Pengembangan modul pembelajaran segitiga berbasis metakognisi dan integrasi
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15575/ja.v7i1.12104Keywords:
Modules, Triangles, Metacognition, IntegrationAbstract
Metakognisi memiliki peran penting terhadap keberhasilan dalam proses pemecahan masalah. Penguasaan peserta didik terhadap metakognisi untuk memecahkan masalah, perlu diimbangi dengan spiritual yang kuat. Selain itu, segitiga sebagai materi yang dipelajari di sekolah, masih memiliki masalah terkait pemecahan masalah. Dengan demikian, mengembangkan modul pembelajaran berbasis metakognisi dan integrasi dapat menjadi salah satu solusi. Tujuan penelitian ini yakni mengetahui kevalidan modul pembelajaran segitiga berbasis metakognisi dan integrasi. Teknik pengumpulan data dilakukan dengan memberikan angket validasi kepada 5 ahli dan 3 praktisi pendidikan. Data kuantitatif dianalisis menggunakan analisis statistik untuk menghitung persentase skor angket. Hasil komentar dan saran pada angket, digunakan sebagai acuan untuk melakukan revisi modul. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa modul pembelajaran segitiga berbasis metakognisi dan integrasi berada pada kualifikasi valid dengan persentase nilai akhir 85%.
Kata kunci: Modul, Segitiga, Metakognisi, Integrasi
Metacognition has played a significant role in the success of the problem-solving process. Mastery of learners of metacognition to solved problems needs to harmonized with solid spirituality. Additionally, the triangle as a material studied in school still has matters related to problem-solving. Thus, developing a learning module based on metacognition and integration could be one solution. The purpose of this study determining the validity of the triangle learning module based on metacognition and integration. Data collection techniques were carried by providing validation questionnaires to 5 experts and 3 education practitioners. Quantitative data were analyzed using statistical analysis to calculate the percentage of the questionnaire scores. The results of comments and suggestions on the questionnaire, used as a reference for revising the module. The results showed that the triangular learning module based on metacognition and integration was in a valid qualification with a final score percentage of 85%.
Keywords: Modules, Triangles, Metacognition, Integration
Â
References
Abdussakir. (2017). Internalisasi nilai-nilai islami dalam pembelajaran matematika dengan strategi analogi. A Seminar Nasional Integrasi Matematika Dan Nilai Islami, 1(1), 1–15. Retrieved from http://conferences.uin-malang.ac.id/index.php/SIMANIS/article/view/546
Abdussakir, & Rosimanidar. (2017). Model integrasi matematika dan al-quran serta praktik pembelajarannya. Seminar Nasional Integrasi Matematika Di Dalam Al-Quran, 1–16. Retrieved from http://repository.uin-malang.ac.id/1934/
Bada, D., & Olusegun, S. (2015). Constructivism Learning Theory: A Paradigm for Teaching and Learning. IOSR Journal of Research & Method in Education (IOSR-JRME), 5(6), 66–70. https://doi.org/10.4172/2151-6200.1000200
Bishop, A., Seah, W. T., & Chin, C. (2003). Values in Mathematics Teaching — The Hidden Persuaders? In Second International Handbook of Mathematics Education. Springer International Handbooks of Education (pp. 717–765). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0273-8_24
Carraher, D. W., & Schliemann, A. D. (2002). Chapter 8: Is Everyday Mathematics Truly Relevant to Mathematics Education? Journal for Research in Mathematics Education. Monograph, 11(January), 131-153. https://doi.org/10.2307/749968
Cozza, B., & Oreshkina, M. J. (2013). Crossâ€Cultural Study of Cognitive and Metacognitive Processes During Math Problem Solving. School Science and Mathematics, 113(6), 275–284. https://doi.org/10.1111/ssm.12027
Darda, A. (2015). Integrasi ilmu dan agama: Perkembangan konseptual di Indonesia. At-Ta’dib, 10(1). Retrieved from https://ejournal.unida.gontor.ac.id/index.php/tadib/article/view/323
Ekawati, T., Anggoro, B. S., & Komarudin. (2019). Pengembangan modul pembelajaran matematika pada materi statistika terintegrasi nilai-nilai keislaman. Jurnal Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika, 8(1), 184–192. https://doi.org/10.24127/ajpm.v8i1.1826
Garofalo, J., & Lester, F. K. (1985). Metacognition, Cognitive Monitoring, and Mathematical Performance. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 16(3), 163. https://doi.org/10.2307/748391
Handayani, M. (2018). Developing thematic-integrative learning module with problem-based learning model for elementary school students. Jurnal Prima Edukasia, 6(2), 166–176. https://doi.org/10.21831/jpe.v6i2.14288
Huda, N. (2020). Geometry and Measurement in Quran. Al-Jabar : Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 11(2), 307–316. https://doi.org/10.24042/ajpm.v11i2.6420
Hutapea, M. L., Suryadi, D., & Nurlaelah, E. (2015). Analysis of Students’ Epistemological Obstacles on the Subject of Pythagorean Theorem. Jurnal Pengajaran Matematika Dan Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam, 20(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.18269/jpmipa.v20i1.555
Jihad, A. (2018). Peningkatan Kompetensi Mahasiswa Uin Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung Dalam Merancang Rencana Pelaksanaan Pembelajaran (Rpp) Matematika Berbasis Nilai-Nilai Islam. Jurnal Analisa, 4(2), 116–123. https://doi.org/10.15575/ja.v4i2.3695
Kurniati, A. (2015). Mengenalkan Matematika Terintegrasi Islam Kepada Anak Sejak Dini. Suska Journal of Mathematics Education, 1(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.24014/sjme.v1i1.1326
Kuzle, A. (2013). Patterns of metacognitive behavior during mathematics problem-solving in a dynamic geometry environment. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 8(1), 20–40. Retrieved from https://www.iejme.com/article/patterns-of-metacognitive-behavior-during-mathematics-problem-solving-in-a-dynamic-geometry
Laurens, T. (2010). Penjenjangan Metakognisi Siswa yang Valid dan Reliabilitas. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Pembelajaran (JPP), 17(2), 201–211. Retrieved from http://journal.um.ac.id/index.php/pendidikan-dan-pembelajaran/article/view/3212
Maarif, S. (2015). Integrasi matematika dan islam dalam pembelajaran matematika. Infinity Journal, 4(2), 223–236. https://doi.org/10.22460/infinity.v4i2.85
Maharani, M., Supriadi, N., & Widiyastuti, R. (2018). Media Pembelajaran Matematika Berbasis Kartun untuk Menurunkan Kecemasan Siswa. Desimal: Jurnal Matematika, 1(1), 101. https://doi.org/10.24042/djm.v1i1.2036
Martin, F., & Betrus, A. K. K. (2019). Digital media for learning: Theories, processes, and solutions. In Digital Media for Learning: Theories, Processes, and Solutions. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-33120-7
Maulindah, L., Arief, M., & Oetami, M. S. (2017). Development of Facility and Infrastructure Administration Module LC5E Improve Student Learning Outcomes. Jurnal Pendidikan Bisnis Dan Manajemen, 3(2), 73–84. https://doi.org/10.17977/um003v3i12017p073
Muganga, L., & Ssenkusu, P. (2013). Teacher-Centered vs. Student-Centered: An Examination of Student Teachers’ Perceptions about Pedagogical Practices at Uganda’s Makerere University. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling, 53(9), 1689–1699. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004
Muljono, P. (2007). Kegiatan Penilaian Buku Teks Pelajaran Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah. Buletin BSNP Media Komunikasi Dan Dialog Standar Pendidikan, II(1), 1–24. Retrieved from http://www.bsnp-indonesia.org
Mustopo, A. (2017). Integrasi Agama dan Ilmu Pengetahuan. Jurnal Al-Afkar, 5(2), 81–110. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.28944/afkar.v5i2.176
Mutijah. (2018). Model integrasi matematika dengan nilai- nilai islam dan kearifan lokal budaya dalam pembelajaran matematika. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 1(2), 52–75. Retrieved from http://journal.stainkudus.ac.id/index.php/jmtk/article/view/4878
Ngah, N., Ismail, Z., Tasir, Z., & Said, M. N. H. M. (2017). Students’ higher order thinking skills and their relationships with problem posing ability. Advanced Science Letters, 23(4), 2876–2879. https://doi.org/10.1166/asl.2017.7589
Nieveen, N. (1999). Prototyping to reach product quality. In In Design approaches and tools in education and training. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-014-0937-9
Nurajizah, U., Windyariani, S., & Setiono, S. (2018). Improving students’ metacognitive awareness through implementing learning journal. Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Indonesia, 4(2), 105–112. https://doi.org/10.22219/jpbi.v4i2.5788
Nurhasanah, F., Kusumah, Y. S., & Sabandar, J. (2017). Concept of Triangle: Examples of Mathematical Abstraction in Two Different Contexts. International Journal on Emerging Mathematics Education, 1(1), 53. https://doi.org/10.12928/ijeme.v1i1.5782
Rachmawati, T. K. (2017). An Analysis of Students’ Difficulties in Solving Story Based Problems and Its Alternative Solutions. JRAMathEdu (Journal of Research and Advances in Mathematics Education), 1(2), 140–153. https://doi.org/10.23917/jramathedu.v1i2.3720
Rahayuningsih, R. (2016). Pengembangan modul pembelajaran berbantuan software geogebra untuk mendukung hasil belajar dan motivasi belajar siswa pada materi segitiga di kelas VII SMPK kemasyarakatan Kalibawang Tahun Ajaran 2015/2016 (Universitas Sanata Dharma Yogyakarta). Retrieved from https://core.ac.uk/display/80761698?recSetID=
Rahman, A. (2019). Pendidikan Islam di Era Revolusi 4.0 (Cetakan Pe; A. Rahman, Ed.). Retrieved from https://zenodo.org/record/3376797
Rakhman, P. A., Suryadi, D., & Prabawanto, S. (2019). Mathematical communication of junior high student based on the conceptual understanding of triangle. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1157(4), 0–5. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1157/4/042115
Retnawati, H., Arlinwibowo, J., & Sulistyaningsih, E. (2017). The student’s difficulties in completing geometry items of nasional examination. International Journal on New Trends in Education and Their Implications (IJONTE), 8(4), 28–41. Retrieved from http://www.ijonte.org/?pnum=63&pt=2017 Volume 8 Number 4
Sabaniatun, S., Febrilia, Ba. R. A., & Juliangkary, E. (2019). Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Siswa pada Materi Keliling dan Luas Segitiga. Edumatica Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 09(02), 1–13. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.22437/edumatica.v9i02.6074
Salafudin, S., Pramesti, S. L. D., & Rini, J. (2018). Pengembangan Bahan Ajar Matematika Smp Berwawasan Nasionalisme Dan Kemandirian. MaPan, 6(1), 20–30. https://doi.org/10.24252/mapan.2018v6n1a3
Sari, A., & Yuniati, S. (2018). Penerapan Pendekatan Realistic Mathematics Education (Rme) Terhadap Kemampuan Pemahaman Konsep Matematis. Jurnal Cendekia : Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 2(2), 71–80. https://doi.org/10.31004/cendekia.v2i2.49
Schraw, G., & Moshman, D. (1995). Metacognitive theories. Educational Psychology Review, 7(4), 351–371. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02212307
Schreurs, J., & Dumbraveanu, R. (2014). A Shift from Teacher Centered to Learner Centered Approach. International Journal of Engineering Pedagogy (IJEP), 4(3), 36–41. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijep.v4i3.339
Sejpal, K. (2013). Modular Method of teaching. International Journal for Research in Education, 2(2), 169–171. Retrieved from https://raijmronlineresearch.files.wordpress.com/2017/07/29_169-171-dr-kandarp-sejpal.pdf
Setiyani, Putri, D. P., Ferdianto, F., & Fauji, S. H. (2020). Designing a digital teaching module based on mathematical communication in relation and function. Journal on Mathematics Education, 11(2), 223–236. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.11.2.7320.223-236
Setyadi, D., Subanji, S., & Muksar, M. (2016). Identification of students’ metacognition level in solving mathematics problem about sequence. IOSR Journal of Research & Method in Education, 6. https://doi.org/10.9790/7388-0606040107
Siegel, M. (2011). Filling in the Distance Between Us: Group Metacognition During Problem Solving in a Secondary Education Course. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 21(3), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-011-9326-z
Sudjana, N. (2014). Penelitian Hasil Proses Belajar Mengajar. Bandung: Sinar Baru Algensindo.
Suryanda, A., Azrai, E. P., & Julita, A. (2019). Expert Validation on The Development Biology Pocketbook Based on Mind Map ( BIOMAP ). Biodik: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Biologi, 5(3), 197–214. https://doi.org/10.22437/bio.v5i3.6879
Suryani, A. I., Anwar, Hajidin, & Rofiki, I. (2020). The practicality of mathematics learning module on triangles using GeoGebra. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1470(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1470/1/012079
Susilawati, W., Abdullah, R., & Abdullah, M. N. (2020). Statistical reasoning through metacognitive brain-based learning. Jurnal Analisa, 6(1), 40–46. https://doi.org/10.15575/ja.v6i1.8158
Telaumbanua, Y. N., Sinaga, B., Mukhtar, & Surya, E. (2017). Development of Mathematics Module Based on Metacognitive Strategy in Improving Students’ Mathematical Problem Solving Ability at High School. Journal of Education and Practice, 8(19), 73–80. Retrieved from https://www.iiste.org/Journals/index.php/JEP/article/view/37883
Tianisa, W. T., & Suparman. (2018). Development of Mathematical Module Based on Guided Discovery to Develop Critical Thinking Ability and Learning Independence. International Summit on Science Technology and Humanity, 183–192. Retrieved from https://publikasiilmiah.ums.ac.id/handle/11617/11675
Torrance, E. P. (1966). Torrance tests of creative thinking: Norms-technical manual: Verbal tests, forms a and b: Figural tests, forms a and b. Personal Press, Incorporated.
Tsaniyah, A. B., & Poedjiastoeti, S. (2017). Moge Learning Model to Improve Creative Thinking Skills. International Journal of Education and Research, 5(1), 165–172. Retrieved from https://www.ijern.com/January-2017.php
Yuan, S. (2013). Incorporating Pólya’s Problem Solving Method in Remedial Math. Journal of Humanistic Mathematics, 3(1), 96–107. https://doi.org/10.5642/jhummath.201301.08
Yuniati, S., & Sari, A. (2018). Pengembangan Modul Matematika Terintegrasi Nilai-Nilai Keislaman melalui Pendekatan Realistic Mathematics Education (RME) di Propinsi Riau. Jurnal Analisa, 4(1), 157–165. https://doi.org/10.15575/ja.v4i1.1588
Zhao, N., Teng, X., Li, W., Li, Y., Wang, S., Wen, H., & Yi, M. (2019). A path model for metacognition and its relation to problem-solving strategies and achievement for different tasks. ZDM - Mathematics Education, 51(4), 641–653. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-019-01067-3
Zubaidah, A. (2017). Strategi metakognitif dalam pembelajaran matematika. JPPM, 10(1), 60–67. Retrieved from https://jurnal.untirta.ac.id/index.php/JPPM/article/view/1198
Zunaidah, F. N., & Amin, M. (2016). Developing the Learning Materials of Biotechnology Subject Based on Students’ Need and Character of Nusantara Pgri University of Kediri. Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Indonesia, 2(1), 19–30. https://doi.org/10.22219/jpbi.v2i1.3368
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish in Jurnal Analisa agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0) License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
3.Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
