Main Article Content

Abstract

Islamic education is increasingly recognized worldwide not merely as a method of transmitting religious knowledge but also as a vital space where ideology, moral authority, and religious subjectivities are actively shaped. In light of modernization and institutional reforms, exploring how pedagogical approaches influence religious identity has emerged as a pivotal concern in contemporary Islamic education scholarship. This study analyzes how Persatuan Islam (Persis) pesantren functions as an ideological–pedagogical system that reproduces a reformist Islamic orientation through the integration of ta’līm, tarbiyah, and ta’dīb. Employing a qualitative case study design, data were collected through semi-structured interviews with teachers, administrators, and students, participant observation of classroom and dormitory life, and analysis of institutional documents. The findings reveal that pedagogy in Persis pesantren operates as a holistic and continuous process embedded in daily routines, disciplinary structures, and scriptural instruction. Through structured knowledge transmission, embodied moral training, and ethical regulation, students internalize doctrinal authority and develop a durable religious habitus that extends beyond institutional boundaries. The study concludes that pedagogy functions as a central mechanism of ideological reproduction and religious subject formation. These findings imply the need to conceptualize Islamic education as a practice-oriented and value-embedded process, offering a theoretical framework for understanding pesantren pedagogy within contemporary Indonesian and global Islamic educational contexts.

Keywords

Ideological Reproduction Islamic Pedagogy Pesantren Education Reformist Islam Religious Habitus

Article Details

How to Cite
Rahman, M. A., Adu, L., Jusu, L., Rajab, L., Sugi, L., & Dhuhani, E. M. (2026). Beyond Knowledge Transmission: Pedagogy and Ideological Formation in Indonesian Reformist Pesantren. Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 12(1), 175–186. https://doi.org/10.15575/jpi.v12i1.54490

References

  1. Ahmed, F., & Chowdhury, R. (2024). Rethinking tarbiyah in contemporary Islamic education: A critical review. Education Sciences, 14(5), 487. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14050487
  2. Alkouatli, C., & Chown, D. (2021). Islamic pedagogy and student formation. Pedagogy, Culture & Society, 29(4), 631–649. https://doi.org/10.1080/14681366.2020.1865440
  3. Althusser, L. (1971). Ideology and ideological state apparatuses. New York: Monthly Review Press.
  4. Azra, A., Afrianty, D., & Hefner, R. W. (2020). Pesantren and madrasa reform. Indonesia, 109, 1–24. https://doi.org/10.5728/indonesia.109.0001
  5. Biesta, G. (2015). Gert Biesta. What is Education For? On Good Education, Teacher Judgement, and Educational Professionalism. European Journal of Education, 50, 75-87. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12109
  6. Bourdieu, P. (1990). The logic of practice. Redwood, CA: Stanford University Press.
  7. Çelik, Ç. (2021). Rethinking institutional habitus in education: A relational approach for studying its sources and impacts. Sociology, 55(3), 522–538. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038520966565
  8. Halstead, J. M. (2021). Islamic values: A distinctive framework for moral education? Journal of Moral Education, 50(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057240.2020.1776119
  9. Hefner, R. W. (2009). Making modern Muslims. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
  10. Lukens-Bull, R. (2020). Pesantren, madrasa, and the future of Islamic education. Comparative Education Review, 64(4), 557–577. https://doi.org/10.1086/710457
  11. Malik, A. (2023). New variants of ultra-conservative Islamic schools in Indonesia: A study on Islamic school endeavor with Islamic group movement. Contemporary Islam, 16(1), 85–104. https://doi.org/10.1177/17577438231163042
  12. Maslani, M., Suntiah, R., Karman, K., & Nursaid, N. (2026). The Hermeneutic Interpretation of Ta'lim Mutaallim By Al-Zarnuji In Shaping The Morals of Santri at Pesantren. Nazhruna: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 9(1), 18-32. https://doi.org/10.31538/nzh.v9i1.206
  13. Mayring, P. (2019). Qualitative content analysis. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung, 20(3). https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-20.3.3343
  14. Memon, N. A., & Alhashmi, M. (2023). Islamic pedagogy and identity formation. British Journal of Religious Education, 45(2), 123–135. https://doi.org/10.1080/01416200.2022.2037747
  15. Pohl, F. (2006). Islamic education and civil society: Reflections on the pesantren tradition in contemporary Indonesia. Comparative Education Review, 50(3), 389–409. https://doi.org/10.1086/503882
  16. Raihani. (2012). Report on multicultural education in pesantren. Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education, 42(4), 585–605. https://doi.org/10.1080/ 03057925.2012.672255
  17. Ricoeur, P. (1992). Oneself as another. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  18. Roller, M. R. (2019). A quality approach to qualitative research. Qualitative Research Journal, 19(3), 251–262. https://doi.org/10.1108/QRJ-D-18-00021
  19. Rofiqi, Zainiyati, H. S., Niam, K., & Kusaeri. (2026). Living under the gaze: an ethnographic study of authority, embodied learning, and social reproduction in Indonesian pesantren educational practices. Ethnography and Education, 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/17457823.2026.2614516
  20. Sahin, A. (2018). Critical Issues in Islamic Education Studies: Rethinking Islamic and Western Liberal Secular Values of Education. Religions, 9(11), 335. https://doi.org/ 10.3390/rel9110335
  21. Sahin, A. (2020). Critical issues in Islamic education studies. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-38783-3