Profiling Students' Critical Thinking and Multiple Representation Skills in Buffer Solution Learning Using a Web-Based Assessment Tool

Authors

  • Tissa Indah Master of Chemistry Education, Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, University of Riau, Kampus Bina Widya KM. 12.5, Simpang Baru, Kec. Tampan, Kota Pekanbaru, Riau, 28293, Indonesia
  • Susilawati Susilawati Master of Chemistry Education, Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, University of Riau, Kampus Bina Widya KM. 12.5, Simpang Baru, Kec. Tampan, Kota Pekanbaru, Riau, 28293, Indonesia
  • Dedi Futra Master of Chemistry Education, Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, University of Riau, Kampus Bina Widya KM. 12.5, Simpang Baru, Kec. Tampan, Kota Pekanbaru, Riau, 28293, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15575/jtk.v11i1.51053

Keywords:

buffer solutions, critical thinking, e-instrument, learning evaluation, multiple representations

Abstract

Critical thinking and multiple representation skills are essential competencies for meaningful chemistry learning, particularly when students are required to connect macroscopic phenomena, microscopic particle behavior, and symbolic chemical representations. However, evidence regarding students’ achievement in these skills remains limited, especially in the context of buffer solution learning. This study aimed to profile secondary students’ critical thinking and multiple representation skills using a previously validated web-based assessment instrument. A quantitative descriptive design was employed involving 74 eleventh-grade students from three secondary schools in Riau Province, Indonesia. Data were collected through an electronic assessment administered via Jotform and analyzed using descriptive statistics. The assessment measured five critical thinking dimensions (interpretation, analysis, inference, evaluation, and explanation) and three representation levels (macroscopic, microscopic, and symbolic). The findings revealed that students’ critical thinking skills ranged from moderate to good levels across schools, with explanation emerging as the strongest dimension. In terms of multiple representations, students demonstrated better performance in symbolic and macroscopic representations than in microscopic representations. Students from School A achieved the highest scores in both critical thinking and multiple representation skills, whereas students from School B showed the lowest performance. The results indicate that students continue to experience difficulties in interpreting microscopic chemical phenomena despite demonstrating satisfactory understanding of symbolic and macroscopic aspects. These findings provide valuable insights for chemistry educators in designing instructional and assessment strategies that better support the development of higher-order thinking and representational competence in chemistry learning.

References

Ainsworth, S., Tytler, R., & Prain, V. (2020). Learning by construction of multiple representations. In Handbook of learning from multiple representations and perspectices. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429443961

Andraini, M. R., Rohiat, S., & Elvia, R. (2021). Analisis kemampuan berpikir kritis siswa pada materi reaksi reduksi oksidasi (redoks) di MAN 1 Kota Bengkulu. ALOTROP: Jurnal Pendidikan dan Ilmu Kimia, 5(1), 35–41. https://doi.org/10.33369/atp.v5i1.16484

Anisah, D. C., Nasrudin, H., & Sukarmin. (2025). Profile of critical thinking skills of phase F learning in chemistry subjects: acid-base material. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 11(1), 82–91. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v11i1.9842

Barnett, R. (2015). A curriculum for critical being. In the Palgrave handbook of critical thinking in higher education. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 63–76. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137378057_4

Dewantara, D., Safitri, Y., & Susilowati, E. (2022). Identification of misconceptions in Jotform-based physics during the Covid-19 pandemic. Radiasi: Jurnal Berkala Pendidikan Fisika, 15(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.37729/radiasi.v15i1.1743

Facione, P. A. (2015). Critical thinking: What it is and why it counts. Insight Assessment. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/251303244_Critical_Thinking_What_It_Is_and_Why_It_Counts

Fatmawati, A., Zubaidah, S., Mahanal, S., & Sutopo, S. (2022). Representation skills of students with different ability levels when learning using the LCMR model. Pegem Journal of Education and Instruction, 13(1), 177-192. https://doi.org/10.47750/pegegog.13.01.20

Fatmawati, H., Mardiyana, & Triyanto. (2014). Analisis berpikir kritis siswa dalam pemecahan masalah matematika berdasarkan Polya pada pokok bahasan persamaan kuadrat (Penelitian pada siswa kelas X SMK Muhammadiyah 1 Sragen tahun pelajaran 2013/2014). Jurnal Elektronik Pembelajaran Matematika, 2(9), 899-910. Retrieved from https://jurnal.uns.ac.id/jpm/article/view/10514

Firdaus, M., Rusman, & Zulfadli. (2021). Analysis of students’ learning difficulties on the concept of buffer solution using four-tier multiple choice diagnostic test. Jurnal Chimica Didactica Acta, 9(2), 57-61. http://doi.org/10.24815/jcd.v9i2.25099

Gkitzia, V., Salta, K., & Tzougraki, C. (2020). Students’ competence in translating between different types of chemical representations. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 21(1), 307–330. https://doi.org/10.1039/C8RP00301G

Hikmayanti, M. & Utami, L. (2019). Analisis kemampuan multiple representasi siswa kelas XI MAN 1 Pekanbaru pada materi titrasi asam basa. Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Kimia (JRPK), 9 (1), 52–57. https://doi.org/10.21009/JRPK.091.07

Imawanty, I. & Fransiska, A. B. (2019). Optimalisasi asesmen dan evaluasi bimbingan dan konseling dengan memanfaatkan aplikasi formulir daring jotform. Konvensi Nasional Bimbingan dan Konseling XXI, 129–135. Retrieved from https://scholar.google.com/citations?view_op=view_citation&hl=en&user=zwMuWrQAAAAJ&citation_for_view=zwMuWrQAAAAJ:u5HHmVD_uO8C

Khoirunnisa, F. & Sabekti, A. W. (2020). Profil keterampilan berpikir kritis siswa pada materi ikatan kimia. Jurnal Pendidikan Kimia Indonesia, 4(1), 26–31. Retrieved from https://ejournal.undiksha.ac.id/index.php/JPK/article/view/25635

Lase, D. (2019). Education and industrial revolution 4.0. Jurnal Handayani, 10(1), 48-62. https://doi.org/10.24114/jh.v10i1

Lestari, S. Z. D. & Roesdiana, L. (2021). Analisis kemampuan berpikir kritis matematis siswa SMP pada materi himpunan. Maju, 8(1), 82–91. Retrieved from https://www.neliti.com/publications/502852/analisis-kemampuan-berpikir-kritis-matematis-siswa-smp-pada-materi-himpunan

Magrabi, S. A. R., Moghal, I. P., & Moghal, Y. P. (2018). Classroom teaching to enhance critical thinking and problem-solving skills for developing IoT applications. Journal of Engineering Education Transformations, 31: 152–57. Retrieved from https://journaleet.in/index.php/jeet/article/view/1730

Rexigel, E., Kuhn, J., Becker, S., & Malone, S. (2024). The more the better? A systematic review and meta-analysis of the benefits of more than two external representations in STEM education. Educational Psychology Review, 36(124), 1-59. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-024-09958-y

Riduwan. (2018). Skala pengukuran variabel-variabel penelitian. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Rudi, L., Haetami, A., Asria, & Shuid, A. N. B. (2023). Analysis of chemistry problem-solving ability in symbolic level for senior high school students. Jurnal Pendidikan Progresif, 13(1), 133-150. https://doi.org/10.23960/jpp.v13.i1.202310

Sari, R. P. & Seprianto. (2018). Analisis kemampuan multipel representasi mahasiswa FKIP Kimia Universitas Samudra semester II pada materi asam basa dan titrasi asam basa. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains Indonesia, 6(1), 55-62. Retrieved from https://jurnal.usk.ac.id/JPSI/article/view/10745

Sarkar M., Overton T., Thompson C., & Rayner G. (2016). Graduate employability: views of recent science graduates and employers, International Journal of Innovation in Science and Mathematics Education, 24(3), 31–48. Retrieved from https://openjournals.library.sydney.edu.au/index.php/CAL/article/view/11043/10644

Takaoglu, Z. B. (2024). High school students’ multiple representation translation skills on one-dimensional motion: A cross-grade study. Journal of Science Learning, 7(1), 47–55. https://doi.org/10.17509/jsl.v7i1.61099

Trixa, J. & Kaspar, K. (2024). Information literacy in the digital age: information sources, evaluation strategies, and perceived teaching competences of pre-service teachers. Frontiers in Psychology, 15, 1336436. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1336436

World Economic Forum. (2020). The future of jobs report 2020. (https://www.weforum.org/publications/the-future-of-jobs-report-2020/), accessed 24 March 2025.

Yunita, S., Rohiat, S., & Amir, H. (2018). Analisis kemampuan berpikir kritis mata pelajaran kimia pada siswa kelas XI IPA SMAN 1 Kepahiang. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Ilmu Kimia, 2(1), 33–38. https://doi.org/10.33369/atp.v2i1.4628

Zahro, S. F., & Ismono. (2021). Analisis kemampuan multirepresentasi siswa pada materi kesetimbangan kimia di masa pandemi Covid-19. Chemistry Education Practice, 4(1), 30-39. https://doi.org/10.29303/cep.v4i1.2338

Downloads

Published

2026-06-04

How to Cite

Indah, T., Susilawati, S., & Futra, D. (2026). Profiling Students’ Critical Thinking and Multiple Representation Skills in Buffer Solution Learning Using a Web-Based Assessment Tool. JTK (Jurnal Tadris Kimiya), 11(1), 14–24. https://doi.org/10.15575/jtk.v11i1.51053

Issue

Section

Articles

Citation Check