TEST THE REACTION OF THE BANK SYARIAH INDONESIA STOCK MARKET (STUDY OF EVENTS PP MUHAMMADIYAH DECIDED TO WITHDRAW CUSTOMER FUNDS)

Authors

  • Adi Sopian Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Indonesia
  • Budi Supriatono Purnomo Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Indonesia
  • Imas Purnamasari Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15575/fjsfm.v6i1.42873

Keywords:

Efficiency Market Hypothesis, Event Study, Sharia Bank

Abstract

This study aims to examine the differences in abnormal returns and trading volume activity before and after the announcement of the Muhammadiyah Central Leadership (PP Muhammadiyah) memo regarding the consolidation of member funds, which are not to be concentrated in Bank Syariah Indonesia (BSI). The research method used is an event study method with a paired sample t-test to assess the significance of differences between the periods before and after the announcement. The data utilized include abnormal returns and trading volume activity for 10 days before and after the event. The results of this study indicate no significant difference in abnormal returns before and after the announcement. This suggests that the PP Muhammadiyah memo did not affect stock returns, as shareholders still trust the credibility of BSI's management, disregarding external influences. However, in terms of trading volume activity, there is a significant difference between the periods before and after the announcement. This is due to a decline in trading volume after the announcement, as shareholders observe the situation of BSI stock trading before deciding to buy or sell shares.

References

Abduh, M., & Azmi Omar, M. (2012). Islamic banking and economic growth: The Indonesian experience. International Journal of Islamic and Middle Eastern Finance and Management, 5(1), 35–47. https://doi.org/10.1108/17538391211216811

Abdullah, F., Hassan, T., & Mohamad, S. (2007). Investigation of performance of Malaysian Islamic unit trust funds: Comparison with conventional unit trust funds. Managerial Finance, 33(2), 142–153. https://doi.org/10.1108/03074350710715854

Alam, N., Hassan, M. K., & Haque, M. A. (2013). Are Islamic bonds different from conventional bonds? International evidence from capital market tests. In Borsa Istanbul Review (Vol. 13, Issue 3, pp. 22–29). Borsa Istanbul Anonim Sirketi. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bir.2013.10.006

Ameur, H. B., Ftiti, Z., & Le Fur, E. (2024). What can we learn from the analysis of the fine wines market efficiency? International Journal of Finance & Economics, 29(1), 703–718. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijfe.2705

Barber, B. M., & Odean, T. (2008). All That Glitters: The Effect of Attention and News on the Buying Behavior of Individual and Institutional Investors. Review of Financial Studies, 21(2), 785–818. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhm079

Belhoula, M. M., Mensi, W., & Naoui, K. (2024). Dynamic efficiency in MENA stock markets during COVID-19 outbreak and vaccines. International Journal of Emerging Markets. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOEM-10-2022-1566

Brouty, X., & Garcin, M. (2024). Fractal properties, information theory, and market efficiency. Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, 180, 114543. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chaos.2024.114543

Brown, S. J., & Warner, J. B. (1985). Using daily stock returns. Journal of Financial Economics, 14(1), 3–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(85)90042-X

Carolin, Y. (2024). Indonesian Capital Market Investors’ Reaction To The Events At Bank Syariah Indonesia. JPS (Jurnal Perbankan Syariah), 5(2), 386–403. https://doi.org/10.46367/jps.v5i2.2081

Chen, Y., Xu, X., Lan, T., & Zhang, S. (2024). The Predictability of Stock Price: Empirical Study on Tick Data in Chinese Stock Market. Big Data Research, 35, 100414. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bdr.2023.100414

Downloads

Published

2025-06-15

How to Cite

Sopian, A., Purnomo, B. S., & Purnamasari , I. (2025). TEST THE REACTION OF THE BANK SYARIAH INDONESIA STOCK MARKET (STUDY OF EVENTS PP MUHAMMADIYAH DECIDED TO WITHDRAW CUSTOMER FUNDS). Finansha: Journal of Sharia Financial Management, 6(1), 50–65. https://doi.org/10.15575/fjsfm.v6i1.42873

Citation Check