The Evaluation of Islamic Education Teachers’ Performance
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15575/jpi.v5i1.3627Keywords:
Countenance Stake model, Learning Activity, Strategy of Learning.Abstract
Teachers’ performance is one of crucial topics in education and become a global problem in improving the quality of education in many countries, including the performance of Islamic Education teachers. Therefore, this research aims to evaluate Islamic Education teachers’ performance at SMA (Sekolah Menengah Atas/Senior High School) in Gorontalo Province. The method used in this research consisted of an evaluation research with countenance stake model. The samples were 66 Islamic Education teachers taken by purposive sampling technique.  Data were obtained through observation, interview, and document study. The finding of this research shows that the Islamic Education teachers’ performance in learning planning is good. Teachers are able to design a good learning process, although the ability in selecting methods and strategies, selecting media and learning source and composing the assessment component in evaluating the learning should be improved. Because those three components are still in enough category. The performance of teachers in the implementation of learning is in good category, despite there are still some measured components that should be improved such as by doing elaboration activity, doing assessment process and furthermore program. Therefore, explicitly shows that Islamic Education teachers in Gorontalo Province performance should be evaluated. It aims to the professional development and the carrier improvement as a teacher.
References
Akiri, A.A, Effects of teachers’ effectiveness on students’ academic performance in public secondary schools: Delta State-Nigeria, (Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 3(2), 2013), p. 105-111.
Ali, Ali Yassin Sheikh., Dahie, Abdulkadir Mohamud, & Ali Abdulkadir, Teacher motivation and school performance, the mediating effect of job satisfaction: Survey from secondary schools in Mogadishu, (International Journal of Education and Social Science, Vol. 3 No. 1, 2016), p. 24-38.
Asyafah, Abas, Research based instruction in the teaching of islamic education, (SpringerPlus, 3:755, 2014), p. 3-5
Atteberry, A., Loeb, S., & Wyckoff, J, Do first impressions matter? Predicting early career teacher effectiveness, (AERA Open, 1(4), 2014), p. 1–23. [DOI: 10.1177/2332858415607834]
Blazar, David., & Kraft, Matthew A., Teacher and teaching effects on students’ attitudes and
behaviors, (Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, Vol. 39, No. 1, 2016), p. 146–170.
Burkhauser, Susan, How Much Do School Principals Matter When It
Comes to Teacher Working Conditions?, (Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, Vol. 39, No. 1, 2016), p. 126–145.
Cohen, Julie., & Goldhaber, Dan, Building a More Complete Understanding of Teacher
Evaluation Using Classroom Observations, (Educational Researcher, Vol. XX No. X, 2016), p. 1–10. [DOI: 10.3102/0013189X16659442]
Dee, Thomas, S., & Wyckoff, James, Incentives, selection, and teacher performance: Evidence from IMPACT, (Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 34(2), 2015), p. 267–297. [https://doi.org/10.1002/pam.21818]
Derrington, Mary Lynne, Implementing Teacher Evaluation: Lattice of
Leadership, (Journal of Research on Leadership Education, 2016), p. 1–9. [DOI: 10.1177/1942775116658689]
Dinama, Baamphatlha, et.al., Students Academic Performance in Religious Education: A Case of Selected Schools in Botswana, (International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research Vol. 15, No. 12, 2016), p. 67-83.
Duflo, Esther., Dupas, Pascaline., & Kremer, Michael, School governance, teacher incentives, and pupil–teacher ratios: Experimental evidence from Kenyan primary schools, (Journal of Public Economics 123, 2015), p. 92–110
Faryadi, Qais, An Islamic perspective of teaching philosophy: A Personal justification, (IOSR Journal of Research & Method in Education, Vol. 5, No. 6, 2015), p. 49-60.
Gershenson, Seth, Linking teacher quality, student attendance, and student achievement,
(Education Finance and Policy, 11, 2016), p. 125–149.
Kraft, Matthew A., & Gilmour, Allison F, Revisiting The Widget Effect: Teacher Evaluation
Reforms and the Distribution of Teacher Effectiveness?, (Educational Researcher, Vol. 46 No. 5, 2017), p. 234–249. [DOI: 10.3102/0013189X17718797]
Loeb, S., Miller, L. C., & Wyckoff, J, Performance screens for school improvement: The case of teacher tenure reform in New York City, (Washington, DC: American Institutes of Research, 2014)
Mehta, J., & Fine, S, Bringing values back in: How purposes shape practices in coherent school designs, (Journal of Educational Change, 16(4), 2015), p. 483–510.
Onsomu, W.M, Influence of teachers’ transfer on student academic perfomance in public secondary schools in Kenya, 2014.
Purwanto, Ngalim, Prinsip-Prinsip dan Teknik Evaluasi Pengajaran, (Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya, 2010
Ruzek, E. A., Domina, T., Conley, A. M., Duncan, G. J., & Karabenick, S. A., Using value-added models to measure teacher effects on students’ motivation and achievement, (The Journal of Early Adolescence, 35), p. 1-31.
Seebruck, R, Teacher quality and student achievement: A Multilevel analysis of teacher credentialization and student test scores in California high schools. McGill Sociological Review, 5, 2015), p. 1-18. [https://www.mcgill.ca/msr/msr-volume-5/teacher-quality-and-student-achievement].
Stufflebeam, D.L & Shinkfield, A.J, Systematic Evaluation, (Boston: Kluwer Nijhof Publishing, 2005
Steinberg, M. P., & Donaldson, M. L, The new educational accountability: Understanding the landscape of teacher evaluation in the post NCLB era, (Education Finance and Policy, 11(3), 2016), p.340–359.
Tehseen, S., & Hadi, NU, Factors influencing teachers’ performance and retention, (Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 6(1), 2015), p 233-244. [https://www.researchgate.net/ publication/271721909].
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0) License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
