Implikasi Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 78/PUU-XXI/2023 Tentang Penghapusan Larangan Penyebaran Berita Hoaks Perspektif Maslahah

Authors

  • Fatiya Adinda Ruth Universitas Islam Negeri Salatiga, Indonesia
  • Farkhani Universitas Islam Negeri Salatiga, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15575/sjtp.v3i1.40146

Keywords:

Implications, constitutional court decision, maslahah

Abstract

Freedom of opinion is a fundamental right that has existed since birth and has been recognized nationally to internationally. There is a recognition of the guarantee of the right to freedom of opinion, it is clear that this right must be respected. Nowadays, the scope of freedom of expression of opinions is very wide. Social media is the main source of human beings to share, receive, and channel opinions without any pressure. However, there are still many civilians whose right to expression is silenced. The focus of this research is the birth of the Constitutional Court Decision Number 78/PUU-XXI/2023 as evidence that the shackles of the right to freedom of opinion are still rampant. Where the content of the decision examines several articles that are often used as a basis of reference to silence the right to freedom of opinion which has been clearly recognized and guaranteed by the constitution. The Constitutional Court's decision needs to be further studied regarding the benefits of the results of the decision for the public interest. This research is normative research using a conceptual approach and a case approach. The primary legal materials to support this research are the Constitutional Court Decisions, the Human Rights Law, and other related regulations, while the secondary legal materials are journals related to the benefits. This research shows that the Constitutional Court Decision Number 78/PUU-XXI/2023 has a good impact, unraveling the shackles on the right to freedom of opinion, upholding the legal umbre protection to freedom of opinion, and the decision is beneficial because it provides benefits for everyone and is in accordance with the conditions of maslahah.

References

Andrian Pratama. Membedah Poin-Poin Revisi UU ITE Masih Ada Pasal Bermasalah. https://tirto.id/membedah-poin-poin-revisi-uu-ite-masih-ada-pasal-bermasalah-gT77. Akses 22 Oktober 2024.

BBC News Indonesia. Haris Azhar dan Fatia jadi tersangka pencemaran nama baik Luhut, 'siap minta maaf asalkan Luhut memaparkan data tandingan hasil riset'. https://www.bbc.com/indonesia/indonesia-60824315. Akese 22 Oktober 2024.

Dian Laksmi Dewi. (2021). Aspek Hukum Kebebasan Berpendapat dan Berekspresi. Jurnal: Yustitia, Vol. 15 (1).

Haris Fadhil, Brigitta Belia. Ini Pertimbangan MK Hapus Pasal Sebar Hoax Bikin Onar. https://news.detik.com/berita/d-7253639/ini-pertimbangan-mk-hapus-pasal-sebar-hoax-bikin-onar. Akses 22 Oktober 2024.

Ikhsan Reliubun. MK Tolak Uji Materiil Pasal 27 dan 45 UU ITE karena sudah ada revisi UU. Akses 22 Oktober 2024.

Imanudin Abdurohman. Rankuman Kasus Haris Fatia Luhut dan Hasil Sidang Terkini. https://tirto.id/rangkuman-kasus-haris-fatia-luhut-dan-hasil-sidang-terkini-gLC4. Akses 22 Oktober 2024.

Internasional Convenant Civil and Politic Rights (ICCPR) tahun 1966.

Jonathan Sarwono. (2010). Pintar Menulis Karangan Ilmiah. Yogyakarta: Andi.

Latipah Nasution. (2020). Hak Kebebasan Berpendapat dan Berekspresi dalam Ruang Publik di Era Digital. Jurnal “Adalah: Buleti Hukum dan Keadilan, Vol. 4 (3).

Miftahul Husna. (2019). Analisis Maslahah Mursalah Terhadap Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 22/PUU-XV/2017 Tentang Batas Minimal Usia Menikah Bagi Perempuan. Skripsi UIN Sunan Ampel.

Miptahul. (2017). Tinjauan Yuridis Hak Kebebasan Berpendapat Bagi Pengguna Media Sosial Menurut Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2008 Tentang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik. Skripsi Universitas Muhammadiyah Sumatera Utara.

M. Najich Syamsuddini. (2022). Konsep Al-Maslahat Al-Mursalah Menurut Imam Al-Ghazalu dan Imam Malik (Studi Ekslusif dan Inklusif). Jurnal: Keislaman, Vol.7 (2).

Mara Ongku Hsb. (2021). HAM dan Kebebasan Berpendapat dalam Undang-Undang Dasar 1945. Jurnal Al-Wasath, Vol. 2 (1).

Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 78/PUU-XXI/2023.

Rahmayani. (2024). Al-Maslahah Al-Mursalah Sebagai Sumber Hukum (Studi Analisis Pendapat al-Syafi’I dalam Kitab al-Risalah. Jurnal: Studi Islam dan Bahasa Arab, Vol.3 (2).

Sigit Sapto Nugroho, dkk. (2020). Metodelogi Riset Hukum. Surakarta: Oase Pustaka.

Singgih Wiryono, Novianti Setuningsih. MK Nyatakan Pasal Pencemaran Nama Baik di KUHP Inkonstitusional Bersyarat. MK Nyatakan Pasal Pencemaran Nama Baik di KUHP Inkonstitusional Bersyarat (kompas.com). Akses 22 Oktober 2024.

Tim Detikcom. Kronologi Laporan Luhut Hingga Haris Azhar Fatia Didatangi Polisi. https://news.detik.com/berita/d-5903419/kronologi-laporan-luhut-hingga-haris-azhar-fatia-didatangi-polisi. Akses 22 Oktober 2024.

Undang-Undang Dasar 1945 Bab XA Hak-Hak Asasi Manusia.

Undang-Undang Nomor 39 Tahun 1999 Tentang Hak Asasi Manusia.

Undang-Undang Nomor 9 Tahun 1998 Tentang Kemerdekaan Menyampaikan Pendapat di Muka Umum.

Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 1946 Tentang Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana.

Undang-Undang Nomor 40 Tahun 1999 Tentang Pers.

Widya Prastika Eka Putri. (2022). Analisis Berpendapat Melalui Media Sosial (Studi dari Undang-Undang Nomor 19 Tahun 2016 Tentang Perubahan Atas Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2008 Tentang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik. Tesis Universitas Wiraraja Madura.

Downloads

Published

2025-10-09

How to Cite

Ruth, F. A., & Farkhani. (2025). Implikasi Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 78/PUU-XXI/2023 Tentang Penghapusan Larangan Penyebaran Berita Hoaks Perspektif Maslahah. SIYASI: Jurnal Trias Politica, 3(1), 37–53. https://doi.org/10.15575/sjtp.v3i1.40146

Citation Check