DEATH, DOXA, AND THE DELEGITIMATION OF POWER IN NAIB IZRAIL
Kematian, Doxa, dan Delegitimasi Kekuasaan dalam *Naib Izrail*
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15575/hijai.v9i1.58275Keywords:
Bourdieu; death; doxa; modern Egyptian literature; symbolic powerAbstract
This study examines how Yusuf al-Siba‘i’s Naib Izrail turns death into a narrative mechanism that destabilizes the legitimacy of office, honor, and public recognition. Previous studies have identified its religious messages, social criticism, representation of the Angel of Death, and authorial subjectivity, but have not explained how the novel withdraws symbolic recognition from dominant actors. Using Pierre Bourdieu’s concepts of doxa, symbolic capital, symbolic power, and legitimate language, the study applies qualitative close reading to narration, dialogue, characterization, and episodes involving Yusuf, Izrail, elites, and ordinary people. The findings show that worldly authority is constructed as a doxic order that misrecognizes status as moral worth; Izrail’s authorized speech reverses human hierarchies; death prevents elite capital from converting into immunity; and fantastic satire exposes manipulation, materialism, and governmental abuse. Death is therefore not symbolic power itself, but a counter-classificatory device that interrupts doxa and reveals human legitimacy as contingent within society.
References
Ahearne, J., & Speller, J. (2012). Introduction: Bourdieu and the literary field. Paragraph, 35(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.3366/para.2012.0038
Boschetti, A. (2012). How field theory can contribute to knowledge of world literary space. Paragraph, 35(1), 10–29. https://doi.org/10.3366/para.2012.0039
Bourdieu, P. (1983). The field of cultural production, or: The economic world reversed. Poetics, 12(4–5), 311–356. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-422X(83)90012-8
Bourdieu, P. (1985). The social space and the genesis of groups. Theory and Society, 14(6), 723–744.
Bourdieu, P. (1989). Social space and symbolic power. Sociological Theory, 7(1), 14–25.
Bourdieu, P. (1991). Language and symbolic power (J. B. Thompson, Ed.; G. Raymond & M. Adamson, Trans.). Polity Press.
Darwis, A. N. A., & Kristianto, B. (2021). Strategi dominasi dalam novel Washington Black (2018): Perspektif Pierre Bourdieu. NUSA, 16(3), 273–287.
Hani, U. (2011). Qishah Naib Izrail al-Bahts ‘an Jasad li Yusuf al-Siba‘i: Dirasah tahliliyah pragmatikiyah [Undergraduate thesis, UIN Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta]. Institutional Repository UIN Sunan Kalijaga.
Harendika, M. S. (2023). Pierre-Felix Bourdieu’s philosophical basis in literary studies. LiNGUA: Jurnal Ilmu Bahasa dan Sastra, 18(1), 83–92. https://doi.org/10.18860/ling.v18i1.19839
Høigilt, J. (2017). Egyptian comics and the challenge to patriarchal authoritarianism. International Journal of Middle East Studies, 49(1), 111–131. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020743816001161
Kosasih, A., Hodijah, O., & Riyanti, Y. (2024). Kritik sosial dalam novel Izrail karya Yusuf As Siba’i. Jurnal Kajian Budaya dan Humaniora, 6(1), 6–11. https://doi.org/10.61296/jkbh.v6i1.216
Masrur, C. S. (2023). Naqd Yusuf al-Siba‘i li shakl al-mujtami‘ al-Misriyyin fi riwayah Naib Izrail: Dirasah tahliliyyah dhatiyyah li Slavoj Žižek [Undergraduate thesis, UIN Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta]. Institutional Repository UIN Sunan Kalijaga.
Murti, G. H., & Susanti, N. (2021). Understanding Bourdieu’s distinction: Social and literary contestation to gain legitimate position. Anaphora: Journal of Language, Literary, and Cultural Studies, 4(1), 48–57. https://doi.org/10.30996/anaphora.v4i1.5268
Parvez, Z. F. (2022). Varieties of misrecognition: Connecting Bourdieu and Fanon toward an analysis of racialized Islamic fields. Sociological Theory, 40(3), 272–296. https://doi.org/10.1177/07352751221103825
Ryan, B. P. (2023). Exhausting aesthetic critiques of the authoritarian present in Egyptian literature from Ṣunʿallāh Ibrāhīm to Muḥammad Rabīʿ. Middle Eastern Literatures, 26(2), 236–253. https://doi.org/10.1080/1475262X.2023.2251909
Sapiro, G. (2003). The literary field between the State and the market. Poetics, 31(5–6), 441–464. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.poetic.2003.09.001
Schirone, M. (2023). Field, capital, and habitus: The impact of Pierre Bourdieu on bibliometrics. Quantitative Science Studies, 4(1), 186–208. https://doi.org/10.1162/qss_a_00232
Ta’abudi, D. H. (2019). Representasi malaikat dalam novel Naib Izrail dan Kau Memanggilku Malaikat: Sebuah bandingan. ALFAZ: Arabic Literatures for Academic Zealots, 7(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.32678/alfaz.Vol7.Iss01.1728
al-Siba‘i, Y. (1947). Naib Izrail [Arabic digital scan; edition statement not provided in the supplied copy]. Maktabat Misr.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Categories
Citation Check
License
Copyright (c) 2026 M. Arifurrahman Hasyim, Mochammad Bagja Agung Nugraha Zainaldy
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
For Authors:
1. Author's Copyright:
Upon publication, the copyright of the article is retained by the author(s). This means that the authors hold the exclusive right to use, reproduce, and distribute their own work.
2. User Rights and License:
The articles published in Hijai: Journal on Arabic Language and Literature are made available to the public under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0). This license allows anyone to copy, redistribute, remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially, provided that appropriate credit is given to the original author(s) and the primary source, a link to the license is provided, and an indication if changes were made.
3. Author's Rights without Restrictions:
As the copyright holder, authors are permitted to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of their work (e.g., depositing it in an institutional repository, publishing it in a book, or sharing it on a personal website), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in Hijai: Journal on Arabic Language and Literature.
For Readers and Users:
1. You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
2. Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
