition? Constitutional Review, 1(2), 49. https://doi.org/10.31078/consrev123

Ojogbo, S. E., & Edu, O. K. (2022). Comparing maintenance and property rights in marriage under customary law and statutory law in Africa. Oxford University Commonwealth Law Journal, 22(2), 229–252. https://doi.org/10.1080/14729342.2022.2153508

Prasetio, D. E., Disantara, F. P., Azzahra, N. H., & Perwitasari, D. (2021). The Legal Pluralism Strategy of Sendi Traditional Court in the Era of Modernization Law. Rechtsidee, 8. https://doi.org/10.21070/jihr.2021.8.702

Prasojo, Z. H. (2015). INDIGENOUS COMMUNITY, CUSTOMARY LAW AND MULTICULTURALISME IN INDONESIA. Al-Albab, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.24260/alalbab.v2i1.26

Rahardjo, S. (2006). Hukum dalam jagat ketertiban. UKI Press: Jakarta.

Rizka Fakhrurozi & Erwin Syahrudin. (2022). Hukum Adat Dalam Perkembangan: Paradigma Sentralisme Hukum Dan Paradigma Pluralisme Hukum. The Juris, 6(2), Article 2. https://doi.org/10.56301/juris.v6i2.620

Saputra, A. H., & Yuspin, W. (2022). Harmonization of Modern Law and Local Law in South Barito District an Overview of Comparison Legal Studies. International Journal of Social Science Research and Review, 5(10), 217–231. https://doi.org/10.47814/ijssrr.v5i10.588

Setiawan, I., Muzaffar Wahyu, A., Rahman, A., & Sutrisno, A. (2024). Juridical Study of Customary Law In The Indonesian National Legal System. Asian Journal of Social and Humanities, 2(8), 1824–1831. https://doi.org/10.59888/ajosh.v2i8.317

Downloads

Published

2025-04-07

Issue

Vol. 7 No. 1 (2025): Khazanah Hukum

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2025 firdaus arifin

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under  Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).