Modifikasi Alat Ukur Interpersonal Reactivity Index (IRI) pada Subjek dengan Identitas Sunda

Article Sidebar

PDF Author Statements
Published: Apr 30, 2021
DOI: https://doi.org/10.15575/jpib.v4i1.9376
Keywords:
Perspective taking, Concern for other, Empathy

Main Article Content

Tahrir Tahrir
Scopus ID: 57212865685, Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung
Asmadi Alsa
Universitas Gadjah Mada
Anizar Rahayu
Universitas Persada Indonesia Y.A.I

Abstract

This study aims to modify the instrument interpersonal reactivity index (IRI) made by Davis (1980) which consists of 4 dimensions into 2 dimensions. This research uses quantitative approach, the respondents is 318 students of UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung who were of Sundanese ethnicity and lived in Islamic boarding schools with simple random sampling. The result of modification IRI instrument from 28 items to 26 items. Based on the results, it is known that content validity shows that all items are valid, the item differences shows that 24 items have a good difference, and confirmatory analysis shows that 23 items are valid. The result of the multidimensional validity test shows that perspective taking aspect has r value .81 and concern for other aspect has r value .71. While the alpha reliability obtained value .903 and reliability CR .96, and the model for empathy instrument of this modification is fit.

Article Details

Issue
Vol. 4 No. 1 (2021): JPIB : Jurnal Psikologi Islam dan Budaya
Section
Articles

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
Author Biography

Tahrir Tahrir, Scopus ID: 57212865685, Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung

Scopus Link: 57212865685

References

Afifah, S. N., & Moeis, S. (2017). Kehidupan masyarakat adat kampung Banceuy: Kebertahanan adat istiadat menghadapi perubahan sosial-budaya (kajian historis tahun 1965-2008). Factum. 6(1). 96-114. https://doi.org/10.17509/factum.v6i1.10181

Amiruddin, A., Fueggle, S. N., Nguyen, A. T., Gignac, G. E., Cluniesâ€Ross, K. L., & Fox, A. M. (2017). Error monitoring and empathy: Explorations within a neurophysiological context. Society for Psychophysiological Research. 54(6). 864-873. https://doi.org/10.1111/psyp.12846

Bajouk, O., & Hansenne, M. (2018). Dispositional perspective-taking and empathic concern modulate the impact of cognitive load on empathy for facial emotions. Psychological Reports, 122(11), 2201-2219. DOI: 10.1177/0033294118799337

Batson, C. D. (2011). Altruism in humans. Oxford University Press.

Chopik, W. J., O’Brien, E., & Konrath, S. H. (2017). Differences in empathic concern and perspective taking across 63 countries. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 48(1). 23-38. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022116673910

Corte, K. D., Buysse, A., Verhofstadt, L. L., Roeyers, H., Ponnet, K., & Davis, M. H. (2007). Empathic tendencies: Reliability and validity of the dutch version of the interpersonal reactivity index. Psychologica Belgica, 47(4). 235-260. https://doi.org./10.5334/pb-47-4-235

Cuff, B. M. P., Brown, S. J., Taylor, L., & Howat, D. (2016) Empathy: A review of the concept. Emotion Review, 8(2), 144-153. https://doi.org./10.1177/1754073914558466

Davis, M. H. (1980). A multidimensional approach to individual differences in empathy. JSAS Catalog of Selected Documents in Psychology, 10. 85.

Fernandez, A. M., Dufey, M., & Kramp, U. (2011). Testing the psychometric properties of the interpersonal reactivity index (IRI) in Chile. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 27(3), 179-185. https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000065

Friedenberg, L. (1995). Psychological testing: Design, analysis, and use 1st edition. Allyn & Bacon.

Girolamo, M. D., Giromini, L., Winters, C. L., & Serie, C. M. B. (2017). The questionnaire of cognitive and affective empathy: A comparison between paper-and-pencil versus online formats in Italian samples. Journal of Personality Assessment, 101(2). 159-170. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2017.1389745

Gustini, N. (2017) Empati kultural pada mahasiswa. JOMSIGN: Journal of Multicultural Studies in Guidance and Counseling, 1(1), 17-35. https://doi.org/10.17509/jomsign.v1i1.6049

Hidayat, D., & Hafiar, H. (2019) Nilai-nilai budaya soméah pada perilaku komunikasi masyarakat suku sunda. Jurnal Kajian Komunikasi, 7(1). 84-96. https://doi.org/10.24198/jkk.v7i1.19595

Jaenudin, U., & Tahrir. (2019). Studi religiusitas, budaya sunda, dan perilaku moral pada masyarakat kabupaten Bandung. JPIB: Jurnal Psikologi Islam dan Budaya, 2(1), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.15575/jpib.v2i1.3445

Lishner, A. D., Stocks, E. L., & Steinert, S. W. (2017) Empathy. Dalam Encyclopedia of personality and individual differences (Hal.1-8). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28099-8_513-1

Masroer, C. J. (2015). Spiritualitas Islam dalam budaya wayang kulit masyarakat Jawa dan Sunda. Jurnal Ilmiah Agama dan Perubahan Sosial, 9(1) 38-61. https://doi.org/10.14421/jsa.2015.091-03

Miguel, F. K., Hashimoto, E. S., Gonsalves, E. R. D. S., de Oliveira, G. T., & Wiltenburg, T. D. (2018). Validity studies of the online empathy questionnaire. Trends Psychol., Ribeirão Preto, 26(4), 2217-2230. https://doi.org./10.9788/TP2018.4-18En

Niedtfeld, I. (2017). Experimental investigation of cognitive and affective empathy in borderline personality disorder: Effects of ambiguity in multimodal social information processing. Psychiatry Research, 253, 58-63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2017.03.037

Norman, R. M., & Sjetne, I. S. (2019). Adaptation, modification, and psychometric assessment of a Norwegian version of the Basel extent of rationing of nursing care for nursing homes instrument (BERNCA-NH). BMC Health Services Research, 19, 969. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-019-4817-3

Permadi, H. S., Justitia, D., & Marjo, H. K. (2016). Profil empati mahasiswa Sunda. Jurnal Insight, 4(1), 1-7. https://doi.org/10.21009/INSIGHT.041.06

Powell, P. A., & Roberts, J. (2017). Situational determinants of cognitive, affective, and compassionate empathy in naturalistic digital interactions. Computers in Human Behavior, 68. 137-148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.11.024

Rahman, A. A., Sarbini, Tarsono, Fitriah, E. A., & Mulyana, A. (2018). Studi eksploratif mengenai karakteristik dan faktor pembentuk identitas etnik Sunda. JPIB: Jurnal Psikologi Islam dan Budaya, 1(1). 1-8. https://doi.org/10.15575/jpib.v1i1.2072

Reniers, R., Corcoran, R., Drake, R. J., Shryane, N., & Vollm, B. (2011). The QCAE: A questionnaire of cognitive and affective empathy. Journal of Personality Assessment, 93(1), 84-95. http://doi.org/ 10.1080/00223891.2010.528484

Riess, H. (2017). The science of empathy. Journal of Patient Experience, 4(2), 74-77. https://doi.org/10.1177/2374373517699267

Salsabila, D. F., Rofifah, R., Natanael, Y., & Ramdani, Z. (2019). Uji validitas konstruk indonesian-psychological measurement of islamic religiousness (I-PMIR). JPIB: Jurnal Psikologi Islam dan Budaya, 2(2), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.15575/jpib.v2i2.5494

Samovar, L. A., Porter, R. E., & McDaniel, E. R. (2010). Komunikasi lintas budaya. Salemba Humanika.

Sukmayadi, T. (2016). Kajian tentang karakter berbasis nilai-nilai kearifan lokal pada masyarakat adat kampung Kuta kecamatan Tambaksari kabupaten Ciamis. Jurnal Civics, 13(1), 96-112. https://doi.org/10.21831/civics.v13i1.11079

Thamrin, H. (2018). Punten, mangga, nuhun†Makna nilai luhur karakter moral Sunda yang harus dipertahankan. Linguart, 6(2).

Wallentin, F. Y., Jöreskog, K. G., & Luo, H. (2010). Confirmatory factor analysis of ordinal variables with misspecified models. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 17(3), 392-423. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2010.489003

Wang, Y., Li, Y., Xiao, W., Fu, Y., & Jie, J. (2020). Investigation on the rationality of the extant ways of scoring the interpersonal reactivity index based on confirmatory factor analysis. Frontiers in Psychology: Quantitative Psychology and Measurement, 11, 1086. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01086

Warsihna, J., Ramdani, Z., & Tae, L. F. (2021). The measurement of science teaching efficacy belief instrument (STEBI): Sustaining teacher’s quality. Psychology and Education, 58(3), 2972–2979. https://doi.org/10.17762/pae.v58i3.4380