Melampaui Dikotomi Barat dan Timur: Tipologi Kesarjanaan Non-Muslim dalam Studi Islam Kontemporer

Melampaui Dikotomi Barat dan Timur: Tipologi Kesarjanaan Non-Muslim dalam Studi Islam Kontemporer

Authors

  • Ahmad Labib Majdi Universitas Islam Darussalam Ciamis
  • Madiha Dzakiyyah Chairunnisa Universitas Terbuka

Keywords:

Contemporary, Islamic Studies, Typology, Non-Muslim Scholarship

Abstract

This article aims to map the typology of non-Muslim scholarship in contemporary Islamic studies by examining its institutional position within American and European universities, the fields and methodologies it employs, and the theoretical frameworks it produces. This aim arises from a critique of the stigmatized and reductionist view held by some Muslim (insider) scholars who regard non-Muslim (outsider) scholarship as a monolithic intellectual bloc. This study adopts a library research design with literature selection criteria that include the use of English- and Indonesian-language sources as dominant academic languages; a publication range from the 1980s to the 2020s as a representation of contemporary developments; the prioritization of seminal primary works and relevant secondary sources; and a focus on literature addressing Islamic studies methodologies, the insider–outsider approach, and the evolution of the revisionist school. Data were analyzed through a qualitative, descriptive-explanatory approach consisting of three methodological steps: data reduction, data presentation, and data interpretation and conclusion drawing. The findings reveal that non-Muslim scholarship in Islamic studies is not monolithic but can be identified through four typologies: descriptive-traditionalist, historical-critical-traditionalist, historical-critical-revisionist, and skeptical-revisionist. These findings affirm that works and ideas from non-Muslim scholars that may appear negative should be understood as a consequence of specific methodological choices. Consequently, rejecting particular theses advanced by non-Muslim scholarship does not necessarily entail the arbitrary rejection of its broader epistemological and methodological frameworks.

References

Abdullah, A. (2010). Kata Pengantar. In R. C. Martin (Ed.), Pendekatan terhadap Islam dalam Studi Agama. Suka Press.

Abdullah, A. (2011). Studi Agama: Normativitas atau Historisitas? Pustaka Pelajar.

Adams, C. J. (1976). Islamic Religious Tradition. In L. Binder (Ed.), The Study of the Middle East: Research and Scholarship in the Humanities and the Social Sciences. John Wiley & Sons.

al-Jabiri, A. (1991). Takwin al-’Aql al-’Arabi. al-Markaz al-Thaqafi al-’Arabi.

Alfi, A. M., & Romadhoni, M. W. (2022). Pendekatan Politis dalam Studi Islam. Qolamuna: Jurnal Studi Islam, 8(1), 96–115.

Ali, M. (2018). Studi Islam di Barat Kontemporer. Jurnal Al-Adyan, 5(2). http://103.55.216.56/index.php/adyan/article/view/10020

Amal, K. (2018). Perang Atas Nama Iman: Telaah Evolusi Jihad Era Kenabian Muhammad Saw. Forum.

Amamou, H. (2018). The Nature of Early Islamic Sources and the Debate over their Historical Significance. AlMuntaqa, 1(2), 68–79.

Amirudin, A., & Maisarah, M. M. (2020). Karakteristik Kajian Islam Kontemporer: Dialektika Barat dan Timur. Eduprof : Islamic Education Journal, 2(1), 18–38. https://doi.org/10.47453/eduprof.v2i1.29

Arif, S. (2008). Orientalis dan Diabolisme Pemikiran. Gema Insani.

Azra, A. (2015). Studi Islam di Timur dan Barat: Pengalaman Selintas. In Experiencing Islam in America.

Azwar, S. (2014). Metodologi Penelitian. Pustaka Pelajar.

Bennett, C. (2012). The Bloomsbury Companion to Islamic Studies (C. Bennett (ed.)). Bloomsbury Publishing.

Berg, H. (2000). The Development of Exegesis in Early Islam: The Authenticity of Muslim Literature from Formative Period. Curzon.

Binder, L. (1976). The Study of Middle East: Research and Scholarship in the Humanities and the Social Sciences. John Wiley & Sons.

Boulatta, I. J. (1990). Trends and Issues in Contemporary Thought. SUNY.

Brill, A. (2012). Judaism and World Religion: Encountering Christianity, Islam, and Eastern Traditions. Palgrave Macmillan.

Brockopp, J. E. (2015). Interpreting Material Evidence: Religion at the “Origins of Islam.” History of Religions, 55(2), 121–147.

Conrad, L. I. (2016). General Editor’s Preface. In F. M. Donner (Ed.), The Expansion of the Early Islamic State. Routledge.

Görke, A., Motzki, H., & Schoeler, G. (2012). First Century Sources for the Life of Muhammad: A Debate. Der Islam, 89(1–2), 2–59.

Hawting, G. R. (2005). The Rise of Islam. In Y. M. Choueiri (Ed.), A Companion to the History of the Middle East. Blackwell Publishing.

Hery, M. (2016). Pengembangan Studi Islam Perspektif Insider-outsider. Intizar, 22(2), 199–220. https://doi.org/10.19109/intizar.v22i2.941

Kaelan. (2010). Metode Penelitian Agama Kualitatif Interdisipliner. Paradigma.

Kasiram, M. (2010). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif-Kuantitatif. UIN Maliki Press.

Khaldun, R. (2017). Telaah Historis Perkembangan Orientalisme Abad XVI-XX. Ulumuna, 9(1).

Koren, J., & Nevo, Y. D. (1991). Methodological Approaches to Islamic Studies. Der Islam, 68.

Kurzman, C., & Ernst, C. W. (2012). Islamic Studies in U.S. Universities. Review of Middle East Studies, 46(1).

Labib, A. (2022). Pendekatan Hermeneutik dalam Studi Islam. Qolamuna: Jurnal Studi Islam, 8(1), 16–29.

Madjid, N. (1992). Islam Doktrin dan Peradaban: Sebuah Telaah Kritis tentang Masalah Keimanan, Kemanusiaan, dan Kemodernan. Yayasan Wakaf Paramadina.

Madjid, N. (1994). Tradisi Syarah dan Hasyiyah dalam Fiqh dan Masalah Stagnasi Pemikiran Hukum Islam. In B. Munawar-Rachman (Ed.), Kontekstualisasi Doktrin Islam dalam Sejarah. Yayasan Wakaf Paramadina.

Majdi, A. L. (2021). Historiografi Islam Kesarjanaan Barat dalam Tinjauan Ortodoksi dan Heterodoksi. El Tarikh: Journal of History, Culture and Civilization, 2(1), 129–143. http://www.ejournal.radenintan.ac.id/index.php/eltarikh/article/view/7886

Majdi, A. L. (2022). Ekumenisme Islam Awal: Telaah Pemikiran Fred McGraw Donner. Maghza Pustaka.

Martin, R. C. (2001). Islam and Religious Studies: An Introductory Essay. In R. C. Martin (Ed.), Approaches to Islam in Religious Studies. Oneworld Publication.

Mastawiyah, M., Erliana, M., Salsabila M., M., & Sukti, S. (2024). Sejarah dan Perkembangan Studi Islam di Dunia Islam dan Barat. Carong: Jurnal Pendidikan, Sosial dan Humaniora, 1(2), 74–86. https://doi.org/doi.org/10.62710/09hgc505

Maufur, M. (1995). Orientalisme: Serbuan Ideologis dan Intelektual. Pustaka al-Kautsar.

Moleong, L. J. (1996). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Remaja Rosdakarya.

Mulyati, S. (2006). Mengenal dan Memahami Tarekat-tarekat Muktabarah di Indonesia. Kencana.

Mustaqim, A. (2014). Model Penelitian Tokoh (Dalam Teori dan Aplikasi. Jurnal Studi Ilmu-ilmu al-Quran dan Hadis, 15(2), 201–218.

Nasution, H. (1991). Pembaharuan dalam Islam: Sejarah Pemikiran dan Gerakan. Bulan Bintang.

Peters, F. E. (1994). Muhammad and the Origins of Islam. SUNY Press.

Qomar, M. (2018). Penelusuran Akar-akar Kekerasan dalam Mengamalkan Ajaran Islam. In A. Wijaya (Ed.), Dari Membela Tuhan ke Membela Manusia; Kritik atas Nalar Agamaisasi Kekerasan. Mizan.

Rippin, A. (2001). Introduction. In The Qur’an: Style and Contents. Ashgate.

Romdhoni, A. (2012). Kajian Islam di Barat (Sebuah Paparan Model Kajian dan Tokoh-tokoh Orientalis). Jurnal Islamic Review (JIE), 1(1).

Said, E. W. (1979). Orientalism. Vintage Books.

Sanchez, F. del R. (2015). The Rejection of Muhammad’s Message by Jews and Christian and its Effect on Islamic Theological Argumentation. Journal of the Middle East and Africa, 6(1), 59–75.

Schoeler, G. (2011). The Biography of Muhammad: Nature adn Authenticity. Routledge.

Sirry, M. (2013). Polemik Kitab Suci: Tafsir Reformasi atas Kritik al-Qur’an terhadap Agama Lain. Gramedia.

Sugiyono. (2011). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif-Kualitatif dan R&D. Alfabeta.

Umam, M. H., & Mustofa, M. L. (2022). Data Field Richard C. Martin dalam Pendekatan Studi Islam. Qolamuna: Jurnal Studi Islam, 8(1), 30–45.

Downloads

Published

2025-11-28

How to Cite

Majdi, A. L., & Chairunnisa, M. D. (2025). Melampaui Dikotomi Barat dan Timur: Tipologi Kesarjanaan Non-Muslim dalam Studi Islam Kontemporer. Jurnal Riset Agama, 5(2), 139–155. Retrieved from https://journal.uinsgd.ac.id/index.php/jra/article/view/45708

Issue

Section

Articles
Loading...