Post-Publication Discussion

The journal welcomes reasoned scholarly dialogue about its published articles, including methodological questions, concerns about supporting evidence, replication attempts, and substantive scientific criticism.

Readers may send a signed communication identifying the relevant article and describing the scientific issue to alkimiya@uinsgd.ac.id. The editorial office will determine an appropriate channel for handling the matter, which may include direct correspondence with authors, an editorial clarification, a published response, a correction, an expression of concern, or a retraction when justified by the evidence.

Substantive allegations of misconduct are handled through the journal's Allegations of Research Misconduct procedure. The journal may moderate communications to prevent defamation, personal attacks, harassment, unsupported accusations, or disclosure of confidential information. Good-faith criticism will be assessed for its scientific substance and not suppressed merely because it questions a published result.

The journal may invite authors to respond and may consult independent experts when necessary. Any material post-publication amendment must be transparently recorded and linked to the published article where possible.