Level of Islamic High Schools Students' Chemistry Literacy
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15575/jtk.v10i2.44204Keywords:
chemical literacy, literacy, student conceptionAbstract
Chemical literacy is a core construct in chemistry education, reflecting students’ ability to understand chemical concepts, coordinate macroscopic, sub-microscopic, and symbolic representations, and apply chemistry knowledge meaningfully. In Indonesia, persistent regional disparities in educational quality remain a challenge, particularly in provinces with lower human development indicators. West Nusa Tenggara has recently been identified as a region with relatively high general illiteracy rates, raising concerns about students’ chemical literacy at the upper secondary level. This study aimed to investigate the chemical literacy levels of Grade XI students enrolled in State Islamic Senior High Schools across West Nusa Tenggara. A quantitative research design was employed involving 654 students selected through multi-stage cluster sampling based on regional Human Development Index classifications. Data were collected using the Chemical Literacy Instrument (CLI), a validated three-tier diagnostic assessment designed to capture students’ conceptual understanding and reasoning across macroscopic, sub-microscopic, and symbolic levels. The instrument consisted of ten items covering core chemistry topics commonly taught in senior secondary education. Descriptive statistical analyses were conducted to categorize students’ chemical literacy into nominal, functional, conceptual, and scientific illiteracy levels. The results reveal critically low levels of chemical literacy. Only 12.62% of students demonstrated nominal literacy, 9.16% reached the functional level, and merely 1.12% achieved conceptual literacy, while 77.10% of students were classified as scientifically illiterate. This study provides novel large-scale empirical evidence on chemical literacy in Islamic secondary education contexts within developing regions, highlighting persistent representational and conceptual gaps that remain underexplored in existing chemistry education research. The findings underscore the need for instructional approaches that explicitly support representational competence, diagnostic assessment, and conceptual integration to strengthen chemical literacy development in secondary chemistry education.
References
Abdinejad, M., Talaie, B., Qorbani, H. S., & Dalili, S. (2021). Student Perceptions using Augmented Reality and 3D Visualization Technologies in Chemistry Education. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 30(1), 87–96. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-020-09880-2
Ayuningtyas, R. F., & Hayati, R. (2022). Tingkat Literasi Sains Remaja Mengenai Sampah dan Prinsip 4R (Reduce, Reuse Recycle, Replace) dalam Kegiatan Sehari-hari. Edu Geography, 10(2), 35–44. https://doi.org/10.15294/edugeo.v10i2.60103
Badan Pusat Statistik Indonesia. (2024). Angka Buta Aksara Menurut Provinsi dan Kelompok Umur. 2 December 2024. Retrieved from https://www.bps.go.id/id/statistics-table/2/MTAyIzI=/angka-buta-aksara-menurut-provinsi-dan-kelompok-umur--persen-.html
Badan Pusat Statistik Provinsi Nusa Tenggara Barat. (2021). Statistik Pendidikan Provinsi Nusa Tenggara Barat 2021. Retrieved from https://ntb.bps.go.id/id/publication/2022/05/31/5504846e9111187b6261b11b/statistik-pendidikan-provinsi-nusa-tenggara-barat-2021.html
Badeo, J. M., & Duque, D. A. (2022). The Effect of Socio-Scientific Issues (Ssi) in Teaching Science: A Meta-Analysis Study. Journal of Technology and Science Education, 4(4), 215–227. https://doi.org/10.3926/jotse.1340
Ban, S., & Mahmud, S. N. D. (2023). Research and Trends in Socio-Scientific Issues Education: A Content Analysis of Journal Publications from 2004 to 2022. Sustainability (Switzerland), 15(15). https://doi.org/10.3390/su151511841
Boothe, J. R., Zotos, E. K., & Shultz, G. V. (2023). Analysis of Post-Secondary Instructors’ Pedagogical Content Knowledge of Organic Acid–Base Chemistry using Content Representations. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 24(2), 577–598. https://doi.org/10.1039/D2RP00253
Carle, M. S. O. (2022). Investigating the Effects of Teaching and Learning Tools in Chemistry Education [University of Ottawa]. Retrieved from https://ruor.uottawa.ca/handle/10393/44204%0Ahttps://ruor.uottawa.ca/bitstream/10393/44204/3/St-Onge_Carle_Myriam_2022_Thesis.pdf
Chen, L., & Xiao, S. (2021). Perceptions, Challenges and Coping Strategies of Science Teachers in Teaching Socioscientific Issues: A Systematic Review. Educational Research Review, 32, 100377. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2020.100377
Coldwell, M., & Moore, N. (2024). Learning from Failure: A Context-informed Perspective on RCTs. British Educational Research Journal, 50(3), 1043–1063. https://doi.org/10.1002/berj.3960
Creswell J. W., & D., C. J. (2023). Research Design: Qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods approaches (Sixth Edit). SAGE Pub.
Derman, A., Gunes, F., Gulacar, O., & Eilks, I. (2024). Using a Combination Technique for the Assessment of Students’ Cognitive Structures on Acid–Base Chemistry. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 25(2), 458–473. https://doi.org/10.1039/D3RP00142C
Ekiz-Kiran, B., Boz, Y., & Oztay, E. S. (2021). Development of Pre-Service Teachers’ Pedagogical Content Knowledge through a PCK-Based School Experience Course. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 22(2), 415–430. https://doi.org/10.1039/d0rp00225a
Fanguy, M., & Kharbash, R. (2023). Using a Metaverse to Teach Students to Predict the Interaction of Acids and Bases using Hard and Soft Acids and Bases (HSAB) Theory. Journal of Chemical Education, 100(9), 3709–3716. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.3c00293
Gargrish, S., Kaur, D. P., Mantri, A., Singh, G., & Sharma, B. (2021). Measuring Effectiveness of Augmented Reality-based Geometry Learning Assistant on Memory Retention Abilities of the Students in 3D Geometry. Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 29(6), 1811–1824. https://doi.org/10.1002/cae.22424
Georgiou, Y., & Kyza, E. A. (2023). Fostering Chemistry Students’ Scientific Literacy for Responsible Citizenship through Socio-Scientific Inquiry-Based Learning (SSIBL). Sustainability, 15(8), 6442. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15086442
Haetami, A., Arwien, R. T., Marhadi, M. A., Rudi, L., & Arsyad, M. (2023). Increasing Literacy Ability in Chemistry on a Socio-Scientific Basis. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 9(6), 154–161. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9i6.3908
Herman, B. C., Newton, M. H., & Zeidler, D. L. (2021). Impact of Place-Based Socioscientific Issues Instruction on Students’ Contextualization of Socioscientific Orientations. Science Education, 105(4), 585–627. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21618
Hernandez-Ramos, J., Pernaa, J., Caceres-Jensen, L., & Rodriguez-Becerra, J. (2021). The Effects of using Socio-Scientific Issues and Technology in Problem-Based Learning: A Systematic Review. Education Sciences, 11(10). https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11100640
Holt-Lunstad, J. (2024). Social Connection as a Critical Factor for Mental and Physical Health: Evidence, Trends, Challenges, and Future Implications. World Psychiatry, 23(3), 312–332. https://doi.org/10.1002/wps.21224
Hunter, K. H., Rodriguez, J. M. G., & Becker, N. M. (2022). A Review of Research on the Teaching and Learning of Chemical Bonding. Journal of Chemical Education, 99(7), 2451–2464. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.2c00034
IMD. (2022). IMD World Competitiveness Booklet. In International Institute for Management Development (Issue 1). Retrieved from https://www.investchile.gob.cl/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/imd-world-competitiveness-booklet-2022-1.pdf
Jannah, A. F. M., & Prodjosantoso, A. K. (2024). Literacy Analysis of Chemistry Teachers on STEAM (Science, Technology, Engineering, Arts and Mathematics) Learning Approach in Senior High Schools in West Nusa Tenggara Province. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 10(9), 6726–6736. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v10i9.8730
Ke, L., Sadler, T. D., Zangori, L., & Friedrichsen, P. J. (2021). Developing and using Multiple Models to Promote Scientific Literacy in the Context of Socio-Scientific Issues. Science and Education, 30(3), 589–607. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-021-00206-1
Khairani, R. N., & Prodjosantoso, A. K. (2023). Application of Discovery Learning Model Based on Blended Learning to Activities and Learning Outcomes. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 9(10), 8974–8981. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9i10.4402
Kouril, D., Strnad, O., Mindek, P., Halladjian, S., Isenberg, T., Groller, M. E., & Viola, I. (2023). Molecumentary: Adaptable Narrated Documentaries using Molecular Visualization. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 29(3), 1733–1747. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2021.3130670
Lieber, L., & Graulich, N. (2022). Investigating Students’ Argumentation when Judging the Plausibility of Alternative Reaction Pathways in Organic Chemistry. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 23(1), 38–54. https://doi.org/10.1039/D1RP00145K
Marfuatun, M., Nahadi, N., Yuliani, G., & Hernani, H. (2024). The Framework and Types of Chemical Literacy Tests: A Systematic Review. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 10(6), 269–276. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v10i6.7641
Marginson, S. (2022). What Drives Global Science? The Four Competing Narratives. Studies in Higher Education, 47(8), 1566–1584. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2021.1942822
Masuwai, A., Zulkifli, H., & Hamzah, M. I. (2024). Evaluation of Content Validity and Face Validity of Secondary School Islamic Education Teacher Self-Assessment Instrument. Cogent Education, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2024.2308410
McLure, F., Won, M., & Treagust, D. F. (2022). Analysis of Students’ Diagrams Explaining Scientific Phenomena. Research in Science Education, 52(4), 1225–1241. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-021-10004-y
Mubarak, S., & Yahdi, Y. (2020). Identifying Undergraduate Students’ Misconceptions in Understanding Acid Base Materials. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 9(2), 276–286. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v9i2.23193
Muntholib, Ibnu, S., Rahayu, S., Fajaroh, F., Kusairi, S., & Kuswandi, B. (2020). Chemical Literacy : Performance of First Year Chemistry Students on Chemical Kinetics. Indonesian Journal of Chemistry, 20(2), 468–482. https://doi.org/10.22146/ijc.43651
Muryani, D. I., Jana, P., & Umasugi, S. M. (2022). The Students’ Misconceptions in using Three-tier Multiple Choice Diagnostic Test on the Angle Relationships. Formatif: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan MIPA, 12(1), 25–34. https://doi.org/10.30998/formatif.v12i1.9641
Nurlaili, N., Ilhamdi, M. L., & Astria, F. P. (2023). Analisis Kemampuan Literasi Sains Siswa Kelas V SDN 1 Sukarara pada Pembelajaran IPA Materi Perpindahan Kalor. Jurnal Ilmiah Profesi Pendidikan, 8(3), 1690–1698. https://doi.org/10.29303/jipp.v8i3.1554
OECD. (2023). Pisa 2022 Result (Volume I). In OECD Publishing (Vol. 46, Issue 1). https://doi.org/10.22201/iisue.24486167e.2024.183.61714
Pacala, F. A. A. (2024). Developing and Validating an Integrated Three-Tier Multiple Choice Test for Smartphone-based Experiments in Physics. CEUR Workshop Proceedings, 3771, 9–21. Retrieved from https://ceur-ws.org/Vol-3771/paper01.pdf
Pardiana, P. (2024). Research Trends in Chemical Literacy: A Systematic Literature Review from 2013 to 2022. Journal of Research in Mathematics, Science, and Technology Education, 1(1), 12–18. https://doi.org/10.70232/s7wdn131
Popova, M., & Jones, T. (2021). Chemistry Instructors’ Intentions toward Developing, Teaching, and Assessing Student Representational Competence Skills. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 22(3), 733–748. https://doi.org/10.1039/d0rp00329h
Primadianningsih, C., Sumarni, W., & Sudarmin, S. (2023). Systematic Literature Review: Analysis of Ethno-STEM and Student’s Chemistry Literacy Profile in 21st Century. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 9(2), 650–659. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9i2.2559
Riska, S. A., & Guspatni, G. (2022). The Effectiveness of Powerpoint-Ispring Integrated Multiple Chemical Representation Learning Media on Acid-Base Materials to Improve Students Learning Outcomes for Senior High School. Jurnal Pijar Mipa, 17(5), 577–580. https://doi.org/10.29303/jpm.v17i5.3792
Rosyidah, K., Lutfi, A., Sanjaya, I. G. M., & Astutik, J. (2024). Identification of Students’ Misconceptions and Understanding on Thermochemistry Material with Four-Tier Multiple-Choice Tests. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains Indonesia, 12(1), 155–171. https://doi.org/10.24815/jpsi.v12i1.34899
Salame, I. I., & Makki, J. (2021). Examining the Use of PhET Simulations on Students’ Attitudes and Learning in General Chemistry II. Interdisciplinary Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 17(4), e2247. https://doi.org/10.21601/ijese/10966
Sari, D. N., Arif, K., Yurnetti, Y., & Putri, A. N. (2024). Identification of Students’ Misconceptions in Junior High Schools Accredited a using the Three Tier Test Instrument in Science Learning. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 10(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v10i1.5064
Setiawan, E. P., & Sukoco, H. (2021). Exploring First Year University Students’ Statistical Literacy: A Case on Describing and Visualizing Data. Journal on Mathematics Education, 12(3), 427–448. https://doi.org/10.22342/JME.12.3.13202.427-448
Sidek, S. F., Yatim, M. H. M., & Said, C. S. (2022). The Design and Validation of A Tool to Measure Content Validity of a Computational Thinking Game-Based Learning Module for Tertiary Educational Students. International Multidisciplinary Research Journal, 4(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.54476/iimrj01
Sihaloho, M., Hadis, S. S., Kilo, A. K., & La Kilo, A. (2021). Diagnosa Miskonsepsi Siswa SMA Negeri 1 Telaga Gorontalo pada Materi Termokimia. Jambura Journal of Educational Chemistry, 3(1), 7–13. https://doi.org/10.34312/jjec.v3i1.7133
Siregar, F. R., & Mawardi, M. (2022). Development of the Learning System of Flipped-Guided Inquiry-Based Learning (FGIL) using Moodle on Chemical Equilibrium material. Indonesian Journal of Educational Studies, 25(1), 31–49. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.26858/ijes.v25i1.33568
Sutarja, M. C., & Wulandari, A. Y. R. (2021). Identifying Students’ Difficulty in the Basic of Thermodynamics. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 2126(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/2126/1/012010
Syamsidar, & Suyanta. (2024). Students’ Chemical Literacy Ability of Senior High School in Gowa Regency. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 10(7), 4118–4128. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v10i7.7721
Valladares, L. (2021). Scientific Literacy and Social Transformation: Critical Perspectives about Science Participation and Emancipation. In Science and Education (Vol. 30, Issue 3). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-021-00205-2
Wiyarsi, A., Prodjosantoso, A. K., & Nugraheni, A. R. E. (2021). Promoting Students’ Scientific Habits of Mind and Chemical Literacy using the Context of Socio-Scientific Issues on the Inquiry Learning. Frontiers in Education, 6(May), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2021.660495
Yamtinah, S., Saputro, S., Mulyani, S., & Shidiq, A. S. (2021). Computerized Testlet Instrument for Assessing Students Chemical Literacy in High School. Journal of Hunan University (Natural Sciences), 48(2), 156. Retrieved from https://jonuns.com/index.php/journal/article/view/510
Yeo, J.-H., Yang, H.-H., & Cho, I.-H. (2022). Using a Three-Tier Multiple-Choice Diagnostic Instrument toward Alternative Conceptions among Lower-Secondary School Students in Taiwan: Taking Ecosystems Unit as an Example. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 21(1), 69–83. https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/22.21.69
Yuliana, I. F., Priyasmika, R., & Fatayah, F. (2021). Literacy Level of Students in Chemistry Education Department on Thermochemistry. Proceeding of International Conference on Islamic Education, 87–95. https://doi.org/10.51425/icie.vi.27
Zandroto, A. V., & Sinaga, K. (2022). Analisis Kemampuan Literasi Kimia Siswa pada Materi Senyawa Hidrokarbon melalui Pendekatan Kontekstual. Jurnal Pendidikan MIPA, 12(2), 349–358. https://doi.org/10.37630/jpm.v12i2.596
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Citation Check
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Syarifatul Mubarak
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
