Khusr in the Perspective of the Qur'an: Transformation of Meaning from Worldly Loss to Spiritual Loss
Main Article Content
Abstract
The term khusr in modern human thought is often understood in material terms, such as financial loss or business failure. However, in the Qur'an, all forms of khusran (loss) primarily refer to spiritual and existential dimensions. This study aims to explore the meaning of khusr in the Qur'an using a qualitative approach based on Toshihiko Izutsu's semantic analysis. By examining the relational meaning of khusr in the pre-Qur'anic period through pre-Islamic Arabic poetry, the concept of loss is shown in the context of warfare and tribal social life. For example, in the poetry of Ka'ab bin Zuhair, khusr signifies destruction and misguidance. During the Qur'anic era, khusr frequently appears as an ism fā’il (active participle) indicating those who experience loss due to human misconduct, such as disbelief, deceit, oppression, misguidance, and futile deeds. In the post-Qur'anic period, the meaning of khusr remained consistent with this spiritual understanding, although its usage gradually expanded toward more material aspects of life.
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
References
Abul Fida Ibnu Katsir Ad Dimasyqi Isma’il. (2002). Tafsir Ibnu Katsir. Bandung: Sinar Baru Algensido.
Aisyahrani, A. I. B., Handayani, L., Dewi, M. K., & Muhtar, M. (2020). A Concept of Materialism and Well-Being. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 9(1), 62–68.
Al-Aṣfahānī, A.-R. (n.d.). al-Mufradāt fī Gharībal-Qur’ān. Beirūt: Dāral-Ma’rifah.
Al-Asfahani, R. (n.d.). Mu’jam Mufradat al-Faz al-Qur’an. Beirut: Dar al-Fikr.
Al-Asyqa, M. S. (2012). Zubdatut Tafsir min Fath al-Qadir (Cet. 3). Dimashq - Beirut: Dar Ibn Kathir.
al-Dīn al-Suyūṭī, J. (n.d.). Asbāb al-Nuzūl (A. Syuja, ed.).
al-Ḥasan ‘Alī ibn Ismā‘īl ibn Sīda al-Mursī, A. (2000). al-Muḥkam wa al-Muḥīṭ al-A‘ẓam (‘Abd al- Ḥamīd Hindāwī, ed.). Beirut: Dār al-Kutub al-‘Ilmiyyah.
Al-Mahalli, J. A.-S. dan J. (2008). Tafsir Jalalain. Riyadh: Al-Maktabah Al-’Arabiyyah As-Su’udiyyah.
Al-Rāzi, F. al-D. (1420). Mafātīḥ al-Ghayb. Beirut: Dār ‘Ihya’ al-Turath al-A’rab.
Al-Sukkarī. (n.d.). Syarḥ Dīwān Kaʿb ibn Zuhair (M. M. Najm, ed.). Iraq: Ministry of Culture and Information.
Al-Zamakhsyarī. (n.d.). Al-Kashshāf, Juz 4.
Al-Zuḥailī, W. (1998). Al-Tafsīr al-Munīr fī al- ‘Aqīdah wa al-Sharī’ah wa al-Manhaj. Damaskus: Dār al-Fikr.
Aminuddin. (1998). Semantik. Bandung: Sinar Baru Algesindo.
Amrullah), H. (H. A. M. K. (1985). Tafsir al-Azhar. Jakarta: Pustaka Panjimas.
Az-Zuhaili, W. (2014). Tafsir Al-Munir fi Al-Aqidah wa al-Syari’ah wa al-Manhaj. Jakarta: Gema Insani.
Bares, C. T., Morillo-Rivero, L. E., & Papini, M. R. (2021). When loss hurts: Psychobiological basis of frustration. Revista Interamericana de Psicología/Interamerican Journal of Psychology, 55(2), e1443–e1443.
bin Nashir as-Sa‘di, A. (n.d.). Tafsir As-Sa’idi. Retrieved from https://tafsirweb.com/
bin Nashir as-Sa’di, A. (2023). Tafsīr as-Saʿdī. Riyadh: Darussalam.
bin Sayyaf as‑Sariih, F. (n.d.). Tafsīr Ash‑Saghīr (P. D. A. bin ‘Abdul Aziz al‑‘Awājī, Ed.). Riyadh: Dār al‑Ḥaḍārah.
Darmawan, D., Riyani, I., & Husaini, Y. M. (2020). Desain Analisis Semantik Al-Qur’an Model Ensiklopedik: Kritik atas Model Semantik Toshihiko Izutsu. Al-Quds: Jurnal Studi Alqur’an Dan Hadis, 4(2).
Dindin Moh Saepudin, M.Solahudin, I. F. S. R. K. (2016). Iman dan Amal Saleh dalam Alquran (studi Kajian Semantik). Jurnal Al-Bayan Ilmu Al-Quran Dan Tafsir, 2.
Ghofur, S. A. (2013). Mozaik Mufassir al-Qur’an: Dari Klasik Hingga Kontemporer. Yogyakarta: Kaukaba.
Hidayat, S. (2021). Bangkrut dalam Al-Quran; Studi Tematis Pemahaman Kata Khasara dalam Al-Qur’an. Saliha: Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Agama Islam, 4(1).
Hidayat, S. (2022). Bangkrut dalam al-Quran; Studi Tematis Pemahaman Kata Khasara dalam Al-Qur’an. SALIHA: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 5(2), 233–249.
ibn ‘Abd al-Qādir al-Rāzī, M. (1984). Mukhtār Mukhtār al-Ṣiḥāḥ. Beirut: Dār al-Kutub al-‘Ilmiyyah.
ibn al-Ṭufayl, Ā. (2001). Dīwān ʿĀmir ibn al- Ṭufayl al-ʿĀmirī bi-syarḥ al-Anbārī. Baghdad: Dār al-Shuʾūn al-Thaqāfiyyah al-ʿĀmmah.
ibn Ziyād ibn ‘Abd Allāh ibn Manẓūr al-Daylamī al-Farrā,’ A. Z. Y. (n.d.). Ma‘ānī al-Qur’ān, Juz’ I. Mesir: Dār al- Maṣriyyah li al-Ta’līf wa al-Tarjamah.
Ismail, E. (2016). Analisis Semantik pada Kata Ahzāb dan Derivasinya dalam Al-Qur’an. Al-Bayan: Jurnal Studi Al-Qur’an Dan Tafsir, 1(2).
Izutsu, Toshihiko. (1993). Konsep-Konsep Etika Religius dalam Al-Qur’an (A. F. Husen, Trans.). Yogyakarta: Pt. Tiara Wacana.
Izutsu, Toshihiko. (2002). God And Man in The Qur’an. Tokyo: Keio University Press.
Mandzur, I. (n.d.). Lisanul Arab. Retrieved from http://arabiclexicon.hawramani.com/
Mandzur, I. (1991). Lisan Al-’Arabiyya. al-Qahirah: Dar al-Ma’arif.
Munawwir, A. W. (1997). Al-Munawwir Kamus Arab Indonesia (XIV). Surabaya: Pustaka Progressif.
Nafiruddin, S. (2020). Pengantar Semantik (Pengertian, Hakikat, Jenis). Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/b8ws3
Poerwadarminta. (2007). Kamus Umum Bahasa Indonesia. Jakarta: Balai Pustaka.
Quthb, S. (1996). Fi Zhilali al-Qur’an. Beirut: Dar as-Syuruq.
Shihab, M. Q. (2002). Tafsir al-misbah (5th ed.). Jakarta: lentera hati.
Sulthoni, A. (2024). Konsep Kerugian dalam Al-Qur’an Perspektif Tafsir Al-Misbah. El-Wasathy: Journal of Islamic Studies, 2(1), 94–111.
Suwarno, Soleh, R., Handayani, I. R., & Lusyana, E. (2022). Relevansi Pendekatan Semantik Toshihiko Izutsu dalam Menafsirkan Al-Qur’an. Jurnal Ilmu Al-Qur’an, 2(2).
Syukri, A. (2007). Metodologi Tafsir al-Qur’an Kontemporer dalam Pandangan Fazlur Rahman. Jambi: Sulton Thaha Press.
Syukur, A. (2015). Mengenal Corak Tafsir Al-Qur’an. El-Furqonia, 01(01), 83–104.
Tafsir al-Muyassar. (2007). Al-Mamlakah Al-‘Arabiyyah As-Su‘ūdiyyah: Mujamma‘ Al-Malik Fahd li Ṭibā‘at al-Muṣḥaf asy-Syarīf.
Tanthawi, M. S. (2013). Ulumul Qur’an: Teori \& Metodologi. Jogjakarta: IRCiSoD.
Tusadiah, K. (2024). “Orang Yang Rugi Dalam Perspektif Al-Qur’an (Studi Komparatif Tafsir Marāh LabīdKarya Nawawi Al-Bantani (W. 1897 M) Dan Tafsir Al-Misbah Karya M. Quraish Shihab (L. 1944 M)).
Wojtyna, E., & Mucha, A. (2023). The Pain of Unjust Losing. The feeling of injustice and the perception of pain. European Psychiatry, 66(S1), S617–S617.
Zainuddin, Z. (2024). Deciphering the Concept of Goodness in Islam: A Comprehensive Qur’anic Linguistic and Thematic Analysis. SINTHOP: Media Kajian Pendidikan, Agama, Sosial Dan Budaya, 3(1), 59–64.