Innovative STEAM Learning: Crafting a Stop Motion Video to Promote Environmental Care for Prospective Elementary School Teachers
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15575/kpi.v7i3.48332Keywords:
Environmental Care Campaign, Project-Based Learning, Prospective Elementary Teachers, STEAM Learning, Stop Motion Video, 21st Century Skills DevelopmentAbstract
This study aims to measure the effectiveness of project-based learning through the creation of stop motion videos as a medium for environmental awareness campaigns among prospective primary school teachers, within the framework of innovative STEAM learning. The model used is project-based learning integrated with the STEAM approach. Tools included smartphones with the Stop Motion Studio app, storyboard templates, and video editing software. The research design is a case study using a weak one-shot experimental method, involving pre-tests, post-tests, and questionnaires administered to 80 prospective teachers. Research instruments included observation sheets, Likert-scale questionnaires, and expert validation forms. The results showed that STEAM-based project learning significantly enhanced students' creativity, collaboration, and understanding of environmental concepts. The production of stop motion videos also contributed to the improvement of digital literacy and communication skills. This approach effectively increased student engagement and awareness of the importance of environmental education. Quantitative data indicated a significant improvement in learning outcomes after the intervention. This study introduces stop motion video production as an innovative tool in STEAM project-based learning, making a meaningful contribution to the development of 21st-century skills and environmental awareness in teacher education programs.
References
Attai, S. L., Reyes, J. C., Davis, J. L., York, J., Ranney, K., & Hyde, T. W. (2021). Investigating the impact of flexible furniture in the elementary classroom. Learning Environments Research, 24(2), 153–167.
Avraamidou, L. (2024). Can we disrupt the momentum of the AI colonization of science education? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 61(10), 2570–2574.
Campbell, D. T., & Stanley, J. C. (2015). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research. Ravenio books.
Chung, C., Hwang, G., & Lai, C. (2019). A review of experimental mobile learning research in 2010--2016 based on the activity theory framework. Computers & Education, 129, 1–13.
Chung, E., Subramaniam, G., & Dass, L. C. (2020). Online learning readiness among university students in Malaysia amidst COVID-19. Asian Journal of University Education, 16(2), 46–58.
Creswell, J. W. (2024). My 35 years in mixed methods research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 18(3), 203–215.
Davis, C., Greenaway, R., Moore, M., & Cooper, L. (2019). Online teaching in social work education: Understanding the challenges. Australian Social Work, 72(1), 34–46.
Eickelmann, B., & Vennemann, M. (2017). Teachers ‘attitudes and beliefs regarding ICT in teaching and learning in European countries. European Educational Research Journal, 16(6), 733–761.
Ernst, J., & Tornabene, L. (2012). Preservice early childhood educators’ perceptions of outdoor settings as learning environments. Environmental Education Research, 18(5), 643–664.
Guyotte, K. W., Sochacka, N. W., Costantino, T. E., Kellam, N. N., & Walther, J. (2015). Collaborative creativity in STEAM: Narratives of art education students’ experiences in transdisciplinary spaces. International Journal of Education & the Arts, 16(15).
Harpe, S. E. (2024). A Survey of Open Science Attitudes and Behaviors among US Pharmacy Faculty. MedRxiv, 2006–2024.
Herro, D., Quigley, C., & Cian, H. (2019). The challenges of STEAM instruction: Lessons from the field. Action in Teacher Education, 41(2), 172–190.
Hsu, C.-C., Zhang, Y., Ch, P., Aqdas, R., Chupradit, S., & Nawaz, A. (2021). A step towards sustainable environment in China: The role of eco-innovation renewable energy and environmental taxes. Journal of Environmental Management, 299, 113609.
Jewitt, C. (2008). Multimodality and literacy in school classrooms. Review of Research in Education, 32(1), 241–267.
Joshi, D. R., Sieverding, H. L., Xu, H., Kwon, H., Wang, M., Clay, S. A., Johnson, J. M., Thapa, R., Westhoff, S., & Clay, D. E. (2023). A global meta-analysis of cover crop response on soil carbon storage within a corn production system. Agronomy Journal, 115(4), 1543–1556.
Kahn, J. P., & others. (2020). Digital contact tracing for pandemic response: Ethics and governance guidance. Johns Hopkins University Press.
Kahn, S., & Zeidler, D. L. (2019). A conceptual analysis of perspective taking in support of socioscientific reasoning. Science & Education, 28(6), 605–638.
Liao, J. C., Mi, L., Pontrelli, S., & Luo, S. (2016). Fuelling the future: microbial engineering for the production of sustainable biofuels. Nature Reviews Microbiology, 14(5), 288–304.
Norman, D. A. (2023). Design for a better world: Meaningful, sustainable, humanity centered. MIT Press.
Peppler, K., & Wohlwend, K. (2018). Theorizing the nexus of STEAM practice. Arts Education Policy Review, 119(2), 88–99.
Peterson, K., DeCato, L., & Kolb, D. A. (2015). Moving and learning: Expanding style and increasing flexibility. Journal of Experiential Education, 38(3), 228–244.
Taylor, C. (2023). Interpretation and the Sciences of Man. In The Philosophy of Society (pp. 156–200). Routledge.
Trochim, W. M., Cabrera, D. A., Milstein, B., Gallagher, R. S., & Leischow, S. J. (2006). Practical challenges of systems thinking and modeling in public health. American Journal of Public Health, 96(3), 538–546.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Dede Trie Kurniawan, Rendi Restiana Sukardi, Yunus Abidin, Sri Maryanti

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
-
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (see The Effect of Open Access).
Authors retain the copyright and full publishing rights without restrictions.