Students' Pseudo-Thinking Process in Solving SPLDV Problems Based on Polya's Stages


Alfi Syahraini(1*), Nanang Priatna(2), Suhendra Suhendra(3)

(1) Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Indonesia
(2) Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Indonesia
(3) Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Indonesia
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


Proses berpikir pseudo siswa terdiri dari pseudo benar dan pseudo salah, dapat dilihat dari cara menyelesaikan soal SPLDV berdasarkan tahapan Polya. Masalah yang akan dikaji adalah proses berpikir pseudo siswa saat menyelesaikan soal SPLDV dengan tahapan Polya. Penelitian ini bertujuan mendeskripsikan proses berpikir pseudo siswa dalam memecahkan masalah berdasarkan Tahapan Polya. Penelitian ini dilakukan di salah satu SMP Kota Jambi, Provinsi Jambi, dengan subjek penelitian 2 siswa kelas 8 untuk materi Sistem Persamaan Linear Dua Variabel. Metode yang diguanakan dalam penelitian ini adalah penelitian kualitatif. Pengumpulan data dilakukan dengan triangulasi data, adapun instrumen penelitian menggunakan tes pemecahan masalah dan pedoman wawancara. Analisis data yang dilakukan terdiri dari reduksi data penyajian data dan penarikan kesimpulan. Temuan dari penelitian ini adalah: 1) Pada proses pemecahan masalah matematis, terdapat siswa yang menjawab benar akan tetapi saat di wawancara ternyata siswa hanya hafal rumus dan tidak memahami konsep, ini dinamakan pseudo benar. 2) Pada proses pemecahan masalah matematis, terdapat siswa yang menjawab salah tetapi setelah diwawancara siswa dapat merefleksikan sehingga mampu memperbaiki jawaban, ini dinamakan pseudo salah. Berdasarkan hasil penelitian, saat mengajar guru dapat mengetahui mana siswa yang benar-benar berpikir dan mana yang berpikir pseudo.

 

The student's pseudo thought process consists of pseudo-true and pseudo-false, it can be seen from how to solve SPLDV problems based on Polya's stages. The problem to be studied is the pseudo thought process of students when solving SPLDV problems with Polya's stages. This study aims to describe the pseudo thought process of students in solving problems based on Polya's stages. This research was conducted at one of the Jambi City Junior High Schools, Jambi Province, with the research subject 2 students of 8th grade students for the material of the System of Linear Equations of Two Variables. The method used in this research is qualitative research. Data collection was carried out by triangulating data, while the research instruments used problem solving tests and interview guidelines. The data analysis consisted of data reduction, data display and conclucing drawing/verification. The findings of this study are: 1) In the process of solving mathematical problems, there are students who answer correctly but when interviewed it turns out that students only memorize formulas and do not understand concepts, this is called pseudo correct. 2) In the process of solving mathematical problems, there are students who answer incorrectly but after being interviewed students can reflect so that they can improve their answers, this is called pseudo-false. Based on the results of the study, when teaching teachers can find out which students are really thinking and which ones are pseudo thinking.


Keywords


Pseudo Thinking, Polya Problem Solving, SPLDV

Full Text:

PDF

References


Ali, R., Akhter, A., & Khan, A. (2010). Effect of using problem solving method in teaching mathematics on the achievement of mathematics students. Asian Social Science, 6(2), 67.

Ciosek, M., & Samborska, M. (2016). A false belief about fractions–What is its source? The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 42, 20–32.

Evans, C. W., Leija, A. J., & Falkner, T. R. (2001). Math links: Teaching the NCTM 2000 standards through children’s literature. Libraries Unlimited.

Hendriana, H., Rohaeti, E. E., & Sumarmo, U. (2017). Hard skills dan soft skills matematik siswa. Bandung: Refika Aditama, 7.

Isoda, M. (2010). Lesson study: Problem solving approaches in mathematics education as a Japanese experience. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 8, 17–27.

KARLINA, E. (2019). Berpikir pseudo peserta didik dalam menyelesaikan soal problem solving ditinjau dari self-efficacy. Universitas Siliwangi.

Khasanah, V. N., Usodo, B., & Subanti, S. (2018). Student’s thinking process in solving word problems in geometry. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1013(1), 12133.

Lacewing, M. (2015). Expert moral intuition and its development: A guide to the debate. Topoi, 34(2), 409–425.

Law, E., Fales, J., Beals-Erikson, S., Logan, D., Weiss, K., Randall, E., McTate, E., Gray, L., & Palermo, T. (2016). (496) Problem-solving therapy for parents of children receiving intensive pain rehabilitation. The Journal of Pain, 17(4), S98–S99.

Limbach, B., & Waugh, W. (2010). Developing higher level thinking. Journal of Instructional Pedagogies, 3.

Maryono, I., & Saputri, R. O. (2019). Pengembangan kemampuan pemecahan masalah dan habit of mind matematis mahasiswa melalui teknik self-explanation. Jurnal Analisa, 5(2), 152–160.

Marzano, R. J. (1988). Dimensions of thinking: A framework for curriculum and instruction. ERIC.

Mashlihah, L. N., & Hasyim, M. (2019). Pengaruh self-esteem, self-regulation, dan self-confidence terhadap kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematika. JP2M (Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Pembelajaran Matematika), 5(2), 44–50.

Mufida, I. (2018). Identifikasi faktor penyebab berpikir pseudo siswa dalam menyelesaiakan masalah pertidaksamaan eksponen. UIN Sunan Ampel Surabaya.

Puadah, P. F., Nurlaelah, E., & Suhendra, S. (2022). Metacognitive ability of junior high school special intelligent students in solving mathematical problems. Jurnal Analisa, 8(1), 67–80.

Ruseffendi, E. T. (2006). Pengantar kepada membantu guru mengembangkan kompetensinya dalam pengajaran matematika untuk meningkatkan CBSA. Bandung: Tarsito.

Sanjaya, A., Johar, R., Ikhsan, M., & Khairi, L. (2018). Students’ thinking process in solving mathematical problems based on the levels of mathematical ability. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1088(1), 12116.

Subanji, S. (2013). Proses berpikir pseudo siswa dalam menyelesaikan masalah proporsi. J-Teqip, 4(2), 207–226.

Subanji, S. (2016). Teori berpikir pseudo penalaran kovariasional. Malang: Penerbit Universitas Negeri Malang.

Subanji, S., & Nusantara, T. (n.d.). Karakterisasi kesalahan berpikir siswa dalam mengonstruksi konsep matematika. Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan Universitas Negeri Malang, 19(2), 102613.

Tarim, K. (2009). The effects of cooperative learning on preschoolers’ mathematics problem-solving ability. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 72, 325–340.

Turmudi, T., Juandi, D., & Sugilar, H. (2018). Meningkatkan kemampuan berpikir kreatif dan pemecahan masalah matematis siswa madrasah aliyah. Jurnal Analisa, 4(1), 33–42.

Vinner, S. (1997). The pseudo-conceptual and the pseudo-analytical thought processes in mathematics learning. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 34(2), 97–129.

Wibawa, K. A., Nusantara, T., Subanji, S., & Parta, I. N. (2018). Defragmentasi pengaktifan skema mahasiswa untuk memperbaiki terjadinya berpikir pseudo dalam memecahkan masalah matematis. Prima: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 2(2), 93–105.

Widjajanti, D. B. (2009). Kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematis mahasiswa calon guru matematika: apa dan bagaimana mengembangkannya. Seminar Nasional FMIPA UNY, 5.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.15575/ja.v9i1.26543

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Jurnal Analisa  licensed under a Creative Commons International License. Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 . Copyright protected by law

Jurnal Analisa has indexed by:

Indonesian Scientific Journal Database (ISJD)

 
Mailing Address
3th Floor, Departement of Mathematics Education, Faculty of Tarbiyah and Teacher Training, UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung. Jl. Cimencrang, Gedebage, Kota Bandung, Jawa Barat 40292, Indonesia
E-mail: jurnalanalisa@uinsgd.ac.id