Ẓafarnamah: A Glimpse into the Text and its Historical and Intellectual Context
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15575/ijik.v13i1.21293Kata Kunci:
ẒafarnÄmah, Guru Gobind Singh, Aurangzeb, India, Persian, Mirror For Princes, Political Ethics.Abstrak
Ẓafarnāmah (Book of Victory), written by the tenth Sikh leader, Guru Gobind Singh (d. 1708), in 1705, about the Mughal emperor of India, Aurangzeb (d. 1706). It is widely considered evidence of a religious leader's spiritual victory over a tyrant who not only broke his Koranic oath (and, consequently, fell from his status as a good believer). The book, originally in Persian poetry, is composed of one hundred and eight bayts (verses), and the first twelve verses praise God and His power. Due to its bold divine connotations, Ẓafarnāmah is widely regarded as a spiritual text. However, as the researcher will argue in the following, Ẓafarnāmah should not be treated as just a spiritual text but as one of “the mirrors for princes,”whichhas a well-established tradition in the history of Persian literature and a political ethics tradition as well.
Referensi
Alam, M. (2013). A Muslim State in a Non-Muslim Context: The Mughal Case, in Mirrors for the Muslim Prince: Islam and the History of Statecraft (M. Boroujerdi, Ed.). New York: Syracuse University Press.
Ashkouri, F. (2020). Quarantine in Punjab, an opportunity to turn Zafarnameh into Music. Retrieved from euro news website: https://parsi.euronews.com/2020/04/24/zafarnameh-persian-poetry-turn-to-video-clip-in-penjab-india-luck-down-time
BMupdate. (2022). ẒafarnÄmah. Retrieved from BMupdate website: https://www.facebook.com/BMupdates/videos/Ø¸ÙØ±Ù†Ø§Ù…Ù‡-به-زبان-ÙØ§Ø±Ø³ÛŒ/571184873504617/
Briggs, C. F. (2015). Scholarly and Intellectual Authority in Late Medieval European Mirrors. Global Medieval: Mirrors for Princes Reconsidered, 26–41.
Eaton, R. M. (2019). India in the Persianate Age: 1000-1765. Penguin UK.
Fenech, L. E. (2013). The Sikh Zafar-Namah of Guru Gobind Singh: a discursive blade in the heart of the Mughal Empire. Oxford University Press.
Forster, R., & Yavari, N. (2015). Global Medieval: Mirrors for Princes Reconsidered. Ilex Foundation.
Fouchecour, C.-H. de. (1999). FarÄʾid ul-SulÅ«k FÄ« Faá¸Äʾil ul-MulÅ«k, in AkhlÄqÄ«yÄt: MafÄhÄ«m AkhlÄqÄ« dar AdabÄ«yÄt-i FÄrsÄ« az Saday-i Siwwum TÄ Saday-i Haftum-i HijrÄ« (Ethics: Ethical Notions in the Persian
Literature from 3rd Century to 7th Century) (M. A. A.-M. wa Ê¿Abdul M.R. BakhshÄn, Ed.). Tehran: Markaz-i Nashr-i DÄnishgÄhÄ« wa Anjuman-i IranshinÄsÄ«-ya FanÄnse dar Iran.
Haake, M. (2015). Writing to a Ruler, Speaking to a Ruler, Negotiating the Figure of the Ruler: Thoughts on “Monocratological†Texts and Their Contexts in Greco-Roman Antiquity, in Global Medieval: Mirrors for Princes Reconsidered (1st ed.; R. Forster & N. Yavari, Eds.). Boston: Ilex Foundation.
Haghighat, S. S. (2015). Persian Mirrors for Princes: Pre-Islamic and Islamic Mirrors Compared. Global Medieval: Mirrors for Princes Reconsidered, 83–93.
Hazelwood, J. A. (2019). Malik, Mullah, Siyar, State: The Role of Non-state Law in the Regulation of Armed Non-state Groups. King’s College London.
Hugen, J. (2020). Voorbeeldige vorsten?: Koningschap in de Roman van Walewein. Queeste, 27(1), 7–41.
Ismail, E. (2021). Concepts of Just Rule in Medieval Islamicate Texts: The Shahnameh, The Siyasatnama, and The Muqaddimah.
KalÄntarÄ«, ḤÄmid Ê¿Amūī and Masʿūd. (2004). BarrisÄ«-ya Taá¹bÄ«qÄ«-ya Do SÄ«yÄsatnÄmah: SÄ«yarulmulÅ«k wa NaṣīḥatulmulÅ«k. Faá¹£lnÄmaya Takhaá¹£usÄ«ya Ê¿UlÅ«m-i SÄ«yÄsÄ«, 9(2).
Korzenik, D. (1985). Doing historical research. Studies in Art Education, 26(2), 125–129.
Leder, S. (2015). Sultanic rule in the mirror of medieval political literature. Global Medieval: Mirrors for Princes Reconsidered, 94–108.
Rizvi, S. R. A. (1981). The SiyÄsat NÄmah (The Book of Government) of NizÄm Al-Mulk ṬusÄ«. Islamic Studies, 20(2), 129–136.
Singh, G. G. (1980). ẒafarnÄmah and FatḥnÄmah (the Book of Victory) (1st ed.; D. S. Duggal, Ed.). Jullundur: Institute of Sikh Studies.
Singh, G. G. (2000). ẒafarnÄmah and FatḥnÄmah (the Book of Victory) (S. D. Singh, Ed.). New Delhi: ABC Publishing House.
Singh, G. G. (2018). ẒafarnÄmah (Epistle of Victory) (4th ed.; G. Singh, Ed.). Lahore: Lahore Book Shop.
Zakeri, M. (2015). A Proposal for the Classification of Political Literature in Arabic and Persian: Folk Narrative as a Source of Political Thought? in Global Medieval: Mirrors for Princes Reconsidered (R. Forster & Y. Neguin, Eds.). Boston: Ilex Foundation.
Unduhan
File Tambahan
Diterbitkan
Cara Mengutip
Terbitan
Bagian
Lisensi
Hak Cipta (c) 2023 Leila Chamankhah

Artikel ini berlisensiCreative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
-
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication. The work is simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution–ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-SA 4.0), which permits others to share and adapt the work, provided that proper credit is given to the authors and the original publication in this journal is acknowledged.
-
Authors may enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal’s published version of the work (for example, posting it in an institutional repository or publishing it in a book), provided that the original publication in this journal is properly acknowledged.
-
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (for example, in institutional repositories or on their personal websites) prior to and during the submission process, as this practice can lead to productive scholarly exchange as well as earlier and increased citation of the published work (see The Effect of Open Access).