Tahfidz Al-Qur’an Learning Strategies from Bandura's Perspective in Islamic Educational Institutions in Bontang City

Tahfidz Al-Qur’an Learning Strategies from Bandura's Perspective in Islamic Educational Institutions in Bontang City

Authors

  • Khumaini Rosadi Universitas Islam Negeri Sultan Aji Muhammad Idris Samarinda
  • Mukhamad Ilyasin Universitas Islam Negeri Sultan Aji Muhammad Idris Samarinda
  • Siti Julaiha Universitas Islam Negeri Sultan Aji Muhammad Idris Samarinda

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15575/kpi.v7i2.48573

Keywords:

Learning strategies, memorizing the Qur'an, Bandura, Islamic education

Abstract

Learning to memorize the Qur'an is an important part of Islamic education that requires effective strategies to be able to form a generation of memorizers of the Qur'an who excel spiritually and intellectually. This study aims to reveal the learning strategy for memorizing the Qur'an from the perspective of Albert Bandura's theory in two Islamic educational institutions in Bontang City, namely MAN Bontang (state) and SMA IT YABIS (private). A qualitative approach with a multi-site study design was used in this study, with data collection techniques in the form of observation, in-depth interviews, and documentation. Bandura's theory was used as the basis for analysis, especially in the aspects of modeling (exemplary behavior of teachers and peers), self-efficacy (student self-confidence), and reinforcement (social reinforcement). The results of the study showed that the learning strategy for memorizing the Qur'an in both institutions prioritized a personal approach, intensive mentoring, and strengthening the Qur'anic character through mentoring activities, joint muroja'ah, and a structured reward system. MAN Bontang excels in systemic reinforcement through the madrasah program, while SMA IT YABIS excels in an individual approach and family involvement. In conclusion, the learning strategy for memorizing the Al-Qur'an based on Bandura's theory has been proven to be able to significantly increase students' motivation, self-confidence, and memorization achievements, and is relevant to be applied in the context of Islamic education in both state and private institutions by adjusting the characteristics of the institution.

References

Afifudin, H., & Saebani, B. A. (2009). Qualitative research methodology. Pustaka Setia.

Al-Ghazali, I. (2005). Ihya Ulum al-Din (M. F. Abd al-Baqi, Ed.). Dar al-Ma‘rifah. (Original work published 1106)

Anwar, K., Faruza, N., & Gusmaneli, G. (2024). Qualitative research in Islamic education: A multisite study approach. Journal of Islamic Studies, 15(2), 45–60.

Azra, A. (2002). A new paradigm of national education: Reconstruction and democratization. Kompas.

Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory. Prentice-Hall.

Bungin, B. (2007). Qualitative data analysis. Kencana Prenada Media Group.

Creswell, J. W. (2016). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). Sage.

Daradjat, Z. (2005). The science of Islamic education. Bumi Aksara.

Djamarah, S. B. (2008). Educational psychology. Rineka Cipta.

Husain, M., & Canra, I. (2023). Reinforcement in Islamic education: Integrating Bandura’s theory with spiritual motivation. Journal of Islamic Education Research, 12(2), 45–60.

Ibn Sina. (1999). The Book of Healing (J. Bakos, Trans.). AMS Press. (Original work published 1027)

Ibrahim, M. (2019). Qur’an memorization (tahfidz) in Islamic education: History and methodology. Prenadamedia Group.

International Seminar on Islamic Studies. (2019). Integrating classical Islamic education with modern psychology (pp. 38–48). UIN Press.

Kim, J. (2022). Self-efficacy in religious education: A meta-analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 34(1), 78–95.

Kirk, J., & Miller, M. L. (1986). Reliability and validity in qualitative research. Sage.

Kuntarto, E., & Asyhar, R. (2016). Innovation in tahfidz methods in the digital era. Journal of Islamic Education, 5(2), 112–130.

Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Sage.

Majid, A. (2005). Teaching and learning strategies. Remaja Rosdakarya.

MAN Bontang. (2025). Tahfidz program report 2025 [Internal document].

Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1992). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd ed.). Sage.

Moleong, L. J. (2017). Qualitative research methodology (Revised ed.). PT Remaja Rosdakarya.

Muhaimin. (2002). Paradigm of Islamic education. Rosda Karya.

Musthafa, I., Rahman, A., Alfarisi, M. F., & Chakam, K. (2023). Bandura’s social cognitive theory in Islamic education: A critical integration. International Journal of Islamic Studies, 15(3), 201–220.

Nasution, S. (2003). Naturalistic-qualitative research methods. Tarsito.

Nazir, M. (2011). Research methods. Ghalia Indonesia.

Neuman, W. L. (2014). Social research methods: Qualitative and quantitative approaches (7th ed.). Pearson.

Noor, J. (2011). Research methodology: Thesis, dissertation, and scientific writing. Kencana Prenada Media Group.

Nurul Wahyuni, S., & Wahidah, N. (2022). Spiritual self-efficacy in Qur’an memorization: A qualitative study. Journal of Muslim Mental Health, 17(1), 33–50.

Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research & evaluation methods (3rd ed.). Sage.

Purwanto, M. N. (2004). Educational psychology. Remaja Rosdakarya.

Rezyika, I., & Alimni, A. (2023). Reward systems in tahfidz learning: A case study. Islamic Education Journal, 8(1), 56–72.

Sabililhaq, I., Sa’diyah, H., & Rahmawati, S. (2024). The actualization of Albert Bandura’s theory in Islamic education: A study of modeling and social reinforcement. Reslaj: Religion Education Social Laa Roiba Journal, 6(1), 22–35.

Saldaña, J. (2013). The coding manual for qualitative researchers (2nd ed.). Sage.

Sanapiah. (2001). Field research methods. Pustaka Pelajar.

Sanjaya, W. (2006). Learning strategies oriented to education process standards. Kencana.

Schwandt, T. A., Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (2007). Judging interpretations: But is it rigorous? Trustworthiness and authenticity in naturalistic evaluation. New Directions for Evaluation, 114, 11–25.

Sudrajat, A., Ruswandi, U., & Arifin, B. S. (2021). Challenges of tahfidz programs in Indonesian schools. Journal of Islamic Education, 10(2), 89–104.

Sugiyono. (2019). Quantitative, qualitative, and R&D research methods. Alfabeta.

Sumarni, S. (2011). The role of teachers as models in tahfidz learning. Journal of Islamic Religious Education, 3(1), 1–15.

Usman, H., & Akbar, P. S. (2009). Social research methodology. Bumi Aksara.

Zamroni. (2002). Alternative education paradigm. Tiara Wacana.

Zamroni. (2011). Democratic education for building civil society. Pustaka Pelajar.

Zarkasyi, I., & Syubani, I. (2005). Islamic education in pesantren. Trimurti Press.

Downloads

Published

2025-08-03
Loading...