The Concerns of Nation-State Sovereignty and International Commercial Law: A Path to Harmonisation


Tran Vang-Phu(1*), Duong Anh Son(2)

(1) Can Tho University, Vietnam, Viet Nam
(2) Ho Chi Minh City University of Economics and Finance, Viet Nam
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


The current body of literature on international business and commercial laws demonstrates the inherent conflict between the legal system and the sovereignty of nation-states. The phenomenon of globalization has amplified the influence of non-state actors, regional organizations, and free trade agreements, resulting in a significant demand for international arbitration. The incorporation of international commercial laws into the current standard is increasingly prevalent, as nation-states discover the benefits of adhering to such laws. Conversely, the concept of national sovereignty, which exerted significant influence in recent years, appears to be facing substantial challenges due to the emerging trends in an increasingly interconnected globalized world. Nevertheless, the nation-state and its sovereignty maintain a significant impact on the dynamics of power and trade between different nation-states. This study undertakes an examination of the substantial discord between principles of international commercial law and the sovereignty attributed to nation-states, with specific attention directed towards the prospects of achieving harmonization. Moreover, it delves into the intricacies and challenges inherent in the pursuit of harmonization within this specific domain.


Keywords


Commercial Law, Globalization, Harmonization, International Commerce, Nation-state, Sovereignty.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Alexe, A. (2009). Sfarsitul lumii libere/The end of the free world.

Bazinas, S. V. (2003). Harmonisation of international and regional trade law: The UNCITRAL experience. Unif. L. Rev. ns, 8, 53.

Brooks, I., Weatherston, J., & Wilkinson, G. (2010). Globalisation, challenges and changes. The international business environment, 306-336.

Bonell, M. J. (2000). The UNIDROIT Principles and transnational law. Unif. L. Rev. ns, 5, 199.

Bishop, L. (1961). International Law: Sovereignty: Judicial Examination of Foreign Act of State under International Law. Michigan Law Review, 60(2), 231. https://doi.org/10.2307/1286443

Bray, R., & Shepard, P. (1953). Sovereignty and State-Owned Commercial Entities. The American Journal of Comparative Law, 2(1), 97. https://doi.org/10.2307/838010

Calliess, G. P. (2001). Lex mercatoria: a reflexive law guide to an autonomous legal system. German Law Journal, 2(17), E4.

Chase-Dunn, C. (1999). Globalization: A World-Systems Perspective, Journal of World-Systems Research, V. 2, pp. 187–215, http://jwsr.ucr.edu/, ISSN 1076-156x

Crawford, J. 1976. The criteria for statehood in international law. British Yearbook of International Law, 48(1), 93-182

Deak, F., & Mattern, J. (1928). Concepts of State, Sovereignty and International Law. Columbia Law Review, 28(7), 993. https://doi.org/10.2307/1114256

Dunning, J. H. (Ed.). (1997). Governments, globalization, and international business. OUP Oxford.

Fazio, S. (2007). The harmonization of international commercial law. Kluwer Law International.

Gopalan, S. (2004). Transnational commercial law. W.S. Hein.

Gopalan, S. (2004). The creation of international commercial law: sovereignty felled. San Diego Int'l LJ, 5, 267.

Jackson, R. (2007). Sovereignty: The evolution of an idea. Polity.

K. J. Holsti (1996). The State, War and the State of War, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, p. 203.

Keohane, R. O., & Nye, J. S. (2020). Globalization: What's new? What's not? (And so, what?). In Making policy happen (pp. 105-113). Routledge.

Keerthiraj. & Devaiah N. G., (2022). Quintessence Of International Politics: Theoretical and Conceptual Foundations. Blue Hill Publications.

Lansford, T. (2000). Post-Westphalian Europe? Sovereignty and the Modern Nation-State. International Studies, 37(1), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020881700037001001

Levmore, S. (2012). Harmonization, Preferences, and the Calculus of Consent in Commercial and Other Law. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2079295

Loshkarev, I. (2019). International Law and State Sovereignty: Issues of Correlation. Contemporary Problems of Social Work, 5(1), 84-91. https://doi.org/10.17922/2412-5466-2019-5-1-84-91

Nakagawa, J. (2011). International harmonization of economic regulation. Oxford University Press.

Negulescu, P. (1927). Curs de drept constituțional român/Course of Romanian constitutional law. Bucharest.

Nweze, C., & Okeke, C. (2009). Contemporary issues on public international and comparative law. Vandeplas Publishing.

Miga-Beșteliu, R. (1998). Drept internațional: introducere in dreptul internațional public/International law: introduction to public international law. Bucharest: ALL.

Rosett, A. (1992). Unification, Harmonization, Restatement, Codification, and Reform in International Commercial Law. The American Journal Of Comparative Law, 40(3), 683. https://doi.org/10.2307/840594

Rühl, G. (2016). Commercial agents, minimum harmonization and overriding mandatory provisions in the European Union: Unamar. Common Market Law Review, 53(Issue 1), 209-224. https://doi.org/10.54648/cola2016009

Sanderson, D. (2011). Commercial Law and Indigenous Sovereignty. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1933805

Schrijver, N. (1999). The changing nature of state sovereignty. British Year Book of International Law, 70(1), 65-98.

Schultz, T., & Mitchenson, J. (2016). Navigating sovereignty and transnational commercial law: the use of comity by Australian courts. Journal Of Private International Law, 12(2), 344-378. https://doi.org/10.1080/17441048.2016.1206704

Shaw, M. N. (1982). Territory in international law. Netherlands Yearbook of International Law, 13, 61-91.

Shackelford, E. (2006). Party Autonomy and Regional Harmonization of Rules in International Commercial Arbitration. University Of Pittsburgh Law Review, 67(4). https://doi.org/10.5195/lawreview.2006.57

Sparke, M. (2012). Introducing Globalization. Wiley.

Stephan, P. (1999). The Futility of Unification and Harmonization in International Commercial Law. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.169209

Tierney, S. (2005). Reframing Sovereignty? Sub-State National Societies and Contemporary Challenges to the Nation-State. International And Comparative Law Quarterly, 54(1), 161-183. https://doi.org/10.1093/iclq/54.1.161

Torres, C. A., & Van Heertum, R. (2009). Globalisation and neoliberalism: The challenges and opportunities of radical pedagogy. Re-Reading Education Policies, 143-162.

Ziegel, J. (1997). Harmonization of Private Laws in Federal Systems of Government: Canada, the USA, and Australia, in Making Commercial Law: Essays In Honour Of Roy Goode 133, Ross Cranston ed.

Ziegel, J., & Lerner, S. (1998). New developments in international commercial and consumer law. Hart Pub




DOI: https://doi.org/10.15575/kh.v6i1.33809

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2024 Tran Vang-Phu and Duong Anh Son

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.


Jl. Raya A.H. Nasution No. 105 Cibiru Kota Bandung, 40614
Handphone: +6282176562270

E-mail: KHukum@uinsgd.ac.id

Lisensi Creative Commons

Khazanah Hukum are licensed under Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International