Studi Sistematik Aspek Kreativitas dalam Konteks Pendidikan

Authors

  • Silmi Amrullah Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia (UPI) Bandung, Indonesia
  • Lidwina Felisima Tae Universitas Timor, Nusa Tenggara Timur, Indonesia
  • Feri Indra Irawan UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung, Indonesia
  • Zulmi Ramdani Faculty of Psychology, UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung, Indonesia
  • Bagus Hary Prakoso Pusat Pendidikan dan Penilaian, Balitbang, Kementrian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15575/psy.v5i2.3533

Keywords:

creativity, good education, systematical review

Abstract

The success of learning in school is determined by the ability to find and use effective and creative learning strategies. Creativity is not only an important element in solving problems, but also an indicator that individuals have higher levels of excellence functions. Creativity character is one of the issues that has not been widely discussed and actualized in the context of education, especially in the focus of creating an effective learning process. A systematic review was used to examine previous research on creativity in the context of education. This study reviewed 450 scientific papers based on the analysis of the three experts who participated in the study. The results show that creativity has a specific model based on aspects of definition, characteristics of creative subjects, supporting factors, inhibiting factors, domain of creativity and creative strategies in school. Creativity is also a very important character and has a particular model both for students and teachers, and for the principals.

References

Abdulla, A. M., & Cramond, B. (2017). After six decades of systematic study of creativity: What do teachers need to know about what it is and how it is measured? Roeper Review, 39(1), 9–23. doi.org/10.1080/02783193.2016.1247398

Abedini, S., & Broujeni, R. B. (2016). Teacher creativity in university students ’ views : A content analysis. International Journal of Pharmaceutical Research & Applied Sciences, 5(21), 379–386.

Agnoli, S., Zanon, M., Mastria, S., Avenanti, A., & Corazza, G. E. (2018). Enhancing creative cognition with a rapid right-parietal neurofeedback procedure. Neuropsychologia, 118(February), 99–106. doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2018.02.015

Ashford, S., Edmunds, J., & French, D. P. (2010). What is the best way to change self-efficacy to promote lifestyle and recreational physical activity? A systematic review with meta-analysis. British Journal of Health Psychology, 15(2), 265–288. doi.org/10.1348/135910709X461752

Boytos, A., Smith, K., & Kim, J. H. (2017). The underdog advantage in creativity. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 26, 96–101. doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2017.10.003

Burns, B. D., Zhang, Y., Wieth, M., & Touyz, S. (2017). An exploratory study of creativity and eating disorders. Journal of Eating Disorders, 5(1), 536–556. doi.org/10.1186/s40337-017-0176-9

Bush, G. (2014). Fear no creativity. Knowledge Quest, 42(5), 20–23. Retrieved from search.proquest.com/docview/1550992342?accountid=14777

Castillo-Vergara, M., Alvarez-Marin, A., & Placencio-Hidalgo, D. (2018). A bibliometric analysis of creativity in the field of business economics. Journal of Business Research, 85(December 2017), 1–9. doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2017.12.011

Chan, S., & Yuen, M. (2014). Personal and environmental factors affecting teachers’ creativity-fostering practices in Hong Kong. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 12, 69–77. doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2014.02.003

Chang, S. H., Wang, C. L., & Lee, J. C. (2016). Do award-winning experiences benefit students’ creative self-efficacy and creativity? The moderated mediation effects of perceived school support for creativity. Learning and Individual Differences, 51, 291–298. doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2016.09.011

Choi, J. N. (2004). Person – environment fit and creative behavior : Differential impacts of supplies – values and demands – abilities. Human Relations, 57(5), 531–552. doi.org/10.1177/0018726704044308

Collard, P., & Looney, J. (2014). Nurturing creativity in education. European Journal of Education, 49(3), 348–364. doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12090

de Alencar, E. M. S. (2014). Maria Helena Novaes – creative person, creative life. Gifted Education International, 30(2), 99–105. doi.org/10.1177/0261429413481118

Delis, D. C., Lansing, A., Houston, W. S., Wetter, S., Han, S. D., Jacobson, M., … Kramer, J. (2007). Creativity lost: The importance of testing higher-level executive functions in school-age children and adolescents. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 25(1), 29–40. doi.org/10.1177/0734282906292403

Gajda, A. (2016). The relationship and moderators of school achievement and creativity at different educational stages. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 19, 246–259. doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2015.12.004

Gralewski, J., & Karwowski, M. (2018). Are teachers’ implicit theories of creativity related to the recognition of their students’ creativity? Journal of Creative Behavior, 52(2), 156–167. doi.org/10.1002/jocb.140

Gulliksen, M. S. (2017). Making matters? Unpacking the role of practical aesthetic making activities in the general education through the theoretical lens of embodied learning. Cogent Education, 4(1), 1–14. doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2017.1415108

Hansenne, M., & Legrand, J. (2012). Creativity, emotional intelligence, and school performance in children. International Journal of Educational Research, 53, 264–268. doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2012.03.015

Hoffmann, J., Ivcevic, Z., & Brackett, M. (2016). Creativity in the age of technology: Measuring the digital creativity of millennials. Creativity Research Journal, 28(2), 149–153. doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2016.1162515

Jahnke, I., Haertel, T., & Wildt, J. (2017). Teachers’ conceptions of student creativity in higher education. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 54(1), 87–95. doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2015.1088396

Jauk, E., Benedek, M., & Neubauer, A. C. (2014). The road to creative achievement: A latent variable model of ability and personality predictors. European Journal of Personality, 28(1), 95–105. doi.org/10.1002/per.1941

Kaufman, J. C., & Beghetto, R. A. (2013). In praise of Clark Kent: Creative metacognition and the importance of teaching kids when (not) to be creative. Roeper Review, 35(3), 155–165. doi.org/10.1080/02783193.2013.799413

Konstantinidou, E., Gregoriadis, A., Grammatikopoulos, V., & Michalopoulou, M. (2014). Primary physical education perspective on creativity: The nature of creativity and creativity fostering classroom environment. Early Child Development and Care, 184(5), 766–782. doi.org/10.1080/03004430.2013.818989

Konstantinidou, E., Zisi, V., Katsarou, D., & Michalopoulou, M. (2015). Barriers and inhibitors of creativity in physical education. European Psychomotricity Journal, 7, 17–31. Retrieved from search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=a9h&AN=119793540&site=ehost-live&scope=site

Krumm, G., Aranguren, M., Arán Filippetti, V., & Lemos, V. (2016). Factor Structure of the torrance tests of creative thinking verbal form B in a Spanish-speaking population. Journal of Creative Behavior, 50(2), 150–164. doi.org/10.1002/jocb.76

Lucas, B. (2016). A five-dimensional model of creativity and its assessment in schools. Applied Measurement in Education, 29(4), 278–290. doi.org/10.1080/08957347.2016.1209206

Lucas, B., Claxton, G., & Spencer, E. (2013). Progression in student creativity in school: First steps towards new forms of formative assessments. OECD Education Working Papers, 86(86), 45. doi.org/10.1787/5k4dp59msdwk-en

Maksić, S., & Pavlović, J. (2011). Educational researchers’ personal explicit theories on creativity and its development: A qualitative study. High Ability Studies, 22(2), 219–231. doi.org/10.1080/13598139.2011.628850

Peterson, C., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2004). Character strengths and virtues: A handbook and classification. United States of America: American Psychological Association.

Ramdani, Z. (2018). Kolaborasi antara kepala sekolah, guru dan siswa dalam menciptakan sistem pendidikan yang berkualitas. In National Conference on Educational Assessment and Plolicy. Jakarta: Balai Pusat Penelitian (Balitbang) Kementrian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Republik Indonesia.

Ramdani, Z., & Fahmi, I. (2014). Profil kekuatan karakter dan kebajikan pada mahasiswa berprestasi. Psympathic, 1, 98–108. doi.org/10.15575/psy.v1i1.471

Rinkevich, J. L. (2011). Creative teaching: Why it matters and where to begin. The Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and Ideas, 84(5), 219–223. doi.org/10.1080/00098655.2011.575416

Runco, M. A., Millar, G., Acar, S., & Cramond, B. (2010). Torrance tests of creative thinking as predictors of personal and public achievement: A fifty-year follow-up. Creativity Research Journal, 22(4), 361–368. doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2010.523393

Seng, Q. K., Keung, H. K., & Cheng, S. K. (2008). Implicit theories of creativity: A comparison of student-teachers in Hong Kong and Singapore. Compare, 38(1), 71–86. doi.org/10.1080/03057920701419959

Soriano, E. M. L. (1985). Creativitv in Brazilian Schools. GCT, 17.

Strenberg, R. J. (2006). The nature of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 18(1), 87–98. doi.org/10.1207/s15326934crj1801

Taylor, M. A., & Callahan, J. L. (2005). Bringing creativity into being: Underlying assumptions that influence methods of studying organizational creativity. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 7(2), 247–270. doi.org/10.1177/1523422305274529

Thoring, K., Desmet, P., & Badke-Schaub, P. (2018). Creative environments for design education and practice: A typology of creative spaces. Design Studies, 56, 54–83. doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2018.02.001

Warren, F., Mason-Apps, E., Hoskins, S., Azmi, Z., & Boyce, J. (2018). The role of implicit theories, age, and gender in the creative performance of children and adults. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 28(2010), 98–109. doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2018.03.010

Zhou, J., Shen, J., Wang, X., Neber, H., & Johji, I. (2013). A cross-cultural comparison: Teachers’ conceptualizations of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 25(3), 239–247. doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2012.730006

Downloads

Published

2018-12-31

Issue

Vol. 5 No. 2 (2018): PSYMPATHIC

Section

Articles

Citation Check

License

The author whose published manuscript approved the following provisions:

1. The right of publication of all material published in the journal / published on the E-Journal of Psychology website is held by the editorial board with the knowledge of the author (moral right remains the author of the script).

2. The formal legal provisions for access to digital articles of this electronic journal are subject to the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license (CC BY-SA), which means that the Journal of Psychology reserves the right to save, transmit media / format, manage in database form, , maintain, and publish articles without requesting permission from the Author as long as it continues to include the name of the Author as the owner of Copyright.

3. Printed and published print and electronic manuscripts are open access for any purposes. In addition to these objectives, the editorial board shall not be liable for violations of copyright law.

Â