Comparative Analysis of Forced Defence (Noodweer) in Dealing with the Crime of Persecution: A Study of Indonesian Criminal Law and Islamic


Sitti Ma'rifah Nisrina(1*), Haerana Haerana(2), Nur Azisa(3)

(1) Department of Law, Hasanuddin University, Indonesia
(2) Department of Law, Hasanuddin University, Indonesia
(3) Department of Law, Hasanuddin University, Indonesia
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


This research delves into the legal framework of forced Defence in addressing the crime of persecution, examining its application in Indonesian criminal law and its comparison with Islamic law. The study employs a normative legal approach, utilizing statutory analysis and case study methods to provide insights into the nuanced distinctions between the two legal systems. The investigation reveals that forced defence arrangements are rooted in juridical considerations, which evaluate the circumstances of victims and perpetrators according to the principles and conditions delineated in the Criminal Code. Intent, legal psychology, and human instincts for self-preservation are integral to the evaluation process. Positive and Islamic laws allow forced Defence when actions align with expert opinions and scholarly interpretations. However, Islamic criminal law limits Defence , prohibiting actions that lead to death or adultery. This study contributes to understanding the legal rationale underpinning forced Defence  in the context of persecution. It underscores the similarities and disparities between Indonesian criminal law and Islamic law.


Keywords


forced Defence, Noodweer, persecution, Indonesian criminal law, Islamic law, legal comparison, juridical considerations, self-defence.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Ahmadi, C. I., Ismail, D. E., & Machmud, A. W. (2023). The Politics of Criminal Law in Self-Defense in Indonesia: Regulatory And Enforcement Discourses. Jurnal Legalitas, 16(1), 1–14.

Alexander Adams, K. (2022). No retreat: the impact of stand your ground laws on violent crime. Criminal Justice Review, 07340168221124453.

Ali, A. (2009). Menguak teori hukum (legal theory) dan teori peradilan (judicialprudence) termasuk interpretasi undang-undang (legisprudence). Jakarta: Kencana.

Arendt, H. (2009). Responsibility and judgment. Schocken.

Aristo, M. A. (2020). Criminal Law Policy against Actor of Criminal Performance Persecution. Jurnal Daulat Hukum, 3(1), 139–146.

Ashworth, A. (2019). Victims’ rights, defendants’ rights and criminal procedure. In Integrating a victim perspective within criminal justice (pp. 185–204). Routledge.

Biberman, Y. (2018). Self-defense militias, death squads, and state outsourcing of violence in India and Turkey. Journal of Strategic Studies, 41(5), 751–781.

Chazawi, A. (2009). Hukum Pidana Positif Penghinaan (Tindak Pidana Menyerang Kepentingan Hukum Mengenai Martabat Kehormatan dan Martabat Nama Baik Orang Bersifat Pribadi Maupun Komunal). In Putra media nusantara, Surabaya. Surabaya: Putra media nusantara.

Doak, K. M., & Doak, K. M. (2019). Tanaka’s Theory of World Law. Tanaka Kōtarō and World Law: Rethinking the Natural Law Outside the West, 41–62.

Efendi, J. (2018). Hukum dan kearifan lokal. Jakad Media Publishing.

Fernández Castro, V., & Heras-Escribano, M. (2020). Social cognition: A normative approach. Acta Analytica, 35, 75–100.

Fletcher, G. P., & Ohlin, J. D. (2013). Defending humanity: when force is justified and why. Oxford University Press.

Green, B. A., & Roiphe, R. (2020). When prosecutors politick: Progressive law enforcers then and now. J. Crim. L. & Criminology, 110, 719.

Hamid, M. A., & Gofar, A. (2011). Penyelesaian Sengketa Perkawinan Islam Dalam Bingkai Hukum Acara Perdata Barat. Amanna Gappa, 19(2), 39–47.

McCormick, K. (2023). “Comments on Gregg Caruso’s Rejecting Retributivism: Free Will, Punishment, and Criminal Justice.” Journal of Practical Ethics, 10(2).

Negara, T. A. S. (2023). Normative Legal Research in Indonesia: Its Originis and Approaches. Audito Comparative Law Journal (ACLJ), 4(1), 1–9.

Nir, E., & Liu, S. (2022). The challenge of imposing just sentences under mandatory minimum statutes: A qualitative study of judicial perceptions. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 33(2), 177–205.

Richards, D. A. J. (1983). Rights, Resistance, and the Demands of Self-respect. Emory LJ, 32, 405.

Ross, A. (2019). On law and justice. Oxford University Press.

Saputra, R., Setiodjati, J. P., & Barkhuizen, J. (2023). Under-Legislation in Electronic Trials and Renewing Criminal Law Enforcement in Indonesia (Comparison with United States). Journal of Indonesian Legal Studies, 8(1).

Schneider, E. M. (2017). The violence of privacy. In Privacy (pp. 263–289). Routledge.

Senjaya, M. (2023). Elements of Vandalism in Law Number 1 of 2023 Concerning the Criminal Code. East Asian Journal of Multidisciplinary Research, 2(2), 673–682.

Shah, N. A., & Shah, N. A. (2008). Self-Defense in Islamic and International Law. Springer.

Sofyan, A. M., SH, M. H., & Nur Azisa, S. H. (2023). Hukum Pidana Indonesia. Prenada Media.

Triantono, T., Marizal, M., & Rochaety, N. (2023). Juridical Analysis of Law No. 12 of 2022 Concerning the Crime of Sexual Violence in the Perspective of Victim Protection. Proceedings of the 1st International Workshop on Law, Economics and Governance, IWLEG 2022, 27 July 2022, Semarang, Indonesia.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.15575/kh.v5i2.25825

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2023 Sitti Ma'rifah Nisrina et.al

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Jl. Raya A.H. Nasution No. 105 Cibiru Kota Bandung, 40614

E-mail: KHukum@uinsgd.ac.id

Lisensi Creative Commons

Khazanah Hukum are licensed under Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International