Kontribusi Religiusitas terhadap Perilaku Prososial Guru Sekolah Inklusi Berbasis Islam

Authors

  • Faza Dinan Hanifah Psikologi, Universitas Islam Bandung, Indonesia
  • Stephani Raihana Hamdan Psikologi, Universitas Islam Bandung, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15575/jpib.v4i1.5609

Keywords:

Inclusion, Religiosity, Prosocial, Teacher

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to find the contribution of religiosity to prosocial behavior on teacher inclusion. This study is a causality study with the respondent of 74 teachers. The measuring instrument used was CRS-15 (The Centrality of Religiosity Scale) adapted by Wardhani (2015) to measure religiosity and The Prosocialness Scale for Adults by Caprara (2005) and adapted by a researcher to measure prosocial. The results showed that there is a significant correlation between religiosity and prosocial. Religiosity contributes 40.7% to the prosocial behavior.

References

Aridhona, J. (2018). Hubungan perilaku prososial dan religiusitas dengan moral pada remaja. Konselor, 7(1), 21-255. https://doi.org/10.24176/perseptual.v2i1.2218

Safrilsyah., Akmal, S., & Mahmud, S. (2019). Religiosity, the use of online media, and the youths’ prosocial behavior in Aceh. Proceedings of the 19th Annual International Conference on Islamic Studies (AICIS). https://doi.org/10.4108/eai.1-10-2019.2291697

Arifin, M. (2017). Filsafat pendidikan Islam. Bina Aksara.

Baharudin, H., & Awwaliyah, R. (2018). Pendidikan inklusi bagi anak berkebutuhan khusus dalam perspektif epistemologi Islam. MODELING: Jurnal Program Studi PGMI, 5(1), 57-71.

Batson, C. D. (2010). Empathy-induced altruistic motivation. Dalam M. Mikulincer & P. R. Shaver (Eds.), Prosocial motives, emotions, and behavior: The better angels of our nature (hal. 15–34). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/12061-001

Bucar, S. (2016). Religiosity, spirituality, and life satisfaction in relation to teachers' service quality. ACADEME, University of Bohol Graduate School and Professional Studies Journal, 9, 1-27.

Caprara, G. V., Steca, P., Zelli, A., & Capanna, C. (2005). A new scale for measuring adults’ prosocialness. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 21, 77-89. https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759.21.2.77

Crane, B. D. (2017). Teacher openness and prosocial motivation: Creating an environment where questions lead to engaged students. Management Teaching Review, 2(1), 7-16. https://doi.org/10.1177/2379298116673838

Cuadra-Martínez, D., Sandoval-Díaz, J., Perez-Zapata, D., Castro-Carrasco, P., Véliz-Vergara, D., Guzman-Ãvalos, J., & Ramos-Thompson, G. (2019). Helping one’s neighbor: Teaching and learning prosocial behavior in a religious community. Religions. 10(9), 515. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel10090515

Damayanti, T., Hamdan, S. R., & Khasanah, A. N. (2017). Kompetensi guru dalam proses pembelajaran inklusi pada guru SD negeri di kota Bandung. Journal of Psychology Research, 3(1), 79-87. https://doi.org/10.29313/schema.v0i0.1947

Dayakisni. (2015). Psikologi sosial, cetakan kelima. UMM Press.

Eisenberg, N., & Mussen, P. H. (2003). The roots of prosocial behavior. Cambridge University Press.

Fauzia, N., Maslihah, S., & Wyandini, D. Z. (2020). Trisilas local wisdom scale, silih asih, silih asah, silih asuh. Jurnal Psikologi Talenta, 5(2), 121-126. https://doi.org/10.26858/talenta.v5i2.12757

FioRito, T. A., Routledge, C., & Jackson, J. (2020). Meaning-motivated community action: The need for meaning and prosocial goals and behavior. Personality and Individual Differences, 110462. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2020.110462

Fridayanti. (2015). Religiusitas, spiritualitas dalam kajian psikologi dan urgensi perumusan religiusitas Islam. Psympathic: Jurnal Ilmiah Psikologi, 2(2), 199-208. https://doi.org/10.15575/psy.v2i2.460

Foulkes, L., Leung, J. T., Fuhrmann, D., Knoll, L. J., & Blakemore, S. J. (2018). Age differences in the prosocial influence effect. Developmental science, 21(6), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1111/desc.12666

Glock, C., & Stark, R. (1966). Religion and society in tension. University of California.

Greenway, T. S. (2020). A review of theories accounting for the relationship between intercessory prayer and prosocial behavior: Current research and future directions. Psychology of Religion and Spirituality, 12(1), 66–76. https://doi.org/10.1037/rel0000209

Guo, Q., Liu, Z., & Tian, Q. (2020). Religiosity and prosocial behavior at national level. Psychology of Religion and Spirituality, 12(1), 55–65. https://doi.org/10.1037/rel0000171

Hafiza, N., Neviyarni, N., & Syukur, Y. (2018). The relationship of religiosity and peer conformity with students’ attitude toward prosocial behavior. International Conferences on Educational, Social Sciences and Technology (pp. 264-269). Padang: Fakultas Ilmu Pendidikan UNP: https://doi.org/10.29210/2018138

Husodo, H. S. (2017). Bandung Barat jadi daerah otonomi baru terbaik. Pikiran Rakyat. https://www.pikiran-rakyat.com/bandung-raya/2017/09/24/bandung-barat-jadi-daerah-otonomi-baru-terbaik-410126.

Herzog, P. S., Strohmeier, A., King, D. P., Khader, R. A., Williams, A. L., Goodwin, J. L., Doan, D. R. H., & Moyo, B. (2020). Religiosity and generosity: Multi-level approaches to studying the religiousness of prosocial actions. Religions, 11(9), 446. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel11090446

Huber, S., & Huber, O. W. (2012). The centrality of religiosity scale (CSR). MDPI Journal Religions, 3(3), 710-724. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel3030710

House, B. R. (2018). How do social norms influence prosocial development?. Current Opinion in Psychology, 20, 87–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2017.08.011

Hruschka, D. J., & Henrich, J. (2015). Prosocial behavior, cultural differences in. International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences, 238–243. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-097086-8.24103-2

Iklima, S. (2017). Hubungan kebersyukuran dengan kebahagiaan pada guru sekolah luar biasa kota Bandung (Skripsi tidak diterbitkan), UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung, Fakultas Psikologi.

Jaenudin, U., & Tahrir. (2019). Studi religiusitas, budaya sunda, dan perilaku moral pada masyarakat kabupaten Bandung. JPIB: Jurnal Psikologi Islam dan Budaya. 2(1), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.15575/jpib.v2i1.3445

Jung, H., Seo, E., Han, E., Henderson, M. D., & Patall, E. A. (2020). Prosocial modeling: A meta-analytic review and synthesis. Psychological Bulletin, 146(8), 635–663. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000235

Kaya, I., Yeniaras, V., & Kaya, O. (2020). Dimensions of religiosity, altruism and life satisfaction. Review of Social Economy, 1-32. https://doi.org/10.1080/00346764.2019.1711151

Karaben, G. A., & Kustanti, E. R. (2020). Hubungan antara regulasi emosi dengan perilaku prososial guru di SLB Negeri Semarang. Empati, 9(4), 294-299.

Kuhnert, R. L., Begeer, S., Fink, E., & de Rosnay, M. (2017). Gender-differentiated effects of theory of mind, emotion understanding, and social preference on prosocial behavior development: A longitudinal study. Journal of experimental child psychology, 154, 13-27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2016.10.001

Li, K.-K., & Chow, W.-Y. (2015). Religiosity/ spirituality and prosocial behaviors among Chinese Christian adolescents: The mediating role of values and gratitude. Psychology of Religion and Spirituality, 7(2), 150–161. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0038294

Martin-Raugh, M. P., Kell, H. J., & Motowidlo, S. J. (2016). Prosocial knowledge mediates effects of agreeableness and emotional intelligence on prosocial behavior. Personality and Individual Differences, 90, 41-49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2015.10.024

Pearce, L. D., Hayward, G. M., & Pearlman, J. A. (2017). Measuring five dimensions of religiosity across adolescence. Rev Relig Res., 59(3), 367–393. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13644-017-0291-8.

Ramdani, Z., Supriyatin, T., & Susanti, S. (2018). Perumusan dan pengujian instrumen alat ukur kesabaran sebagai bentuk coping strategy. JPIB: Jurnal Psikologi Islam dan Budaya, 1(2), 97–106. https://doi.org/10.15575/jpib.v1i2.2955

Ramdani, Z., Marliani, R., & Rahman, A. A. (2019). The individual work perfomance scale: A psychometric study and its aplication for emloyee performance. Humanities & Social Sciences Reviews, 7(5), 405–414. https://doi.org/10.18510/hssr.2019.754 5

Różycka-Tran, J. (2017). Love thy neighbor? The effects of religious in/out-group identity on social behavior. Personality and Individual Differences, 115, 7–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2016.11.009

Salsabila, D. F., Rofifah, R., Natanael, Y., & Ramdani, Z. (2019). Uji validitas konstruk Indonesian-psychological measurement of Islamic religiousness (I-PMIR). JPIB: Jurnal Psikologi Islam dan Budaya, 2(2), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.15575/jpib.v2i2.5494

Shariff, A. F. (2015). Does religion increase moral behaviour?. Current Opinion in Psychology, 6, 108–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2015.07.009

Silalahi, U. (2015). Metode penelitian sosial kuantitatif. Refika Aditama.

Sudjarwadi, H. (2013). Penetapan sekolah penyelenggara pendidikan inklusif dinas pendidikan provinsi jawa barat tahun 2013 SD/MI. https://docplayer.info/30752002-Tentang-penetapan-sekolah-penyelenggara-pendidikan-inklusif-dinas-pendidikan-provinsi-jawa-barat-tahun-2013-sd-mi.html

Suyadi. (2017). Pendidikan Islam inklusi humanis dan religius. Jurnal Tajdidukasi: Jurnal Penelitian & Kajian Pendidikan Islam, 7(2), 15-27. http://doi.org/10.47736/tajdidukasi.v7i2.96

Thielmann, I., Spadaro, G., & Balliet, D. (2020). Personality and prosocial behavior: A theoretical framework and meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 146(1), 30–90. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000217

UNESCO. (1994, June 7-10). The salamanca statement and framework for action on special needs education. World Conference on Special Needs Education: Access and Quality, Salamanca, Spain. https://bice.org/app/uploads/2014/10/unesco_the_salamanca_statement_and_framework_for_action_on_special_needs_education.pdf

Wardhani, N. (2015). Makna penting keberagamaan dalam kepribadian seseorang. Prosiding SNaPP2015 Sosial, Ekonomi, dan Humaniora, 5(1), 749-754. http://proceeding.unisba.ac.id/index.php/sosial/article/view/432.

Witri, T. M. (2018). Hubungan antara religiusitas dan kecerdasan emosional terhadap perilaku prososial pada mahasiswa (Skripsi tidak diterbitkan). Universitas Islam Negeri Sultan Syarif Kasim Riau, Fakultas Psikologi.

Downloads

Additional Files

Published

2021-04-30

Issue

Vol. 4 No. 1 (2021): JPIB : Jurnal Psikologi Islam dan Budaya

Section

Articles

Citation Check

License

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).