The Role of Political Party Elites in Reconciling Identity Political Conflicts After the 2019 Presidential Election: A Consensus Perspective
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15575/jt.v7i1.31695Keywords:
identity politics, political Sociology, Presidential Election, reconciliation, social conflict.Abstract
The research aims to analyze the role of political party elites in reconciling identity political conflicts after the 2019 presidential election carried out by political party elites from the perspective of Ralf Dahrendorf's social conflict theory. The research approach used is qualitative with descriptive methods. The data was collected using documentation, namely journal articles and news articles about reconciliation after the 2019 presidential election—news articles taken from kompas and detik.com. The analysis used is content analysis. The findings from this research are that the consensus agreed upon by the political party elites that intersect has a significant influence on society, which previously experienced polarization due to the strengthening use of identity politics in the 2019 presidential election. This research is useful in the realm of political sociology and also social development. Based on the research findings, this research is novel in the perspective that conflicts that occur between groups can be negotiated and made mutual agreements for the progress of a larger organization.
References
Al-Farisi, L. S. (2020). Politik identitas: ancaman terhadap persatuan dan kesatuan bangsa dalam negara pancasila. Aspirasi, 10(2), 77–90.
Annur, C. M. (2023). Inilah Media yang Paling Dipercaya Warga Indonesia pada 2023, Ada Favoritmu? Katadata.Co.Id.
Ardipandanto, A. (2020). Dampak Politik Identitas Pada Pilpres 2019: Perspektif Populisme [The Impact of Identity Politics On President Election 2019: Populism Perspective]. Jurnal Politica Dinamika Masalah Politik Dalam Negeri Dan Hubungan Internasional, 11(1), 43–63.
Bar-Tal, D. (2009). Reconciliation as a foundation of culture of peace. In Handbook on building cultures of peace (pp. 363–377). Springer.
Budiardjo, M. (2008). Dasar-Dasar Ilmu Politik. Ikrar Mandiriabadi.
Cross, W. P., & Katz, R. S. (2013). The challenges of intra-party democracy. OUP Oxford.
Dahrendorf, R. (1986). Konflik dan konflik dalam masyarakat industri: sebuah analisa-kritik. Rajawali.
Damarjati, D. (2019). BPN Setuju Rekonsiliasi: Prabowo-Jokowi Sahabat, Gandengan Usai Lebaran. Detik.Com.
Ekawati, E., Sweinstani, D., & Mouliza, K. (2020). Dampak Personalisasi Partai Terhadap Demokrasi Internal Partai di Indonesia Pasca Orde Baru. Jurnal Wacana Politik, 5(2).
Erwanti, M. O. (2019). BPN Prabowo Anggap Rekonsiliasi dengan Kubu Jokowi Tak Perlu, Ini Alasannya. Detik.Com2.
Fatimah, S. (2018). Kampanye sebagai Komunikasi Politik. Resolusi: Jurnal Sosial Politik.
Hayner, P. B. (2005). Kebenaran Tak Terbahasakan Refleksi Pengalaman Komisi-Komisi Kebenaran. “Kenyataan dan Harapan.†ELSAM.
Haynes, J. (2020). Introductory thoughts about peace, politics and religion. Religions, 11(5). https://doi.org/10.3390/rel11050242
Indrawan, J., Ilmar, A., & Kusuma, A. J. (2022). Rekonsiliasi Politik Pasca Pilpres 2019: Menumbuhkan Semangat Kebangsaan dalam Konstruksi Sosial Budaya. Journal of Political Issues, 4(1), 50–61.
Kharina, J., & Krisiandi. (2019). TKN Sebut Ajakan Rekonsiliasi dari Jokowi adalah Upaya “Menjaga†Prabowo. Kompas.Com.
Muhtadi, B. (2019). Populisme, politik identitas, dan dinamika elektoral: mengurai jalan panjang demokrasi prosedural. Intrans Publishing, .
Philipus, & Aini, N. (2006). Sosiologi dan Politik. Raja Grafindo Persada.
Rahman, M. T. (2018). Pengantar filsafat sosial. LEKKAS.
Rahman, M. T. (2020). Agama dan Politik Identitas dalam Kerangka Sosial. Prodi S2 Studi Agama-Agama UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung.
Ritzer, G. (2012). Teori Sosiologi Klasik Sampai Perkembangan Terakhir Postodern. Pustaka.
Ritzer, G., & Goodman., D. J. (2008). Teori Sosiologi Modern Edisi Keenam. Kencana Prenada Media.
Sukidin, & Suharso, P. (2015). Pemikiran Sosiologi Kontemporer. Jember University Press.
Syam, F., Mangunjaya, F. M., Rahmanillah, A. R., & Nurhadi, R. (2020). Narrative and the Politics of Identity: Patterns of the Spread and Acceptance of Radicalism and Terrorism in Indonesia. Religions, 11(6), 290.
Syaodih Sukmadinata, N. (2007). Metode penelitian pendidikan. Bandung: Remaja Rosda Karya.
TimDetik.com. (2019). Siapa yang Tak Mau Jokowi-Prabowo Rekonsiliasi? Detik.Com.
Vrsanka, I., Kovicky, V., & Jangl, S. (2017). Xenophobia–The cause of terrorism in a democratic society. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 7(4), 168–171.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish in Temali: Jurnal Pembangunan Sosial agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0) License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).