Harapan terhadap Perdamaian: Peran Need for Closure, Fondasi Moral, dan Latar Belakang Demografis
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15575/psy.v7i1.8691Keywords:
hope, peace, moral foundation, cognitive closureAbstract
This study aims to examine the role of need for closure, moral foundations, and demographic background on hope for peace. The method used was a quantitative survey of 374 students. The measuring instrument consisted of a scale of hope in the context of peace, a scale of need for closure (NFC), and a moral foundation questionnaire (MFQ). The measured demographic background includes age, gender, ethnicity, and affiliation of religious organizations. Data were analyzed using path analysis. Findings from this study indicate that need for closure and moral foundations have a significant direct effect on hopes for peace. There are no differences in hope for peace at different ages, genders, religious organizational affiliations, and ethnicities.
References
Federico, C. M., Ekstrom, P., Tagar, M. R., & Williams, A. L. (2016). Epistemic motivation and the structure of moral intuition: Dispositional need for closure as a predictor of individualizing and binding morality. European Journal of Personality, 30, 227–239. doi:10.1002/per.2055
Graham, J., Nosek, B. A., Haidt, J., Iyer, R., Koleva, S., & Ditto, P. H. (2011). Mapping the moral domain. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101(2), 366.
Grussendorf, J., McAlister, A., Sandström, P., Udd, L., & Morrison, T. C. (2002). Resisting moral disengagement in support for war: Use of the “Peace Test†scale among student groups in 21 nations. Peace and Conflict: The Journal of Peace Psychology, 8, 73-83.
Hayhurst, L. M. C., & Giles, A. (2013). Private and moral authority, self-determination, and the domestic transfer objective: foundations for understanding sport for development and peace in aboriginal communities in Canada. Sociology of Sport Journal, 30, 504-519.
Jackson, L. E., & Sparr, J. L. (2005). Introducing a new scale for the measurement of moral disengagement in peace and conflict research. Conflict & Communication Online, 4(2), 1-16.
Kossowska, M., Czernatowicz-Kukuczka, A., Szumowska, E., & Czarna, A. (2016). Cortisol and moral decisions among young men: The moderating role of motivation toward closure. Personality and Individual Differences, 101, 249–253. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2016.06.017
Kruglanski, A. W., & Webster, D. M. (1996). Motivated closing of the mind: “Seizing†and “freezingâ€. Psychological Review, 103, 263-283.
Lakoff, G. (1996). What conservatives know that liberals don’t. Chicago: University Of Chicago Press.
Pilisuk, M. (2005). Is there really hope for peace? Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology, 11(4), 419-425.
Roets, A., & Hiel, A. V. (2011). Item selection and validation of a brief, 15-item version of the Need for Closure Scale. Personality and Individual Differences, 50(1), 90-94.
Schulze, K. E. (2017). The “ethnic†in Indonesia’s communal conflicts: Violence in Ambon, Poso, and Sambas. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 40, 2096-2114. doi:10.1080/01419870.2017.1277030
Snyder, C. R., Sympson, S. C., Ybasco, F. C., Borders, T. F., Babyak, M. A., & Higgins, R. L. (1996). Development and validation of the State Hope Scale. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70(2), 321.
Staats, S., & Partlo, C. (1993). A brief report on hope in peace and war, and in good times and bad. Social Indicators Research, 29(2), 229-243.
Watkins, M. M. (1985). Moral imagination and peace activism: Discerning the inner voices. Psychological Perspectives, 16(1), 77-93. doi:10.1080/00322928508407945
Zavala, A. G. D., Cislak, A., & Wesolowska, E. (2010). Political conservatism, need for cognitive closure, and intergroup hostility. Political Psychology, 31(4), 521-541. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9221.2010.00767.x
Downloads
Additional Files
Published
Issue
Section
Citation Check
License
The author whose published manuscript approved the following provisions:
1. The right of publication of all material published in the journal / published on the E-Journal of Psychology website is held by the editorial board with the knowledge of the author (moral right remains the author of the script).
2. The formal legal provisions for access to digital articles of this electronic journal are subject to the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license (CC BY-SA), which means that the Journal of Psychology reserves the right to save, transmit media / format, manage in database form, , maintain, and publish articles without requesting permission from the Author as long as it continues to include the name of the Author as the owner of Copyright.
3. Printed and published print and electronic manuscripts are open access for any purposes. In addition to these objectives, the editorial board shall not be liable for violations of copyright law.
Â
