EXPLANATORY GAP AND HARD PROBLEM OF CONSCIOUSNESS ON PHILOSOPHY OF MIND: A CRITICAL STUDY ON SOUL-BODY RELATION POINT OF VIEW IN MULLÂ ŚADRÂ’S PHILOSOPHY
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15575/jaqfi.v8i1.25544Keywords:
Soul, Philosophy of Hikmah Muta’âliyah, Soul and Body Relation, Philosophy of Mind, Mind-Body Problem, Hard Problem, and Explanatory GapAbstract
Abstract
Â
The goal pf this research to examine Śadrâ’s view on the “soul-body relation†in order to solve the “explanatory gap and the hard problem of consciousness†which are the basic core of the mind-body problem in the philosophy of mind. The explanatory gap explains how physical property can give influence non-physical things conversely. Meanwhile, the hard problem mentions how physical system (material) can produce subjectivity in the mind (non-physics/ immaterial), especially when we have experience. In this context, there is a gap that appears between the immaterial mind and the material body.
Â
According to the author’s view, Śadrâ’s philosophy of mind-body relation can solve the problem because it is based on principles of Hikmah Muta’âliyah philosophy, which is “monis of existential-dualism of essential†[in author’s term]. In this research, the author develops the research using Paul Ricoeur’s hermeneutic and philosophical approaches.
Â
This research would like to highlight Hikmah Muta’âliyah philosophy, which synthesizes philosophy, theology, and tasawuf (‘irfân), which can be the reference for Muslims (or anyone interested in Islamic Philosophy) to solve philosophical problems. In other explanations, Islamic tradition [in this paper it is represented by Śadrâ] can contribute to contemporary philosophical discourse without making tendentious claim that Western Philosophy cannot solve problems better than the philosophy of Śadrâ.
References
Bibliography
Ahwani, A.F. al., Ibn Sina: Risalat fi Ma’rifat al-Nafs al-Natiqat wa Ahwaliha, Kairo: Dar al-Ma’arif, 1952.
al-Walid, Kholid, Perjalanan Jiwa menuju Akhirat: Filsafat Eskatologi Mulla
Shadra, Jakarta: Mullâ Śadrâ Press, 2012.
Âmolî, Hasan Zâdeh, Sarh al-‘Uyûn fî Syarh al-‘Uyûn. Qom: Markaz Intesyârât-e
Daftar-e Tablîghât-eIslâmî, 1421 H.
Bagus, Lorens, Kamus Filsafat, Jakarta: Gramedia, 1996.
Blackburn, Simon, The Oxford Dictionary of Philosophy, Oxford: Oxford
University Press, 1996.
Chalmers, David J., Philosophy of Mind: Classical and Contemporary Readings, New York: Oxford UP, 2002.
Chalmers, David J., The conscious mind: In search of a fundamental theory. Oxford Paperbacks, 1997.
Dennett, Daniel C., “Quining Qualia†in Anthony J. Marcel & E. Bisiach (ed.),
Oxford: Oxford UniversityPress, 1988.
Hart, W.D., “Dualismâ€, A Companion to the Philosophy of Mind, ed., Samuel Guttenplan, Oxford: Blackwell, 1996.
Harman, Gilbert. "Explaining an explanatory gap." APA Newsletter on Philosophy
and Computers 6.02 (2007).
Ibn Sina, Asy-Syifa’; ath-Thabi’iyyat, Kairo: Haiah Mishriyah al-‘Ammah lil Kitabah, 1975.
Kim, Jaegwon and Ted Honderich etc., Problems in the Philosophy of Mind, Oxford
Companion to Philosophy, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1996.
Kriangel, Uriah, Self-Representationalism and Explanatory Gap, Oxford
University Press, 2009.
Mack, Michael, The Savage Science: Sigmund Freud, Psychoanalysis, and the
History of Religion, Journal of religious history, Volume 30, Issue 3, 2006.
Marhaban, Muhammad ‘Abdur Rahman, Min al-Falsafah al-Yunaniyah ila al
Filsafah, Beirut: Uwaidat li an-Nasyr, 2007.
Nagel, Thomas. "What is it like to be a bat?." The philosophical review 83.4
(1974): 435-450.
Revonsuo, Antti, Consciousness: The Science of Subjectivity, Hove and New
York: Psychology Press Taylor & Francis Group, 2009.
Rosenthal, David M. "Two concepts of consciousness." Consciousness and
Emotion in Cognitive Science. Routledge, 1998.
Śadrâ, Mullâ, al- Hikmah al-Muta‟âliyah fi al-Asfar al-‘Aqliyyah al-
Arba’ah, Beirut: Dâr Ihyâ‟ al-Turâts al-‘Arabi, 2002.
Shanon, Benny, Mind-Body, Body-Mind: Two Distinct Problems in
Philosophical Psychology, Volume 21, Issue 5, 2008.
Tabâtabâi, Muhammad Husein, Bidâyah al-Hikmah, Qom: tp., 1418 H
Woodward, William R., Fechner’s Panpsychism: a Scientific Solution to the Mind-
Body Problem in Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences Volume 8, Issue 4, 1972.
Zaleski, Jeff, Gediman, Paul, etc., A General Theory of Love (Reviews), by Thomas
Lewis, Fari Amini dan Richard Lannon Reviews, Publishers Weekly, Art and Humanities Vol. 247, Issue 2, 2000.
