Integration of Islamic Jurisprudence Principles within the UN Global Human Security Framework
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15575/kh.v6i3.40205Keywords:
MaqÄá¹£id al-SharÄ«Ê¿a, á¸awÄbiá¹, human security, United Nations, Islamic jurisprudenceAbstract
This study explores the integration of Islamic jurisprudence principles, particularly maqÄá¹£id al-SharÄ«Ê¿a (objectives of Islamic law) and á¸awÄbiá¹ (regulatory principles ensuring adherence to justice and moderation), into the United Nations' (UN) Global Human Security Framework. Using a recommendatory legal research methodology, this study analyses international legal documents, such as UNGA Resolution 66/290, and classical Islamic texts, including Al-Ghazali’s Al-Mustasfa. The findings reveal a strong alignment between maqÄá¹£id al-SharÄ«Ê¿a and the human security dimensions outlined by the UN, encompassing protection of religion, life, intellect, lineage, and wealth. By incorporating Islamic principles, this research offers a culturally inclusive and ethically grounded approach to global security challenges. The application of á¸awÄbiá¹ highlights the importance of balancing justice and moderation in addressing critical issues such as economic inequality, humanitarian crises, and governance challenges. This study contributes to the discourse on global human security by proposing a novel framework that bridges religious law and international governance, providing a foundation for future interdisciplinary studies.References
Adib Samsudin, M., & Hamjah, S. H. (2015). Confusion Concerning the Use of Maqasid Al-Shari’ah in some Social Issues in Malaysia. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences. https://doi.org/10.5901/mjss.2015.v6n6s5p369
Al-Rodhan, N. R. F. (2007). The Five Dimensions of Global Security: Proposal for a Multi Sum Security Principle. Berlin: LIT Verlag.
Aragane, Y., Ogura, K., Endoh, H., & Takahashi, K. (2015). Trends in global security threats. NTT Technical Review, 13(12).
Banerjee, S. B. (2012). A Climate for Change? Critical Reflections on the Durban United Nations Climate Change Conference. Organization Studies, 33(12), 1761–1786. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840612464609
Bouzov, V. (2015). Philosophy of Global Security. In I.-A. Tofan & M.-D. Chiţoiu (Eds.), Proceedings of the International Conference “Humanities and Social Sciences Today: Classical and Contemporary Issues†– Philosophy and Other Humanities (pp. 43–51). Pro Universitaria.
Burke, A., & Parker, R. (2017). Global insecurity: Futures of global chaos and governance. In Global Insecurity: Futures of Global Chaos and Governance. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95145-1
Caballero-Anthony, M., & Amul, G. G. (2014). Health and human security: Pathways to advancing a human-centered approach to health security in east asia. In Routledge Handbook of Global Health Security (pp. 32–47). https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203078563-4
Chandler, D. (2012). Resilience and human security: The post-interventionist paradigm. Security Dialogue, 43(3), 213–229. https://doi.org/10.1177/0967010612444151
Chattu, V. K., Knight, A., Reddy, K. S., & Aginam, O. (2020). Corrected and republished: Global health diplomacy fingerprints on human security: Global health diplomacy fingerprints on human security. International Journal of Preventive Medicine, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.4103/2008-7802.279163
Culang, J. (2024). From the Common Good to Public Interest. In The Oxford Handbook of Modern Egyptian History (pp. 299–322). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190072742.013.16
Cuny, F. (1989). Politics and Famine Relief. In B. Nichols & G. Loescher (Eds.), The Moral Nation: Humanitarianism and US Foreign Policy Today (pp. 1–28). Notre Dame, Ind.: University of Notre Dame Press.
Duderija, A. (2014). Islamic law reform and maqīṣid al-sharī‘a in the thought of Mohammad Hashim Kamali. In Maqasid Al-Shari’a and Contemporary Reformist Muslim Thought: An Examination (pp. 13–37). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137319418_2
Dupont, A. (2020). Transnational security. In Strategy and Security in the Asia-Pacific: Global and Regional Dynamics (pp. 103–120). https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003117506-9
Ewan, P. (2007). Deepening the human security debate: Beyond the politics of conceptual clarification. Politics, 27(3), 182–189. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9256.2007.00298.x
Glanville, L. (2016). Does R2P matter? Interpreting the impact of a norm. Cooperation and Conflict, 51(2), 184–199. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010836715612850
Gordon, J. (1999). A Peaceful, Silent, Deadly Remedy: The Ethics of Economic Sanctions. Ethics and International Affairs, 13, 123–142. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-7093.1999.tb00330.x
Hammäd, A. Z. M. (1987). Abü Hamid al-Ghazäli’s Juristic Doctrine in al-Mustasfä min ’Ilm al-Usül with a Translation of Volume One of al-Mustasfä min ’Ilm al-Usül. The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois.
Harel-Shalev, A., & Wolberg, C. (2023). Human Security. In The Palgrave Encyclopedia of Global Security Studies (pp. 741–745). Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-74319-6_227
Harnisch, S., & Kim, N.-K. (2021). Human Security. In European Union in International Affairs (pp. 161–183). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-69966-6_8
Hilhorst, D., Özerdem, A., & Michelle Crocetti, E. (2013). Human security and natural disasters. In Routledge Handbook of Human Security (pp. 174–187). https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315885926-23
Hultman, L. (2013). UN peace operations and protection of civilians. Journal of Peace Research, 50(1), 59–73. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022343312461662
Ince, F. (2008). The role of space assets in providing for public security. NATO Security through Science Series C: Environmental Security, 221–228. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6575-0_16
Izzotti, E. (2019). Non-Muslims’ Rights in Islamic Law: From Principles of Tolerance and (in)Equality to the Challenge of the Implementation of Affirmative Actions by the State. Università degli Studi di Trento.
Jonah, J. (1993). Humanitarian Intervention. In T G Weiss & L. Minear (Eds.), Sustaining Civilians in Times of War. London: Lynee Reinner Publishers.
Kedzia, Z. (2017). United Nations Mechanisms to Promote and Protect Human Rights. In Human Rights: International Protection, Monitoring, Enforcement (pp. 3–90). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351218467-1
Kestemont, L. (2018). Handbook on Legal Methodology. Intersentia. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781839702389
King, G., & Murray, C. J. L. (2001). Rethinking Human Security. Political Science Quarterly, 116(4), 585–610. https://doi.org/10.2307/798222
Krause, K. (2013). Critical perspectives on human security. In Routledge Handbook of Human Security (pp. 76–93). https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315885926-15
Lau, R. K.-S. (2023). Operationalizing Human Security: What Role for the Responsibility to Protect? International Studies, 60(1), 29–44. https://doi.org/10.1177/00208817231154054
Llamzon, A. P. (2007). Jurisdiction and compliance in recent decisions of the International Court of Justice. European Journal of International Law, 18(5), 815–852. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejil/chm047
Majee, D. (2024). Theoretical outline of human security. In Human Security in Asia: Interrogating State, Society, and Policy (pp. 13–36). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-3585-7_2
Maras, M.-H. (2014). Transnational security. In Transnational Security.
Martin, M., & Owen, T. (2010). The second generation of human security: lessons from the UN and EU experience. International Affairs, 86(1), 211–224. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2346.2010.00876.x
Mulesky, S., Sandholtz, W., & Zvobgo, K. (2024). Do human rights treaty obligations matter for ratification? Journal of Human Rights, 23(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/14754835.2023.2267578
Nasu, H. (2013). The place of human security in collective security. Journal of Conflict and Security Law, 18(1), 95–129. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcsl/krs026
Newman, E. (2016). Human Security: Reconciling Critical Aspirations With Political ‘Realities.’ British Journal of Criminology, 56(6), 1165–1183. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjc/azw016
Oberleitner, G. (2013). Human security: Idea, policy and law. In Routledge Handbook of Human Security (pp. 319–330). https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315885926-37
Opwis, F. (2017). New trends in islamic legal theory: Maqasid al-Shari’a as a new source of law? Welt Des Islams, 57(1), 7–32. https://doi.org/10.1163/15700607-00571p03
Orencio, P. M., Endo, A., Taniguchi, M., & Fujii, M. (2016). Using Thresholds of Severity to Threats to and the Resilience of Human Systems in Measuring Human Security. Social Indicators Research, 129(3), 979–999. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-015-1152-x
Orford, A. (2003). Dreams of human rights. In Reading Humanitarian Intervention (pp. 186–219). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511494277.007
Pulido, M. A. (2017). The application of the human security concept. Ragion Pratica, 2017(1), 43–60. https://doi.org/10.1415/86436
Punjabi, R. (1984). DOCTRINE OF IJMA IN A SECULAR STATE PARADOX OR DILEMMA. Journal of the Indian Law Institute, 26(3), 333–341.
Regilme, S. S. F., & Beller, B. (2023). Security State. In The Palgrave Encyclopedia of Global Security Studies (pp. 1328–1332). Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-74319-6_126
Roberts, S. A. (2003). The United Nations and Humanitarian Intervention. In Humanitarian Intervention and International Relations (pp. 71–97). Oxford University PressOxford. https://doi.org/10.1093/0199267219.003.0005
Saier Jr., M. H., & Trevors, J. T. (2010). Global Security in the 21st Century. Water, Air, and Soil Pollution, 205(Supplement 1), 45–46.
Sattam, A. A. bin, & Haleem, M. A. S. A. (2015). Sharīʿa and the Concept of Benefit. I.B.Tauris. https://doi.org/10.5040/9780755608874
Seybolt, T. B. (2007). Humanitarian Military Intervention. Oxford University PressOxford. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199252435.001.0001
United Nations. (2005). Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 16 September 2005 (A/RES/60/1 on 2005 World Summit Outcome ).
United Nations. (2012). Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 10 September 2012 (A/RES/66/290 on Follow-up to paragraph 143 on human security of the 2005 World Summit Outcome).
United Nations. (2013). Follow-up to General Assembly resolution 66/290 on human security Report of the Secretary-General (A/68/685).
United Nations. (2024a). Human Security Report of the Secretary-General (A/78/665).
United Nations. (2024b). Secretary-General’s press conference to launch the Global Principles for Information Integrity.
United Nations. (2024c). United Nations Global Principles for Information Integrity: Recommendations for Multi-stakeholder Action.
United Nations Development Programme (UNDP). (1994). Human Development Report. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Wählisch, M. (2014). Human Security: Concept and Evolution in the United Nations. Max Planck Yearbook of United Nations Law, 18, 3–31. https://doi.org/10.1163/18757413-00180002
Weiss, Thomas George. (2005). Military-civilian Interactions: Humanitarian Crises and the Responsibility to Protect. Rowman & Littlefield.
Wood, W. B. (1996). From humanitarian relief to humanitarian intervention: victims, interveners and pillars. Political Geography, 15(8), 671–695. https://doi.org/10.1016/0962-6298(95)00066-6
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).