Harmonisasi Fungsi Non-Judicial Review Ombudsman dengan Kewenangan Judicial Review Mahkamah Agung dalam Pengujian Kebijakan Publik
Harmonizing the Ombudsman's Non-Judicial Review Function with the Supreme Court's Judicial Review Authority in Public Policy Review
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15575/sjtp.v3i2.56556Keywords:
Harmonization, Non-Judicial Review, Judicial Review, Ombudsman, Public PolicyAbstract
This study analyzes the urgency of harmonizing the non-judicial review function of the Ombudsman of the Republic of Indonesia with the judicial review authority of the Supreme Court in assessing public policies. Amidst increasingly complex policy dynamics and the diversification of modern economic instruments, effective oversight mechanisms are crucial to maintaining the integrity of good governance. The core issue addressed is the overlap in perception and lack of systemic coordination, which leads to legal uncertainty for the public. Using a juridical-normative legal research method with a conceptual approach, this study evaluates the scope of authority, legal basis, and practical implications of both institutions. The results indicate that harmonization is the key to creating a comprehensive oversight system, wherein the Ombudsman addresses maladministration and sociological aspects, while the Supreme Court focuses on testing legislative norms. This synergy not only prevents oversight redundancy but also enhances legal process efficiency and national budget effectiveness. This study offers policy propositions regarding data integration and inter-institutional coordination as a solution model to ensure that every state action remains grounded in the principles of justice, transparency, and social benefit. Thus, this harmonization serves as an absolute prerequisite for building a responsive and just rule of law for all citizens in the contemporary era.
References
“An Appraisal of Sociology’s Contribution to Public Policy Analysis - International Affairs Forum.” Accessed June 8, 2026. https://www.ia-forum.org/Content/ViewInternal_Document.cfm?contenttype_id=0&ContentID=9543.
Arif, Muhammad Andy. “Efektivitas Pelayanan Publik dalam Penerapan Sistem Penerbitan Surat Perjalanan publik Indonesia (SPRI) di kantor Imigrasi Kelas I Polonia Medan.” JURNAL PUBLIK REFORM 4, no. 0 (2018). https://doi.org/10.46576/jpr.v4i0.405.
Arrazak, Muhammad Afdhal, Aldri Frinaldi, and Roberia. “Hukum Administrasi Negara Sebagai Instrumen Pengawasan Dan Peningkatan Kinerja Pemerintah.” Gudang Jurnal Multidisiplin Ilmu 2, no. 12 (2024): 927–30. https://doi.org/10.59435/gjmi.v2i12.1158.
Basyar, Sayyidatun Nashuha. “Reposisi Kewenangan Judicial Review: Integrasi Pengujian Peraturan Ke Dalam Mahkamah Konstitusi Sebagai Upaya Harmonisasi Hukum Nasional.” Staatsrecht: Jurnal Hukum Kenegaraan Dan Politik Islam 5, no. 2 (2025): 395–428. https://doi.org/10.14421/staatsrecht.v5i2.4578.
Cahyono, Yoyok. “Koordinasi Antar Lembaga Dalam Implementasi Kebijakan Publik: Studi Kualitatif Tata Kelola Kolaboratif.” Journal of Law, Policy, and Governance 1, no. 1 (2026): 14–19.
chsm. Reportase Webinar Diskusi Hukum Kesehatan Bahas Putusan MK Dan Masa Depan Penanganan Sengketa Medis – CHPM FK-KMK UGM. n.d. Accessed June 8, 2026. https://chpm.fk.ugm.ac.id/reportase-webinar-diskusi-hukum-kesehatan-bahas-putusan-mk-dan-masa-depan-penanganan-sengketa-medis/.
Ercolaw.com. “Mengenal Proses Judicial Review di Indonesia.” Ercolaw, December 30, 2024. https://ercolaw.com/proses-judicial-review-di-indonesia/.
Firm, SIP Law. “SIP Law Firm - Premium and Professional Legal Solutions in Indonesia.” SIP Law Firm. Accessed June 8, 2026. https://siplawfirm.id.
Ishak, Nurfaika. “Efektivitas Pengawasan Pelayanan Publik Oleh Ombudsman Republik Indonesia.” Mulawarman Law Review 7, no. 1 (2022): 71–88. https://doi.org/10.30872/mulrev.v7i1.834.
“Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia.” Accessed June 8, 2026. https://mahkamahagung.go.id/id/artikel/4965/pembaruan-peradilan-sebagai-ikhtiar-mewujudkan-court-excellence.
Mawardi, Yudhi Hertanto, Iqlima Zahari, Fatma Faisal, and Johannes Triestanto. “Kebijakan Publik Pemerintah Dalam Perspektif Maslahah Dan Prinsip Negara Hukum:” Jurnal Kolaboratif Sains 9, no. 1 (2026): 1451–61. https://doi.org/10.56338/jks.v9i1.10233.
Negara, Kementerian Sekretariat. “Komitmen Reformasi Dan Stabilitas Ekonomi, Presiden Prabowo Perkuat Daya Tarik Investasi Bagi Investor | Sekretariat Negara.” Accessed June 8, 2026. https://www.setneg.go.id/baca/index/komitmen_reformasi_dan_stabilitas_ekonomi_presiden_prabowo_perkuat_daya_tarik_investasi_bagi_investor.
Negara, Kementerian Sekretariat. “Ombudsman Republik Indonesia | Sekretariat Negara.” Accessed June 8, 2026. https://www.setneg.go.id/view/index/ombudsman_republik_indonesia_1.
Pamungkas, Pandu, and Annisa Larasati Chairani. “Praktik Maladministrasi di Pemerintah Daerah: Respon Ombudsman dalam Kasus Pelayanan Publik: Respon Ombudsman dalam Kasus Pelayanan Publik.” Jurnal Penelitian Ilmiah INTAJ 10, no. 1 (2026): 1–20. https://doi.org/10.35897/intaj.v10i1.2458.
Paskarina, Ramona. Memahami Legitimasi dalam Pemerintahan: Tinjauan Komprehensif. n.d. Accessed June 8, 2026. https://www.hilarispublisher.com/open-access/understanding-legitimacy-in-governance-a-comprehensive-overview-101132.html.
“(PDF) Kewenangan Ombudsman RI Pada Aspek Pelayanan Publik.” ResearchGate, ahead of print, January 11, 2026. https://doi.org/10.56370/jhlg.v6i8.2200.
“(PDF) Pelayanan Publik Dalam Perspektif Administrasi: Prinsip Kategori Barang, Dan Jenis Layanan.” ResearchGate, n.d. https://doi.org/10.58192/profit.v4i2.3321.
“(PDF) Penyelesaian Sengketa Keolahragaan Dan Kepastian Hukum Dalam Sistem Hukum Indonesia.” ResearchGate, ahead of print, June 4, 2026. https://doi.org/10.26623/julr.v9i1.13209.
“Pengawasan Terhadap Lembaga Negara Independen: Antara Independensi Dan Akuntabilitas.” ResearchGate, ahead of print, June 4, 2026. https://doi.org/10.57096/lentera.v3i4.180.
“Penyidikan Tindak Pidana Memproduksi Dan Memperdagangkan Tangki Air Silinder Vertikal Yang Tidak Memenuhi Standar Nasional Indonesia.” ResearchGate, ahead of print, June 1, 2026. https://doi.org/10.31933/zs1ve572.
Problematika Pengujian Peraturan Perundang-Undangan Oleh Mahkamah Agung (MA) Pasca Putusan MK Tentang Pemerintah Daerah. n.d. Accessed June 8, 2026. https://business-law.binus.ac.id/2017/11/30/problematika-pengujian-peraturan-perundang-undangan-oleh-mahkamah-agung-ma-paska-putusan-mk-tentang-pemerintah-daerah/.
Razak, Andi Rosdianti, Muhammad Yahya, and Sudarmi Sudarmi. “Analisis Dampak Kebijakan Publik Terhadap Pemberdayaan Ekonomi.” Jurnal Review Pendidikan Dan Pengajaran 7, no. 3 (2024): 8715–21. https://doi.org/10.31004/jrpp.v7i3.30461.
Solihin, Danu Firman, Rusnan, Sarkawi, and Agung Setiawan. “Pelaksanaan Rekomendasi Yang Dikeluarkan Oleh Ombudsman Republik Indonesia Dalam Penyelenggaraan Pelayanan Publik.” Jurnal Diskresi 4, no. 1 (2025): 196–205. https://doi.org/10.29303/diskresi.v4i1.7459.
Wiraguna, Sidi Ahyar. “Metode Normatif Dan Empiris Dalam Penelitian Hukum: Studi Eksploratif Di Indonesia.” Public Sphere: Jurnal Sosial Politik, Pemerintahan Dan Hukum 3, no. 3 (2024). https://doi.org/10.59818/jps.v3i3.1390.
Yanti, Dinda, Anggi Agustina, Saniyyah Defna, Nurcahyati, and Nurmala Sari. “Pengawasan Ombudsman Terhadap Maladministrasi Pelayanan Publik.” Indonesian Journal of Law and Justice 3, no. 3 (2026): 19–19. https://doi.org/10.47134/ijlj.v3i3.5398.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Citation Check
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Rena Zulfaidah, Tatang Astarudin

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.





