Main Article Content

Abstract

The growing adoption of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in education has created new opportunities to strengthen inclusive pedagogical practices that accommodate diverse learner needs. However, empirical evidence concerning the role of AI in supporting inclusive learning within Islamic higher education remains limited. This study investigates the effects of AI-supported inclusive learning on academic achievement, learner participation, accessibility, motivation, and instructional effectiveness in Islamic higher education institutions in Uzbekistan. Employing a convergent mixed-method design, the study involved 96 students and 12 teachers who participated in an eight-week intervention. Quantitative data were collected through pretest–posttest assessments, engagement and motivation questionnaires, technology acceptance surveys, and system analytics, while qualitative data were obtained through classroom observations and semi-structured interviews. The findings revealed that students exposed to AI-supported inclusive learning achieved significantly higher academic outcomes and demonstrated stronger engagement, greater accessibility, enhanced autonomy, and more positive perceptions of inclusion than those receiving conventional instruction. Additionally, teachers also reported improvements in instructional efficiency, progress monitoring, and differentiated learning support. Drawing on principles of Universal Design for Learning, Self-Determination Theory, and Islamic educational concepts of tarbiyah, ta’lim, and ta’dib, the findings suggest that AI can support more responsive, equitable, and learner-centered educational practices when integrated within coherent pedagogical frameworks. This study contributes to the growing scholarship on inclusive pedagogy in Islamic higher education by demonstrating how AI-supported learning environments can promote educational equity, meaningful participation, and sustainable quality education in diverse learning contexts.

Keywords

Artificial Intelligence Educational Equity Inclusive Learning Islamic Higher Education Student Engagement Universal Design for Learning

Article Details

How to Cite
Omonova, N. P., Nurmatova, S. S., Mukhammedov, S. K., Abduraxmanova, I., Olimova, A. A., Tajibaev, S., … Ernazarova, D. X. (2026). Artificial Intelligence for Inclusive Learning in Islamic Higher Education: Evidence from Uzbekistan on Educational Equity and Student Engagement. Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 12(2), 330–345. https://doi.org/10.15575/jpi.v12i2.55510

References

  1. Abosede, P. J., Idris, I. A., Adeola, I. M., Glory, T., & Stephen, G. O. (2025). Community service assessment of demographic predictors of undergraduates’ readiness to use artificial intelligence (AI) tools for learning. ASEAN Journal of Community Service and Education, 4(2), 77–90. Retrieved from https://ejournal.bumipublikasinusantara.id/index.php/ajcse/article/view/742
  2. Ainscow, M. (2020). Promoting inclusion and equity in education: Lessons from international experiences. Nordic Journal of Studies in Educational Policy, 6(1), 7–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/20020317.2020.1729587
  3. Al-Abrasyi, M. A. (1974). The basis of Islamic education. Lebanon: Dar Al-Fikr.
  4. Al-Attas, S. M. N. (1991). The concept of education in Islam: A framework for an Islamic philosophy of education. Virginia: International Institute of Islamic Thought and Civilization.
  5. Ashraf, S. A. (1985). New horizons in Muslim education. London: Hodder and Stoughton.
  6. Ashurova, S. Y., Eshbekova, N. J., Dobilovich, K. U., Askaraliev, O. U., Rasulov, A. N., Sultonova, D. A., & Omonova, M. D. (2026). Scientific and theoretical model of continuous inclusive education for equity and quality learning to support sustainable development goals (SDGs). ASEAN Journal of Educational Research and Technology, 5(2), 219–228. Retrieved from https://www.ejournal.bumipublikasinusantara.id/index.php/ajert/article/view/838/662
  7. Baxtiyor, A. S., & Sardor, E. D. (2024). Transforming special and inclusive education: Leveraging information technologies for enhanced learning. ASEAN Journal of Community and Special Needs Education, 3(2), 95–104. Retrieved from https://ejournal.bumipublikasinusantara.id/index.php/ajcsne/article/view/657
  8. Bilotta, M., Rocca, R., & Alcaro, S. (2025). Next-generation drug discovery: The AI revolution in pharmaceutical research. Artificial Intelligence in the Life Sciences, 8, Article 100149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ailsci.200149
  9. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
  10. Cleveland, B., Imms, C., Merrick, N., Imms, W., Aston, R., Candido, C., … Graham, L. (2025). Inclusive learning spaces in Australian schools: an exploration of stakeholder participation, perspectives and priorities. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2025.2553212
  11. Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications.
  12. David, D., Garry, J., Kevin, J., ed Hamelin, D., & Thomas, M. (2015). INCOSE systems engineering handbook: a guide for system life cycle processes and activities. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons.
  13. Davidson, V. C., Maduegbunam, T. O., Odo, J. A., Adony, I. I., Ugwuarua, F. S., & Agbo, C. N. (2026). Integrating artificial intelligence (AI) in mathematics education: Enhancing students’ interest and achievement through adaptive learning systems. ASEAN Journal for Science Education, 5(1), 87–94. Retrieved from https://ejournal.bumipublikasinusantara.id/index.php/ajsed/article/view/826
  14. Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008
  15. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The “What” and “Why” of Goal Pursuits: Human Needs and the Self-Determination of Behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227–268. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01
  16. Denzin, N. K. (2012). Triangulation 2.0. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 6(2), 80–88. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689812437186
  17. Field, A. (2018). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics (5th ed.). Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications
  18. Florian, L. (2014). What counts as evidence of inclusive education? European Journal of Special Needs Education, 29(3), 286–294. https://doi.org/10.1080/08856257.2014.933551
  19. Gil Jr, T. O. (2025). Promoting inclusive education through sikolohiyang indigenous pilipino: A community-based service approach. ASEAN Journal of Community Service and Education, 4(2), 133–146. Retrieved from http://ejournal.bumipublikasinusantara.id/index.php/ajcse/article/view/751
  20. Hair, J. F., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., & Black, W. C. (2019). Multivariate Data Analysis (8th ed.). Boston: Cengage Learning.
  21. Halstead, J. M. (2004). An Islamic concept of education. Comparative Education, 40(4), 517–529. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305006042000284510
  22. Hashim, R. (2004). Educational dualism in Malaysia: Implications for theory and practice (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press.
  23. Holmes, W., Bialik, M., & Fadel, C. (2019). Artificial intelligence in education promises and implications for teaching and learning. Boston: Center for Curriculum Redesign.
  24. Kamali, M. H. (2008). Shari'ah law: An introduction. Oneworld Publications.
  25. Katel, K. (2026). Artificial intelligence (AI) ChatGPT in academic and science writing education: Student dependency, creativity, and the mediating role of feedback in English as a second language and English as a foreign language contexts. ASEAN Journal for Science Education, 5(2), 155–166. Retrieved from https://www.ejournal.bumipublikasinusantara.id/index.php/ajsed/article/view/885
  26. Khudayshukurovna, K. S., Asror, S. F., Nusrat, N. M., & Adamboy, M. K. (2024). Pedagogical and psychological factors for ensuring the sustainability of inclusive education in Uzbekistan. ASEAN Journal of Community and Special Needs Education, 3(2), 115–126. Retrieved from https://ejournal.bumipublikasinusantara.id/index.php/ajcsne/article/view/661
  27. Kukulska-Hulme, A., Beirne, E., Conole, G., Costello, E., Coughlan, T., Ferguson, R., & Whitelock, D. (2022). Innovating pedagogy with artificial intelligence. British Journal of Educational Technology, 53(6), 1445–1460. Retrieved from https://eduq.info/xmlui/handle/11515/38577
  28. Latif, E., Liu, V., & Zhai, X. (2026). A systematic review of intelligent and robot tutoring systems: Evolution, pedagogical design, and AI-driven classification. Smart Learning Environments, 13, Article 1. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-025-00427-9
  29. Li, S. (2026). Promoting inclusive history education through new media integration. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 1–31. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2026.2614721
  30. Luckin, R., Holmes, W., Griffiths, M., & Forcier, L. B. (2016). Intelligence Unleashed: An argument for AI in Education. London: Pearson.
  31. Mohamed, A. M. (2025). Using AI to teach English to multilingual autistic children: a qualitative study. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2025.2564336
  32. Musayaroh, S., Asmiati, N., Utami, Y. T., Mulia, D., Sidik, S. A., Abadi, R. F., Pratama, T. Y., Maslahah, S., & Pramudyo, A. S. (2023). A digital accessibility and inclusive design-based e-module in higher education: Does it work in a classroom with a deaf student? ASEAN Journal of Community and Special Needs Education, 2(1), 55–60. Retrieved from https://ejournal.bumipublikasinusantara.id/index.php/ajcsne/article/view/264
  33. Nagaraju, K., & Ramakrishna, S. (2024). Leveraging artificial intelligence (AI) and geospatial technologies for community-centered urban expansion forecasting in Hyderabad. ASEAN Journal of Community Service and Education, 3(2), 135–146. Retrieved from http://ejournal.bumipublikasinusantara.id/index.php/ajcse/article/view/619
  34. Nnanguma, K. A. (2025). Integrating artificial intelligence for climate-smart agriculture and sustainable food systems. ASEAN Journal of Agriculture and Food Engineering, 4(2), 71–80. Retrieved from https://www.ejournal.bumipublikasinusantara.id/index.php/ajafe/article/view/837
  35. Oktamovna, K. M., & Ruslanovna, K. T. A. M. B. (2024). Overcoming barriers and implementing best practices in inclusive higher education: Strategies for accessibility, equity, and student support. ASEAN Journal of Community and Special Needs Education, 3(2), 105–114. Retrived from http://ejournal.bumipublikasinusantara.id/index.php/ajcsne/article/view/659
  36. Oliver, M. (1990). The politics of disablement. New York: Macmillan.
  37. Rahim, F., & Apzhaparovna, R. Y. (2026). The impact of AI-driven speech recognition on listening comprehension and pronunciation accuracy in English language teaching. Discovery Computing, 29, Article 81. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10791-026-09992-0
  38. Selwyn, N. (2019). Should robots replace teachers? AI and the future of education. Cambridge: Polity Press.
  39. Wang, L., Lei, Y., Zhou, Q., & Wei, Y. (2026). Impact of inclusive education on early childhood development: a systematic review and meta-analysis. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 30(2), 374–389. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2025.2449848
  40. Woolf, B. P. (2010). Building Intelligent Interactive Tutors: Student-Centered Strategies for Revolutionizing E-Learning. Massachusetts: Morgan Kaufmann.
  41. Zawacki-Richter, O., Marín, V. I., Bond, M., & Gouverneur, F. (2019). Systematic review of research on artificial intelligence applications in higher education–where are the educators?. International journal of educational technology in higher education, 16(1), 39. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0171-0

Similar Articles

<< < 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.