SPEAKING FLUENCY AND INTERPRETING PERFORMANCE

Authors

  • Salsa Billa UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung, Indonesia
  • Muhammad Aminuddin UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung, Indonesia
  • Rully Agung Yudhiantara UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung, Indonesia

Keywords:

Speaking Skills, Interpreting

Abstract

        Speaking fluency is crucial for successful interpreting. However, less attention is paid to the direct relationship between speaking skills and interpreting performance, especially for students who want to become English teachers. This study aims to discover more efficient teaching methods for interpretation classes by focusing on three primary objectives: first, to analyze the students’ speaking skills based on their video project performances; second, to examine the students’ interpreting performance also through their video assignments; and third, to determine whether there is a correlation between students’ speaking skills and their interpreting performance. This study used a quantitative correlational method to examine the relationship between students’ speaking skills and interpreting performance. The data were obtained from 25 fifth-semester students through their assessed video assignments in the Educational Interpreting course. Speaking and interpreting performances were assessed with standardized rubrics, and the results were statistically analyzed using Pearson correlation to measure the strength and significance of their relationship.  This study found a strong and significant positive correlation (r = 0.938, p < 0.001) between students’ speaking skills and interpreting performance, based on data from 25 students. The results indicate that higher speaking proficiency is closely associated with better interpreting outcomes, highlighting the importance of developing speaking skills to support success in interpretation tasks.

References

Bojnourdi, S. A. S., Mahadi, T. S. T., & Kenevisi, M. S. (2013). The relationship between the simultaneous interpreters’ speed of speaking in their native language and the quality of their simultaneous interpretation from English into their native language. International Journal of Applied Linguistics & English Literature, 2(6), 9–14. https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijalel.v.2n.6p.9

Brown, H. D. (2004). Language assessment: Principles and classroom practices. Pearson Education.

Creswell, J. W. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Dewi, D. S., Siahaan, S., & Putri, N. N. (2020). The correlation between students’ personality and Students’ speaking Skill. Anglo-Saxon: Journal of The English Language Education Study Program, 11(2), 289–299. https://doi.org/10.33373/as.v11i2.2784

Etikan, I., Musa, S. A., & Alkassim, R. S. (2016). Comparison of convenience sampling and purposive sampling. American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Statistics, 5(1), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajtas.20160501.11

Gile, D. (2009). Basic concepts and models for interpreter and translator training (Rev. ed.). John Benjamins Publishing Company.

Han, C. (2021). Interpreting testing and assessment: A state-of-the-art review. Language Testing, 38(4), 507–531. https://doi.org/10.1177/02655322211036100

Nkhoma, C., Nkhoma, M., Thomas, S., & Le, N. Q. (2020). The role of rubrics in learning and implementation of authentic assessment: A literature review. InSITE Conference, 237–276. https://doi.org/10.28945/4606

Suhendar, S. (2018). The importance of translating and interpreting studies towards student’s speaking skill. JELL (Journal of English Language and Literature) STIBA-IEC Jakarta, 2(2), 83–100. https://doi.org/10.37110/jell.v2i02.28

Downloads

Published

2026-08-12

Citation Check

Most read articles by the same author(s)