Tinjauan Kritis Polri Sebagai Komponen Pendukung Dalam Pertahanan Negara Berdasarkan Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 27/PUU-XIX/2021

Authors

  • Raines Wadi Pengadilan Tinggi Negeri Gorontalo, Indonesia
  • Ruli Agustin Universitas Pembangunan Nasional Veteran Jakarta, Indonesia
  • Irwan Triadi Universitas Pembangunan Nasional Veteran Jakarta, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15575/sjtp.v2i1.37653

Keywords:

Pertahanan Negara, Komponen Utama, Komponen Pendukung, Polri, Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi

Abstract

The status of the National Police as a Supporting Component as stated in the National Resources Management Law for National Defense and confirmed in Constitutional Court Decision Number 27/PUU-XIX/2021 is problematic. This is because Article 30 paragraph (2) of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia states that the position of the National Police is to carry out efforts to protect and secure the state as the main component. So, the author wants to examine it thoroughly in relation to, firstly, the position of the National Police in protection and security efforts in terms of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia. Second, analyze the existence of the National Police in the Supporting Component of state protection and security efforts. There are two conclusions, namely: First, the position of the National Police in national defense and security efforts based on the initial intention of amending the 1945 Constitution is to synergize with the TNI, especially if a war or armed battle occurs. Second, placing the National Police as a Supporting Component has equalized their rights as citizens who have the principle of the right to refuse military service, while the National Police's protection and security efforts are a constitutional obligation while citizens in military service have a constitutional right.

References

Asbjern Eiden dan Chama Mubanga-Chipoya, Conscientious Objection To Military Service: Report Prepared in Pursuance of Resolution 14 (XXXIV) and 1982/30 of the Sub-Commission on Prevention of Discrimination and Protection of Minorities, (New York: United Nations, 1985).

Bagir Manan, Politik Perundang-Undangan Dalam Rangka Liberalisasi Perekonomian, (Bandar Lampung: FH UNILA, 1996).

Danial, Efektifitas Konsep Prinsip Pembedaan Hukum Humaniter Internasional Sebagai Upaya Perlindungan Korban dalam Konflik Bersenjata Modernâ€, (Jurnal Media Hukum, Volume 23, Nomor 2).

Emily Graham, Conscientious Objectors To Military Service: Punishment and Discriminatory Treatment, (Geneva: Quaker United Nations Office, 2014).

Hibertus Jaka Triyana, “Conscientious Objection Before The Indonesian Constitutional Courtâ€, (Constitutional Review, Volume 8, Nomor 2, Desember 2022).

I Dewa Gede Palguna, Mahkamah Konstitusi: Dasar Pemikiran, Kewenangan dan Perbandingan dengan Negara Lain, (Jakarta: Konstitusi Press, 2018).

Laurel Townhead, International Standards on Conscientious Objection to Military Service, (Geneva: Quaker United Nations Office, 2021).

Mike McConville and Wing Hong Chui, “Introduction and Overviewâ€, in Research Methods For Law (Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2007).

Osgar S. Matompo, “Pembatasan Terhadap Hak Asasi Manusia Dalam Perspektif Keadaan Daruratâ€, (Jurnal Media Hukum, Volume 21, Nomor 1, Juni 2014).

Puteri Puslatpur, dkk, “Kedudukan dan Fungsi Komponen Cadangan Dalam Sistem Pertahanan Negara Ditinjau dari UU Nomor 3 Tahun 2002 Tentang Pertahanan Negaraâ€, (Lex Privatum, Volume 11, Nomor 5, Juni 2023).

Rahayu Prasetianingsih, Prinsip-Prinsip Yang Menentukan Nilai Konstitusi Indonesia dalam Interaksi Konstitusi dan Politik: Kontekstualisasi Pemikiran Sri Soemantri, (Bandung: Pusat Studi Kebijakan Negara Fakultas Hukum Universitas Padjadjaran (PSKN FH UNPAD), 2016).

Rhona K.M Smith, dkk, Hukum Hak Asasi Manusia, (Yogyakarta: Pusat Studi Hak Asasi Manusia (PUSHAM UII), 2008).

Robby Simamora, “Hak Menolak Wajib Militer: Catatan atas RUU Komponen Cadangan Pertahanan Negaraâ€, (Jurnal Konstitusi, Volume 11, Nomor 1, Maret 2014).

Satjipto Rahardjo, Negara Hukum: Yang Membahagiakan Rakyatnya, (Yogyakarta: Genta Publishing, 2009).

Satya Arinanto, “Hak Atas Pendidikan Sebagai Hak Asasi Manusia dan Implementasinya Dalam Perspektif Provinsi Nanggroe Aceh Darussalam (NAD)â€, (Jurnal Hukum dan Pembangunan, Nomor 1, Januari-Maret, 2002).

Sulistyowati Irianto, “Metode Penelitian Kualitatif Dalam Metode Penelitian Ilmu Hukumâ€, (Jurnal Hukum Pembangunanâ€, Nomor 2, April-Juni 2002).

Tim Penyusun, Buku Putih Pertahanan Indonesia, (Jakarta: Kementerian Pertahanan Republik Indonesia, 2015).

Tim Penyusun, Conscientious Objection To Military Service, (Geneva: United Nations, 2012).

Tim Penyusun, Naskah Komprehensif Perubahan Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945: Latar Belakang, Proses, dan Hasil Pembahasan 1999-2002 (Buku IV Kekuasaan Pemerintahan Negara Jilid 2), (Jakarta: Sekretariat Jenderal dan Kepaniteraan Mahkamah Konstitusi 2010).

Zakarias Poerba, “Sulitnya Mengurangi Paramilitary Policing di Polriâ€, (Jurnal Studi Kepolisian, Edisi 071, Juni-September, 2009).

Downloads

Published

2024-07-17

How to Cite

Wadi, R., Agustin, R., & Triadi, I. (2024). Tinjauan Kritis Polri Sebagai Komponen Pendukung Dalam Pertahanan Negara Berdasarkan Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 27/PUU-XIX/2021. SIYASI: Jurnal Trias Politica, 2(1), 74–91. https://doi.org/10.15575/sjtp.v2i1.37653

Citation Check