Balancing Pluralism and Legal Certainty in Ijtihād through The Theories of Al-Mushawwibah and Al-Mukhaththiah
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15575/as.v25i2.30327Keywords:
al-Mushawwibah, al-Mukhaththiah, truth indeterminism, ikhtilaf, fiqh, mujtahidAbstract
Abstract: The formulation of Islamic legal norms (fiqh) based on zhanni (speculative) evidence often leads to divergent interpretations among mujtahid scholars. These differences can confuse within the Muslim community regarding which legal opinion should be followed. This study aims to analyse the theoretical framework of al-mushawwibah and al-mukhaththiah within the discipline of ushul al-fiqh, particularly in the context of determining legal rulings derived from zhanni sources. Employing a qualitative descriptive approach and library research method, the study examines selected verses of the Qur’an, Prophetic traditions, and the classical as well as contemporary juristic opinions. The findings reveal that the al-mushawwibah theory affirms the validity of multiple legal conclusions as long as they are grounded in sound ijtihadic methodology. At the same time, al-Mukhaththiah asserts that only one ruling can be deemed correct, though other attempts still merit reward. The novelty of this research lies in its contextual application of classical epistemological theories to contemporary fiqh disputes, such as the differing opinions on whether bank interest constitutes riba. These insights contribute to the reinforcement of legal pluralism and encourage a moderate approach in navigating diverse ijtihad-based rulings within Islamic law.
References
Abdul Wahab Ibrahim Abu Sulaiman. Alfikru Al Ushul Dirasah Tahliliyah Naqdiyah. Jedah: Daar Al Syaruq Lil Al-Nasyr Wal Tauzi’, 1984.
Abu Hamid Al-Ghazali. Al-Mustashfa Min Ilm Al Ushul. Beirut: Dar alKutub al-Ilmiah, 2014.
Ahmad Rofiq. “Teori Kebenaraan Dalam Pemikiran Hukum Al-Ghazali (1058-1111M).” International Journal Ihya’ ‘Ulum Al-Din 18, no. 2 (2016): 181–215. https://doi.org/10.21580/ihya.17.2.1736.
Al-Leheabi, Saleh Muhammad Zeki Mahmood, Mujahid Mustafa Bahjat, and Abdullatif Ahmadi Ramchahi. “The Economic Thought of IBN Khaldoun in His ‘Muqaddimah.’” World Applied Sciences Journal 25, no. 1 (2013). https://doi.org/10.5829/idosi.wasj.2013.25.01.743.
Alles, Thorben. “Truth and Perspectives.” Interdisciplinary Journal for Religion and Transformation in Contemporary Society 8, no. 1 (July 7, 2022): 13–33. https://doi.org/10.30965/23642807-bja10040.
Amin Nadir, Suhayb. “Investigating the Place of Imagination in Farabi’s Epistemological Theory.” Asian Social Science 11, no. 22 (August 18, 2015). https://doi.org/10.5539/ass.v11n22p220.
Ar-Razi, Imam Fakhruddin. Manaqib Imam Asy-Syafi’i. Beirut: Dar Al-Kutub Al - Ilmiyah, 2015.
Arenas, Ruben Dario Mendoza, Josefina Arimatea García Cruz, César Angel Durand Gonzales, José Luis Salazar Huarote, Josefrank Pernalete Lugo, and Marisol Paola Delgado Baltazar. “Ibn Khaldun, Muqaddima: Outline on Conflict and Social Cohesion at the Dawn of Sociology or Social Theory.” Journal of Law and Sustainable Development 11, no. 7 (September 25, 2023): e1058. https://doi.org/10.55908/sdgs.v11i7.1058.
Arif Jamaluddin Malik. “Kebenaran Dalam Ilmu Fiqh.” Al-Hukama: The Indonesian Journal of Islamic Family Law 2, no. 2 (2012). https://doi.org/10.15642/al-hukama.2012.2.2.186-194.
Arrasyid, Fauzan, Pagar Pagar, Dhiauddin Tanjung, and Mohd Roslan Mohd Nor. “The Progressivity of Umar Ibn Al-Khattab’s Ijtihad in Responding to Community Social Changes.” Al-Istinbath: Jurnal Hukum Islam 8, no. 1 May (May 16, 2023): 21. https://doi.org/10.29240/jhi.v8i1.4872.
Baderin, Mashood A. Islamic Legal Theory: Volume 1. Edited by Mashood A. Baderin. Routledge, 2017. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315251721.
Basri, Muhammad, Pahru Hidayat, Universitas Islam, and Negeri Antasari. “Dinamika Ikhtilaf Di Antara Ulama Mazhab Fiqih” 1, no. 1 (2023): 57–66. https://doi.org/10.24014/trs.v6i2.908.
Bhushan, Nalini, Jay L. A Garfield, and Daniel Raveh. “Thinking with Causality about ‘Causality.’” In Contrary Thinking, edited by Nalini Bhushan, Jay L. Garfield, and Daniel Raveh, 46–56. Oxford University Press, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:osobl/9780199795550.003.0004.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Citation Check
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Syahrul Anwar
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The author whose published manuscript approved the following provisions:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0) License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
