Evaluating the Effectiveness of Islamic Religious Education Learning in Implementing 2013 Curriculum in Madrasah

Authors

  • St. Jumaeda FITK IAIN Ambon

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15575/jpi.v8i1.19017

Keywords:

Learning effectiveness, Learning evaluation, Process quality, Output quality, 2013 curriculum

Abstract

This study aims to obtain objective information, process quality, and output quality in Islamic religious education learning. The present study used a qualitative approach with the model developed by Widoyoko covering the quality of the process and the quality of the learning output. This research applies a program evaluation study method. The data were collected through document studies, interviews, questionnaires, and observations. The results showed that the evaluation of the Islamic Religious Education learning program in Madrasah Aliyah Negeri 1 Central Maluku Regency was in good category (84%) based on the quality of the learning program process and learning output. There are several aspects in evaluating the quality of the process and the quality of learning output that need to be improved. Learning facilities, student motivation, class climate, student attitudes, and students' personal skills should be improved to achieve effective and efficient Islamic religious education learning. 

References

Aeini, K. (2018). The Implementation of Curriculum 2013 Revision on Lesson Plans Made by English Teachers of SMAN 2 Magelang in School Year 2018/2019, Journal of Research on Applied Linguistics, 2 (1), 17–23. https://doi.org/10.31002/jrlt.v2i1.424

Arezoo, I. (2011). Islamic Perspective about Evaluation Criterion and Educational Implication, Journal of Lifer Science and Biomedicane,

Boyle, B., While, D., & Boyle, T (2004). A longitudinal Study of Teacher Change: What Make Professional Development Effective? The Curriculum Journal, 15(1), 45-68.

C. Deneen. &. G.TL. Brown. (2016). The Impact of Conception of Assessment on Assessment Literacy in a Teacher Education, COgent Education, 3-1. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2016. 1225380

Carrol, N. & Burke M.. (2010). Learning Effectiveness Using Different Teaching Modalities, American Journal of Business Education, 3 (12), 65-76.

Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research Design Qualitative,Quantitative and Mixed Methods Approaches Sage Publication.

Gunawan, I. (2019). Indonesian Curriculum 2013: Instructional Management, Obstacles Faced by Teachers in Implementation and the Way Forward, Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, Volume 128, 56-63. https://doi.org/10.2991/icet-17.2017.9

Hidayatulloh, M. K., Susila, Y. I W., & Rijanto, T. (2020). 2013 Curriculum: Assessment of Minimum Competencies in Freedom Learning and education 4.0 Context, International Journal for Educational and Vocational Studies, 2 (7), https://doi.org/10.29103/ ijevs.v2i7.2621

Jaedun, A., Hariyanto, L. & E.R. Nuryadin, (2014). An evaluation of the Implementation of Curriculum 2013 at The Building Construction Department of Vocational High Schoos in Yogyakarta, Journal of Education, 7 (1), 14-22.

Lam. R. (2014). Can Student-Generated Test Materials Support Learning?, Studies in Evaluation Educational,95-108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2014.02.003

M. R. &. S. Campbell, (2016). Evaluating Teacher Preparation Using Graduates Observational Ratings, Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 38. https://doi.org/10.3102/0162373716649690

Machali, I. (2014). Dimensi Kecerdasan Majemuk dalam Kurikulum 2013. Insania. 19(1), 21-45.

Mahfud, C. (2019). Evaluation of islamic education curriculum policy in Indonesia, Premiere Educandum: Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar dan Pembelajaran, 9 (1), 34-43. Doi: 10.25273/pe.v9i1. 4016

Maul, A. (2017). Rethingking Taditional Methode ofSurvey Validation, Measurement Interdisiplinary Research and Perspective, 15.

Nuraeni, Y., Zulela MS, & Boeriswati, E. (2020).A Case Study of Curriculum Implementation and K-13 Challenges in Indonesia, International Journal for Educational and Vocational Studies, 2 (1) 14-18. https://doi.org/10.29103/ijevs.v2i1.2263

Nuryana, Z. (2017).Curriculum 2013 and The Future of Islamic Education in Indonesia, International Seminar on Islamic Education, 257-270.

Palobo, M., et al. (2020). Analysis of Teachers’ Difficulties on Developing Curriculum 2013 Lesson Plans, 226 (ICCS), 1319-1324. https://doi.org/10.2991/icss-18.2018.278

Richardson, J. (2013). Research Issues in Evaluating Learning Pattern Development in Higher Educaton, Studies in Educational Evaluation, 66-70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2012.11.003

Sahroh, A. (2020). Evaluation of Education Policy in 2013 Curriculum Change. AIUA: Jurnal of Islamic Education, II (2), 157-166.

Swan, K. (2003). Learning Effectiveness Online: What The Research Tells Us, In J. Bourne & J. C. Moore (Eds) Elements of Quality Online Education, Practice and Direction. Needham, MA: Sloan Center for Online Education, 1-34.

Tukinem & Widodo, H. (2019). The Implementation of Curriculum 2013 in Islamic Education Subject at Muhammadiyah Pakem Elementary School, FITRAH Jurnal Kajian Ilmu-ilmu Keislaman, 05(2), 229-242. https://doi.org/10.24952/ fitrah.v5i2.1602

Widiyatmoko, A. (2018). An overview of Conceptual Understanding in Science Education Curriculum in Indonesia. Journal of Physics Conference Series, 983(1), https://doi.org/012044. 10.1088/ 1742-6596/983/1/012044

Wulandari, I Gst A A. (2020). Implementation of the 2013 Curriculum Based on a Scientific Approach (Case Study at SD Cluster II Kintamani). International Journal of Elementary Education, 4 (3), 422-430.

Yulianti, K. (2015). The New Curriculum Implementation in Indonesia: A Study in Two Primary Schools, International Journal about Parents in Education, 9 (1), 157-168.

Zahra, D. N. (2019). Development of Islamic Education Curriculum Model Curriculum 2013 (K13). al-Hayat: Journal of Islamic Education, 3(1):38. https://doi.org/10.35723/ajie.v3i1.50

Downloads

Published

2022-06-06

Issue

Vol. 8 No. 1 (2022): Jurnal Pendidikan Islam

Section

Articles

License

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0) License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).