Editorial Policies

Focus and Scope

JTK (Jurnal Tadris Kimiya) is a chemistry education journal published by the Department of Chemistry Education, Faculty of Education and Teacher Training. UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung collaborates with Perkumpulan Pendidik IPA Indonesia. This journal provides readers with present developments in chemistry education through the publication of articles and research reports. All articles will be reviewed (double-blind) by experts before accepted for publication. Each author is responsible for the content of published articles.

 

JTK (Jurnal Tadris Kimiya) focused on the study results in the field of chemistry education. This journal encompasses original research articles, including:

  • Teaching & Learning
  • Material Learning
  • Learning Media/Multimedia
  • Evaluation & Assessment
  • Higher Order Thinking Skills
  • Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) Education
  • Chemical Content Learning Strategy
  • School Laboratory Experiment
  • Integrating Islamic Values with Chemistry

 

Section Policies

Articles

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

SEMNAS TADRIS KIMIYA

Editors
  • Efa Asyiah
  • Yulia Sukmawardani
Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed
 

Peer Review Process

JTK (Jurnal Tadris Kimiya) published two times a year since 2016. Articles should be written in English (abstract only) and Indonesian, peer-reviewed journal, and specializes on chemistry education. 

All the review process are conducted in double-blind review. Editor in Chief handles all correspondence with the author and makes the final decision as to whether the paper is recommended for The editors then make a decision based on the reviewer’s recommendation from among several possibilities: rejected, require major revision, need minor revision, or accepted.

Editor in Chief and Editorial Board will evaluate the submitted papers on a prequalification step for suitability of further review process. The manuscripts will be evaluated by two qualified peer reviewers selected by Editor in Chief. The peer reviewers should examine the manuscript and return it with their recommendation to the Editor in Chief as soon as possible, usually within 3 weeks. The Editor in Chief decide the acceptance or rejection of the paper.

Papers needing revision will be returned to the authors, and the author must return the revised manuscript to the Editor in Chief via OJS of JTK (Jurnal Tadris Kimiya). Editor in Chief sends the revised manuscript to the Editorial Board to check whether the manuscript is revised as suggested by peer reviewers. Editorial Board could give a recommendation to Editor in Chief that the manuscript should return to authors, accept, or reject within 1 week. Editor in Chief would send an acceptance letter announcing the publication issue attached with manuscript reprint to authors. 

 

Publication Frequency

JTK (Jurnal Tadris Kimiya) is published twice a year in June and December

 

Open Access Policy

This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.

This journal is open access journal which means that all content is freely available without charge to users or / institutions. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to full-text articles in this journal without asking prior permission from the publisher or author. This is in accordance with Budapest Open Access Initiative.

 

Archiving

This journal utilizes the LOCKSS system to create a distributed archiving system among participating libraries and permits those libraries to create permanent archives of the journal for purposes of preservation and restoration. More...

 

Publication Ethic

JTK (Jurnal Tadris Kimiya) (p-ISSN (Print): 2527-6816 e-ISSN (online): 2527-9637) is a peer-reviewed journal published by Department of Chemistry Education, Faculty of Education and Teacher Training UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung. This statement clarifies the ethical behavior of all parties involved in the act of posting an article in this journal, including the author, the chief editor, the Editorial Board, the peer-reviewers and the publisher. This statement based on COPE’s Best Practice Guidelines for Journal Editors.

Ethical Guideline for Journal Publication

The publication of an article in a peer-reviewed JTK (Jurnal Tadris Kimiya) is an essential building block in the development of a coherent and respected network of knowledge. It is a direct reflection of the quality of the work of the authors and the institutions that support them. Peer-reviewed articles support and embody the scientific method. It is therefore essential to agree upon standards of expected ethical behavior for all parties involved in the act of publishing: the author, the journal editor, the peer-reviewer, the publisher and the society. 

Department of Chemistry Education, Faculty of Education and Teacher Training UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung as publisher of JTK (Jurnal Tadris Kimiya) takes its duties of guardianship over all stages of publishing seriously, and we recognize our ethical and other responsibilities. We are committed to ensuring that advertising, reprint or additional commercial revenue has no impact or influence on editorial decisions. Besides, Department of Chemistry Education, Faculty of Education and Teacher Training UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung, and the Editorial Board will assist in communications with other journals and publishers where this is useful and necessary.

Publication decisions

The editor of the JTK (Jurnal Tadris Kimiya) is responsible for deciding which of the articles submitted to the journal should be published. The validation of the work in question and its importance to researchers and readers must always drive such decisions. The editors may be guided by the policies of the journal's editorial board and constrained by such legal requirements as shall then be in force regarding libel, copyright infringement and plagiarism. The editors may confer with other editors or reviewers in making this decision.

Fair play

An editor at any time evaluates manuscripts for their intellectual content without regard to race, gender, sexual orientation, religious belief, ethnic origin, citizenship, or political philosophy of the authors.

Confidentiality

The editor and any editorial staff must not disclose any information about a submitted manuscript to anyone other than the corresponding author, reviewers, potential reviewers, other editorial advisers, and the publisher, as appropriate.

Disclosure and conflicts of interest 

Unpublished materials disclosed in a submitted manuscript must not use in an editor's research without the express written consent of the author.

Duties of Peer-Reviewers

Contribution to Editorial Decisions

Peer-reviewers assist the editor in making editorial decisions and through the editorial communications with the author may also help the author in improving the paper.

Promptness

Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process.

Confidentiality

Any manuscripts received for review must be considered as confidential documents. They must not be shown to or discussed with others except as authorised by the editor.

Standards of Objectivity

Peer-review process should conduct objectively. Personal criticism of the author is inappropriate. Referees should express their views clearly with supporting arguments.

Acknowledgement of Sources

Peer-reviewers should identify relevant published work that has not been cited by the authors. Any statement that an observation, derivation, or argument reported should accompany by the appropriate citation. A reviewer should also call to the editor's attention any substantial similarity or overlap between the manuscript under consideration and any other published paper of which they have personal knowledge.

Disclosure and Conflict of Interest

Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer-review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Peer-reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.

Duties of Authors

Reporting standards

Authors of reports of original research should present an accurate account of the work performed as well as an objective discussion of its significance. Underlying data should be represented accurately in the paper. A paper should contain sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the work. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behaviour and are unacceptable.

Data Access and Retention

Authors are asked to provide the raw data in connection with a paper for editorial review, and should be prepared to provide public access to such data (consistent with the ALPSP-STM Statement on Data and Databases), if practicable, and should in any event be prepared to retain such data for a reasonable time after publication.

Originality and Plagiarism

The authors should ensure that they have written entirely original actions and if the authors have used the works, or words of others that this has appropriately cited or quoted.

Multiple, Redundant or Concurrent Publication

An author should not, in general, publish manuscripts describing essentially the same research in more than one journal or primary publication. Submitting the same paper concurrently to more than one journal constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable.

Acknowledgement of Sources

Proper acknowledgment of the work of others must always be provided. Authors should cite publications that have been influential in determining the nature of the reported work.

Authorship of the Paper

Authorship should be limited to those who have made a significant contribution to the conception, design, execution, or interpretation of the reported study. All those who have made significant contributions should be listed as co-authors. Where there are others who have participated in certain substantive aspects of the research project, they should be acknowledged or listed as contributors. The corresponding author should ensure that all appropriate co-authors and no inappropriate co-authors are included on the paper and that all co-authors have seen and approved the final version of the article and have agreed to its submission for publication.

Hazards and Human or Animal Subjects

  1. If the work involves chemicals, procedures or equipment that have any unusual hazards inherent in their use, the author must clearly identify these in the manuscript.
  2. The confidential and anonymous treatment of human participants’ data is considered the norm for the conduct of research. Authors should recognise the entitlement of both institutions and individual participants to privacy, and should accord them their rights to confidentiality and anonymity. This could involve employing ‘fictionalising’ approaches when reporting, and where using such approaches researchers should fully explain how and why they have done so. However, in some circumstances individual participants, or their guardians or responsible others, may want to specifically and willingly waive their right to confidentiality and anonymity: researchers should recognise participants’ rights to be identified in any publication of their original works or other inputs if they so wish. This statement baseb on the ethical guidance of the privacy and data storage from BERA Ethical Guidelines for Educational Research (4th ed.)

Disclosure and Conflicts of Interest

All authors should disclose in their manuscript any financial or other substantive conflict of interest that might be construed to influence the results or interpretation of their manuscript. All sources of financial support for the project should be disclosed.

Fundamental errors in published works

When an author discovers a significant error or inaccuracy in his/her own published work, it is the author’s obligation to promptly notify the journal editor or publisher and cooperate with the editor to retract or correct the paper.

 

Plagiarism Check

Plagiarism screening will be conducted by OJS Editorial Board using Turnitin with maximum limit of similarity 25 %. For CrossCheck plagiarism screening service Klik This

 

 

Indexing

Journal  Tadris Kimiya Is Indexed in : 

 

 

Citedness in Scopus

Jurnal Tadris Kimiya is cited by articles on SCOPUS database at least 3 times in 3 source title since published in Juni 2016.

  • Irmita, L.U., Atun, S. Pengembangan Perangkat Pembelajaran Menggunakan Pendekatan TPACK Untuk Meningkatkan Literasi Sains (2017) Jurnal Tadris Kimiya, 2 (1), pp. 84-90. Cited 1 time. Document Type: Article Publication Stage: Final Source: Scopus
  • Sari, S., Hidayat, R. Pengembangan Keterampilan Berpikir Kreatif Siswa Pada Praktikum Jenis-Jenis Koloid: Pendekatan Saintifik (2017) J Tadris Kimiya, 1 (1), pp. 27-32. Cited 1 time. Document Type: Article Publication Stage: Final Source: Scopus
  • Pitasari, R., Yunaningsih, A. Peningkatan Keterampilan Generik Sains Siswa melalui Task Based Learning pada Larutan Buffer (2016) Jurnal Tadris Kimiya, pp. 1-7. Cited 1 time. Document Type: Article Publication Stage: Final Source: Scopus
  • Helsy, I., Andriyani, L. Pengembangan Bahan Ajar pada Materi Kesetimbangan Kimia Berorientasi Multipel Representasi Kimia (2017) Jurnal Tadris Kimiya, 2(1), pp. 104-108. Cited 1 time. Document Type: Article Publication Stage: Final Source: Scopus
  • Khairunnisa, Wisudawati A.W. Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Treffinger Terhadap Kreativitas Berpikir Kimia pada Peserta Didik Kelas XI di SMAN 1 Sewon ( 2018) Jurnal Tadris Kimiya,3(1), pp. 52-61. Cited 1 time. Document Type: Article Publication Stage: Final Source: Scopus 
  • Amalia R, Rahmawati Y, Budi S. Pengembangan
    Keterampilan Argumentasi Calon Guru Kimia Melalui
    Pendekatan Socio Critical and Problem Oriented (2019) Jurnal Tadris Kimiya, 1, pp. 91–104. Cited 1 time. Document Type: Article Publication Stage: Final Source: Scopus

 

Retraction

The articles published in Jurnal Tadris Kimiya will be considered to retract in the publication if:

1. They have clear evidence that the findings are unreliable, either as a result of misconduct (e.g. data fabrication) or honest error (e.g. miscalculation or experimental error)

2. the findings have previously been published elsewhere without proper crossreferencing, permission or justification (i.e. cases of redundant publication)

3. it constitutes plagiarism

4. it reports unethical research

The mechanism of retraction follows the Retraction Guidelines of Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) which can be accessed at https://publicationethics.org/files/retraction%20guidelines.pdf

 

 

 

Conflicts-of-Interest Statement

Authors

According to general publication policy of the JTK (Jurnal Tadris Kimiya) only the researchers who contributed to the work in a real sense should be considered as an author. Authors should be responsible to disclose all the personal and financial relationships, which might bias their work. Financial relationships such as employment, consultancies, stock ownership, honoraria, paid expert testimony can be classified as the most easily identifiable conflicts-of-interest and the most likely to undermine the credibility of the journal. To clarify conflicts-of-interest issue, authors must submit a letter to the editorial office accompanying the submitted manuscript and explicitly state if any potential conflicts exist or not.

Peer Reviewers

Peer Reviewers should be responsible to decline the review process if any substantial conflicts-of-interest exists. In case of any doubt, they should consult to the Editor to make a decision regarding the review process. Researchers from authors' institutions should not be considered as peer reviewers to prevent any conflicts-of-interest.

Editors

Editors should be responsible to manage the review process and have the right of declining any submission in case of any conflict-of-interest. They should not have any direct personal and/or financial conflicts with their assigned manuscripts. They should not be assigned to manuscripts if they are in the author list of them.