Main Article Content

Abstract

Previously, the teachers of fiqh at Madrasah Tsanawiyah still have the difficulties in correctly measuring the competence and student learning outcomes. It means, the validity of the result of teacher assessments is still in doubt. It’s caused the lack of knowledge and variation in assessing their learning outcomes. The teacher of Madrasah Tsanawiyah on average are not familiar with classroom-based assessment techniques that have not mastered the basic techniques required in the assessment of classroom-based assessment techniques, such as product assessment, portfolio, project, performance, attitude and personal assessment. This paper aims to introduce a class-based assessment techniques and then describe of fiqh teacher competency in designing classroom-based assessment techniques. This research uses qualitative-descriptive method, where instruments for data collection are observation/observation sheets and test. The results of data processing indicates that after receiving the learning materials about classroom assessment techniques, which include product assessment techniques, portfolios, projects, performance, attitude and self-assessment, the competence of fiqh teachers in designing classroom-based assessment techniques is considered at the average level.

Keywords

Planning Assessment Technique Class-based

Article Details

References

  1. Anonimous.2009. Himpunan Perundang-undangan Republik Indonesia tentang: Sistem Pendidikan Nasional (Sisdiknas), Nuansa Aulia. Bandung
  2. Depdiknas, 2002.Kurikulum Berbasis Kompetensi.Jakarta : Pusat Kurikulum Balitbang Depdiknas.
  3. Depdiknas, 2002.Ringkasan Pengelolaan Kurikulum Berbasis Sekolah, Jakarta: Pusat Kurikulum Balitbang Depdiknas
  4. Forster, Margaret, dan Masters, G. 1996. Portfolios Assessment Resource Kit. Camberwell, Melborne: The Australian Council for Educational Research Ltd.
  5. Forster, Margaret, dan Masters, G. 1998. Product Assessment Resource Kit. Camberwell, Melborne: The Australian Council for Educational Research Ltd.
  6. Forster, Margaret, dan Masters, G. 1999. Paper amd Pen Assessment Resource Kit. Camberwell, Melborne: The Australian Council for Educational Research Ltd.
  7. Haryati, Mimin, 2007. Model Dan Teknik Penilaian Pada Tingkat Satuan Pendidikan, Jakarta: Gaung Persada Press.
  8. Muslich, Masnur. 2009. KTSP Pembelajaran Berbasis Kompetensi dan Kontekstual (Panduan bagi Guru, Kepala Sekolah, dan Pengawas Sekolah). PT. Bumi Aksara. Jakarta.
  9. Nitko, Anthony J. 1996. Educational Assessment Of Student. Second Addition, Ohio Merril an imprin of Perentice Hall.
  10. Safari. 2008. Penulisan Butir Soal Berdasarkan Kurikulum Tingkat Satuan Pendidikan (KTSP). Jakarta, ASPI. Departemen Pendidikan Nasional
  11. Sudijono, Anas, 2003. Pengantar Evaluasi Pendidikan. Jakarta : PT. RajaGrafindo Persada.
  12. Thoha, M. Chabib, 2003. Teknik Evaluasi Pendidikan. Jakarta : PT. Raja Grafindo Persada.
  13. Undang Undang RI Nomor 20 Tahun 2003. Tentang Sistem Pendidkan Nasional (SISDIKNAS). Citra Umbara. Bandung.
  14. Worthen, Blaine R and Sanders, James R, 1987. Educational Evaluation. New York & London: Longman.
  15. http://pakarbisnisonline.blogspot.com/2010/01/kompetensi-kewirausahaan.html. diunduh tanggal 25 Pebruari