Public Participation in Healthy City Planning: Maintaining a Balanced Usage of City Green Spaces


Diki Suherman(1*)

(1) Institut Teknologi Bandung, Indonesia
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


The rapid development of urbanization has made cities experience an increase in urban population from rural areas who are looking for and creating new livelihoods. This urbanization is an opportunity for the city to develop the city through aspects of development that support the economic growth of the city. However, this aspect of urban development also has an impact on the use of less and less green openspace, this is of course a new problem in the use of public space, such as parks planted with oxygen-producing plants, because humans cannot be separated from healthy air, this is influenced by the amount of oxygen produced from plants around the city. For this reason, the purpose of writing this is to explain public participation in planning a healthy city, a perfect balance of the use of urban green space. The method used is a literature study by reviewing and examining literature related to public participation and healthy cities, especially the use of green spaces. In this paper, we will discuss the theoretical and empirical debates about the role of public participation in planning healthy cities, which is seen from the balance of green openspace as a public space which is very important for human health in the city where it lives, because public participation needs to be carried out bottom-up by building collaborative participation, involving citizens as subjects who play an active role directly.

Keywords


Public Participation, Collaboration, Healthy City, Green openspace

Full Text:

PDF

References


Adi, I. R. (2007). Perencanaan partisipatoris berbasis aset komunitas: dari pemikiran menuju penerapan. Fisip UI Press. Arnstein, S. R. (1969). A ladder of citizen participation. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 35(4), 216–224. Bazrkar, M. H., Zamani, N., Eslamian, S., Eslamian, A., & Dehghan, Z. (2015). Urbanization and Climate Change, Handbook of Climate Change Adaptation, Ed. By Leal Filho, W. Springer. Dwihatmojo, R. (2016). Ruang terbuka hijau yang semakin terpinggirkan. Dalam Http://Www. Bakosurtanal. Go. Id/Assets/Download/Artikel/BIGRuangTerbukaHijauyangSema KinTerpinggirkan. Pdf, Diakses Tanggal, 4. Fandeli, C. (2021). Pembangunan Kota Hijau. UGM PRESS. Fawzi, N. I. (2017). Mengukur urban heat island menggunakan penginderaan jauh, kasus di Kota Yogyakarta. Majalah Ilmiah Globe, 19(2), 195–206. Fay edwards. (2013). Pertanian Perkotaan Sebagai Solusi untuk Masalah Urbanisasi di Kota Bandung. Australian Consortium for In-Country Indonesian Studies (ACICICS). Flint, R. W. (2012). Practice of sustainable community development: a participatory framework for change. Springer. Hancock, T. (1990). From ‘publik health in the 1980’s’ to ‘healthy Toronto 2000’: The evolution of healthy publik policy in Toronto. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research, 1(2–3), 213–228. Hancock, T. (2018). Healthy cities 2.0: transitioning towards ‘One Planet’cities (key challenges facing twenty-first-century cities, part 3). Cities & Health, 2(1), 22–25. Harpham, T., Burton, S., & Blue, I. (2001). Healthy city projects in developing countries: the first evaluation. Health Promotion International, 16(2), 111–125. Islamy, M. I. (2004). Membangun Masyarakat Partisipatif. Dalam Jurnal Ilmiah Administrasi Publik Universitas Brawijaya, Malang. Kirmanto, D., I. E. and R. D. (2012). Indonesia Green City Development Program: an urban Reform. 48th ISOCARP Conress 2012, 2–13. Kotus, J., & Sowada, T. (2017). Behavioural model of collaborative urban management: extending the concept of Arnstein’s ladder. Cities, 65, 78–86. Maulana, I., & Susanti, R. F. (2021). Tingkat Partisipasi Masyarakat Pada Kegiatan Rehab Rumah Tidak Layak Huni Di Kota Tangerang. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat UNSIQ, 8((1)), 1–9. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.32699/ppkm.v8i1.1250 Pasolong, H. (2012). Metode Penelitian Administrasi Publik. Alfabeta. Ranga, M., & Etzkowitz, H. (2013). Triple Helix systems: an analytical framework for innovation policy and practice in the Knowledge Society. Industry and Higher Education, 27(4), 237–262. Ridwan Sutriadi. (2018). Perencanaan Kota Abad 21 Inovasi dan Tujuan Pembangunan Berkelanjutan. ITB Press. Roseland, M., & Spiliotopoulou, M. (2017). Sustainable community planning and development. In Encyclopedia of sustainable technologies (pp. 53–61). Elsevier. Salahuddin, S., Junaidin, J., Surip, S., Firman, F., & Nur, M. (2021). Derajat Partisipasi Masyarakat Pada Program Kota Sehat (Studi di Kelurahan Rabadompu Timur Kota Bima). Jurnal Komunikasi Dan Kebudayaan, 8(1), 44–56. Slaev, A. D., Kovachev, A., Nozharova, B., Daskalova, D., Nikolov, P., & Petrov, P. (2019). Overcoming the failures of citizen participation: The relevance of the liberal approach in planning. Planning Theory, 18(4), 448–469. Sorensen, A. (2018). Institutions and urban space: Land, infrastructure, and governance in the production of urban property. Planning Theory & Practice, 19(1), 21–38. Tsouros, A. D. (2019). The healthy cities movement. Urban Health. New York: Oxford University Press, 285–292. Usman, A. 2020. (2020). Kebijakan Pembangunan Perkotaan dan Pedesaan. STISIP Mbojo Bima.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.15575/ijni.v10i1.21515

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Flag Counter

View My Stats

Creative Commons License

International Journal of Nusantara Islam is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License