Article Sidebar

Submitted
August 20, 2024
Accepted
August 20, 2024
Published
October 8, 2024
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 39 Download : 35

Main Article Content

Abstract

The growing importance of online learning in teacher education highlights the need to assess its impact on teacher professionalism. This study examines the effects of online learning within the in-service Teacher Professional Education (TPE) program at a State Islamic Higher Education institution in Indonesia. Using a mixed-methods approach, the research investigates online learning practices, curriculum adaptation, instructor preparation, and professionalism development. The quantitative analysis shows a significant, moderate correlation between online learning and teacher professionalism (R = 0.573), accounting for 32.9% of the variance (R² = 0.329), with a high statistical significance (p < 0.001). Qualitative results support these findings, emphasizing the role of relevant course materials, learning tool development, and instructor feedback in enhancing professionalism. Curriculum adaptation and thorough preparation by lecturers and mentor teachers are also identified as critical to the program's success. While challenges such as limited interaction and internet access persist, online learning has proven to improve teacher professionalism by offering greater accessibility and flexibility. This study concludes that online learning, when implemented with the right strategies, can significantly elevate teacher professionalism. The implications for Islamic education emphasize the potential of online platforms to strengthen teacher development and educational quality.

Keywords

Cybergogy Heutagogy Peeragogy Teacher Professional Development

Article Details

License

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0) License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).

References

  1. Amtu, O., Makulua, K., Matital, J., & Pattiruhu, C. M. (2020). Improving Student Learning Outcomes through School Culture, Work Motivation and Teacher Performance. International Journal of Instruction, 13(4), 885–902. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2020.13454a
  2. Anderson, T., & Dron, J. (2011). Three Generations of Distance Education Pedagogy. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 12(3), 80–97. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v12i3.890
  3. Azaiki, S., & Shotte, G. (2020). Teacher Training, Teacher Education, Professional Development and Professional Learning: Essentials for Sustainability Education. New Era in Education: The Journal of the World Education Fellowship, 101(1), 13–27. Retrieved from https://www.newera.ijkie.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/Azaiki-Shotte.pdf
  4. Bao, W. (2020). COVID-19 and online teaching in higher education: A Case Study of Peking University. Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies, 2(2), 113–115. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbe2.191
  5. Boling, E. C., Hough, M., Krinsky, H., Saleem, H., & Stevens, M. (2012). Cutting the Distance in Distance Education: Perspectives on What Promotes Positive, Online Learning Experiences. Internet and Higher Education, 15(2), 118–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2011.11.006
  6. Chin, W. W. (1998). The Partial Least Squares Approach to Structural Equation Modeling. Modern Methods for Business Research.
  7. Corneli, J., & Danoff, C. J. (2011). Paragogy: Synergizing individual and organizational learning. In 1st International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge, 26(1), 205–215. https://doi.org/10.1093/analys/9.3.49
  8. Corneli, J., Danoff, C. J., Pierce, C., Ricaurte, P., & Macdonald, L. S. (2015). Patterns of peeragogy. Proceedings of the 22nd Conference on Pattern Languages of Programs, 22, 1–23. https://dl.acm.org/doi/pdf/10.5555/3124497.3124531
  9. Creswell, J. W. (2015). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research, enhanced Pearson etext with loose-leaf version access card package. Pearson Education, Inc.
  10. Dittmar, E., & Mccracken, H. (2012). Promoting continuous quality improvement in online teaching: The meta-model. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Network, 16(2), 163–176. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v16i2.269
  11. Ertmer, P. A., Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. T., Sadik, O., Sendurur, E., & Sendurur, P. (2012). Teacher beliefs and technology integration practices: A critical relationship. Computers and Education, 59(2), 423–435. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.02.001
  12. Etkina, E., Gregorcic, B., & Vokos, S. (2017). Organizing physics teacher professional education around productive habit development: A way to meet reform challenges. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 13(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.13.010107
  13. Fauyan, M. (2019). Developing Interactive Multimedia Through Ispring on Indonesian Language Learning with The Insights of Islamic Values in Madrasah Ibtidaiyah. Al Ibtida: Jurnal Pendidikan Guru MI, 6(2), 177–190. https://doi.org/10.24235/al.ibtida.snj.v6i2.4173
  14. Hanun, F. (2021). Implementasi Penyelenggaraan Program Pendidikan Profesi Guru (PPG) Pendidikan Agama Islam Di LPTK UIN Serang Banten. . EDUKASI: Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Agama Dan Keagamaan, 19(3), 268–285. https://doi.org/10.32729/edukasi.v19i3.1158
  15. Haryani, E., Cobern, W. W., Pleasants, B. A.-S., & Fetters, M. K. (2021). Analysis Of Teachers’ Resources For Integrating The Skills Of Creativity And Innovation, Critical Thinking And Problem Solving, Collaboration, And Communication In Science Classroom. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 10(1), 92–102. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v10i1.27084
  16. Hase, S., & Kenyon, C. (2007). Heutagogy: A Child of Complexity Theory. Complicity: An International Journal of Complexity and Education, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.29173/cmplct8766
  17. Helmi, J. (2015). Kompetensi Profesionalisme Guru. Al Ishlah Jurnal Pendidikan, 7(2), 318–336. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.35445/alishlah.v7i2.43
  18. Herliandry, L. D., Nurhasanah, N., Suban, M. E., & Kuswanto, H. (2020). Pembelajaran Pada Masa Pandemi Covid-19. JTP - Jurnal Teknologi Pendidikan, 22(1), 65–70. https://doi.org/10.21009/jtp.v22i1.15286
  19. Huang, B., Siu-Yung Jong, M., Tu, Y. F., Hwang, G. J., Chai, C. S., & Yi-Chao Jiang, M. (2022). Trends and exemplary practices of STEM teacher professional development programs in K-12 contexts: A systematic review of empirical studies. Computers and Education, 189(July), 104577. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2022.104577
  20. Iqbal, S., & Ali, A. (2024). Education And Professional Development: Opportunities And Challenges For In-Service Teachers: A Review. Gomal University Journal of Research, 40(1), 117–133. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.51380/gujr-40-01-10
  21. Julia, J., Subarjah, H., Maulana, M., Sujana, A., Isrokatun, I., Nugraha, D., & Rachmatin, D. (2019). Readiness and Competence of New Teachers for Career as Professional Teachers in Primary Schools. European Journal of Educational Research, 9(2), 655–673. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.9.2.655
  22. Katyara, P., Hussain Dahri, K., Muhiuddin, G., & Shabroz. (2022). Impact Of Technology On Student’s Engagement In Different Dimensions: Cognitive, Behavioral, Reflective And Social Engagement. Webology, 19(3), 3451–3464. Retrieved from http://www.webology.org
  23. Keengwe, J., & Kidd, T. T. (2010). Towards Best Practices in Online Learning and Teaching in Higher Education. MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 6(2), 533–541. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcn/61.6.1402S
  24. Kennedy, K., & Archambault, L. (2012). Offering preservice teachers field experiences in K-12 online learning: A national survey of teacher education programs. Journal of Teacher Education, 63(3), 185–200. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487111433651
  25. Kentnor, H. E. (2015). Distance education and the evolution of online learning in the United States. Curriculum and Teaching Dialogue, 17(1), 21–34. Retrieved from https://digitalcommons.du.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1026&context=law_facpub
  26. Khozin, K., & Umiarso, U. (2019). The Philosophy and Methodology of Islam-Science Integration: Unravelling the Transformation of Indonesian Islamic Higher Institutions. Ulumuna, 23(1), 135-162. https://doi.org/10.20414/ujis.v23i1.359
  27. Kim, S., Raza, M., & Seidman, E. (2019). Improving 21st-century teaching skills: The key to effective 21st-century learners. Research in Comparative and International Education, 14(1), 99–117. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745499919829214
  28. Koehler, M. J., MIshra, P., Kereluik, K., Shin, T. S., & Graham, C. R. (2013). The Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge Framework. In *Handbook of Research on Educational Communications and Technology. In Handbook of Research on Educational Communications and Technology: Fourth Edition. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-3185-5
  29. Kommalasari, I. (2023). Analisis Literasi Digital Guru Paud Pada Penyelenggaraan Program PPG Yang Dilaksanakan Secara Daring. Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia.
  30. Kupiainen, R. (2019). Digital Technologies and Online Learning. Bloomsbury Education and Childhood Studies, May 1–6. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5040/ 9781350996304.0014
  31. Kusumawardhani, P. N. (2017). Does teacher certification program lead to better quality teachers? Evidence from Indonesia. Education Economics, 25(6), 590-618. https://doi.org/10.1080/09645292.2017.1329405
  32. Laili, S. R., Supriyatno, T., & Gafur, A. (2022). Development of Islamic Religious Education Teacher Competency and Character Through Blended Learning. Nazhruna: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 5(2), 864-875. https://doi.org/10.31538/nzh.v5i2.2359
  33. Larson, J., & Archambault, L. (2015). The ever-evolving educator: Examining K-12 online teachers in the United States. In Exploring the effectiveness of online education in K-12 environments (p. 22). Retrieved from https://www.igi-global.com/chapter/the-ever-evolving-educator/116145
  34. Mansurjonovich, J. M. (2023). Designing an electronic didactic environment to ensure interdisciplinary integration in the teaching of “Informatics and information technologies†during professional education. International Conference on Advance Research in Humanities, Sciences and Education, 78–82. Retrieved from https://confrencea.org/index.php/confrenceas/article/download/438/444
  35. Mariyudi, M., Sakdiah, H., Fadhla, T., & Ikramuddin, I. (2021). ICT Adaptation in ERL-Based Learning During the COVID-19 Pandemic. International Journal of Engineering, Science and Information Technology, 1(3), 116–122. https://doi.org/10.52088/ijesty.v1i3.137
  36. Mat, H., Mustakim, S. S., & Razali, F. (2023). The Integration of Digital Learning to Enhance Higher Order Thinking Skills ( HOTS ) among Elementary Students in Science Education. International Graduate Research in Education Seminar 2023 (IGREduc, 2023), November. Retrieved from https://conference.upm.edu.my/
  37. Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldana, J. (2018). Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook. SAGE Publications.
  38. Mustadi, A., Nur, M., & Purbani, W. (2023). Motivation, self-efficacy, and perceptions : A comparative study of male and female teacher candidates in Indonesia. Kasetsart Journal of Social Sciences, 44, 273–280. Retrieved from https://so04.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/kjss/article/view/264474
  39. Musthofa, M., Junaedi, M., & Hasanah, S. (2023). The influence of online learning on student professionalism Teacher professional Education Program : Studies in Islamic higher Education in Indonesia The influence of online learning on student professionalism Teacher professional Education Program : Stud. Cogent Education, 10(2). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2023.2276025
  40. Nurwidodo, N., Ibrohim, I., Sueb, S., & Husamah, H. (2023). “Let’s transform!â€: A systematic literature review of science learning in COVID-19 pandemic era. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 19(2), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/12875
  41. Quddus, A. (2019). Implementasi technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) dalam pendidikan profesi guru (PPG) PAI LPTK UIN Mataram. Jurnal Tatsqif, 17(2), 213–230. https://doi.org/10.20414/jtq.v17i2.1911
  42. Rahmawati, R. N., & Narsa, I. M. (2019). Penggunaan e-learning dengan Technology Acceptance Model (TAM). Jurnal Inovasi Teknologi Pendidikan, 6(2), 127–136. https://doi.org/10.21831/jitp.v6i2.26232
  43. Ritonga, M., Mudinillah, A., Ardinal, E., Tauhid, T., & Nurdianto, T. (2024). Enhancing Arabic Language Learning in Higher Education: Leveraging E-Campus as an Online Learning and Evaluation Platform. Jurnal Ilmiah Peuradeun, 12(2), 491-516. doi:https://doi.org/10.26811/peuradeun.v12i2.1103
  44. Rohayani, A. H. H., Kurniabudi, & Sharipuddin. (2015). A Literature Review: Readiness Factors to Measuring e-Learning Readiness in Higher Education. Procedia Computer Science, 59(Iccsci), 230–234. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2015.07.564
  45. SA, N. H., Suyanto, Arifi, A., Putranta, H., & Azizah, A. N. M. (2021). Experiences of Participants in Teacher Professional Education on Obtaining Soft Skills: A Case Study in Indonesia Nurul. 10(1), 313–325. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.10.1.313
  46. Sembiring, T. B., Aina, M., Yuniwati, I., Mardiah, A., Rohmiyati, Y., & Utami, B. (2024). Pelatihan Interaktif : Peningkatan Kapasitas Dosen Dalam Pendidikan Berbasis Teknologi. Community Development Journal, 5(1), 1715–1728. https://doi.org/10.31004/cdj.v5i1.25545
  47. Sepriyanti, N., Nelwati, S., Kustati, M., & Afriadi, J. (2022). The Effect of 21st-Century Learning on Higher-Order Thinking Skills (Hots) and Numerical Literacy of Science Students in Indonesia Based on Gender. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 11(2), 314–321. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v11i2.36384
  48. Setiawan, J., Sudrajat, A., Aman, & Kumalasari, D. (2021). Development of higher order thinking skill assessment instruments in learning Indonesian history. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 10(2), 545–552. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v10i2.20796
  49. Shurygin, V., Ryskaliyeva, R., Dolzhich, E., Dmitrichenkova, S., & Ilyin, A. (2024). Transformation of teacher training in a rapidly evolving digital environment. Education and Information Technologies, 29, 2579. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-11902-6
  50. Siemens, G. (2005). Connectivism: A Learning Theory for the Digital Age. International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning, 2(l), pp. 3–10. Retrieved from https://edtechbooks.s3.us-west-2.amazonaws.com/pdfs/133/6849.pdf
  51. Siregar, H. S. (2023). Perceived Usefulness and Perceived Ease of Use of Online Learning for Islamic Religious Education Teacher. Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 9(1), 93–106. https://doi.org/10.15575/jpi.v0i0.25518
  52. Siregar, H. S., Ramdhan, D. F., & Sugilar, H. (2022). Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) Pada Pembelajaran Online Mahasiswa PPG Di Perguruan Tinggi Keagamaan Islam Negeri. Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 11(1), 279–293. https://doi.org/10.30868/ei.v11i01
  53. Situmorang, M., Gultom, S., Msnsyur, A., Gultom, S., Restu, & Ritonga, W. (2022). Implementation of Learning Innovations to Improve Teacher Competence in Professional Certificate Programs for In-Service Teachers Syamsul Gultom Abil Mansyur Syawal Gultom. International Journal of Instruction, 15(2), 675–696. Retrieved from https://e-iji.net/ats/index.php/pub/article/view/406
  54. Skenderi, F., & Skenderi, L. (2022). Fostering Innovation in Higher Education: Transforming Teaching for Tomorrow. KNOWLEDGE-International Journal, 60(2), 251–255. Retrieved from http://ikm.mk/ojs/index.php/kij/article/view/6262
  55. Syafitri, E., Nisa, K., Anim, A., Sirait, S., Rahmadani, E., & Rahayu, S. (2024). Analisis Kesulitan Pelaksanaan Perkuliahan PPG Dalam Jabatan dalam Lingkup Kemendikbud. Journal of Education Research, 5(1), 230–240. Retrieved from https://jer.or.id/index.php/jer/article/view/829
  56. Tavakoli, M., & Azad, S. B. (2017). Teachers’ conceptions of effective teaching and their teaching practices: a mixed-method approach. Teachers and Teaching, 23(6), 674–688. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2016.1218326
  57. Teo, T., Unwin, S., Scherer, R., & Gardiner, V. (2021). Initial teacher training for twenty-first-century skills in the Fourth Industrial Revolution (IR 4.0): A scoping review. Computers and Education, 170(April), 104223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104223
  58. Tondeur, J., van Braak, J., Ertmer, P. A., & Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. (2016). Understanding the Relationship between teachers' pedagogical beliefs and technology use in education: a systematic review of qualitative evidence. Educational Technology Research and Development, 65(3), 555–575. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-016-9481-2
  59. Tri Murdiyanto. (2020). Persepsi Peserta PPG dalam Jabatan terhadap Pelaksanaan Program PPG Hybrid Learning Bidang Studi Matematika Universitas Negeri Jakarta Tahun 2019. Jurnal Riset Pembelajaran Matematika Sekolah, 4(1), 76–84. https://doi.org/10.21009/jrpms.2020.0311
  60. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Harvard University Press.
  61. Wang, M. J., & Kang, M. (2006). Cybergogy for engaged learning. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on E-Learning for Knowledge-Based Society. Retrieved from https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/1-4020-3669-8_11
  62. Wang, M., & Hannafin, R. E. (2005). Design-based research and technology-enhanced learning environments. Educational Technology Research and Development, 53(4), 5–23. Retrieved from https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF02504682
  63. Wang, V. C. X., & Torrisi-Steele, G. (2015). Online Teaching, Change, and Critical Theory. New Horizons in Adult Education and Human Resource Development, 27(3), 18–26. https://doi.org/10.1002/nha3.20108
  64. Zaeni, A., Fauyan, M., & Fadhilah, N. (2018). Kualifikasi, Persepsi, dan Kompetensi Guru PAI SMP/MTS Se-Kota Pekalongan dalam Pemanfaatan Media Pembelajaran Berbasis TIK di Era Generasi Z. Jurnal Litbang Kota Pekalongan, 14, 95–111. Retrieved from http://repository.uingusdur.ac.id/23/
  65. Zhang, C. (2022). A Forwardâ€Looking Study on the Inâ€Depth Development Planning of Information Technology into Teacher Education. Journal of Sensors, 2022(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/4885771