Article Sidebar

Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 0 Download : 6

Main Article Content

Abstract

Pesantren have become a defining feature of one form of education in Indonesia. Furthermore, Pesantren continue to develop innovative learning models that are relevant to the educational needs in this era of disruption. This study analyzes how the contemporary educational framework of Peacesantren Welas Asih (PWA) demonstrates both continuity and change, as well as rearticulation within the pesantren tradition. In addition, it explores how Rahmah, as rearticulated through Welas Asih, manifests in relational and pedagogical practices, thereby influencing student authority and agency. The study investigates how these pedagogical practices foster epistemic agency and contribute to the transformative experiences reported by students. To achieve this, the study employs a case study design, using Peacesantren Welas Asih as a representative example of the criteria required of Islamic boarding schools to address the research questions. Data collection was conducted through interviews, observations, documentation, open-ended questions, and digital archiving. The results showed that, at PWA, the pesantren tradition continued to uphold its religious and cultural elements. However, this continuity often went hand in hand with a rearticulation of the tradition, achieved through the infusion of new meaning derived from the value of Rahmah. Notably, this rearticulation was evident in the transformation of the educator’s authority. Specifically, it shifted from reliance on supervision and obedience towards a more dialogical and reflective relationship, without diminishing the educator’s role. As a result, this shift in authority created space for students to take the initiative in their learning process. As a result, this space paved the way for transformative pedagogy, in which students demonstrated development of epistemic agency and experienced transformative changes in how they thought and understood themselves.

Keywords

Islamic educational tradition Rahmah epistemic agency transformative pedagogy

Article Details

License

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0) License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
How to Cite
Ratnasari, D., Putri, L. A., Alamin, N., & Zakaria, A. R. (2026). Tracing Islamic Educational Traditions Through an Indonesian Pesantren: Rahmah, Epistemic Agency, and Transformative Pedagogy. Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 12(2), 409–423. https://doi.org/10.15575/jpi.v12i2.57549
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. Aljabaly, M., Seitamaa-Hakkarainen, P., Aarnio, H., Korhonen, T., & Kangas, K. (2026). Teachers’ facilitation of students’ making and maker mindset in the elementary classroom. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 36(4), 1509–1533. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-026-10061-2
  2. Allende, N., & Luttenberg, R. S. (2021). FIDS for kids: Empowering children through design. In E. Bohemia, L. M. Nielsen, L. Pan, & N. A. G. Z. Börekçi (Eds.), Learn X Design 2021: Engaging with challenges in design education (pp. 24–26). Shandong University of Art & Design. https://doi.org/10.21606/drs_lxd2021.12.280w
  3. Aragao, H., & Malibari, M. A. (2026). Student-generated questions as an active learning strategy in management education: Evidence from an international business course. The International Journal of Management Education, 24(3), 101488. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2026.101488
  4. Aryani, S. A., Wiranto, E. B., Asroni, A., Fauziah, S., & Yusup, M. (2024). Exploring student-centered learning as a tool to prevent radicalization in Islamic junior schools: A case study of Indonesia and Bangladesh. Jurnal Pendidikan Agama Islam, 21(2), 329-345. https://doi.org/10.14421/jpai.v21i2.10492
  5. Asnawi, N., & Zuhdi, M. (2025). Deconstructing Logocentrism and School-Centrism in Indonesia’s Islamic Education: A Critical Epistemological Analysis. Education Sciences, 15(12), 1615. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15121615
  6. Badley, K., Patrick, M., & Badley, K. (2022). The Complexities of Authority in the Classroom: Fostering Democracy for Student Learning (1st ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003140849
  7. Blakely, J. (2013). Returning to the Interpretive Turn: Charles Taylor and His Critics. The Review of Politics, 75(3), 383–406. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0034670513000326
  8. Bouncken, R. B., Czakon, W., & Schmitt, F. (2025). Purposeful sampling and saturation in qualitative research methodologies: Recommendations and review. Review of Managerial Science. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-025-00881-2
  9. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2019). Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis. Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health, 11(4), 589–597. https://doi.org/10.1080/2159676X.2019.1628806
  10. Cleverley, K., Ewing, L., McCann, E., Guu, T.-W., & Chu, F. (2026). Recommendations for enhancing student leadership in post-secondary mental health research. Research Involvement and Engagement, 12(1), 34. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40900-026-00869-6
  11. Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publication.
  12. Creswell, J. W., & Guetterman, T. C. (2019). Educational Research: Planning, Conducting, And Evaluating Quantitative And Qualitative Research. London: Pearson.
  13. Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publication.
  14. Dominguez, S., & Svihla, V. (2023). A review of teacher implemented scaffolding in K-12. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 8(1), 100613. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2023.100613
  15. Douwes, R., Metselaar, J., Pijnenborg, G. H. M., & Boonstra, N. (2023). Perceived educators’ roles in student well-being in higher education. Cogent Education, 10(2), 2272630. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2023.2272630
  16. Dhofier, Z. (1982). Tradisi pesantren: Studi tentang pandangan hidup Kyai. Jakarta: LP3ES.
  17. Didin, D., Tohirin, T., Basirin, B., & Sumadi, S. (2026). The authority of knowledge and teacher-student relations: An epistemological analysis of Islamic education based on kitab kuning. ALSYS: Jurnal Keislaman dan ilmu Pendidikan. 6(1), 693-705. https://doi.org/10.58578/alsys.v6i1.8987
  18. Fouché, I. (2025). From recipients to contributors: Reimagining curriculum for enhanced student agency. Teachers and Teaching, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2025.2528820
  19. Guo, P., Saab, N., Post, L. S., & Admiraal, W. (2020). A review of project-based learning in higher education: Student outcomes and measures. International Journal of Educational Research, 102, 101586. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2020.101586
  20. Green, J. L., & Joo, J. (2016). Classroom Interaction, Situated Learning. In S. Wortham, D. Kim, & S. May (Eds.), Discourse and Education (pp. 1–16). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02322-9_1-2
  21. Gregory, A., Skiba, R. J., & Mediratta, K. (2017). Eliminating Disparities in School Discipline: A Framework for Intervention. Review of Research in Education, 41(1), 253–278. https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X17690499
  22. Hartikainen, J., Haapala, E. A., Poikkeus, A.-M., Sääkslahti, A., Laukkanen, A., Gao, Y., & Finni, T. (2023). Classroom-based physical activity and teachers’ instructions on students’ movement in conventional classrooms and open learning spaces. Learning Environments Research, 26(1), 177–198. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-022-09411-3
  23. Halimatussa’diyah, H. D., Suriansyah, A., Bachri, A. A., & Sulistiyana, S. (2026). From Dormitory Walls to Moral Worlds: Empowering Educators as Moral Architects in Indonesian Boarding-Based Madrasahs. JURNAL EDUSCIENCE, 13(1), 141-154. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.36987/jes.v13i1.8495
  24. Haliza, S. N., & Mukminin, M. A. (2025). Deconstructing Ta’dzim Culture: The Implementation of Sayyidah Aisyah’s Critical Pedagogy to Foster Discursive Logic Among Santri. Assyfa Journal of Islamic Studies, 3(1), 71-96. https://doi.org/10.61650/ajis.v3i1.312
  25. Hamda, L. L., Yusuf, A. A., & Aziz, A. (2026). Reconstructing Teacher–Student Relations in Islamic Adab Education: A Critical Analysis of the Islamic Religious Education Curriculum in Madrasah Aliyah. Journal of Islamic Education Research, 7(3), 439-454. 454. https://doi.org/10.35719/jier.v7i3.579
  26. Humaidi, A., Fadhliyah, N., & Sufirmansyah, S. (2024). The Centrality of Kyai in Establishing Moderate Understandings in Salafiyyah Pesantren. Nazhruna: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 7(3), 554–569. https://doi.org/10.31538/nzh.v7i3.3
  27. Huriyah, L., Ali Mudlofir, Moh. Ali Aziz, Muhammad Anas Ma’arif, Siti Amaliati, & Yusrianingsih. (2025). The Importance of Islamic Education Teachers’ Performance Assessment in Realising High Quality Of Madrasah. Jurnal Pendidikan Agama Islam, 22(2), 317–338. https://doi.org/10.14421/jpai.v22i2.11412
  28. Isbah, M. F. (2020). Pesantren in the changing indonesian context: History and current developments. Qudus International Journal of Islamic Studies (QIJIS), 8(1), 65-106. http://dx.doi.org/10.21043/qijis.v8i1.5629
  29. Jarah Anilon, B., Sairin, S., Abas Abdulkarim, K., Syifa Amin Widigdo, M., & M. Suud, F. (2026). Academic Commitment of Muslim Filipino Students in an Islamic Boarding School: A Phenomenological Study at Islamic Boarding School. Nazhruna: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 9(1), 227–245. https://doi.org/10.31538/nzh.v9i1.302
  30. Lindgren, T., Mujahidin, A., & Rofiq, A. C. (2024). A Model of Transformative Religious Education: Teaching and Learning Islam in Pondok Modern Darussalam Gontor, Indonesia. Millah: Jurnal Studi Agama, 23(1), 171. https://doi.org/10.20885/millah.vol23.iss1.art6
  31. Kawakip, A. N., & Sulanam, S. (2023). The Practice of shared values and Islamicc educational identity: Evidence from a Pesantren in East Java, Indonesia. Journal of Indonesian Islam, 17(1), 27-53. https://doi.org/10.15642/JIIS.2023.17.1.27-53
  32. Keiler, L. S. (2018). Teachers’ roles and identities in student-centered classrooms. International Journal of STEM Education, 5(1), 34. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-018-0131-6
  33. Kosim, M., Muqoddam, F., Mubarok, F., & Laila, N. Q. (2023). The dynamics of Islamic education policies in Indonesia. Cogent Education, 10(1), 2172930. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2023.2172930
  34. Lim, W. M. (2025). What Is Qualitative Research? An Overview and Guidelines. Australasian Marketing Journal, 33(2), 199–229. https://doi.org/10.1177/14413582241264619
  35. Madsen, S. E., Alleman, N. F., Newberry, B., & Cliburn Allen, C. (2024). Teacher power and authority: An analysis of exemplar faculty by career stage. Teaching in Higher Education, 29(6), 1588–1605. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2022.2078960
  36. Manca, S., Cerina, V., Tobia, V., Sacchi, S., & Fornara, F. (2020). The Effect of School Design on Users’ Responses: A Systematic Review (2008–2017). Sustainability, 12(8), 3453. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12083453
  37. Mardia, M., Pabbajah, M., Ramli, N., Larasati, Y. G., & Rehani, R. (2026). Teacher powerlessness in curriculum management for educational quality at traditional Islamic boarding schools. Cogent Education, 13(1), 2681982. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2026.2681982
  38. Ma’arif, M. A., Rokhman, M., Fatikh, M. A., Kartiko, A., Ahmadi, A., & Hasan, M. S. R. (2025). Kiai’s leadership strategies in strengthening religious moderation in Islamic boarding schools. Jurnal Ilmiah Peuradeun, 13(1), 23-48. https://doi.org/10.26811/peuradeun.v13i1.1168
  39. Mansir, F. (2020). Manajemen pondok pesantren di Indonesia dalam perspektif pendidikan Islam era modern. QALAMUNA: Jurnal Pendidikan, Sosial, dan Agama, 12(2), 207–216. https://doi.org/10.37680/qalamuna.v12i2.644.
  40. Mas’udi, A. T. (2024). The evolution of pesantren education: Continuity and change in curriculum and management amid modernization. Journal of Pesantren and Diniyah Studies, 1(2), 211–218. https://doi.org/10.63245/jpds.v1i2.23.
  41. Maxwell, J. (2009). Designing a Qualitative Study. In The SAGE Handbook of Applied Social Research Methods (pp. 214–253). SAGE Publications, Inc. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781483348858.n7
  42. Merriam, S. B., & Tisdell, E. J. (2016). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation (4th ed.). New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons.
  43. Mills, J., & Birks, M. (2014). Qualitative Methodology: A Practical Guide. SAGE Publications, Inc. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781473920163
  44. Mujahid & Muqowim. (2026). Reconstruction of Humanistic Learning Theory in the Context of Islamic Education: Integrative Islamic Humanistic Learning as a New Paradigm for Islamic Education Learning. Jurnal Pendidikan Agama Islam, 23(1), 167–186. https://doi.org/10.14421/v23i1.13305
  45. Mumtaz, N. Muhammad, Alghani, E. M., & Doli Witro. (2024). Educational Policy Analysis: Examining Pesantren Policies and Their Implications on the Independence of Kyai and Pesantren in the Contemporary Era. Jurnal Pendidikan Agama Islam, 21(2), 287–306. https://doi.org/10.14421/jpai.v21i2.9612
  46. Munsinski, B. (2007). The Educator as Facilitator: A New Kind of Leadership. Nursing Forum, 34(1), 23–29. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6198.1999.tb00232.x
  47. Nadlir, M., Baihaqi, M., & Huda, H. (2025). Humanizing teacher education for madrasah contexts: A curriculum model integrating ethical reflection on socio-scientific issues. Cogent Education, 12(1), 2583513. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2025.2583513
  48. Nurtawab, E., & Wahyudi, D. (2022). Restructuring traditional Islamic education in Indonesia: Challenges for pesantren institution. Studia Islamika, 29(1), 55-81. https://doi.org/10.36712/sdi.v29i1.17414
  49. Patton, M. Q. (2015). Sampling, Qualitative (Purposeful). In The Blackwell Encyclopedia of Sociology. Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781405165518.wbeoss012.pub2
  50. Pohlhaus, G. (2020). Epistemic Agency Under Oppression. Philosophical Papers, 49(2), 233–251. https://doi.org/10.1080/05568641.2020.1780149
  51. Polanyi, M. (1966). The tacit dimension. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
  52. Pontecorvo, C. (1993). Social interaction in the acquisition of knowledge. Educational Psychology Review, 5(3), 293–310. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01323049
  53. Putri, L. A., & Hamami, T. (2023). The Islamic Religious Education Curriculum Towards Globalization of Education: A Study on the Dynamics and Implications of Curriculum Changes. Muslim Education Review, 2(2), 249–274. https://doi.org/10.56529/mer.v2i2.199
  54. Rahman, M. (2016). Guru Humanis dalam Pendidikan Islam. Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 28(1), 91–106. https://doi.org/10.15575/jpi.v28i1.538
  55. Ratnasari, D., Putri, L. A., Abrori, M. S., & Alsulami, N. D. (2026). 200 Years of Pesantren: Tradition, Reform, and the Institutional Trajectory of Pesantren Tremas. Nazhruna: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 9(1), 109–128. https://doi.org/10.31538/nzh.v9i1.314
  56. Reimers, E., & Martinsson, L. (2026). School knowledge and teacher authority – politicisation and depoliticisation of compulsory education instigated by a right-wing nationalist parental intervention. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 47(1), 42–53. https://doi.org/10.1080/01596306.2025.2491384
  57. Ridwan, M. (2026). Beyond Charismatic Authority: Kyai-Led Human Resource Development and Organizational Continuity in Indonesian Pesantren. ICON-IMAD XV Proceedings, 1. Retrieved from https://iconimadxv.uinsgd.ac.id/conference-papers/beyond-charismatic-authority-Kyai-led-human-resource-development-and-organizational-continuity-in-indonesian-pesantren/
  58. Saliya, C. A. (2022). Case Studies. In C. A. Saliya, Doing Social Research and Publishing Results (pp. 273–279). Springer Nature Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-3780-4_17
  59. Sofi, M. J., Manaf, S., & Ali, J. (2025). Pesantren in dynamic transformation: Harmonizing classical roots and modern practices. MIQOT: Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Keislaman, 49(2), 333-353. http://dx.doi.org/10.30821/miqot.v49i2.1459
  60. Taufikin, T., Nurhayati, S., & Adeoye, M. A. (2026). Dwi Tunggal Pedagogy in Children’s Pesantren: Integrating Teacher–Parent Roles in Relational Islamic Education. Al-Insyiroh: Jurnal Studi Keislaman, 12(1), 55-68. https://doi.org/10.35309/alinsyiroh.v12i1.647
  61. Timonen, V., Foley, G., & Conlon, C. (2024). Quality in qualitative research: A relational process. Qualitative Research Journal. https://doi.org/10.1108/QRJ-07-2024-0153
  62. Usiono, S., R., A., J., Y., E., & Budiman. (2026). Toward a pedagogical model: Insights from student perspectives in learning Islamic Education Philosophy. Cogent Education, 13(1), 2645287. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2026.2645287
  63. Watts, M., Alsop, S., Gould, G., & Walsh, A. (1997). Prompting teachers’ constructive reflection: Pupils’ questions as critical incidents. International Journal of Science Education, 19(9), 1025–1037. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069970190903
  64. Willison, J. (Ed.). (2024). Research Thinking for Responsive Teaching: Research Skill Development with In-service and Preservice Educators. Springer Nature Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-6679-0
  65. Wise, J. A. (1985). Decisions in Design. In G. Wright (Ed.), Behavioral Decision Making (pp. 283–308). Springer US. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-2391-4_13
  66. Withall, J. (1975). Teachers as Facilitators of Learning—A Rationale. Journal of Teacher Education, 26(3), 261–266. https://doi.org/10.1177/002248717502600319
  67. Yin, R. K. (with Campbell, D. T.). (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications.
  68. Zeng, L., Chano, J., & Mohamad, B. (2025). Islamic Pedagogical Competencies for Sustainable Hospitality Education. Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 11(2), 275–292. https://doi.org/10.15575/jpi.v11i2.49883
  69. Zhang, J., Tian, Y., Yuan, G., & Tao, D. (2022). Epistemic agency for costructuring expansive knowledge‐building practices. Science Education, 106(4), 890–923. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21717

Similar Articles

<< < 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.