How Are Coping Strategies Associated With Perceived Stress? A Meta-Analytic Review
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15575/jpib.v9i2.55870Abstract
Psychological distress is related to how individuals respond to stressful experiences, highlighting the importance of coping strategies in understanding perceived stress. This study examined associations between coping strategies and perceived stress through a meta-analytic review. A total of 53 effect sizes were synthesized using random-effects models, covering positive or adaptive and negative or maladaptive coping strategies. Positive or adaptive coping was negatively associated with perceived stress, whereas negative or maladaptive coping was positively associated with perceived stress. Substantial heterogeneity was observed across effect sizes. Moderator analyses examined participant type, mean age, survey year, publication year, and continent. Univariate meta-regression indicated that mean age, survey year, and publication year were not significant moderators of either association. Subgroup estimates varied across participant types and continents, although these differences alone do not establish significant moderation. These findings highlight the importance of distinguishing adaptive and maladaptive coping and further investigating sources of between-study heterogeneity.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Citation Check
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Dwi Yan Nugraha, Fuad Nashori, Raden Rachmy Diana, Dibyo Restu Nugraha

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).

