About Publishing System

Peer review helps editors in making editorial decisions and through editorial communication with authors can also help authors in improving papers.
Manuscript articles submitted online to the Journal of Islamic Religious Education Innovation (JIPAI) will be checked by the editorial board regarding scope, in-house style, plagiarism. Manuscripts that meet the focus and scope of the Journal of Islamic Education will proceed to a review process which will at least be reviewed by a reviewer with a double blind commitment, and by two reviewers. Reviewers are journal partners consisting of experts who are concentrated in the journal field. The editor will send an email to the selected reviewers regarding the title and contents of the manuscript, as well as an invitation to log in to the journal website to complete the review process. Reviewers log in to the journal website to agree to conduct a review, download the manuscript, submit comments, and select recommendations. The review process by reviewers is carried out at least one month. The results will be returned to the author for follow-up. Eligible papers will be published in English.

Speed

Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that prompt review is not possible should notify the editor and seek permission from the review process.

Confidentiality

Any manuscript received for review must be treated as a confidential document. The document may not be shown or discussed with others except with the permission of the editor.

Objectivity Standards

The review must be conducted objectively. Personal criticism of the author is inappropriate. The referee must express his views clearly with supporting arguments.

Source Acknowledgment

Reviewers should identify relevant published work that has not been cited by the author. Any statement that an observation, derivation, or argument has been reported previously should be accompanied by relevant citations. A reviewer should also draw the editor's attention if there are substantial similarities or overlaps between the manuscript under consideration and other published papers of which they are personally aware.

Disclosure and Conflicts of Interest

Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal gain. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts that have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any authors, companies, or institutions associated with the paper.

Publishing System