Relieve Fatigue by Socializing in Sidoarjo City Park


Ivanda Normalita(1*)

(1) Surabaya State University, Indonesia
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


City parks are one of the green open public spaces. The development of city parks gives meaning to the community because city people who are busy working very rarely interact. The existence of a city park as a public space provides movement for the community to be able to interact with other individuals. In Sidoarjo, there is a City Park called Abhirama Park. The Park is strategically located with easy access. This research aims to analyze the development of city parks as a space for interaction in the Sidoarjo community. The research results are regarding the situation of the Sidoarjo city park, as for the views of the people of Sidoarjo regarding the existence of parks and the various functions of city parks. The method used is qualitative, with data collection through interviews, observation, and documentation. This study uses the theory of Herbert Mead regarding symbolic interaction.


Keywords


air pollution control; comfort zone; functional theory; interaction space; ornamental plant

Full Text:

PDF

References


Alberti, M. (2010). Maintaining ecological integrity and sustaining ecosystem function in urban areas. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 2(3), 178–184.

Anggriani, N. (2010). Ruang Publik dalam Perancangan Kota. Yayasan Humaniora. Surabaya.

Azahra, S. D., & Kartikawati, S. M. (2021). Tingkat Kenyamanan Termal Ruang Terbuka Hijau dengan Pendekatan Temperature Humidity Index (THI). BIOEDUSAINS: Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Dan Sains, 4(1), 40–47.

Badar, R. N., & Bahadure, S. P. (2020). Assessing tourism sustainability in hill towns: Case study of Shimla, India. Journal of Mountain Science, 17(9), 2241–2261.

Bridge, C. (2019). Reading the Australian War Memorial, Hyde Park Corner, London. The London Journal, 44(3), 227–232.

Dwiputra, I. D., & Ardiani, N. A. (2017). Preferensi Masyarakat dalam Memilih Karakteristik Taman Kota Berdasarkan Motivasi Kegiatan. Prosiding Temu Ilmiah IPLBI.

Etiningsih, E. (2016). Fungsi Taman Kota Sebagai Ruang Publik (Studi di Taman Merdeka Kota Metro).

Fitriandini, S. (2014). Efektivitas Pemanfaatan Taman Kota Lembah Gurame di Kota Depok. Jurnal Ilmiah Desain & Konstruksi, 13(2).

Gani, R. (2017). Taman Kota Sebagai Modal Sosial Dan Interaksi Masyarakat Kota Bandung. Journal Signal, 5(1).

Gobang, A. A. K. S. (2019). Eksistensi RTH Publik bagi Generasi Milenial di Kota Maumere. Prosiding SEMSINA, IV–25.

Gravari-Barbas, M. (2020). Star architecture and the boundaries of tourism: The case of Paris. About Star Architecture: Reflecting on Cities in Europe, 203–226.

He, M., Wang, Y., Wang, W. J., & Xie, Z. (2022). Therapeutic plant landscape design of urban forest parks based on the Five Senses Theory: A case study of Stanley Park in Canada. International Journal of Geoheritage and Parks, 10(1), 97–112.

Ibrahim, A. O., Bashir, F. M., Ojobo, H., Dodo, Y. A., Abdulmumin, I., & Christian, O. I. (2021). Opting for Enriching Saudi Arabia’s Tourism Attraction Sites towards the Realization of Vision 2030. Elementary Education Online, 20(5), 4101.

Irie, T. (2022). The cooling effect of green infrastructure in mitigating nocturnal urban heat islands: a case study of Yoyogi Park and Meiji Jingu Shrine in Tokyo. Landscape Research, 47(5), 559–583.

Kita, H., Mallory, K. D., Hickling, A., Wilson, K. E., Kroshus, E., & Reed, N. (2020). Social support during youth concussion recovery. Brain Injury, 34(6), 784–792.

Kustianingrum, D., Sukarya, A. K., Nugraha, R. A., & Rachadi, F. (2013). Fungsi dan Aktifitas Taman Ganesha Sebagai Ruang Publik di Kota Bandung. Reka Karsa: Jurnal Arsitektur, 1(2).

Latham, A., & Layton, J. (2019). Social infrastructure and the public life of cities: Studying urban sociality and public spaces. Geography Compass, 13(7), e12444.

Liem, Y., & Lake, R. C. (2018). Pemaknaan ruang terbuka publik taman nostalgia Kota Kupang. ARTEKS, Jurnal Teknik Arsitektur, 2(2), 149. https://doi.org/10.30822/artk.v2i2.150.

Lin, I.-H., Wu, C., & De Sousa, C. (2013). Examining the economic impact of park facilities on neighboring residential property values. Applied Geography, 45, 322–331.

Lopez, B., Kennedy, C., Field, C., & McPhearson, T. (2021). Who benefits from urban green spaces during times of crisis? Perception and use of urban green spaces in New York City during the COVID-19 pandemic. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 65, 127354.

Miller, D. (2016). Majorities and minarets: Religious freedom and public space. British Journal of Political Science, 46(2), 437–456.

Mohamad, N. A., & Hussein, H. (2021). Perceived effect of urban park as a restorative environment for well being in Kuala Lumpur. International Journal of Built Environment and Sustainability, 8(1), 69–79.

Noor, A., Winandari, M. I. R., & Ischak, M. (2018). Karakter Pengguna Ruang Publik di Taman Ayodya Jakarta Selatan. AGORA: Jurnal Penelitian Dan Karya Ilmiah Arsitektur Usakti, 16(2), 60–68.

Nugroho, H. B. J., Arsi, A. A., & Akhiroh, N. S. (2017). Perilaku Sosial Remaja Dalam Memanfaatkan Ruang Publik Perkotaan (Studi Kasus Pemanfaatan Taman Kota Pleret Banjir Kanal Barat Semarang). Solidarity: Journal of Education, Society and Culture, 6(1), 34–46.

Poongodi, M., Malviya, M., Kumar, C., Hamdi, M., Vijayakumar, V., Nebhen, J., & Alyamani, H. (2022). New York City taxi trip duration prediction using MLP and XGBoost. International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, 1–12.

Pradipta, I. G. A., Sarwadana, S. M., & Pradnyawathi, N. L. M. (2018). Persepsi dan preferensi masyarakat terhadap taman rekreasi bantaran Sungai Loloan Sanur. Jurnal Arsitektur Lansekap, 4(2), 194–201.

Pratomo, A. (2017). Kualitas taman kota sebagai ruang publik di kota Surakarta berdasarkan persepsi dan preferensi pengguna.

Quercia, D., O’Hare, N. K., & Cramer, H. (2014). Aesthetic capital: what makes London look beautiful, quiet, and happy? Proceedings of the 17th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing, 945–955.

Rahman, M. (2020). Filsafat Ilmu Pengetahuan. Prodi S2 Studi Agama-Agama UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung.

Rini, H. S., & Afriyani, R. W. (2018). Fungsi Edukasi Taman Kota Patih Sampun Pemalang sebagai Ruang Publik bagi Masyarakat. Sosietas, 8(2).

Ritzer, G. (2014). Teori Sosiologi dari Sosiologi Klasik sampai Perkembangan Terakhir Postmodern (8th ed.). Pustaka Pelajar.

Sjamsu, A. S., & Dharma, I. K. A. (2019). Tipologi Teritori Pada Pemanfaatan Ruang Terbuka Hijau Di Taman Kota Kendari (Studi Kasus: Taman Walikota Kendari). Jurnal Malige Arsitektur (Media Arsitektur Lintas Generasi), 1(1), 64–72.

Sugiyono. (2018). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan Kombinasi (Mixed Methods). Alfabeta.

Syukur, L. S. (2020). Pola Ruang Terbuka Publik sebagai Taman Wisata dan Edukasi di Taman Gajah Tunggal (Studi Kasus:Taman Gajah Tunggal Kota Tangerang). Universitas Mercu Buana.

Volenec, Z. M., Abraham, J. O., Becker, A. D., & Dobson, A. P. (2021). Public parks and the pandemic: How park usage has been affected by COVID-19 policies. PloS One, 16(5), e0251799.

Widiastuti, K. (2013). Taman kota dan jalur hijau jalan sebagai ruang terbuka hijau publik di Banjarbaru. Modul, 13(2), 57–64.

Wirawan, D. I. (2012). Teori-teori Sosial dalam Tiga Paradigma: fakta sosial, definisi sosial, dan perilaku sosial. Kencana.

Xie, J., Luo, S., Furuya, K., & Sun, D. (2020). Urban parks as green buffers during the COVID-19 pandemic. Sustainability, 12(17), 6751.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.15575/jt.v6i1.14649

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

View My Stats

________________________________________________________________________

E - ISSN : 2615-5028


TEMALI is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.>

 

Published by : Prodi Sosiologi Fakultas Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung

Sponsored by : Ikatan Sosiologi Indonesia (ISI)

 

Flag Counter