Pengaruh Marital Satisfaction Terhadap Kecenderungan Infidelity Pada Dewasa Madya Pengguna Facebook
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15575/jops.v2i2.30700Kata Kunci:
perselingkuhan, kepuasan Pernikahan, dewasa madyaAbstrak
 Fenomena perselingkuhan dalam ikatan pernikahan dapat terjadi pada pasangan usia dewasa madya yang telah menjalani pernikahan dalam jangka waktu yang lama. Adanya perselingkuhan (infidelity) dapat disebabkan oleh berbagai faktor, salah satunya adalah permasalahan kepuasan dalam pernikahan (marital satisfaction). Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk memahami pengaruh marital satisfaction terhadap kecenderungan infidelity dalam kelompok X, suatu komunitas dewasa madya yang memiliki minat serupa, seperti mengunjungi tempat karaoke, bar, kafe hingga melakukan perjalanan ke luar kota tanpa didampingi oleh pasangan atau keluarga. Selain itu, mereka secara aktif berkomunikasi melalui grup Facebook khusus. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan kuantitatif dengan versi termodifikasi dari alat ukur ENRICH Marital Satisfaction Scale dan Propensity towards Infidelity Scale. Terdapat 43 responden (24 pria dan 19 wanita) berusia 40-65 tahun dan masih terikat dalam pernikahan dengan durasi usia pernikahan lebih dari 15 tahun. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa kepuasan pernikahan berpengaruh terhadap kecenderungan perselingkuhan dengan koefisien determinasi sebesar 56.2% dan kontribusi dari rendahnya kepuasan pernikahan memiliki peran signifikan dalam meningkatkan perilaku berselingkuh.
Referensi
Al Mansur, M., Saim, & Riyaldi, R. (2021). Faktor Penyebab Perselingkuhan Suami Istri dan Upaya Penanganannya di KUA Kecamatan Rupat. Tahkim, 17, 62–82.
Allen, E. S., Markman, H. J., Williams, T., Melton, J., & Clements, M. L. (2008). Premarital Precursors of Marital Infidelity. 47(2), 243–260.
Amalia, V., & Ratnasari, Y. (2017). Kepuasan Pernikahan Berhubungan dengan Kecenderungan Berselingkuh. 1, 45–57.
Apostolou, M., Constantinou, C., & Anagnostopoulos, S. (2019). Reasons That Could Lead People to Divorce in an Evolutionary Perspective: Evidence from Cyprus. Journal of Divorce and Remarriage, 60(1), 27–46. https://doi.org/10.1080/10502556.2018.1469333
Bird, M. H., Butler, M. H., & Fife, S. T. (2007). The process of couple healing following infidelity: A qualitative study. Journal of Couple and Relationship Therapy, 6(4), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1300/J398v06n04_01
Conroy, A. A. (2014). Marital Infidelity and Intimate Partner Violence in Rural Malawi: A Dyadic Investigation. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 43(7), 1303–1314. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-014-0306-2
Dalvi, I., & Hermaleni, T. (2021). Faktor-faktor yang Memengaruhi Perceraian Selama Masa Pandemi Covid-19 di Kota Bukittinggi. Jurnal Pendidikan Tambusai, 5(3), 7236–7241. https://www.jptam.org/index.php/jptam/article/view/2072
Drigotas, S. M., Safstrom, C. A., & Gentilia, T. (1999). An Investment Model Prediction of Dating Infidelity. 77(3), 509–524.
Fajri, K., & Mulyono. (2017). Selingkuh sebagai Salah satu Faktor Penyebab Perceraian (Analisis Putusan No.3958/Pdt.G/2012.PA.Sby. Perspektif Maqashid Syariah). Maqasid: Jurnal Studi Hukum Islam, 6(1).
Fowers, B. J., & Olson, D. H. (1989). Enrich Marital Inventory: a Discriminant Validity and Crossâ€Validation Assessment. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 15(1), 65–79. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-0606.1989.tb00777.x
Fox, J., Osborn, J. L., & Warber, K. M. (2014). Relational dialectics and social networking sites: The role of Facebook in romantic relationship escalation, maintenance, conflict, and dissolution. Computers in Human Behavior, 35, 527–534. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.02.031
Freund, A. M., & Ritter, J. O. (2009). Midlife Crisis : A Debate. Gerontology, 55, 582–591. https://doi.org/10.1159/000227322
Haseli, A., Shariati, M., Nazari, A. M., Keramat, A., & Emamian, M. H. (2019). Infidelity and Its Associated Factors: A Systematic Review. Journal of Sexual Medicine, 16(8), 1155–1169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsxm.2019.04.011
Henry, R. G., & Miller, R. B. (2004). Marital Problems Occurring in Midlife : Implications for Couples Marital Problems Occurring in Midlife : Implications for Couples Therapists. The American Journal of Family Therapy, 32(May 2014), 405–417. https://doi.org/10.1080/01926180490455204
Levenson, R. W., Carstensen, L. L., & Gottman, J. M. (1993). Long-Term Marriage : Age , Gender , and Satisfaction. 8(2), 301–313.
Lișman, C. G., & Holman, A. C. (2021). Cheating under the Circumstances in Marital Relationships: The Development and Examination of the Propensity towards Infidelity Scale. Social Sciences, 10(10), 392. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci10100392
Loudová, I., Janiš, K., & Haviger, J. (2013). Infidelity as a Threatening Factor to the Existence of the Family. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 106(May 2015), 1462–1469. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.12.164
Moller, N. P., & Vossler, A. (2015). Defining Infidelity in Research and Couple Counseling : A Qualitative Study Defining Infidelity in Research and Couple Counseling : A Qualitative Study. Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy, 41(5), 487–497. https://doi.org/10.1080/0092623X.2014.931314
Northrup, J., & Smith, J. (2016). Effects of Facebook Maintenance Behaviors on Partners’ Experience of Love. Contemporary Family Therapy, 38(2), 245–253. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10591-016-9379-5
Offer, D., & Simon, W. (1976). Sexual Development. In B. J. Sadock, H. I. Kaplan, & A. M. Freedman (Eds.), the Sexual Experience (pp. 128–141). THE WILLIAMS & WILKINS COMPANY.
Olson, D., DeFrain, J., & Skogrand, L. (2010). Marriages and families: Intimacy, diversity, and strengths. McGraw Hill.
Ostenson, J. A., & Zhang, M. (2014). Reconceptualizing Marital Conflict : A Relational Perspective. 34(4), 229–242. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0034517
Ridgway, J. L., & Clayton, R. B. (2016). Instagram Unfiltered: Exploring Associations of Body Image Satisfaction, Instagram #Selfie Posting, and Negative Romantic Relationship Outcomes.
Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 19(1), 2–7. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2015.0433
Roebuck, J., Brown, J. S., & Yamashita, T. (2016). Social Science & Medicine Marital quality , marital dissolution , and mortality risk during the later life course. Social Science & Medicine, 165, 119–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2016.07.025
Shackelford, T. K., & Goetz, A. T. (2008). Personality , Marital Satisfaction , and Probability of Marital Infidelity. 6(1), 13–25.
Shaleha, R. R. A., & Kurniasih, I. (2021). Ketidaksetiaan : Eksplorasi Ilmiah tentang Perselingkuhan. Buletin Psikologi, 29(2), 218. https://doi.org/10.22146/buletinpsikologi.55278
Stieglitz, J., Gurven, M., Kaplan, H., & Winking, J. (2012). Infidelity, jealousy, and wife abuse among Tsimane forager-farmers: Testing evolutionary hypotheses of marital conflict. Evolution and Human Behavior, 33(5), 438–448. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2011.12.006
Sugiyono. (2015). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif Dan Kombinasi (Mixed Methods). Bandung: Alfabeta.
Thompson, A. P. (1983). Extramarital Sex: A Review of the Research Literature. The Journal of Sex Research, 19(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224498309551166
Whisman, M. A., & Gordon, K. C. (2007). Predicting Sexual Infidelity in a Population-Based Sample of Married Individuals. 21(2), 320–324. https://doi.org/10.1037/0893-3200.21.2.320
Wilson, K., Mattingly, B. A., Clark, E. M., Weidler, D. J., & Bequette, A. W. (2011). The gray area: Exploring attitudes toward infidelity and the development of the perceptions of dating infidelity scale. Journal of Social Psychology, 151(1), 63–86. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224540903366750
Unduhan
Diterbitkan
Terbitan
Bagian
Citation Check
Lisensi
The author whose published manuscript approved the following provisions:
1. The right of publication of all material published in the journal / published on the E-Journal of Psychology website is held by the editorial board with the knowledge of the author (moral right remains the author of the script).
2. The formal legal provisions for access to digital articles of this electronic journal are subject to the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license (CC BY-SA), which means that the Journal of Psychology reserves the right to save, transmit media / format, manage in database form, , maintain, and publish articles without requesting permission from the Author as long as it continues to include the name of the Author as the owner of Copyright.
3. Printed and published print and electronic manuscripts are open access for any purposes. In addition to these objectives, the editorial board shall not be liable for violations of copyright law.
