The Role of Political Party Elites in Reconciling Identity Political Conflicts After the 2019 Presidential Election: A Consensus Perspective


Bahrul Ulum(1*)

(1) University of Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


The research aims to analyze the role of political party elites in reconciling identity political conflicts after the 2019 presidential election carried out by political party elites from the perspective of Ralf Dahrendorf's social conflict theory. The research approach used is qualitative with descriptive methods. The data was collected using documentation, namely journal articles and news articles about reconciliation after the 2019 presidential election—news articles taken from kompas and detik.com. The analysis used is content analysis. The findings from this research are that the consensus agreed upon by the political party elites that intersect has a significant influence on society, which previously experienced polarization due to the strengthening use of identity politics in the 2019 presidential election. This research is useful in the realm of political sociology and also social development. Based on the research findings, this research is novel in the perspective that conflicts that occur between groups can be negotiated and made mutual agreements for the progress of a larger organization.


Keywords


identity politics; political Sociology; Presidential Election; reconciliation; social conflict.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Al-Farisi, L. S. (2020). Politik identitas: ancaman terhadap persatuan dan kesatuan bangsa dalam negara pancasila. Aspirasi, 10(2), 77–90.

Annur, C. M. (2023). Inilah Media yang Paling Dipercaya Warga Indonesia pada 2023, Ada Favoritmu? Katadata.Co.Id.

Ardipandanto, A. (2020). Dampak Politik Identitas Pada Pilpres 2019: Perspektif Populisme [The Impact of Identity Politics On President Election 2019: Populism Perspective]. Jurnal Politica Dinamika Masalah Politik Dalam Negeri Dan Hubungan Internasional, 11(1), 43–63.

Bar-Tal, D. (2009). Reconciliation as a foundation of culture of peace. In Handbook on building cultures of peace (pp. 363–377). Springer.

Budiardjo, M. (2008). Dasar-Dasar Ilmu Politik. Ikrar Mandiriabadi.

Cross, W. P., & Katz, R. S. (2013). The challenges of intra-party democracy. OUP Oxford.

Dahrendorf, R. (1986). Konflik dan konflik dalam masyarakat industri: sebuah analisa-kritik. Rajawali.

Damarjati, D. (2019). BPN Setuju Rekonsiliasi: Prabowo-Jokowi Sahabat, Gandengan Usai Lebaran. Detik.Com.

Ekawati, E., Sweinstani, D., & Mouliza, K. (2020). Dampak Personalisasi Partai Terhadap Demokrasi Internal Partai di Indonesia Pasca Orde Baru. Jurnal Wacana Politik, 5(2).

Erwanti, M. O. (2019). BPN Prabowo Anggap Rekonsiliasi dengan Kubu Jokowi Tak Perlu, Ini Alasannya. Detik.Com2.

Fatimah, S. (2018). Kampanye sebagai Komunikasi Politik. Resolusi: Jurnal Sosial Politik.

Hayner, P. B. (2005). Kebenaran Tak Terbahasakan Refleksi Pengalaman Komisi-Komisi Kebenaran. “Kenyataan dan Harapan.” ELSAM.

Haynes, J. (2020). Introductory thoughts about peace, politics and religion. Religions, 11(5). https://doi.org/10.3390/rel11050242

Indrawan, J., Ilmar, A., & Kusuma, A. J. (2022). Rekonsiliasi Politik Pasca Pilpres 2019: Menumbuhkan Semangat Kebangsaan dalam Konstruksi Sosial Budaya. Journal of Political Issues, 4(1), 50–61.

Kharina, J., & Krisiandi. (2019). TKN Sebut Ajakan Rekonsiliasi dari Jokowi adalah Upaya “Menjaga” Prabowo. Kompas.Com.

Muhtadi, B. (2019). Populisme, politik identitas, dan dinamika elektoral: mengurai jalan panjang demokrasi prosedural. Intrans Publishing, .

Philipus, & Aini, N. (2006). Sosiologi dan Politik. Raja Grafindo Persada.

Rahman, M. T. (2018). Pengantar filsafat sosial. LEKKAS.

Rahman, M. T. (2020). Agama dan Politik Identitas dalam Kerangka Sosial. Prodi S2 Studi Agama-Agama UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung.

Ritzer, G. (2012). Teori Sosiologi Klasik Sampai Perkembangan Terakhir Postodern. Pustaka.

Ritzer, G., & Goodman., D. J. (2008). Teori Sosiologi Modern Edisi Keenam. Kencana Prenada Media.

Sukidin, & Suharso, P. (2015). Pemikiran Sosiologi Kontemporer. Jember University Press.

Syam, F., Mangunjaya, F. M., Rahmanillah, A. R., & Nurhadi, R. (2020). Narrative and the Politics of Identity: Patterns of the Spread and Acceptance of Radicalism and Terrorism in Indonesia. Religions, 11(6), 290.

Syaodih Sukmadinata, N. (2007). Metode penelitian pendidikan. Bandung: Remaja Rosda Karya.

TimDetik.com. (2019). Siapa yang Tak Mau Jokowi-Prabowo Rekonsiliasi? Detik.Com.

Vrsanka, I., Kovicky, V., & Jangl, S. (2017). Xenophobia–The cause of terrorism in a democratic society. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 7(4), 168–171.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.15575/jt.v7i1.31695

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

View My Stats

________________________________________________________________________

E - ISSN : 2615-5028


TEMALI is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.>

 

Published by : Prodi Sosiologi Fakultas Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung

Sponsored by : Ikatan Sosiologi Indonesia (ISI)

 

Flag Counter