Article Sidebar

Submitted
September 6, 2017
Accepted
June 28, 2018
Published
June 29, 2018
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 7 Download : 49

Main Article Content

Abstract

This study aims to describe the quality of principals’ managerial capabilities, supervisors’ coaching quality, PAI (Pendidikan Agama Islam/Islamic education) teachers’ performance in Madrasa Aliyah (equal to senior high school level), and the relationship among those three aspects. The research method used in this study is an explanatory survey that tries to connect each variable. The respondent of the research was 57 teachers of PAI in a madrasa aliyah in Pekanbaru. The data were obtained through questionnaire. To analyze the data, the study used Bivariate correlation, regression, and coefficient of determination test. Having performed the necessary statistical computations, this study found out that principals’ managerial abilities, supervisors’ coaching quality, and PAI teachers’ performance were all categorized into sufficient. Regarding correlation, it has been proven that there was positive correlation between the teachers’ performance and principals’ managerial abilities, between principals’ managerial abilities and supervisors’ coaching quality, and between teachers’ performance and supervisors’ coaching quality. These results imply that there is a need of those three aspects enhancement in madrasa aliyah so that that madrasa can compete with public schools both in academic and non-academic aspects.

Keywords

Madrasa Principals’ Managerial Abilities Supervisors’ Coaching Quality Teachers’ Performance.

Article Details

License

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0) License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).

References

  1. Austin, A. E. (2002). Preparing the next generation of faculty. The Journal of Higher Education, 73(1), 94–122. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00221546.2002.11777132
  2. Bandura, Albert. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action. New Jersey: Prentaice Hall. Engle Cliffs.
  3. Bano, M. (2011). Co-Producing with FBOs: lessons from state–madrasa engagement in the Middle East and South Asia. Third World Quarterly, 32(7), 1273–1289. https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2011.596751
  4. Botha, R. J. (2011). The managerial role of the principal in promoting teacher professionalism in selected Eastern Cape schools the managerial role of the principal in promoting teacher professionalism in selected Eastern Cape schools. Africa Education Review, 8(3), 397–415. https://doi.org/10.1080/18146627.2011.618620
  5. Busher, H., & Harris, A. (1999). Leadership of school subject areas: Tensions and dimensions of managing in the middle. School Leadership & Management, 19(3), 305–317. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632439969069
  6. Darling-Hammond, L. (2012). Powerful teacher education: Lessons from exemplary programs. John Wiley & Sons.
  7. Eskeland, G. S., & Filmer, D. (2007). Autonomy, participation and learning: Findings from Argentine Schools, and implications for decentralization. Education Economics, 15(1), 103–127. https://doi.org/10.1080/09645290601133951
  8. Hahn, Y., Choon, L., & Yang, H. (2018). Does greater school autonomy make a di ff erence ? Evidence from a randomized natural experiment in South Korea. Journal of Public Economics, 161, 15–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2018.03.004
  9. Higgins, M., Morton, A. E., & Wolkenhauer, R. (2018). Reconceptualizing preservice teacher supervision through duoethnography: Reflecting, supporting, and collaborating with and for each other. Teaching and Teacher Education, 69, 75–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate. 2017.09.020
  10. Kanji, G. K., Malek, A., & Tambi, B. A. (1999). Total quality management in UK higher education institutions. Total Quality Management, 10(1), 129–153. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0954412998126
  11. Karweti, E. (2010). Pengaruh kemampuan manajerial kepala sekolah dan faktor yang mempengaruhi motivasi kerja terhadap kinerja guru SLB di Kabupaten Subang. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan, 11(2), 77–89. Retrieved from http://jurnal.upi.edu/file/7-Engkay.pdf
  12. Kusnan. (2007). Kemampuan manajerial kepala madrasah dan implikasinya terhadap kinerja guru. Iqra’, 3, 1–14. Retrieved from https://jurnaliqro.files.wordpress.com/2008/08/01-kusnan-1-12.pdf
  13. Moghadami, K. (2010). A comparative study of depression among male athletic vs non-athletic principals of high schools and junior high schools. In Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences (Vol. 5, pp. 2404–2408). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.07.471
  14. Mokoena, S. (2012). Effective participative management : Does it affect trust levels of stakeholders in schools ?, 30(1), 43–53.
  15. Mulyana, (2007). Hubungan persepsi siswa tentang kinerja guru terhadap prestasi belajar pada diklat
  16. kelistrikan otomotif. Bandung: UPI.
  17. Park, J., & Niyozov, S. (2008). Madrasa education in South Asia and Southeast Asia: current issues and debates. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 28(4)(May 2012), 323–351. https://doi.org/10.1080/02188790802475372
  18. Parker, L., & Raihani, R. (2011). Democratizing Indonesia through education? Community participation in Islamic schooling. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 39(6), 712-732.
  19. Purwanto, M. N. (2004). Administrasi dan pengawas pendidikan. Bandung, PT. Remaja Rosdakarya.
  20. Robbins, S. R. (2003). Perilaku organisasi jilid I. Jakarta: PT. Tim Kelompok Gramedia.
  21. Simamora, H. (2004). Manajemen sumber daya manusia. Yogyakarta: Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Ekonomi YKPN.
  22. Steinberg, M. P., & Cox, A. B. (2016). School autonomy and district support: how principals respond to a tiered autonomy initiative in Philadelphia public schools. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 16(1), 130–165. https://doi.org/10.1080/15700763.2016.1197278
  23. Stuckey, R. (2007). Best practices for legal educcation: A vision and a road map. United States. Retrieved from http://www.cleaweb.org/Resources/Documents/best_practices-full.pdf
  24. Suleymanova, D. (2015). Islam as moral education: madrasa courses and contestation of the secular in the Republic of Tatarstan, Russia. Religion, State & Society, 43(2), 150–167. https://doi.org/10.1080/09637494.2015.1056639
  25. Sumanto. (2005). Pengaruh kemampuan manajerial, kepemimpinan, dan motivasi tarhadap kinerja
  26. guru (Master’s thesis). Retrived: ttp://eprints.ums.ac.id/6725/1/Q100010131.pdf
  27. Wahyudi. (2009). Kepemimpinan kepala sekolah dalam organisasi pembelajar. Bandung: Alfabeta.
  28. Wang, Y., & Chan, R. K. H. (2015). Autonomy and control: The struggle of minban schools in China. International Journal of Educational Development, 45, 89–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2015.09.010
  29. Wulan, S. (2013). Hubungan disiplin dengan kinerja guru SMA Negeri di tiga kecamatan Kota Depok. Jurnal Ilmiah Widya, 1(2), 106–112. Retrieved from https://e-journal.jurwidyakop3.com/index.php/jurnal-ilmiah/.../115