Adaptation of Religious/Spiritually Integrated Practice Assessment Scale-Client Attitude (RSIPAS-CA) in Indonesia

Authors

  • Fadhilla Najmi Qinthara Fakultas Psikologi, Universitas Padjadjaran, Indonesia
  • Yuliana Hanami Fakultas Psikologi, Universitas Padjadjaran, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15575/jpib.v7i1.29083

Keywords:

Client preferences, Mental health, Religiosity, Spirituality, Scale adaptation, Validity and reliability

Abstract

Assessment tools are important to helps Indonesian practitioners to understand the preference of clients toward integration of religious/spiritual values in mental health services. Therefore, this study aimed is to adapt the Religious/Spiritually Integrated Practice Assessment Scale - Client Attitude (RSIPAS-CA) by Oxhandler et al. (2018) to Indonesian context as well as describing the responses of participants. Adaptation of this scale was conducted quantitatively, and the process included translations and expert reviews, followed by data collection on 77 participants who had or are currently receiving mental health services. The results showed that the Indonesian version of the RSIPAS-CA with 9 items, had good discriminating power, content validity, reliability, and construct validity. Most participants had a positive view towards the integration of religion/spirituality in the context of mental health services. This questioneer facilitated practitioners to conduct assessments and served as a measuring tool in future studies.

References

Agbo, A. A. (2010). Cronbach’s Alpha: Review of Limitations and Associated Recommendations. Journal of Psychology in Africa, 20(2), 233–239. https://doi.org/10.1080/14330237.2010.10820371

Al-Ma’seb, H. (2019). Assessment of clinical social worker’s familiarity with and views about the integration of client’s religion and spirituality in social work. Journal of Religion & Spirituality in Social Work: Social Thought, 38(2), 180–196. https://doi.org/10.1080/15426432.2019.1574691

Balboni, T., Balboni, M., Paulk, M. E., Phelps, A., Wright, A., Peteet, J., Block, S., Lathan, C., VanderWeele, T., & Prigerson, H. (2011). Support of cancer patients’ spiritual needs and associations with medical care costs at the end of life. Cancer, 117(23), 5383–5391. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.26221

Currier, J. M., McDermott, R. C., Hawkins, D. E., Greer, C. L., & Carpenter, R. (2018). Seeking help for religious and spiritual struggles: Exploring the role of mental health literacy. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 49(1), 90–97. https://doi.org/10.1037/pro0000151

El Hafiz, S., & Aditya, Y. (2021). Kajian Literatur Sistematis Penelitian Religiusitas di Indonesia: Istilah, Definisi, Pengukuran, Hasil Kajian, serta Rekomendasi. Indonesian Journal for The Psychology of Religion, 1(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.24854/ijpr428

Gauthier, G., Bergeron-Leclerc, C., & Pilote, É. (2023). La prise en compte de la spiritualité en travail social : une analyse quantitative exploratoire. Intervention, 157, 135. https://doi.org/10.7202/1105596ar

Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., & Black, W. C. (2019). Multivariate data analysis (8th ed.). Harlow. https://digitalcommons.kennesaw.edu/facpubs/2925/

Hairina, Y., & Mubarak, M. (2020). Penerapan Psikologi Islam dalam praktek profesi psikolog muslim. Jurnal Psikologi Islam Dan Budaya, 3(1), 47–60. https://doi.org/10.15575/jpib.v3i1.4132

Harahap, E. S., Azrina, N., & Hasanah, N. A. (2023). Integrasi nilai-nilai Islami dalam layanan bimbingan karir: Tantangan dan peluang bagi konselor profesional. Innovative: Journal Of Social Science Research, 3(3), 961–975. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.31004/innovative.v3i3.2313

Harris, K. A., Randolph, B. E., & Gordon, T. D. (2016). What do clients want? Assessing spiritual needs in counseling: A literature review. Spirituality in Clinical Practice, 3(4), 250–275. https://doi.org/10.1037/scp0000108

Hashmi, F. K., Iqbal, Q., Haque, N., & Saleem, F. (2020). Religious cliché and stigma: A Brief response to overlooked barriers in COVID-19 management. Journal of Religion and Health, 59(6), 2697–2700. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10943-020-01063-y

Hoe, S. L. (2008). Issues and procedures in adopting structural equation modeling technique. Journal of Quantitative Methods, 3(1), 76–83.

Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118

Kiran, Y., & Dewi, U. S. P. (2017). Pengetahuan dan Sikap Perawat dalam Memenuhi Kebutuhan Psikologis dan Spiritual Klien Terminal. Jurnal Pendidikan Keperawatan Indonesia, 3(2), 182–189. https://doi.org/10.17509/jpki.v3i2.9425

Kline, R. B. (2023). Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling (4th ed.). Guilford Press. https://doi.org/978-1-4625-5191-0

Krishnan, V. (2013). The early child development instrument (EDI): An item analysis using classical test theory (CTT) on Alberta’s data. Early Child Development Mapping (ECMap) Project Community-University Partnership (CUP) Faculty of Extension, University of Alberta. https://www.ualberta.ca/community-university-partnership/media-library/community-university-partnership/research/ecmap-reports/ediitemanalysisctt.pdf

Kyriazos, T. A. (2018). Applied Psychometrics: Sample Size and Sample Power Considerations in Factor Analysis (EFA, CFA) and SEM in General. Psychology, 9(8), 2207–2230. https://doi.org/10.4236/psych.2018.98126

Muzdalipah, M., Reza, I. F., & Zaharuddin, Z. (2018). Makna kematian pada muslim lanjut usia. Jurnal Psikologi Islam Dan Budaya, 1(2), 131–142. https://doi.org/10.15575/jpib.v1i2.2741

Ninin, R. H., Iskandar, Tb. Z., Sumintardja, E. N., & Siswadi, A. G. P. (2018). Diri religius: Suatu model konseptual tentang diri. Journal of Psychological Science and Profession, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.24198/jpsp.v2i1.16580

Oxhandler, H. K. (n.d.). Resources. Retrieved July 27, 2023, from https://hollyoxhandler.com/resources/

Oxhandler, H. K., Parrish, D. E., Torres, L. R., & Achenbaum, W. A. (2015). The Integration of Clients’ Religion and Spirituality in Social Work Practice: A National Survey. Social Work, 60(3), 228–237. https://doi.org/10.1093/sw/swv018

Oxhandler, H. K., Ellor, J. W., & Stanford, M. S. (2018). Client Attitudes toward Integrating Religion and Spirituality in Mental Health Treatment: Scale Development and Client Responses. Social Work (United States), 63(4), 337–345. https://doi.org/10.1093/sw/swy041

Oxhandler, H. K., & Parrish, D. E. (2016). The development and validation of the religious/spiritually integrated practice assessment scale. Research on Social Work Practice, 26(3), 295–307. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049731514550207

Oxhandler, H. K. (2019). Revalidating the Religious/Spiritually Integrated Practice Assessment Scale With Five Helping Professions. Research on Social Work Practice, 29(2), 223–233. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049731516669592

Oxhandler, H. K., Pargament, K. I., Pearce, M. J., Vieten, C., & Moffatt, K. M. (2021). Current mental health clients’ attitudes regarding religion and spirituality in treatment: A national survey. Religions, 12(6). https://doi.org/10.3390/rel12060371

Peraturan Perundang-undangan. (2020). Peraturan Badan Narkotika Nasional Nomor 3 Tahun 2020 Tentang Petunjuk Teknis Jabatan Fungsional Konselor Adiksi Dan Angka Kreditnya. JDIH BPK. https://peraturan.bpk.go.id/Home/Details/177115/peraturan-bnn-no-3-tahun-2020

Pew Research Center. (2012, October 9). “Nones†on the Rise. Pew Research Center. https://www.pewresearch.org/religion/2012/10/09/nones-on-the-rise/

Polit, D. F., & Beck, C. T. (2006). The content validity index: Are you sure you know what’s being reported? critique and recommendations. Research in Nursing & Health, 29(5), 489–497. https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.20147

Sarbini, S., Kurniadewi, E., & Santoso, R. (2021). Peran religiusitas dan kecerdasan emosional terhadap resiliensi penyintas tsunami selat Sunda. Jurnal Psikologi Islam Dan Budaya, 4(2), 119–128. https://doi.org/10.15575/jpib.v4i2.9476

Schaffner, A. D., & Dixon, D. N. (2003). Religiosity, Gender, and Preferences for Religious Interventions in Counseling: A Preliminary Study. Counseling and Values, 48(1), 24–33. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2161-007X.2003.tb00272.x

Shamsi, M., Khoshnood, Z., & Farokhzadian, J. (2022). Improving psychiatric nurses’ competencies in spiritual care and integration of clients’ religion/spirituality into mental healthcare: outcomes of an online spiritual care training program. BMC Psychiatry, 22(1), 645. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-022-04280-9

Tanaka, J. S. (1987). “How Big Is Big Enough?â€: Sample Size and Goodness of Fit in Structural Equation Models with Latent Variables. Child Development, 58(1), 134. https://doi.org/10.2307/1130296

UUD RI (2014). Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 18 Tahun 2014 Tentang Kesehatan Jiwa. https://www.ipkindonesia.or.id/media/2017/12/uu-no-18-th-2014-ttg-kesehatan-jiwa.pdf

Viri, K., & Febriany, Z. (2020). Dinamika Pengakuan Penghayat Kepercayaan di Indonesia. Indonesian Journal of Religion and Society, 2(2), 97–112. https://doi.org/10.36256/ijrs.v2i2.119

World Health Organization. (2016). Process of translation and adaptation of instruments. http://www.who.int/substance_abuse/research_tools/translation/en/

Zijlmans, E. A. O., Tijmstra, J., van der Ark, L. A., & Sijtsma, K. (2018). Item-Score Reliability in Empirical-Data Sets and Its Relationship With Other Item Indices. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 78(6), 998–1020. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164417728358

Zinnbauer, B. J., Pargament, K. I., Cole, B., Rye, M. S., Butter, E. M., Belavich, T. G., Hipp, K. M., Scott, A. B., & Kadar, J. L. (1997). Religion and Spirituality: Unfuzzying the Fuzzy. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 36(4), 549–564. https://doi.org/10.2307/1387689

Downloads

Published

2024-06-28

Issue

Vol. 7 No. 1 (2024): JPIB : Jurnal Psikologi Islam dan Budaya

Section

Articles

Citation Check

License

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).