Studi Sistematik Aspek Kreativitas dalam Konteks Pendidikan


Silmi Amrullah(1), Lidwina Felisima Tae(2), Feri Indra Irawan(3), Zulmi Ramdani(4*), Bagus Hary Prakoso(5)

(1) Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia (UPI) Bandung, Indonesia
(2) Universitas Timor, Nusa Tenggara Timur, Indonesia
(3) UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung, Indonesia
(4) Faculty of Psychology, UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung, Indonesia
(5) Pusat Pendidikan dan Penilaian, Balitbang, Kementrian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan, Indonesia
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


The success of learning in school is determined by the ability to find and use effective and creative learning strategies. Creativity is not only an important element in solving problems, but also an indicator that individuals have higher levels of excellence functions. Creativity character is one of the issues that has not been widely discussed and actualized in the context of education, especially in the focus of creating an effective learning process. A systematic review was used to examine previous research on creativity in the context of education. This study reviewed 450 scientific papers based on the analysis of the three experts who participated in the study. The results show that creativity has a specific model based on aspects of definition, characteristics of creative subjects, supporting factors, inhibiting factors, domain of creativity and creative strategies in school. Creativity is also a very important character and has a particular model both for students and teachers, and for the principals.


Keywords


creativity, good education, systematical review

Full Text:

PDF

References


Abdulla, A. M., & Cramond, B. (2017). After six decades of systematic study of creativity: What do teachers need to know about what it is and how it is measured? Roeper Review, 39(1), 9–23. doi.org/10.1080/02783193.2016.1247398

Abedini, S., & Broujeni, R. B. (2016). Teacher creativity in university students ’ views : A content analysis. International Journal of Pharmaceutical Research & Applied Sciences, 5(21), 379–386.

Agnoli, S., Zanon, M., Mastria, S., Avenanti, A., & Corazza, G. E. (2018). Enhancing creative cognition with a rapid right-parietal neurofeedback procedure. Neuropsychologia, 118(February), 99–106. doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2018.02.015

Ashford, S., Edmunds, J., & French, D. P. (2010). What is the best way to change self-efficacy to promote lifestyle and recreational physical activity? A systematic review with meta-analysis. British Journal of Health Psychology, 15(2), 265–288. doi.org/10.1348/135910709X461752

Boytos, A., Smith, K., & Kim, J. H. (2017). The underdog advantage in creativity. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 26, 96–101. doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2017.10.003

Burns, B. D., Zhang, Y., Wieth, M., & Touyz, S. (2017). An exploratory study of creativity and eating disorders. Journal of Eating Disorders, 5(1), 536–556. doi.org/10.1186/s40337-017-0176-9

Bush, G. (2014). Fear no creativity. Knowledge Quest, 42(5), 20–23. Retrieved from search.proquest.com/docview/1550992342?accountid=14777

Castillo-Vergara, M., Alvarez-Marin, A., & Placencio-Hidalgo, D. (2018). A bibliometric analysis of creativity in the field of business economics. Journal of Business Research, 85(December 2017), 1–9. doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2017.12.011

Chan, S., & Yuen, M. (2014). Personal and environmental factors affecting teachers’ creativity-fostering practices in Hong Kong. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 12, 69–77. doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2014.02.003

Chang, S. H., Wang, C. L., & Lee, J. C. (2016). Do award-winning experiences benefit students’ creative self-efficacy and creativity? The moderated mediation effects of perceived school support for creativity. Learning and Individual Differences, 51, 291–298. doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2016.09.011

Choi, J. N. (2004). Person – environment fit and creative behavior : Differential impacts of supplies – values and demands – abilities. Human Relations, 57(5), 531–552. doi.org/10.1177/0018726704044308

Collard, P., & Looney, J. (2014). Nurturing creativity in education. European Journal of Education, 49(3), 348–364. doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12090

de Alencar, E. M. S. (2014). Maria Helena Novaes – creative person, creative life. Gifted Education International, 30(2), 99–105. doi.org/10.1177/0261429413481118

Delis, D. C., Lansing, A., Houston, W. S., Wetter, S., Han, S. D., Jacobson, M., … Kramer, J. (2007). Creativity lost: The importance of testing higher-level executive functions in school-age children and adolescents. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 25(1), 29–40. doi.org/10.1177/0734282906292403

Gajda, A. (2016). The relationship and moderators of school achievement and creativity at different educational stages. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 19, 246–259. doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2015.12.004

Gralewski, J., & Karwowski, M. (2018). Are teachers’ implicit theories of creativity related to the recognition of their students’ creativity? Journal of Creative Behavior, 52(2), 156–167. doi.org/10.1002/jocb.140

Gulliksen, M. S. (2017). Making matters? Unpacking the role of practical aesthetic making activities in the general education through the theoretical lens of embodied learning. Cogent Education, 4(1), 1–14. doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2017.1415108

Hansenne, M., & Legrand, J. (2012). Creativity, emotional intelligence, and school performance in children. International Journal of Educational Research, 53, 264–268. doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2012.03.015

Hoffmann, J., Ivcevic, Z., & Brackett, M. (2016). Creativity in the age of technology: Measuring the digital creativity of millennials. Creativity Research Journal, 28(2), 149–153. doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2016.1162515

Jahnke, I., Haertel, T., & Wildt, J. (2017). Teachers’ conceptions of student creativity in higher education. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 54(1), 87–95. doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2015.1088396

Jauk, E., Benedek, M., & Neubauer, A. C. (2014). The road to creative achievement: A latent variable model of ability and personality predictors. European Journal of Personality, 28(1), 95–105. doi.org/10.1002/per.1941

Kaufman, J. C., & Beghetto, R. A. (2013). In praise of Clark Kent: Creative metacognition and the importance of teaching kids when (not) to be creative. Roeper Review, 35(3), 155–165. doi.org/10.1080/02783193.2013.799413

Konstantinidou, E., Gregoriadis, A., Grammatikopoulos, V., & Michalopoulou, M. (2014). Primary physical education perspective on creativity: The nature of creativity and creativity fostering classroom environment. Early Child Development and Care, 184(5), 766–782. doi.org/10.1080/03004430.2013.818989

Konstantinidou, E., Zisi, V., Katsarou, D., & Michalopoulou, M. (2015). Barriers and inhibitors of creativity in physical education. European Psychomotricity Journal, 7, 17–31. Retrieved from search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=a9h&AN=119793540&site=ehost-live&scope=site

Krumm, G., Aranguren, M., Arán Filippetti, V., & Lemos, V. (2016). Factor Structure of the torrance tests of creative thinking verbal form B in a Spanish-speaking population. Journal of Creative Behavior, 50(2), 150–164. doi.org/10.1002/jocb.76

Lucas, B. (2016). A five-dimensional model of creativity and its assessment in schools. Applied Measurement in Education, 29(4), 278–290. doi.org/10.1080/08957347.2016.1209206

Lucas, B., Claxton, G., & Spencer, E. (2013). Progression in student creativity in school: First steps towards new forms of formative assessments. OECD Education Working Papers, 86(86), 45. doi.org/10.1787/5k4dp59msdwk-en

Maksić, S., & Pavlović, J. (2011). Educational researchers’ personal explicit theories on creativity and its development: A qualitative study. High Ability Studies, 22(2), 219–231. doi.org/10.1080/13598139.2011.628850

Peterson, C., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2004). Character strengths and virtues: A handbook and classification. United States of America: American Psychological Association.

Ramdani, Z. (2018). Kolaborasi antara kepala sekolah, guru dan siswa dalam menciptakan sistem pendidikan yang berkualitas. In National Conference on Educational Assessment and Plolicy. Jakarta: Balai Pusat Penelitian (Balitbang) Kementrian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Republik Indonesia.

Ramdani, Z., & Fahmi, I. (2014). Profil kekuatan karakter dan kebajikan pada mahasiswa berprestasi. Psympathic, 1, 98–108. doi.org/10.15575/psy.v1i1.471

Rinkevich, J. L. (2011). Creative teaching: Why it matters and where to begin. The Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and Ideas, 84(5), 219–223. doi.org/10.1080/00098655.2011.575416

Runco, M. A., Millar, G., Acar, S., & Cramond, B. (2010). Torrance tests of creative thinking as predictors of personal and public achievement: A fifty-year follow-up. Creativity Research Journal, 22(4), 361–368. doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2010.523393

Seng, Q. K., Keung, H. K., & Cheng, S. K. (2008). Implicit theories of creativity: A comparison of student-teachers in Hong Kong and Singapore. Compare, 38(1), 71–86. doi.org/10.1080/03057920701419959

Soriano, E. M. L. (1985). Creativitv in Brazilian Schools. GCT, 17.

Strenberg, R. J. (2006). The nature of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 18(1), 87–98. doi.org/10.1207/s15326934crj1801

Taylor, M. A., & Callahan, J. L. (2005). Bringing creativity into being: Underlying assumptions that influence methods of studying organizational creativity. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 7(2), 247–270. doi.org/10.1177/1523422305274529

Thoring, K., Desmet, P., & Badke-Schaub, P. (2018). Creative environments for design education and practice: A typology of creative spaces. Design Studies, 56, 54–83. doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2018.02.001

Warren, F., Mason-Apps, E., Hoskins, S., Azmi, Z., & Boyce, J. (2018). The role of implicit theories, age, and gender in the creative performance of children and adults. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 28(2010), 98–109. doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2018.03.010

Zhou, J., Shen, J., Wang, X., Neber, H., & Johji, I. (2013). A cross-cultural comparison: Teachers’ conceptualizations of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 25(3), 239–247. doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2012.730006




DOI: https://doi.org/10.15575/psy.v5i2.3533

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


web stats

View My Stats

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.