Main Article Content

Abstract

Integrating Islamic contexts into mathematics learning has recently gained increasing scholarly attention. This study aims to develop and test a Hypothetical Learning Trajectory (HLT) for learning cuboid geometry through realistic contexts embedded with Islamic values. Employing a design research approach, the study followed three key stages: (1) preparing for the experiment, (2) conducting the experimental design, and (3) conducting retrospective analysis. The HLT was implemented with Grade VIII students from three state-run Madrasah Tsanawiyah in different provinces of Indonesia (Padang, Malang, and Bandung) to capture contextual diversity and ensure the transferability of the findings. Data were collected through analysis questionnaires, students’ written work, video transcripts, and observation sheets, then analyzed using thematic coding and descriptive analysis aligned with the RME framework. The findings indicate that integrating Islamic values within realistic contexts supported students in constructing geometric concepts meaningfully while internalizing the moral and cultural dimensions of learning. Empirically, the study is limited by its small-scale implementation and focus on a single mathematical topic; Therefore, future research should expand to broader mathematical domains and explore longitudinal impacts to strengthen evidence-based recommendations for culturally responsive mathematics education.

Keywords

Islamic Values Learning Trajectory RME

Article Details

How to Cite
Yulia, Y., Eliza , R., Musdi, E., Kustati, M., Afriadi, J., & Rahmadhani , M. K. (2026). Integrating Realistic Mathematics Education and Islamic Values: A Hypothetical Learning Trajectory for Teaching Cuboid Geometry. Jurnal Pendidikan Islam. Retrieved from https://journal.uinsgd.ac.id/index.php/jpi/article/view/48965

References

  1. Abdullah, A. S. (2017). Ethnomatematics in Perspective of Sundanese Culture. Journal on Mathematics Education, 8(1), 1–16. Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1173644
  2. Achadah, A., Wahidmurni, W., & Yasin, A. F. (2022). Internalization of Character Education Values in Shaping Students’ Religious Behavior (Multi Case Studies at SD NU Kepanjen and SDI Global School Malang). AL-ISHLAH: Jurnal Pendidikan, 14(4), 4723–4734. https://doi.org/10.35445/alishlah.v14i4.2509
  3. Akbar, S. A., & Hasby. (2019). The Profile of Student Analytical Skills Through Hypothetical Learning Trajectory on Colligative Properties Lesson. Jurnal Ilmiah Peuradeun, 7(3), 455–468. https://doi.org/10.26811/peuradeun.v7i3.307
  4. Akgul, E. N., & Yilmaz, R. (2023). Secondary School Students’ Construction Processes of Square Root Concept With Realistic Problems: An APOS Perspective. Mathematics Teaching-Research Journal, 15(1), 174–197. Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/?q=Times+AND+Square&ff1=pubReports+-+Research&id=EJ1391461
  5. Al Migdadi, M. H. (2011). Issues In Islamization of Knowledge, Man, and Education Introduction. Revue Académique Des Sciences Humaines et Sociales, 7, 3–16. Retrieved from https://asjp.cerist.dz/en/article/73455
  6. Aldhaen, E., Braganza, A., Hamdan, A., & Chen, W. (2025). Business Sustainability With Artificial Intelligence ( AI ): Challenges and Opportunities. Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland.
  7. Alex, J. K., and Mammen, K. J. (2012). A Survey of South African Grade 10 Learners’ Geometric Thinking Levels in Terms of the Van Hiele Theory. Anthropologist, 14(2), 123–129. https://doi.org/10.1080/09720073.2012.11891229
  8. Alhamuddin, A., Surbiantoro, E., & Erlangga, R. D. (2022). Character Education in Islamic Perspective. Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, 658, 326–331.
  9. Andrews-Larson, C., Wawro, M., & Zandieh, M. (2017). A Hypothetical Learning Trajectory for Conceptualizing Matrices as Linear Transformations. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 48(6), 809–829. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2016.1276225
  10. Anggraini, T. W., & Retnawati, H. (2022). Evaluation of Character Education Program in Mathematics Learning at Schools: Review Of Evaluation Results. In AIP Conference Proceedings (Vol. 2575). American Institute of Physics Inc. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0108483
  11. Ardi, Lufri, Amran, A., Kosasih, A., & Hervi, F. (2024). The Effect of Islam and Science Integration Implementing on Science Learning in Indonesia: A Meta-Analysis. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education , 13(4), 2594–2602. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v13i4.27632
  12. Bahamonde, A. D. C., Aymemí, J. M. F., & Urgellés, J. V. G. i. (2017). Mathematical Modelling and The Learning Trajectory: Tools to Support the Teaching of Linear Algebra. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 48(3), 338–352. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2016.1241436.
  13. Baroody, A. J., Clements, D. H., & Sarama, J. (2022). Lessons Learned from 10 Experiments That Tested The Efficacy and Assumptions of Hypothetical Learning Trajectories. Education Sciences, 12(3), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12030195
  14. Bedewy, S. El, Lavicza, Z., Haas, B., & Lieban, D. (2022). A STEAM Practice Approach to Integrate Architecture, Culture and History to Facilitate Mathematical Problem-Solving. Education Sciences, 12(9), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12010009
  15. Bhagat, K. K., & Chang, C. Y. (2015). Incorporating GeoGebra Into Geometry Learning-A Lesson From India. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 11(1), 77–86. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2015.1307a
  16. Bustang, Zulkardi, Darmawijoyo, Dolk, M., & van Eerde, D. (2013). Developing A Local Instruction Theory For Learning The Concept of Angle Through Visual Field Activities and Spatial Representations. International Education Studies, 6(8), 58–70. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v6n8p58
  17. Chang, K. E., Wu, L. J., Lai, S. C., & Sung, Y. T. (2016). Using Mobile Devices to Enhance The Interactive Learning for Spatial Geometry. Interactive Learning Environments, 24(4), 916–934. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2014.948458
  18. Choirudin, C., Setiawan, A., Anwar, M. S., Riyana, E., Abrori, M. S., & Wahyudi, W. (2021). Development of Qur’an and Hadith-Based Mathematics Module For Students’ Methematical Understanding Religious Character. Jurnal Tatsqif, 19(2), 114–132. https://doi.org/10.20414/jtq.v19i2.4086
  19. Clements, D. H., & Sarama, J. (2011). Early Childhood Teacher Education: The Case of Geometry. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 14(2), 133–148. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-011-9173-0
  20. Couto, A., & Vale, I. (2014). Pre-Service Teachers’ Knowledge on Elementary Geometry Concepts. Journal of the European Teacher Education Network, 9, 57–73. Retrieved from https://etenjournal.com/peer-reviewed-articlas/archive-articles/2014-in-progress/
  21. Crowley, J. E. (2023). How Averages Became Normal. American Historical Review, 128(2), 616–647. https://doi.org/10.1093/ahr/rhad185
  22. Darwis, R. H., Alimuddin, & Patimbangi, A. (2024). Higher Order Thinking and Critical Thinking Skills in Problem-Based Learning Environments: A Systematic Review. Journal of Learning and Development Studies, 4(2), 21–33. https://doi.org/10.32996/jlds.2024.2.2.3
  23. Desvita, N. A., & Turdjai. (2020). Penerapan Model Pembelajaran R. DIADIK: Jurnal Ilmiah Teknologi Pendidikan, 10(1), 101–110. https://doi.org/10.33369/diadik.v10i1.18115
  24. Doğruer, Ş. Ş. (2018). Developing Eight Grade Students’ Mathematical Practices in Solids Through Argumentation: A Design-Based Study. Ankara: Middle East Technical University.
  25. Doorman, M. (2019). Design and Research for Developing Local Instruction Theories. AIEM: Avances de Investigacion En Educacion Matematica, 15, 29–42. https://doi.org/10.35763/aiem.v0i15.266
  26. Dwidayati, N., Zaenuri, & Suyitno, A. (2019). Ethnomathematics Exploration at The Chinese Wall and Its Relation to The Concept of Geometry. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1321(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1321/3/032010
  27. Elida. (2023). Integrasi Nilai-Nilai Islam dalam Pembelajaran Matematika. EL-DARISA: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 2(1), 98–107. Retrieved from http://ejournal.staihwduri.ac.id/index.php/eldarisa/98
  28. Fauzan, A., Musdi, E., & Afriadi, J. (2018). Developing Learning Trajectory for Teaching Statistics at Junior High School Using RME Approach. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1088(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1088/1/012040
  29. Fitrah, M., & Kusnadi, D. (2022). Integrasi Nilai-Nilai Islam Dalam Membelajarkan Matematika Sebagai Bentuk Penguatan Karakter Peserta Didik. Jurnal Eduscience (JES), 9(1), 152–167. https://doi.org/10.36987/jes.v9i1.2550
  30. Freudenthal, H. (1991). Revisiting Mathematics Education. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.
  31. Gabriel, F., Coché, F., Szucs, D., Carette, V., Rey, B., & Content, A. (2013). A Componential View of Children’s Difficulties in Learning Fractions. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00715
  32. Gargrish, S., Kaur, D. P., Mantri, A., Singh, G., & Sharma, B. (2021). Measuring Effectiveness of Augmented Reality-Based Geometry Learning Assistant on Memory Retention Abilities of The Students in 3D Geometry. Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 29(6), 1811–1824. https://doi.org/10.1002/cae.22424
  33. Gravemeijer, K., & Cobb, P. (2013). Design Research from A Learning Design Perspective. In Educational Design Research (pp. 72–113). https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203088364-12
  34. Gravemeijer, K., & Terwel, J. (2000). Hans Freudenthal: A Mathematician on Didactics and Curriculum Theory. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 32(6), 777–796. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/46606480
  35. Haris, D., & Ilma, R. (2011). The Role of Context in Third Graders’ Learning of Area Measurement. Journal on Mathematics Education, 2(1), 55–66. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.2.1.778.55-66
  36. Haryanto, S. (2020). Internalisasi Nilai Demokrasi dan Humanisme Dalam Pendidikan Islam. Paramurobi, 3(2), 114–128. https://doi.org/10.32699/paramurobi.v3i2.2860
  37. Hasanah, S. I., Tafrilyanto, C. F., & Aini, Y. (2019). Mathematical Reasoning: The Characteristics of Students’ Mathematical Abilities in Problem Solving. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1188(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1188/1/012057
  38. İbili, E., Çat, M., Resnyansky, D., Şahin, S., & Billinghurst, M. (2020). An Assessment of Geometry Teaching Supported with Augmented Reality Teaching Materials to Enhance Students’ 3D Geometry Thinking Skills. International Journal Of Mathematical Education In Science And Technology, 51(2), 224–246. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2019.1583382
  39. Irma, M. A., & Nada, Y. H. (2024). Desain Hypothetical Learning Trajectory (HLT) Pada Materi Statistika Konteks Adiwiyata di SD Inpres Waioti. Fraktal: Jurnal Matematika Dan Pendidikan Matematika, 5(1), 64–76. Retrieved From Https://Ejurnal.Undana.Ac.Id/Index.Php/Fraktal/Article/View/14952%0Ahttps://Ejurnal.Undana.Ac.Id/Index.Php/Fraktal/Article/Download/14952/6640
  40. Jelatu, S., Sariyasa, & Made Ardana, I. (2018). Effect of Geogebra-Aided REACT Strategy on Understanding of Geometry Concepts. International Journal Of Instruction, 11(4), 325–336. https://doi.org/10.12973/Iji.2018.11421a
  41. Juwita, H., Putri, R. I. I., & Somakim, S. (2015). Peranan Buah Semangka Dalam Pembelajaran Volume Bola. Jurnal Elemen, 1(2), 130–143. https://doi.org/10.29408/Jel.V1i2.145
  42. Khalid, M. (2018). Framework for Inculcating Islamic Values Through Problem Solving in Mathematics and Lesson Study Approach. Al-Shajarah: Journal Of The International Institute Of Islamic Thought And Civilisation (ISTAC), 197–218. Https://doi.org/10.31436/Shajarah.V0i0.569
  43. Kurniati, Kusumah, Y. S., Sabandar, J., & Herman, T. (2015). Mathematical Critical Thinking Ability Through Contextual Teaching and Learning Approach. Journal On Mathematics Education, 6(1), 53–62. https://doi.org/10.22342/Jme.6.1.1901.53-62
  44. Kuzle, A. (2021). Drawing Out Emotions in Primary Grade Geometry: An Analysis of Participant-Produced Drawings of Grade 3-6 Students. Lumat, 9(1), 844–872. https://doi.org/10.31129/LUMAT.9.1.1620
  45. Mariana, N. (2017). Transforming Mathematics Problems in Indonesian Primary Schools By Embedding Islamic And Indonesian Contexts. In Disertasi. Perth, Australia: Murdoch University. Universitas Negeri Surabaya.
  46. Mayasari, E. D., Araujo, D. D., Kusumastuti, B., & Anastasia. (2014). The use of creative traditional games to increase the children’s calculation skills. In Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Education, Psychology and Society (pp. 340–347). Sanata Dharma University. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/374814185_The_Use_of_Creative_Traditional_Games_to_Increase_the_Children's_Calculation_Skills
  47. Mcgeough, K. M. (2016). The Roles of Violence In Recent Biblical Cinema : The Passion , Noah, and Exodus : Gods and Kings. Journal Of Religion & Film Article, 20(2), 1–55. Retrieved From Https://Digitalcommons.Unomaha.Edu/Cgi/Viewcontent.Cgi?Article=1325&Context=Jrf
  48. Muhtadi, D., Sukirwan, Yulianto, E., & Fauzi, R. M. (2025). Designing Hypothetical Learning Trajectories for Set Theory Using School Snack Contexts. JARME: Journal of Authentic Research On Mathematics Education, 7(1), 93–102. https://doi.org/10.37058/Jarme.V7i1.13665
  49. Nasaruddin. (2014). Pembelajaran Matematika Berbasis Islam. Al-Khwarizmi, 2(2), 59–68. https://doi.org/10.24256/Jpmipa.V2i2.113
  50. Nasir, N. S., Hand, V., & Taylor, E. V. (2008). Culture and Mathematics in School: Boundaries Between “Cultural” and “Domain” Knowledge in The Mathematics Classroom And Beyond. Review Of Research In Education, 32, 187–240. https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X07308962
  51. Naufal, M. A., Ihsan, H., Samsuddin, A. F., Zainal, Z., Ashari, N. W., & Hassan, M. N. (2025). Evaluating The Geometric Thinking Levels Of Generation Z Pre-Service Mathematics Teachers In Indonesia. International Journal Of Evaluation And Research In Education, 14(2), 918–925. https://doi.org/10.11591/Ijere.V14i2.32365
  52. Ni, Y., Zhou, D.-H. R., Cai, J., Li, X., Li, Q., & Sun, I. X. (2017). Improving Cognitive and Affective Learning Outcomes of Students Through Mathematics Instructional Tasks of High Cognitive Demand. The Journal Of Educational Research, 111(6), 704–719. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2017.1402748
  53. Nindiasari, H., Pranata, M. F., Sukirwan, Sugiman, Fathurrohman, M., Ruhimat, A., & Yuhana, Y. (2024). The Use of Augmented Reality to Improve Students’ Geometry Concept Problem-Solving Skills Through The Steam Approach. Infinity Journal, 13(1), 119–138. https://doi.org/10.22460/Infinity.V13i1.P119-138
  54. Novak, E., & Tassell, J. L. (2017). Studying Preservice Teacher Math Anxiety and Mathematics Performance in Geometry, Word, And Non-Word Problem Solving. Learning And Individual Differences, 54, 20–29. Https://doi.org/10.1016/J.Lindif.2017.01.005
  55. Novita, R., Prahmana, R. C. I., Fajri, N., & Putra, M. (2018). Penyebab Kesulitan Belajar Geometri Dimensi Tiga. Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Matematika, 5(1), 18–29. https://doi.org/10.21831/Jrpm.V5i1.16836
  56. Nubatonic, A. B. M., Sulistiawati, Muktyas, I. B., Murnaka, N. P., & Arifin, S. (2023). Description of Gasing Mathematics Learning Online on Improving Students’ Cognitive Learning Outcomes. AIP Conference Proceedings, 2886. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0154658
  57. Nugraha, Y. S. (2019). Ethnomathematical Review of Toraja’s Typical Carving Design in Geometry Transformation Learning. Journal Of Physics: Conference Series, 1280(4), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1280/4/042020
  58. Nursyahidah, F., Putri, R. I. I., & Somakim. (2013). Supporting First Grade Students’ Understanding of Addition Up to 20 Using Traditional Game. Journal On Mathematics Education, 4(2), 212–223. https://doi.org/10.22342/Jme.4.2.557.212-223
  59. Nursyahidah, F., Putri, R. I. I., & Somakim. (2014). Instructional Design of Subtraction Using PMRI Approach Based on Traditional Game. Proceeding The 2nd SEA-DR, 132–141. Retrived from https://repository.unsri.ac.id/6836/1/Farida_Nursyahidah.pdf
  60. Nursyahidah, F., Saputro, B. A., & Albab, I. U. (2020). Learning Reflection Through The Context of Central Java Historical Building. Journal Of Physics: Conference Series, 1567(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1567/2/022095
  61. Nursyahidah, F., Saputro, B. A., & Albab, I. U. (2021). Desain Pembelajaran Kerucut Berkonteks Tradisi Megono Gunungan. Jurnal Elemen, 7(1), 14–27. https://doi.org/10.29408/Jel.V7i1.2655
  62. Nursyahidah, F., Saputro, B. A., & Rubowo, M. R. (2018). A Secondary Student’s Problem Solving Ability in Learning Based on Realistic Mathematics with Ethnomathematics. Jramathedu (Journal Of Research And Advances In Mathematics Education), 3(1), 13–24. https://doi.org/10.23917/Jramathedu.V3i1.5607
  63. Nurwijayanti, A., Budiyono, & Fitriana, L. (2019). Combining Google Sketchup and Ispring Suite 8: A Breakthrough to Develop Geometry Learning Media. Journal On Mathematics Education, 10(1), 103–115. https://doi.org/10.22342/Jme.10.1.5380.103-116
  64. Owens, K. (2014). Diversifying Our Perspectives on Mathematics About Space and Geometry: An Ecocultural Approach. International Journal Of Science And Mathematics Education, 12(4), 941–974. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10763-013-9441-9
  65. Palinussa, A. L., Molle, J. S., & Gaspersz, M. (2021). Realistic Mathematics Education: Mathematical Reasoning and Communication Skills In Rural Contexts. International Journal Of Evaluation And Research In Education, 10(2), 522–534. https://doi.org/10.11591/Ijere.V10i2.20640
  66. Pradibta, H., Triswidrananta, O. D., & Jannah, M. R. (2023). The Implementation of Augmented Reality in Geometry For Primary School Students. Journal Of Computing Research And Innovation, 8(1), 45–57. https://doi.org/10.24191/Jcrinn.V8i1.341
  67. Prahmana, R. C. I., & D’Ambrosio, U. (2020). Learning Geometry and Values From Patterns : Ethnomathematics on The Batik Patterns of Yogyakarta , Indonesia. Journal On Mathematics Education, 11(3), 439–456. Retrieved From https://Files.Eric.Ed.Gov/Fulltext/EJ1294663.Pdf
  68. Prahmana, R. C. I., Zulkardi, & Hartono, Y. (2012). Learning Multiplication Using Indonesian Traditional Game in Third Grade. Journal On Mathematics Education, 3(2), 103–188. https://doi.org/10.22342/Jme.3.2.1931.115-132
  69. Purwati, N., Zubaidah, S., Corebima, A. D., & Mahanal, S. (2018). Increasing Islamic Junior High School Students Learning Outcomes Through Integration of Science Learning and Islamic Values. International Journal Of Instruction, 11(4), 841–854. https://doi.org/10.12973/Iji.2018.11453a
  70. Putri, R. I. I., & Zulkardi. (2017). Fraction in Shot-Put: A Learning Trajectory. AIP Conference Proceedings, 1868(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4995132
  71. Rahmat, M., & Yahya, M. W. B. H. M. (2022). The Impact of Inclusive Islamic Education Teaching Materials Model on Religious Tolerance of Indonesian Students. International Journal Of Instruction, 15(1), 347–364. https://doi.org/10.29333/Iji.2022.15120a
  72. Rahmatika, R., Amin, M., Al Muhdhar, M. H. I., & Suwono, H. (2024). Socio-Science Spirituality Learning Model for Cultivating Student Spirituality and Science Process Skills at Islamic Schools. International Journal Of Evaluation And Research In Education , 13(4), 2621–2630. https://doi.org/10.11591/Ijere.V13i4.27056
  73. Rahmawati, A., & Swaditya, R. (2017). Pengembangan Bahan Ajar Matematika Berbasis Nilai-Nilai Islam Pada Materi Aritmatika Sosial. Aksioma: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika FKIP Univ. Muhammadiyah Metro, 6(1), 81–88. https://doi.org/10.1093/Oseo/Instance.00208803
  74. Risdiyanti, I., & Prahmana, R. C. I. (2018). Ethnomathematics: Exploration in Javanese Culture. Journal Of Physics: Conference Series, 943(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/943/1/012032
  75. Sa’bana, S. M. (2024). Expert’S View on The Miracles of The Qur’an in Field of Family Law. INTIHA: Islamic Education Journal, 1(3), 157–168. https://doi.org/10.58988/Intiha.V1i3.320
  76. Sari, D. S., Kusnandi, K., & Suhendra, S. (2017). A Cognitive Analysis of Students’ Mathematical Communication Ability on Geometry. Journal Of Physics: Conference Series, 895(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/895/1/012083
  77. Serin, H. (2018). Perspectives on The Teaching of Geometry: Teaching and Learning Methods. Journal of Education And Training, 5(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.5296/Jet.V5i1.12115
  78. Shaw, W. M. K. (2022). Islamic Geometries: Spiritual Affects Against A Secularist Grid. Sophia, 61(1), 41–59. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11841-022-00905-4
  79. Shen, Y. (2021). Rays, Waves, SU(2) Symmetry and Geometry: Toolkits for Structured Light. Journal Of Optics (United Kingdom), 23(12), 1–40. https://doi.org/10.1088/2040-8986/Ac3676
  80. Simon, M. A. (1995). Reconstructing Mathematics Pedagogy From A Constructivist Perspective. Journal For Research In Mathematics Education, 26(2), 114–145. https://doi.org/10.5951/Jresematheduc.26.2.0114
  81. Sinclair, N., & Bruce, C. D. (2015). New Opportunities in Geometry Education at The Primary School. ZDM Mathematics Education, 47(3), 319–329. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11858-015-0693-4
  82. Sumirattana, S., Makanong, A., & Thipkong, S. (2017). Using Realistic Mathematics Education and The DAPIC Problem-Solving Process to Enhance Secondary School Students’ Mathematical Literacy. Kasetsart Journal Of Social Sciences, 38(3), 307–315. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.Kjss.2016.06.001
  83. Sunzuma, G., & Maharaj, A. (2022). Zimbabwean In-Service Teachers’ Views of Geometry: An Ethnomathematics Perspective. International Journal Of Mathematical Education In Science And Technology, 53(9), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2021.1919770
  84. Suryani, D. I., Wahyudi, W., & Rokhmaniyah, R. (2023). Penerapan Pendekatan Realistic Mathematics Education (RME) Dengan Media Papan Pecahan Untuk Meningkatkan Pembelajaran Matematika Tentang Pecahan Pada Siswa Kelas III SDN 2 Kalibagor Tahun Ajaran 2022/2023. Kalam Cendekia: Jurnal Ilmiah Kependidikan, 11(2), 749–756. https://doi.org/10.20961/Jkc.V11i2.73192
  85. T.R., F. (2017). Geometry Concepts in Mathematics Perceived Difficult to Learn By Senior Secondary School Students in Ekiti State, Nigeria. IOSR Journal Of Research & Method In Education (IOSRJRME), 07(01), 83–90. https://doi.org/10.9790/7388-0701018390
  86. Uriarte-Portillo, A., Zatarain-Cabada, R., Barrón-Estrada, M. L., Ibáñez, M. B., & González-Barrón, L. M. (2023). Intelligent Augmented Reality For Learning Geometry. Information (Switzerland), 14(4), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.3390/Info14040245
  87. Utami, C. T. P., Mardiyana, & Triyanto. (2019). Profile of Students’ Mathematical Representation Ability in Solving Geometry Problems. IOP Conference Series: Earth And Environmental Science, 243(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/243/1/012123
  88. Verner, I., Massarwe, K., & Bshouty, D. (2019). Development of Competencies For Teaching Geometry Through An Ethnomathematical Approach. Journal Of Mathematical Behavior, 56, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.Jmathb.2019.05.002
  89. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind In Society: The Development Of Higher Psychological Processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  90. Widada, W., Herawaty, D., Ma’rifah, N., Aida, Serlis, Yunita, D., & Sarwoedi. (2019). Characteristics Of Students Thinking In Understanding Geometry in Learning Ethnomathematics. International Journal Of Scientific And Technology Research, 8(11), 3496–3503. Retrieved From https://Www.Ijstr.Org/Final-Print/Nov2019/Characteristics-Of-Students-Thinking-In-Understanding-Geometry-In-Learning-Ethnomathematics.Pdf
  91. Widada, W., Herawaty, D., Nugroho, K. U. Z., & Anggoro, A. F. D. (2021). Augmented Reality Assisted By Geogebra 3-D For Geometry Learning. Journal Of Physics: Conference Series, 1731(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1731/1/012034
  92. Widiawati, L., Joyoatmojo, S., & Sudiyanto. (2018). Higher Order Thinking Skills As Effect of Problem Based Learning in The 21st Century Learning. International Journal Of Multicultural And Multireligous Understanding, 5(3), 96–105. Retrieved From http://Ijmmu.Com
  93. Winarso, W., & Wahid, S. (2020). Development of Mathematics Teaching Device Integrated With Quranic Values: Issues, Challenges, and Implementation Model. International Journal Of Learning, Teaching And Educational Research, 19(1), 95–117. https://doi.org/10.26803/Ijlter.19.1.6
  94. Yanti, W., Hartono, Y., & Somakim, S. (2016). Desain Pembelajaran Peluang Dengan Pendekatan PMRI Menggunakan Kupon Undian Untuk Siswa Kelas VII. Jurnal Elemen, 2(1), 56–71. https://doi.org/10.29408/Jel.V2i1.177
  95. Yavuz, A., Aydin, B., & Avci, M. (2016). The Effect of The Success in Teaching Geometry Of Basic Level Education Mathematics. European Journal Of Education Studies, 2(8), 59–71. Retrieved From https://Eric.Ed.Gov/?Id=ED570657
  96. Yulia, Y., Fauzan, A., Gustituati, N., & Yerizon. (2019). Designing Learning Trajectory For Teaching Sets At Grade 7 Using Realistic Mathematics Education Approach. Journal Of Physics: Conference Series, 1317, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1317/1/012139
  97. Yulia, Y., Musdi, E., Afriadi, J., & Wahyuni, I. (2020). Developing A Hypothetical Learning Trajectory of Fraction Based on RME For Junior High School. Journal Of Physics: Conference Series, 1470, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1470/1/012015