Menakar Ulang Besaran Persentase Ambang Batas Parlemen yang Konseptual di Indonesia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15575/sjtp.v3i1.41333Keywords:
Ambang Batas, Parlemen, Sistem Kepartaian,Abstract
This research aims to provide legal certainty and a conceptual basis for determining the percentage threshold for parliamentary representation. (parliamentary threshold). The method used in this research is normative juridical (law-normative) relying on literature: books, journals, laws, Constitutional Court decisions, and the internet as the analytical tools in this study. Basically, Indonesia has quite a number of political parties. Viewed from the electoral contests from 1999 to the 2024 elections, according to Satori, Indonesia falls into the category of an extreme multi-party system. With an average of 5 or more relevant political parties in Parliament, this impacts government and political stability. Looking at its history, Indonesia has already responded to this and intends to simplify the party system in parliament. Starting from the implementation of the electoral threshold and parliamentary threshold, this is one of the government's steps towards achieving a simple multiparty system. However, it becomes a problem when the threshold numbers, especially the parliamentary threshold, increase year by year, from 2.5%, 3%, to the current 4%. However, the attainment of these percentage figures lacks a conceptual basis, as they are merely the result of agreements between political parties. Therefore, this research discusses the formulation to obtain the ideal percentage figure using Taagepera's theory, and the ideal figure in Indonesia according to Taagepera's theory is 1%.
References
ANTARA Kantor Berita Indonesia. “9 Parpol Lolos Parliamentary Threshold Pemilu 2009,†2009. https://www.antaranews.com/berita/140509/9-parpol-lolos-parliamentary-threshold-pemilu-2009.
Budiono, Eko. “KPU Tetapkan Parpol Yang Lolos Ke DPR.†INFO PUBLIK, 2019.https://infopublik.id/kategori/nasional-politik-hukum/370155/kpu-tetapkan-parpol-yang-lolos-ke-dpr.
Firdaus, Sunny Ummul. “Relevansi Parliamentary Threshold Terhadap Pelaksanaan Pemilu Yang Demokratis.†Jurnal Konstitusi 8, no. 2 (2016): 91. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk825.
Georgius Benny Kristiadi, and Anindya Putri Maharani. “Implikasi Sistem Multipartai Terhadap Oposisi Di Indonesia : Analisis Hasil Pemilu 2024 Dengan Indeks ENPP.†NeoRespublica : Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan 5, no. 2 (2024): 1014–30.
Ibnu, Malik. “Hasil Pemilu 2024: 8 Parpol Lolos Parlemen, PSI Dan PPP Tidak Lolos.†NUONLINE, 2024. https://nu.or.id/nasional/hasil-pemilu-2024-8-parpol-lolos-parlemen-psi-dan-ppp-tidak-lolos-SU5sa.
Janu, Ismadi. Demokrasi Tiang Negara. Banten: Delta Edukasi Prima, 2019.
Nauli, Debby, Rafeyfa Simanjuntak, Khoirunnisa Putri Diksy, Balqis Tsabitah Azzahrah, Nayara Dihati, Irwan Triadi, and Fakultas Hukum. “Pemberlakuan Parliamentary Threshold Dalam Sistem Pemilihan Umum Legislatif Di Indonesia.†Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 1, no. 3 (2024): 113–21. https://doi.org/10.62017/syariah.
Noer, Denny, and Catur Wido. “KONSTRUKSI IDEAL SISTEM PARLEMENTARY THRESHOLD DALAM PERSPEKTIF DEMOKRASI,†2012, 1–11.
Nurdin, Nurdin, and Syauyiid Alamsyah. “Penerapan Sistem Kepartaian Di Indonesia Dan Jerman Dalam Persepektif Perbandingan Politik.†MARAS: Jurnal Penelitian Multidisiplin 1, no. 2 (2023): 180–88. https://doi.org/10.60126/maras.v1i2.38.
Nurjaman, Asep. Sistem Kepartaian Indonesia. Malang: Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang, 2018.
Purnama, Yusuf Agung. “Ambang Batas Parlemen (Parliamentary Threshold) Dalam Pemilu Legislatif Tahun 2019 Ditinjau Dari Teori Kedaulatan Rakyat [Skripsi].†Universitas Islam Negri Syarif Hidayatullah, 2021.
Rakhmatulloh. “Hasil Resmi Pileg 2014, 10 Parpol Lolos Ambang Batas.†SINDONEWS, 2014.
Ramadhan, Muhammad Febry. “Politik Hukum Penyederhanaan Sistem Kepartaian Di Indonesia.†Jurnal Lex Renaissance 3, no. 1 (2018): 148–70. https://doi.org/10.20885/jlr.vol3.iss1.art6.
Soekanto, Soerjono. Pengantar Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: UI Press, 2014.
Suparyanto, Yudi. Sistem Kepartaian Di Indonesia. Cempaka Putih, 2019.
Supriyanto, Dikdik, and August Mellaz. Ambang Batas Perwakilan “Pengaruh Parliamentary Threshold Terhadap Penyederhanaan Sistem Kepartaian Dan Proposionalitas Hasil Pemilu.†PERLUDEM, n.d.
Sutisna, Agus. “Politik Penyederhanaan Sistem Kepartaian Di Indonesia Pasca Reformasi 1998.†Sosio-Didaktika: Social Science Education Journal 2, no. 2 (2015): 167–75. https://doi.org/10.15408/sd.v2i2.2816.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Citation Check
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Wijdan Daurut Tazakka

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.





