The Development of an Affective Assessment Instrument Based on Creativity and Critical Thinking on Reaction Rate Material


Yessi Prihartina(1*), Das Salirawati(2)

(1) Department of Chemistry Education, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Yogyakarta, Indonesia
(2) Department of Chemistry Education, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Yogyakarta, Indonesia
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


This study aims to determine the characteristics of the assessment instrument, feasibility, and description of the affective aspects of students in the reaction rate material. The measure affective aspects are creativity and critical thinking attitudes. The research method is research and development (R&D) developed with a 4-D model. The research subject was taken from second-grade Senior High School with a random sampling technique. The initial product of the instrument was content validated by expert judgment, which was calculated using the Aiken formula and construct validity using Confirmatory Factor Analysis. The results showed that the instrument was declared feasible based on the content validity of 0.976 with a good category. The construct validity results stated that 18 fit items from 21 statement items. The description of the affective aspects of students in the reaction rate material from 213 students showed that the average student is in a good category.

Keywords


affective; assessment instrument; the reaction rate

Full Text:

PDF

References


Bayrak, F. (2021). Investigation of the webbased selfassessment system based on assessment analytics in terms of perceived selfintervention. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 27, 639-662. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-021-09511-8

Changwong, K., Sukkamart, A., & Sisan, B. (2018). Critical thinking skill development: Analysis of a new learning management model for Thai high schools. Journal of International Studies, 11(2), 37-48. doi:10.14254/2071-8330.2018/11-2/3

Chng, L. S., & Lund, J. (2018). Assessment for learning in physical education: the what, why and how. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation and Dance, 89(8), 29–34. https://doi.org/10.1080/07303084.2018.1503119

Dewi, N. L. R. A. (2021). Pengembangan instrumen asesmen keterampilan belajar dan berinovasi (4C) pada pembelajaran IPA siswa kelas V SD. Tesis. Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha.

Edwards-Schachter, M. (2018). The nature and variety of innovation. International Journal of Innovation Studies, 2, 65–79. doi:10.1016/j. ijis.2018.08.004

Erdoğan, V. (2019). Integrating 4C Skills of 21st Century into 4 Language Skills in EFL Classes. International Journal of Education and Research, 7(11), 113-124. Retrieved from https://www.ijern.com/journal/2019/November-2019/09.pdf

Fathayati, S., Isnaeni, Wiwi., & Marianti, A. (2022). Scientific attitude assessment instruments using self-assessment in project-based learning development. Journal of Innovative Science Education, 11(1), 108–114. https://doi.org/10.15294/jise.v10i1.49985

Habiby, W. N & Sayekti, I. C. (2018). Pemenuhan hak anak dalam buku siswa kelas lima sekolah dasar Kurikulum 2013. Profesi Pendidikan Dasar, 3(2), 64. https://doi.org /10.23917/ppd.v3i2.4745

Henderson, M., Phillips, M., Ryan, T., Boud, D., Dawson, P., Molloy, E., & Mahoney, P. (2019). Conditions that enable efective feedback. Higher Education Research & Development, 38(7), 1401–1416. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2019.1657807

Inteni, K. A. S., Candiasa, I. M., & Suarni, N. K. (2013). Pengembangan instrumen tes objektif pilihan ganda yang diperluas berbasis web untuk mata pelajaran TIK kelas XI SMAN di Kabupaten Karangasem. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, 3(5). http://119.252.161.254/e-journal/index.php/jurnal_ep/article/view/1039/787

Irwanto, I., Rohaeti, E., & Prodjosantoso, A. K. (2018). A survey analysis of pre-service chemistry teachers’ critical thinking skills. MIER Journal of Educational Studies, Trends & Practices, 8(1), 57–73. https://doi.org/10.52634/mier/2018/v8/i1/1423

Keith, T. Z. (2015). Multiple regression and beyond. New York: Routledge.

Larson, L. C. & Miller, T. N. (2011). 21st century skills: Prepare students for the future. Kappa Delta Pi Record, 47(3), 121–123. https://doi.org/10.1080/00228958.2011.10516575

Mudhakiyah, Z., Wijayati, N., Haryani, S., & Nurhayati, S. (2022). Pengembangan instrumen penilaian aspek psikomotorik peserta didik pada praktikum pembelajaran kimia materi laju reaksi. Chemistry in Education, 11(2), 166-172. https://doi.org/10.15294/chemined.v11i2.56309

Muhlisin, A., Susilo, H., Amin, M., & Rohman, F. (2016). Improving critical thinking skills of college students through RMS model for learning basic concepts in science. Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, 17(1), 1–24. Retrieved from https://www.eduhk.hk/apfslt/download/v17_issue1_files/muhlisin.pdf

Mustafa, P. S., Winarno, M. E., & Supriyadi, S. (2019). Penilaian pendidikan jasmani, olahraga, dan kesehatan pada sekolah menengah pertama negeri kota Malang. Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, Dan Pengembagan, 4(10), 1364–1379. http://journal.um.ac.id/index.php/jptpp/article/view/12845

Noviar, D. (2016). Pengembangan ensiklopedi Biologi mobile berbasis android dalam rangka implementasi Kurikulum 2013. Jurnal Cakrawala Pendidikan, 15(2), 198–207. https://doi.org/10.21831/cp.v15i2.8255

Pertiwi, A. A & Rizal, F. (2020). Pengaruh model pembelajaran problem-based instruction berbasis collaboration, communication, creativity and critical thinking terhadap hasil belajar rangkaian elektonika. Jurnal Inovasi Vokasional dan Teknologi, 20(1), 61- 68. https://doi.org/10.24036/invotek.v20i1.665

Prihadi, S. (2017). Penguatan keterampilan abad 21 melalui pembelajaran mitigasi bencana banjir. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pendidikan Georgrafi FKIP UMP, 45-50. Retrieved from https://digitallibrary.ump.ac.id/1216/2/8.%20Singgih%20Prihadi.pdf

Purnawirawan, O. (2019). Pengembangan instrumen penilaian 4C (creativity, critical thinking, communication, dan collaboration) sistem pembelajaran abad dua satu dalam pengajaran bidang produktif sekolah menengah kejuruan. Tesis. Universitas Negeri Semarang.

Rear, D. (2019). One size fits all? The limitations of standardised assessment in critical thinking. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education Journal, 44(5), 664-675. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2018.1526255

Retnawati, H. (2016). Analisis kuantitatif instrumen penelitian (panduan peneliti, mahasiswa, dan psikometrian). Yogyakarta: Parama publishing.

Sanabria, J. C & Jesús, A. L. (2017). Enhancing 21st century skills with AR: Using the gradual immersion method to develop collaborative creativity. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 13(2), 487–501. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2017.00627a

Smart Solutions Team. (2017). Pocket shortcut chemistry. Solo: Genta Smart.

Sole, F & Anggaraeni, D. (2017). Respon guru terhadap instrumen penilaian sikap ilmiah sains siswa sekolah dasar. Jurnal Edukasi Sumba, 1(1), 93-99. https://doi.org/10.53395/jes.v1i1.16

Sudarmo, Unggul. (2017). Kimia 2. Jakarta: Erlangga.

Suyanto, S. (2018). The implementation of the scientific approach through 5MS of the revised curriculum 2013 in Indonesia. Jurnal Cakrawala Pendidikan, 1. https://doi.org/ 10.5151/cidi2017-060

Thiagarajan, S. (1974). Instructional development for teacher of exceptional children. Bloomington: Indiana University.

Veloo, A., Nor, R., & Khalid, R. (2015). Attitude towards physics and additional mathematics achievement towards physics achievement. International Education Studies, 8(3), 35–43. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v8n3p35

Verawardina, U., Ramadhani, D., Susanti, W., Lubis, A. L., & Simeru, A. (2020). Studying technology-based XXI Century Learning using MOOC in Education. International Journal of Psychosocial Rehabilitation, 24(9), 2644-2650. Retrieved from https://psychosocial.com/article/PR290297/24975/

Yusliani, E., Burhan, H., & Nafsih, N. (2019). Analisis integrasi keterampilan abad ke-21 dalam sajian buku teks fisika sma kelas XII semester 1. Jurnal Eksakta Pendidikan JEP, 3(2), 184-191. https://doi.org/10.24036/jep/vol3- iss2/392




DOI: https://doi.org/10.15575/jtk.v8i1.25397

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2023 Yessi Prihartina

Journal  Tadris Kimiya Is Indexed By : 

Lisensi Creative Commons

Chemistry Education: Jurnal Tadris Kimiya licensed with Lisensi Internasional Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 . Copyright is protected by law . p-ISSN: 2527-6816 | e-ISSN: 2527-9637