The Foreign Policy of Cultural Heritage: A Constructivist Analysis of Cambodia’s Artefact Repatriation Efforts

Authors

  • Havez Al Assad Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta, Indonesia
  • Muhammad Adel Aditya Abdullah Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta, Indonesia

Keywords:

artefact repatriation, heritage diplomacy, holistic constructivism, soft power, UNESCO

Abstract

Cambodia’s recent wave of cultural-heritage returns has elevated artefact repatriation from a technical heritage issue to a visible arena of international politics. This article examines why repatriation has become a sustained foreign policy priority for Cambodia and how it has been pursued in practice. The study aims to (1) map the main mechanisms of Cambodia’s repatriation strategy, (2) explain how repatriation is framed as part of post-conflict national identity, and (3) assess its broader significance for cultural sovereignty and development narratives. Methodologically, the article applies a holistic constructivist framework and uses qualitative document-based research combined with process tracing. It draws on scholarly literature, official releases, legal-diplomatic materials, and reputable investigative reporting to reconstruct the interactional pathways through which norms and identity shape policy choices. The findings show that Cambodia’s repatriation agenda is driven less by immediate material gain than by immaterial structures (historical justice, legitimacy, and identity) anchored in a “culture of restoration” centered on Angkor. Cambodia has operationalized this agenda through a hybrid toolkit: mobilizing UNESCO’s 1970 Convention, leveraging bilateral agreements, engaging in legal diplomacy, and cooperating with enforcement and museum actors. These dynamics illustrate norm diffusion and localization, where global frameworks are adapted to reinforce domestic meanings of recovery. The article concludes that Cambodia’s repatriation campaign functions as heritage diplomacy and soft power, offering practical lessons for Global South states and policy implications for museums, provenance governance, and ethical restitution frameworks.

References

Acharya, Amitav. 2004. “How Ideas Spread: Whose Norms Matter? Norm Localization and Institutional Change in Asian Regionalism.” International Organization 58 (2): 239–275. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818304582024.

Becker, Elizabeth. 2016. Overbooked: The Exploding Business of Travel and Tourism. New York: Simon & Schuster.

Cambodia Ministry of Tourism. 2024. Tourism Statistics Report December 2024. Phnom Penh: Cambodia Ministry of Tourism. Accessed January 21, 2026. https://asset.cambodia.gov.kh/tourism/2025/01/CAM122024.pdf.

Causevic, Senija, and Paul Lynch. 2011. “Phoenix Tourism: Post-Conflict Tourism Role.” Annals of Tourism Research 38 (3): 780–800. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annals.2010.12.004.

Checkel, Jeffrey T. 2008. “Process Tracing.” In Qualitative Methods in International Relations: A Pluralist Guide, edited by Audie Klotz and Deepa Prakash, 114–130. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

Fierke, Karin M. 2013. “Constructivism.” In International Relations Theories: Discipline and Diversity, edited by Timothy Dunne, Milja Kurki, and Steve Smith, 187–204. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Jasparro, Chris. 2003. “Culture and ‘Human Security Now’: A Role for Archaeology and the Past?” Regional Development Dialogue 24 (2): 11–21.

Lamont, Christopher K. 2021. Research Methods in International Relations. London: SAGE.

Lixinski, Lucas, and Sarah Williams. 2024. “Cultural Heritage, Conservation and Insecurity Paradigms: International Law in the Pursuit of Social Cohesion.” In Heritage in War and Peace: Legal and Political Perspectives for Future Protection, edited by Gianluigi M. Bonaviri and Mirosław M. Sadowski, 105–125. Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-47347-0_8.

Mommarolin, Srey. 2023. “Soft Power as Smart Diplomacy for Cambodia.” AVI Perspective 2023, no. 02 (March 10). Asian Vision Institute. Accessed January 21, 2026.

Needham, Susan, and Karen Quintiliani. 2019. “Prolung Khmer in Sociohistorical Perspective.” In The CALA 2019 Conference on Asian Linguistic Anthropology: Conference Proceedings, 82–89. Siem Reap, Cambodia: The GLOCAL Unit, SOAS University of London. https://doi.org/10.47298/cala2019.3-1.

Nye, Joseph S., Jr. 2004. Soft Power: The Means to Success in World Politics. New York: PublicAffairs.

Peou, Sorpong. 2000. Intervention and Change in Cambodia: Toward Democracy? Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.

Reus-Smit, Christian. 2022. “Constructivism.” In Theories of International Relations, edited by Richard Devetak and Jacqui True, 188–206. London: Bloomsbury Publishing.

Shirley, Grant, Emma Wylie, and Wardlow Friesen. 2018. “The Branding of Post-Conflict Tourism Destinations: Theoretical Reflections and Case Studies.” In The Tourism–Disaster–Conflict Nexus, edited by Andreas Neef and Jesse Hession Grayman, 119–139. Community, Environment and Disaster Risk Management 19. Bingley, UK: Emerald Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/S2040-726220180000019007.

Trigger, Bruce G. 1990. “Monumental Architecture: A Thermodynamic Explanation of Symbolic Behaviour.” World Archaeology 22 (2): 119–132. https://doi.org/10.1080/00438243.1990.9980135.

Tythacott, Louise, and Panggah Ardiyansyah, eds. 2021. Returning Southeast Asia’s Past: Objects, Museums, and Restitution. Singapore: NUS Press.

UNESCO. 1954. Convention for the Protection of Cultural Property in the Event of Armed Conflict (The Hague Convention). Paris: UNESCO. Accessed January 21, 2026.

UNESCO. 1970. Convention on the Means of Prohibiting and Preventing the Illicit Import, Export and Transfer of Ownership of Cultural Property. Paris: UNESCO. Accessed January 21, 2026.

UNESCO. 1972. Convention Concerning the Protection of the World Cultural and Natural Heritage. Paris: UNESCO. Accessed January 21, 2026.

UNESCO. 1992. “Angkor.” UNESCO World Heritage Centre. Accessed January 21, 2026.

UNESCO. 1999. Second Protocol to the Hague Convention of 1954 for the Protection of Cultural Property in the Event of Armed Conflict. Paris: UNESCO. Accessed January 21, 2026.

UNESCO. 2003. Convention for the Safeguarding of the Intangible Cultural Heritage. Paris: UNESCO. Accessed January 21, 2026.

UNESCO. 2005. Convention on the Protection and Promotion of the Diversity of Cultural Expressions. Paris: UNESCO. Accessed January 21, 2026.

Winter, Tim. 2004. “Landscape, Memory and Heritage: New Year Celebrations at Angkor, Cambodia.” Current Issues in Tourism 7 (4–5): 330–345. https://doi.org/10.1080/13683500408667989.

Winter, Tim. 2007. Post-Conflict Heritage, Postcolonial Tourism: Tourism, Politics and Development at Angkor. Routledge Studies in Asia’s Transformations. Oxon, UK: Routledge.

Winter, Tim. 2008. “Post-conflict Heritage and Tourism in Cambodia: The Burden of Angkor.” International Journal of Heritage Studies 14 (6): 524–539. https://doi.org/10.1080/13527250802503274.

Winter, Tim. 2015. “Heritage Diplomacy.” International Journal of Heritage Studies 21 (10): 997–1015. https://doi.org/10.1080/13527258.2015.1041412.

Downloads

Published

2025-12-28

How to Cite

Al Assad, H., & Aditya Abdullah, M. A. (2025). The Foreign Policy of Cultural Heritage: A Constructivist Analysis of Cambodia’s Artefact Repatriation Efforts. JISPO Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Dan Ilmu Politik, 15(2), 219–240. Retrieved from https://journal.uinsgd.ac.id/index.php/jispo/article/view/47857

Citation Check