Retraction & Corrections

Retraction & Corrections Policy

The Journal of Islamic Economics and Business (JIEB) is committed to maintaining the accuracy, transparency, and integrity of the scholarly record. When a published article is found to contain a significant error, raise concerns about research integrity, or no longer meet the standards required for reliable scholarly communication, the journal will assess the matter and take appropriate editorial action.

1. General Principles

JIEB handles requests and concerns relating to published articles in a fair, objective, and transparent manner. Editorial decisions are based on the nature and seriousness of the issue, its implications for the reliability of the article, the available evidence, and the relevant publication ethics principles.

The journal distinguishes between corrections, retractions, and expressions of concern. The action taken will be proportionate to the issue identified and intended to inform readers while preserving the integrity of the scholarly record.

Editorial action is not intended to punish authors for honest mistakes. At the same time, honest error does not prevent the journal from taking corrective action when necessary to protect the accuracy of the published literature.

2. Corrections

A correction may be considered when an error is identified in a published article and the issue can be addressed without withdrawing the article as a whole. Corrections may be appropriate for errors involving text, data presentation, tables, figures, author information, affiliations, acknowledgments, or other published details.

A correction is appropriate when the error requires clarification or amendment but does not undermine the overall reliability of the article to such an extent that retraction is necessary.

2.1 Requests for Corrections

Authors, readers, editors, reviewers, or other concerned parties may notify JIEB of a possible error in a published article. Requests should identify the article, explain the suspected error, and provide supporting information where available.

When a correction is requested by an author, the journal may seek clarification from the corresponding author and, where appropriate, other co-authors. The editorial team will assess whether the proposed correction is necessary and whether it adequately addresses the issue.

2.2 Publication of Corrections

When a correction is approved, JIEB will publish an appropriate correction notice or another clearly identifiable form of amendment. The notice should describe the error and the correction in sufficient detail for readers to understand what has changed.

Where technically feasible, the correction notice and the original article will be linked to each other. The journal will aim to maintain a transparent record of the correction rather than silently altering material in a way that could mislead readers.

3. Retraction

Retraction may be considered when there is substantial evidence that a published article is unreliable or that serious publication ethics violations have occurred. The purpose of retraction is to alert readers that the article, or a significant part of it, should no longer be relied upon as part of the scholarly record.

3.1 Grounds for Retraction

Depending on the evidence and circumstances, grounds for retraction may include:

  • Major errors in data, analysis, methods, or interpretation that invalidate the principal findings or conclusions.
  • Fabrication or falsification of research data, results, images, or other research materials.
  • Plagiarism or substantial unattributed use of another person's work.
  • Duplicate publication or substantial redundant publication that materially misrepresents the originality of the article.
  • Serious authorship or publication ethics violations that compromise the integrity of the article.
  • Unethical research practices, including serious violations of applicable research ethics requirements.
  • Manipulation of the peer-review or publication process that undermines confidence in the article's editorial assessment.
  • Other substantiated circumstances in which the reliability or integrity of the published article is seriously compromised.

The existence of an allegation alone does not automatically justify retraction. The journal will consider the available evidence and the seriousness of the concern before deciding on an appropriate response.

3.2 Retraction Procedure

When a potential retraction issue is identified, JIEB may:

  1. Conduct an initial assessment of the concern and the available supporting information.
  2. Request an explanation, relevant documents, or other evidence from the authors.
  3. Consult appropriate editorial advisers, reviewers, institutions, or other relevant parties when necessary.
  4. Assess the evidence impartially and determine whether correction, retraction, an expression of concern, or another response is appropriate.
  5. Communicate the editorial decision to the relevant parties, subject to applicable confidentiality and legal considerations.
  6. Publish a retraction notice when retraction is approved.

The journal may proceed with an editorial decision when an author does not respond, provided that the decision is supported by the available evidence and the circumstances of the case.

3.3 Retraction Notice and Article Record

A retraction notice should clearly identify the affected article and explain the principal reason for retraction in sufficient detail to inform readers. Where appropriate and possible, the notice should identify who is retracting the article and whether the authors agree with the decision.

The retracted article and its notice should remain linked in the journal's publication record where technically feasible. The article should be clearly identified as retracted so that readers are not misled about its status. Retraction does not ordinarily mean that the publication record is erased.

4. Expression of Concern

JIEB may publish an expression of concern when a substantial issue has been raised about a published article but the available evidence is not yet sufficient to reach a final decision, or when an investigation by an appropriate institution or body remains unresolved.

An expression of concern is intended to alert readers to a material issue while further clarification is sought. It does not, by itself, constitute a final finding of misconduct or a retraction.

Where appropriate, JIEB may update its response when additional reliable information becomes available. The journal will consider whether a correction, retraction, or other editorial action is subsequently warranted.

5. Submission of Concerns About Published Articles

Readers, authors, reviewers, institutions, and other interested parties may report a suspected error or publication ethics concern to the editorial office. Reports should include, where available:

  • The title and publication details of the article concerned.
  • A clear description of the suspected error or ethical issue.
  • Supporting evidence, relevant references, or documentation.
  • The reporter's contact details, if they wish to receive a response.

Reports should be made in good faith and provide sufficient information to allow a meaningful assessment. The journal may consider reports submitted without identification when they contain sufficiently specific and verifiable information.

Concerns may be submitted to the JIEB editorial office at jieb@uinsgd.ac.id.

6. Fair Assessment and Confidentiality

JIEB will assess concerns as objectively as possible and give relevant parties a reasonable opportunity to provide information when appropriate. The journal will consider the evidence available and avoid treating an allegation as an established fact before it has been assessed.

Information relating to a case will be handled with appropriate confidentiality, subject to the needs of a fair assessment, applicable legal obligations, and the need to consult relevant institutions or other parties.

The journal will seek to avoid unnecessary harm to individuals and will not make public allegations of misconduct as established findings without an adequate basis. Editorial action will be determined by the merits of the case rather than by pressure from authors, institutions, or other interested parties.

7. Relationship to Research Misconduct and Other Policies

Retraction and correction decisions may be related to concerns addressed under other JIEB policies. The journal will consider the relevant policies together when assessing a case.

Where a concern involves possible research misconduct, the journal may refer to or consult the relevant institution or other appropriate body, while retaining responsibility for decisions concerning the publication record in JIEB.

8. Responsibilities of Authors

Authors are expected to notify the editorial office promptly if they discover a significant error or inaccuracy in their published work. They should provide a clear explanation of the issue and cooperate with the journal in assessing the appropriate corrective action.

Authors should not attempt to conceal material errors or publication ethics concerns. Requests for correction or retraction will be assessed on their merits, and the journal will determine the appropriate editorial response based on the available evidence.

9. Editorial Independence

Decisions concerning corrections, retractions, and expressions of concern are editorial decisions intended to protect the reliability of the scholarly record. They should be based on evidence, publication ethics, and the seriousness of the issue rather than on commercial, personal, or reputational interests.

JIEB aims to handle such matters consistently and transparently, while recognizing that the appropriate response depends on the facts and circumstances of each case.

Contact Information

For questions, correction requests, or concerns about a published article, please contact the editorial office of the Journal of Islamic Economics and Business (JIEB).

Email: jieb@uinsgd.ac.id