Marketing the Miracles: Studies on the Commodification of the Quran, Prayer, and Sadaqa


Dadang Darmawan(1*)

(1) UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung, Indonesia
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


Religion is a miracle. The history of religion is filled with stories of the miracles of its founder and leaders. Religion does not intend to sell miracles for worldly gain because the purpose of religion is spiritual. Nevertheless, in reality, the miracles offered by religion are often commodified. This study examines the commodification of religion in Indonesia, especially those related to the Quran, sadaqa, and glory. This research uses qualitative methods with Habermas’s hermeneutical approach to uncover the economic motives behind the utterances delivered by certain religious figures. The results showed that certain religious figures had commodified the Quran (as a material element), prayer (as a suprarational element), and sadaqa (as a social element) through the utterances they delivered. This research found that religion, based on ordinary people’s point of view, is nothing more than a solution to their complex problems. These social conditions have given religious elites the opportunity to commodify religion. In addition, the research proposes a theoretical contribution that “the perfect religious commodification” should consist of and offer three elements: material, suprarational, and social benefits. This combination of benefits may be the key to the effectiveness of religious commodification and the continued support of ordinary people.


Full Text:

PDF

References


Adebayo, R. O., & Zulu, S. P. (2019). Miracle as a spiritual event and as a marketing tactic among neo-Charismatic churches: a comparative study. Journal for Christian Scholarship= Tydskrif Vir Christelike Wetenskap, 55(1–2), 105–125.

Alam, L. (2018). Popular Piety and the Muslim Middle Class Bourgeoisie in Indonesia. Al-Albab, 7(2), 237–248. https://doi.org/10.24260/alalbab.v7i2.1039

Althusser, L. (2006). Ideology and ideological state apparatuses (notes towards an investigation). The Anthropology of the State: A Reader, 9(1), 86–98.

Chaiken, S. (1980). Heuristic versus systematic information processing and the use of source versus message cues in persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39(5), 752–766. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.39.5.752

Cialdini, R. B. (2009). Influence: The Psychology of Persuasion. New York: HarperCollins e-books.

Conger, J. A. (2012). Charismatic Leadership. In The Oxford Handbook of Leadership (pp. 376–391). Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195398793.013.0022

Darnela, L. (2021). Islam and Humanity: Commodification of Aid for Rohingya in Aceh. Al-Jami’ah: Journal of Islamic Studies, 59(1), 57–96. https://doi.org/10.14421/ajis.2021.591.57-96

Daswani, G. (2016). A prophet but not for profit: ethical value and character in Ghanaian Pentecostalism. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 22(1), 108–126. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9655.12336

Foltz, T. G. (2005). The Commodification of Withcraft. In H. A. Berger (Ed.), Witchcraft and Magic (pp. 137–168). Pennsylvania: University of Pennsylvania Press. https://doi.org/10.9783/9780812201253.137

Griffin, E. (2012). A first look at communication theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.

Habermas, J. (1984). The Theory of Communicative Action, Volume One: Reason and Rationalization of Society. Boston: Beacon Press.

Hasan, N. (2009). The making of public Islam: piety, agency, and commodification on the landscape of the Indonesian public sphere. Contemporary Islam, 3(3), 229–250. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11562-009-0096-9

Hasyim, S. (2022). The Halal Project in Indonesia: Shariatization, Minority Rights and Commodification. In The Halal Project in Indonesia (pp. 1–21). Singapore: ISEAS–Yusof Ishak Institute Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1355/9789815011777-003

Herrick, J. A. (2017). The History and Theory of Rhetoric. New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315404141

Kgatle, M. S., & Anderson, A. H. (Eds.). (2020). The Use and Abuse of the Spirit in Pentecostalism. New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003038795

Kitiarsa, P. (Ed.). (2007). Religious Commodifications in Asia. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203937877

Loy, D. R. (1997). The Religion of the Market. Journal of the American Academy of Religion, 65(2), 275–290. https://doi.org/10.1093/jaarel/65.2.275

Malinowski, B. (1948). Magic, Science and Religion and Other Essays. Illinois: The Free Press.

Marx, K. (1977). Capital: A Critique of Political Economy, Vol. 1. New York: Vintage.

McCormack, K. C. (2014). Ethos, pathos, and logos: The benefits of Aristotelian rhetoric in the courtroom. Washington University Jurisprudence Review, 7, 131–155.

Mosco, V. (2009). The Political Economy of Communication. London: SAGE Publications Ltd. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446279946

Muary, R., & Atikah, P. (2023). Tahfidz Al Quran Class: Religion Commodification and Popular Culture in Muslim Middle Class. Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Dan Ilmu Politik Malikussaleh (JSPM), 4(1), 49–63.

O’Dea, T. F. (1966). The sociology of religion. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.

Oeppen Hill, J. H. (2020). Logos, ethos, pathos and the marketing of higher education. Journal of Marketing for Higher Education, 30(1), 87–104. https://doi.org/10.1080/08841241.2019.1683120

Purnama, R. F. (2020). The Aesthetic Reception of the Quran in Instagram: Variations, Factors, and Religious Commodification. Ulul Albab Jurnal Studi Islam, 21(2), 237–268. https://doi.org/10.18860/ua.v21i2.9528

Rahayu, E., Hartati, H., Hamidah, I., Nur Aliffia, A., Nur Hidayat, S., Ikrimah, F., & Carceres, T. (2022). Miracle From Allah” an Analysis on The Meaning of Tourist Attraction Batu Qur’an, Pandeglang-Banten. Proceedings of the First International Conference on Literature Innovation in Chinese Language. EAI. https://doi.org/10.4108/eai.19-10-2021.2316578

Rahmatikawati, Y., Rusmana, D., & Jauhari, A. (2021). Relation Between Religion and Film: The Commodication of Quranic Verses in Indonesian Religious Films 2008-2020. International Journal of Islamic Khazanah, 11(2), 103–117. https://doi.org/10.15575/ijik.v11i2.12029

Roseberry, W. (1997). Marx and Anthropology. Annual Review of Anthropology, 26(1), 25–46. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.anthro.26.1.25

Stiff, J. B., & Mongeau, P. A. (2016). Persuasive communication. New York: Guilford Publications.

Talabi, J. M. (2021). Reappraisal of Philosophical Discourse on the Authenticity of Miracles in Christianity. Journal of Religions & Peace Studies, 5(1), 34–41.

Trihastutie, N. (2019). American Televangelical Frames: Religiosity, Spirituality, and Commodification. Lire Journal (Journal of Linguistics and Literature), 3(2), 91–106. https://doi.org/10.33019/lire.v3i2.53

Twelftree, G. H. (2014). The Miraculous in the New Testament: Current Research and Issues. Currents in Biblical Research, 12(3), 321–352. https://doi.org/10.1177/1476993X13501578

Vásquez, M. A. (2020). More than belief: A materialist theory of religion. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Wilson, B. R. (1975). The noble savages: The primitive origins of charisma and its contemporary survival. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Yang, D., Chen, J., Yang, Z., Jurafsky, D., & Hovy, E. (2019). Let’s Make Your Request More Persuasive: Modeling Persuasive Strategies via Semi-Supervised Neural Nets on Crowdfunding Platforms. Proceedings of the 2019 Conference of the North, 3620–3630. Stroudsburg, PA, USA: Association for Computational Linguistics. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/N19-1364




DOI: https://doi.org/10.15575/rjsalb.v7i1.25232

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2023 Dadang Darmawan

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Department of Religious Studies Faculty of Ushuluddin Building 3rd Floor

Jl. Raya A.H. Nasution No. 105 Bandung, 40614,

Tel: (022) 7802275

Fax: (022) 780-3936

_____________________________________________________________________________________________________

Religious: Jurnal Studi Agama-Agama dan Lintas Budaya is Indexed By:

DOAJ (Directory of Open Access Journal) Dimensions Moraref Crossref SINTA Portal Garuda Google Scholar

_____________________________________________________________________________________________________

Lihat Statistik Religious View MyStat

 

Lisensi Creative Commons

This work is licensed under Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International