Critical Analysis of Pure Legal Theory in Contemporary Legal Development

Authors

  • Iskandar Iskandar Universitas Muhammadiyah Kuningan, Indonesia https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5839-4821
  • Diah Nurafifah Universitas Muhammadiyah Kuningan, Indonesia
  • Intan Permani UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15575/vh.v7i1.40543

Abstract

Abstract: This study aims to examine and analyze the Pure Theory of Law developed by Hans Kelsen, focusing on both its strengths and weaknesses. Additionally, it assesses the extent to which this theory remains relevant and applicable in the context of contemporary law. The research employs a normative method with a conceptual approach to gain an in-depth understanding of the fundamental concepts within the Pure Theory of Law. This study is based on secondary data sourced from primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials obtained through literature reviews and documentation. Data analysis is conducted using descriptive qualitative analysis. The findings indicate that Kelsen's theory provides a crucial foundation for the legal discipline, emphasizing that law should be understood as an autonomous normative system, independent of moral, social, and political values. However, in the face of ongoing social dynamics, such as globalization, digital technological advancements, and environmental crises, the Pure Theory of Law faces significant challenges due to its rigid and limited capacity to address the complexity of cross-border issues. While this theory remains vital as a basis for ensuring legal objectivity, its inability to accommodate social dynamics suggests that law requires a more flexible and adaptive approach.

References

Assadyra, Yanuar Harry, Glandis Aullia Putri Tarto, and Muthia Shafa Helvira. “Analisis Kritis Terhadap Teori Hukum Naturalis Dalam Ilmu Hukum Kontemporer.” Das Sollen: Jurnal Kajian Kontemporer Hukum Dan Masyarakat 2, no. 1 (2024): 1–18. https://journal.forikami.com/index.php/dassollen/article/view/555.

Astomo, Putera. “Perbandingan Pemikiran Hans Kelsen Tentang Hukum Dengan Gagasan Satjipto Rahardjo Tentanf Hukum Progresif Berbasis Teori Hukum.” Yustisia 90 (2014): 5–14. https://jurnal.uns.ac.id/yustisia/article/download/28720/20092.

Atmadja, I Dewa Gede, I Nyoman Putu Budiarta. “Teori-Teori Hukum.” Setara Press, 2018, 233.

Bo’a, Fais Yonas. “Pancasila Sebagai Sumber Hukum Dalam Sistem Hukum Nasional.” Jurnal Kontitusi 15, no. 1 (2018): 28–49. https://doi.org/10.57235/jerumi.v2i1.2007.

Busroh, Firman Freaddy, and Fatria Khairo. Teori Hukum Kontemporer. badung, bali: infes media, 2024.

Fitriani, Nike, and Universitas Pasundan. “Pengaruh The Pure Theory Of Law Dalam Perkembangan Hukum Positivisme Di Indonesia.” Das Sollen: Jurnal Kajian Kontemporer Hukum Dan Masyarakat 2, no. 1 (2023): 1–15. https://journal.forikami.com/index.php/dassollen/article/view/565.

Hermanto, Asep Bambamg. “Ajaran Positivisme Hukum Di Indonesia: Kritik Dan Alternatif Solusinya.” Selisik 2, no. 4 (2016): 108–21. https://doi.org/10.35814/selisik.v2i2.650.

Islamiyati, Islamiyati. “Kritik Filsafat Hukum Positivisme Sebagai Upaya Mewujudkan Hukum Yang Berkeadilan.” Law, Development and Justice Review 1, no. 1 (November 9, 2018): 82–96. https://doi.org/10.14710/ldjr.v1i1.3574.

Kasim, Helmi. “Mendialogkan Hakikat Hukum Dan Keadilan Pada Berbagai Aliran Pemikiran Hukum Dalam Novel Les Miserables.” Jurnal Konstitusi 17, no. 4 (2020): 753–76. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1743.

M. Manullang, E. Fernando. “Subjek Hukum Menurut Hans Kelsen Dan Teori Tradisional : Antara Manipulasi Dan Fiksi.” Jurnal Hukum Dan Peradilan 10, no. 1 (April 13, 2021): 139. https://doi.org/10.25216/jhp.10.1.2021.139-154.

Manullang, E Fernando M. “Mempertanyakan Pancasila Sebagai Grundnorm : Suatu.” Jurnal Hukum Dan Pembangunan 50, no. 2 (2020): 284–301. https://doi.org/10.21143/jhp.vol50.no2.2584.

Mukhidin. “Hukum Progresif Sebagai Solusi Hukum Yang Mensejahterakan Rakyat.” Jurnal Pembaharuan Hukum 1, no. 3 (2014). https://jurnal.unissula.ac.id/index.php/PH/article/viewFile/1488/1156.

Munaf, Yusri. Hukum Administrasi Negara: Pengantar Hukum Administrasi Negara. Pekanbaru: Marpoyan Tujuh, 2016.

Murphy, Tim. “Living Law , Normative Pluralism , and Analytic Jurisprudence.” Jurisprudence 3, no. 1 (2012): 177–210. https://ssrn.com/abstract=2146667.

Paryadi. “Maqashid Syariah : Definisi Dan Pendapat Para Ulama.” Cross-Border 4, no. 2 (2021): 201–16. https://journal.iaisambas.ac.id/index.php/Cross-Border/article/view/742.

Pinasang, Dani. “Falsafah Pancasila Sebagai Norma Dasar (Grundnorm) Dalam Rangka Pengembanan Sistem Hukum Nasional.” Jurnal Hukum Unsrat 20, no. 3 (2020): 1–10. https://repo.unsrat.ac.id/266/.

Rato, Dominikus, Fendy Setyawan, and koko roby Yahya. “Aliran Hukum Sociological Jurisprudence Dalam Perseptif Filsafat Hukum.” Jurnal Insan Pendidikan Dan Sosial Humaniora 1, no. 1 (2023): 45–60. https://doi.org/10.59581/jipsoshum-widyakarya.v1i1.76.

Roza, Darmini, and Gokma Toni Parlindungan S. “Teori Positivisme Hans Kelsen Mempengaruhi Perkembangan Hukum Di Indonesia.” Lex Jurnalica Volume 18, no. 1 (2021): 20–26. https://doi.org/10.47007/lj.v18i1.4056.

Samekto, FX. Adji. “Menelusuri Akar Pemikiran Hans Kelsen Tentang Stufenbeautheorie Dalam Pendekatan Normatif-Filosofis.” Jurnal Hukum Progresif 7, no. 1 (2019): 1–19. https://doi.org/10.14710/hp.7.1.1-19.

Setiawan, Muhammad Arif, and Mahrus Ali. Kapita Selekta Teori Hukum. yogyakarta: bintan Semesta Media, 2021.

Sinaulan, Ramlani Lina. Teori Ilmu Hukum. Edited by Abdul Rahmat and Yuhelson. Yogyakarta: Zahir Publishing, 2020.

Sujono, Imam. “Perkembangan Teori Hukum Murni Di Indonesia.” universitas bhayangkara, 2019. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3385176.

Talita Prapta Putri, Nur, and Ananda Aulia. “Penerapan Teori Positivisme Hans Kelsen Di Indonesia.” Jurnal Kajian Kontemporer Hukum Dan Masyarakat 2, no. 1 (2024): 1–25. https://journal.forikami.com/index.php/dassollen/article/download/543/285/3811.

Umar, Nasarudin. “Konsep Hukum Modern: Suatu Perspektif Keindonesiaan, Integrasi Sistem Hukum Agama Dan Sistem Hukum Nasional.” Walisongo: Jurnal Penelitian Sosial Keagamaan 22, no. 1 (2014): 157–80. https://doi.org/10.21580/ws.22.1.263.

Downloads

Published

2025-06-28

How to Cite

Iskandar, I., Nurafifah, D., & Permani, I. (2025). Critical Analysis of Pure Legal Theory in Contemporary Legal Development. VARIA HUKUM, 7(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.15575/vh.v7i1.40543

Issue

Vol. 7 No. 1 (2025): VARIA HUKUM: Jurnal Forum Studi Hukum dan Kemasyarakatan

Section

Articles

Citation Check

License

Copyright (c) 2025 Iskandar Iskandar, Diah Nurafifah, Intan Permani

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish in Varia Hukum agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0) License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).